Advancements in robotic arm-based 3D bioprinting for biomedical applications
Kai Li, WenHui Huang, HaiTao Guo, YanYan Liu, Shuxian Chen, Heng Liu, Qi Gu
Advancements in robotic arm-based 3D bioprinting for biomedical applications
3D bioprinting emerges as a critical tool in biofabricating functional 3D tissue or organ equivalents for regenerative medicine. Bioprinting techniques have been making strides in integrating automation, customization, and digitalization in coping with diverse tissue engineering scenarios. The convergence of robotic arm-based 3D bioprinting techniques, especially in situ 3D bioprinting, is a versatile toolbox in the industrial field, promising for biomedical application and clinical research. In this review, we first introduce conceptualized modalities of robotic arm-based bioprinting from a mechanical perspective, which involves configurative categories of current robot arms regarding conventional bioprinting strategies. Recent advances in robotic arm-based bioprinting in tissue engineering have been summarized in distinct tissues and organs. Ultimately, we systematically discuss relative advantages, disadvantages, challenges, and future perspectives from bench to bedside for biomedical application.
3D bioprinting / robot arm-based bioprinting / tissue engineering / in situ bioprinting / hydrogel
[1] |
MurphySV, AtalaA. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 2014;32:773–85.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
MaX, LiuJ, ZhuW, et al. 3D bioprinting of functional tissue models for personalized drug screening and in vitro disease modeling. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2018;132:235–51.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
MazzocchiA, SokerS, SkardalA. 3D bioprinting for high-throughput screening: drug screening, disease modeling, and precision medicine applications. Appl Phys Rev 2019;6:011302–011324.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
LeeA, HudsonAR, ShiwarskiDJ, et al. 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science 2019;365:482–7.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
DasguptaQ, BlackLD III. A fresh slate for 3D bioprinting. Science 2019;365:446–7.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
GylesC. Robots in medicine. Can Vet J 2019;60:819–20.
|
[7] |
CampbellPG, WeissLE. Tissue engineering with the aid of inkjet printers. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2007;7:1123–7.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
PrendergastME, Burdick JA. Recent advances in enabling technologies in 3D printing for precision medicine. Adv Mater 2020;32:1902516.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
NengX, Guohong S, YulingS, et al. Research progress of robot technology in In situ 3D Bioprinting. Int J Bioprint 2022;8:614.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Arslan-YildizA, El Assal R, ChenP, et al. Towards artificial tissue models: past, present, and future of 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication 2016;8:014103.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
KnowltonS, OnalS, YuCH, et al. Bioprinting for cancer research. Trends Biotechnol 2015;33:504–13.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
XuJ, ZhengS, HuX, et al. Advances in the research of bioinks based on natural collagen, polysaccharide and their derivatives for skin 3D bioprinting. Polymers 2020;12:1237.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
DongH, HuB, ZhangW, et al. Robotic-assisted automated in situ bioprinting. Int J Bioprint 2023;9:629.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
DingJ, LyuS, DaT, et al. Error space estimation of three degrees of freedom planar parallel mechanisms. J Mech Rob 2019;11:031013.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
ZhuZ, GuoS-Z, HirdlerT, et al. 3D printed functional and biological materials on moving freeform surfaces. Adv Mater 2018;30:1707495.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
ZhaoW, XuT. Preliminary engineering for in situ in vivo bioprinting: a novel micro bioprinting platform for in situ in vivo bioprinting at a gastric wound site. Biofabrication 2020;12:045020.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
ShiE, LouL, WarburtonL, et al. Three-dimensional printing in combined cartesian and curvilinear coordinates. J Med Dev 2022;16:044502.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
FortunatoGM, RossiG, BonattiAF, et al. Robotic platform and path planning algorithm for in situ bioprinting. Bioprinting 2021;22:e00139.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
DongH, DuZ, ChirikjianGS. Workspace density and inverse kinematics for planar serial revolute manipulators. Mech Mach Theory 2013;70:508–22.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
HanlyEJ, Talamini MA. Robotic abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 2004;188:19–26.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
ZhaoQ, GuoJ, HongJ, et al. An enhanced moment-based approach to time-dependent positional reliability analysis for robotic manipulators. Mech Mach Theory 2021;156:104167.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
AlbouyM, Desanlis A, BrossetS, et al. A preliminary study for an intraoperative 3D bioprinting treatment of severe burn injuries. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022;10:e4056.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
