Low-carbon cement development: modifying volcanic ash reactivity for portland cement replacement

Abstract

Volcanic ash (VA) reactivity is typically low and requires activation or modification to expand its applicability. This study focuses on modifying the VA reactivity by introducing optimal mixing proportions of amorphous materials (AM) and by developing a reliable reactivity measurement technique based on the standard Ca(OH)₂-reactivity test (CRT). CRT was used as a reference test to quantify the reactivity of four VAs. Optimal AM addition was used to increase the reaction rate and to take advantage of synergistic effects on the strength of mortars. Replacing VA with 15 wt.% silica fume (SF), 30 wt.% slag (SL), or 25 wt.% metakaolin (MK) to form modified-VA (MVA) significantly improved the strength and reactivity. The standard CRT was modified by utilizing a constant w/b ratio of 0.484 and by changing the curing regime where the ambient temperature was set to 43℃ for up to 91 days. This revised CRT is referred to as the “modified-Ca(OH)₂-reactivity test” (MCRT). A relationship between the strength and the heat was used as a foundation to develop a classification that determines the level of reactivity of VA/MVA. The results indicate that three of the four VAs evaluated were found to be reactive. The synergistic actions within MVA mixtures significantly improved the reactivity at early ages. Results show that MVA mortar mix with 70% volcanic ash and 30% slag can achieve 25.6 MPa compressive strength at 91 days. By substituting 15% SF, 30% SL, or 25% MK for VA to form MVA, the mixes provide promising results for an alternative concrete mixture for future industrial applications.

Keywords

Volcanic ash (VA) / Modified-VA (MVA) / Amorphous materials (AMs) / Ca(OH)₂-reactivity test (CRT) / Modified-Ca(OH)₂-reactivity test (MCRT) / Synergistic Effect / Reactivity Test

References

[1] LamL, WongYL, PoonCS. Degree of hydration and gel/space ratio of high-volume fly ash/cement systems. Cement and concrete research, 2000, 30(5): 747-756

[2] BaeS, MeralC, OhJ, MoonJ, KunzM, MonteiroPJ. Characterization of morphology and hydration products of high-volume fly ash paste by monochromatic scanning x-ray micro-diffraction (μ-SXRD). Cement and Concrete Research, 2014, 59: 155-164

[3] TangSW, CaiXH, HeZ, ShaoHY, LiZJ, ChenE. Hydration process of fly ash blended cement pastes by impedance measurement. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 113: 939-950

[4] SkibstedJ, SnellingsR. Reactivity of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in cement blends. Cement and Concrete Research, 2019, 124 105799

[5] SnellingsR, MertensG, ElsenJ. Supplementary cementitious materials. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 2012, 74(1): 211-278

[6] AvetF, SnellingsR, DiazAA, HahaMB, ScrivenerK. Development of a new rapid, relevant and reliable (R3) test method to evaluate the pozzolanic reactivity of calcined kaolinitic clays. Cement and Concrete Research, 2016, 85: 1-11

[7] KasaniyaM, ThomasMD, MoffattEG. Development of rapid and reliable pozzolanic reactivity test method. ACI Materials Journal, 2019, 116(4): 145-154

[8] LiX, et al. . Reactivity tests for supplementary cementitious materials: RILEM TC 267-TRM phase 1. Materials and Structures, 2018, 51(6): 1-14

[9] SuraneniP, WeissJ. Examining the pozzolanicity of supplementary cementitious materials using isothermal calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2017, 83: 273-278

[10] AlhozaimyA, FaresG, AlawadOA, Al-NegheimishA. Heat of hydration of concrete containing powdered scoria rock as a natural pozzolanic material. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 81: 113-119

[11] Seraj S., Cano R., Ferron R. D., & Juenger M. C.G. (2017).The role of particle size on the performance of pumice as a supplementary cementitious material. Cement and Concrete Composites, 80, 135–142.

[12] Hansen P. F., & Pedersen E. J. (1977). Maturity computer for controlled curing and hardening of concrete. Nordisk Betong, 1, 21–25.

[13] PaneI, HansenW. Investigation of blended cement hydration by isothermal calorimetry and thermal analysis. Cement and concrete research, 2005, 35(6): 1155-1164

[14] PaneI, HansenW. Concrete hydration and mechanical properties under nonisothermal conditions. Materials Journal, 2002, 99(6): 534-542

[15] LeonG, ChenH-LR. Thermal Analysis of Mass Concrete Containing Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag. CivilEng, 2021, 2(1): 254-271

[16] Neville A. M. (2011). Properties of concrete (5th ed.). Pearson.

[17] RadlinskiM, OlekJ. Investigation into the synergistic effects in ternary cementitious systems containing portland cement, fly ash and silica fume. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2012, 34(4): 451-459

[18] SujjavanichS, SuwanvitayaP, ChaysuwanD, HenessG. Synergistic effect of metakaolin and fly ash on properties of concrete. Construction and building materials, 2017, 155: 830-837

[19] SuraneniP, HajibabaeeA, RamanathanS, WangY, WeissJ. New insights from reactivity testing of supplementary cementitious materials. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2019, 103: 331-338

[20] KasaniyaM, AlaibaniA, ThomasMD, RidingKA. Exploring the efficacy of emerging reactivity tests in screening pozzolanic materials. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 325 126781

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)