LiL, ShiJ, MaK, et al. Robotic in situ 3D bio-printing technology for repairing large segmental bone defects. J Adv Res 2021;30:75–84.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
GhezziCE, Rnjak-Kovacina J, KaplanDL. Corneal tissue engineering: recent advances and future perspectives. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2015;21:278–87.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
ZhaoG, BaoX, HuangG, et al. Differential effects of directional cyclic stretching on the functionalities of engineered cardiac tissues. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2019;2:3508–19.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
ChoiJS, PiaoY, SeoTS. Circumferential alignment of vascular smooth muscle cells in a circular microfluidic channel. Biomaterials 2014;35:63–70.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
ChoiS, LeeKY, KimSL, et al. Fibre-infused gel scaffolds guide cardiomyocyte alignment in 3D-printed ventricles. Nat Mater 2023;22:1039–46.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
LiuS, WangZ, ChenX, et al. Multiscale anisotropic Scaffold integrating 3D printing and electrospinning techniques as a heart-on-a-chip platform for evaluating drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Adv Healthcare Mater 2023;12:2300719.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
JinY, DuJ, HeY, et al. Modeling and process planning for curved layer fused deposition. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 2017;91:273–85.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
MaK, ZhaoT, YangL, et al. Application of robotic-assisted in situ 3D printing in cartilage regeneration with HAMA hydrogel: an in vivo study. J Adv Res 2020;23:123–32.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
ZhangZ, WuC, DaiC, et al. A multi-axis robot-based bioprinting system supporting natural cell function preservation and cardiac tissue fabrication. Bioact Mater 2022;18:138–50.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
IbrahimA. 3D Bioprinting Bone, in 3D Bioprinting for Reconstructive Surgery. Elsevier, 2018, 245–75.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
OuK-L, WengC-C, WuC-C, et al. Research of StemBios cell therapy on dental implants containing nanostructured surfaces: Biomechanical behaviors, microstructural characteristics, and clinical trial. Implant Dent 2016;25:63–73.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
LipskasJ, DeepK, YaoW. Robotic-assisted 3D Bio-printing for repairing bone and cartilage defects through a minimally invasive approach. Sci Rep 2019;9:3746.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
PooleAR, KojimaT, YasudaT, et al. Composition and structure of articular cartilage: a template for tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;391:S26–33.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
YeK, Di Bella C, MyersDE, et al. The osteochondral dilemma: review of current management and future trends. ANZ J Surg 2014;84:211–7.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
WuC, DaiC, FangG, et al. General support-effective decomposition for multi-directional 3-D printing. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 2019;17:599–610.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
DaiC, WangCCL, WuC, et al. Support-free volume printing by multiaxis motion. ACM Trans Graph 2018;37:1–14.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
ZhouC, YangY, WangJ, et al. Ferromagnetic soft catheter robots for minimally invasive bioprinting. Nat Commun 2021;12:5072.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
MoncalKK, Gudapati H, GodzikKP, et al. Intra-operative bioprinting of hard, soft, and hard/soft composite tissues for craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. Adv Funct Mater 2021;31:2010858.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
MazzagliaC, ShengY, RodriguesLN, et al. Deployable extrusion bioprinting of compartmental tumoroids with cancer associated fibroblasts for immune cell interactions. Biofabrication 2023;15:025005.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
ZhangW, LiH, CuiL, et al. Research progress and development trend of surgical robot and surgical instrument arm. Int J Med Robotics + Computer Assisted Surg: MRCAS 2021;17:e2309.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Di BellaC, FosangA, DonatiDM, et al. 3D bioprinting of cartilage for orthopedic surgeons: reading between the lines. Front Surg 2015;2:39.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
DattaP, BaruiA, WuY, et al. Essential steps in bioprinting: From pre-to post-bioprinting. Biotechnol Adv 2018;36:1481–504.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[45] |
StankovicBM, GuptaR. Patentability, global development and ethical considerations of bioprinting. Law Justice Develop 2017.
|
[46] |
VijayavenkataramanS, Lu W, FuhJYH, et al. 3D bioprinting–an ethical, legal and social aspects (ELSA) framework. Bioprinting 2016;1-2:11–21.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
ChromyA. Application of high-resolution 3D scanning in medical volumetry. Int J Electron Telecommun 2016;62:23–31.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
CohenDL, LiptonJI, BonassarLJ, et al. Additive manufacturing for in situ repair of osteochondral defects. Biofabrication 2010;2:035004.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |