CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genetic correction reverses spinocerebellar ataxia 3 disease-associated phenotypes in differentiated cerebellar neurons
Guoxu Song, Yuying Ma, Xing Gao, Xuewen Zhang, Fei Zhang, Chunhong Tian, Jiajia Hou, Zheng Liu, Zixin Zhao, Yong Tian
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genetic correction reverses spinocerebellar ataxia 3 disease-associated phenotypes in differentiated cerebellar neurons
The neurodegenerative disease spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3; also called Machado-Joseph disease, MJD) is a trinucleotide repeat disorder caused by expansion of the CAG repeats in the ATXN3 gene. Here, we applied a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated approach using homologous recombination to achieve a one-step genetic correction in SCA3-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). The genetic correction reversed disease-associated phenotypes during cerebellar region-specific differentiation. In addition, we observed spontaneous ataxin-3 aggregates specifically in mature cerebellar neurons differentiated from SCA3 iPSCs rather than in SCA3 pan-neurons, SCA3 iPSCs or neural stem cells, suggesting that SCA3 iPSC-derived disease-specific and region-specific cerebellar neurons can provide unique cellular models for studying SCA3 pathogenesis in vitro. Importantly, the genetically corrected cerebellar neurons did not display typical SCA3 aggregates, suggesting that genetic correction can subsequently reverse SCA3 disease progression. Our strategy can be applied to other trinucleotide repeat disorders to facilitate disease modeling, mechanistic studies and drug discovery.
genetic correction / spinocerebellar ataxia 3 / iPSC / CRISPR/Cas9 / cell differentiation
[1] |
Evers MM, Toonen LJ, van Roon-Mom WM. Ataxin-3 protein and RNA toxicity in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: current insights and emerging therapeutic strategies. Mol Neurobiol 2014;49:1513–31.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Schols L, Bauer P, Schmidt T, et al. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: clinical features, genetics, and pathogenesis. Lancet Neurol 2004;3:291–304.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Saute JAM, Jardim LB. Machado Joseph disease: clinical and genetic aspects, and current treatment. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs 2015;3:517–35.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Kawaguchi Y, Okamoto T, Taniwaki M, et al. CAG expansions in a novel gene for Machado-Joseph disease at chromosome 14q32.1. Nat Genet 1994;8:221–8.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Costa Mdo C, Paulson HL. Toward understanding Machado-Joseph disease. Prog Neurobiol 2012;97:239–57.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Matos CA, de Macedo-Ribeiro S, Carvalho AL. Polyglutamine diseases: the special case of ataxin-3 and Machado–Joseph disease. Prog Neurobiol 2011;95:26–48.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Berke SJ, Schmied FA, Brunt ER, et al. Caspase-mediated proteolysis of the polyglutamine disease protein ataxin-3. J Neurochem 2004;89:908–18.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Koch P, Breuer P, Peitz M, et al. Excitation-induced ataxin-3 aggregation in neurons from patients with Machado-Joseph disease. Nature 2011;480:543–6.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Auer TO, Duroure K, De Cian A, et al. Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in in zebrafish by homology-independent DNA repair. Genome Res 2014;24:142–53.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Platt RJ, Chen S, Zhou Y, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 knockin mice for genome editing and cancer modeling. Cell 2014;159:440–55.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Young CS, Hicks MR, Ermolova NV, et al. A single CRISPR-Cas9 deletion strategy that targets the majority of DMD patients restores dystrophin function in hiPSC-derived muscle cells. Cell Stem Cell 2016;18:533–40.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 2013;339:819–23.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, et al. A programmable dual- RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 2012;337: 816–21.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Ran FA, Hsu PD, Wright J, et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc 2013;8:2281–308.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Zhang F, Song G, Tian Y. Anti-CRISPRs: the natural inhibitors for CRISPR-Cas systems. Anim Model Exp Med 2019;2:69–75.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Dever DP, Bak RO, Reinisch A, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 beta-globin gene targeting in human haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 2016;539:384–9.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Park CY, Kim DH, Son JS, et al. Functional correction of large factor VIII gene chromosomal inversions in hemophilia a patient-derived iPSCs using CRISPR-Cas9. Cell Stem Cell 2015b;17:213–20.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Wu Y, Liang D, Wang Y, et al. Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR-Cas9. Cell Stem Cell 2013;13:659–62.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Muffat J, Li Y, Jaenisch R. CNS disease models with human pluripotent stem cells in the CRISPR age. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2016;43:96–103.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Xue Y, Cai X, Wang L, et al. Generating a non-integrating human induced pluripotent stem cell bank from urine-derived cells. PLoS One 2013;8:e70573.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Muguruma K, Nishiyama A, Kawakami H, et al. Self-organization of polarized cerebellar tissue in 3D culture of human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep 2015;10:537–50.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Koch P, Opitz T, Steinbeck JA, et al. A rosette-type, self-renewing human ES cell-derived neural stem cell with potential for in vitro instruction and synaptic integration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:3225–30.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Tailor J, Kittappa R, Leto K, et al. Stem cells expanded from the human embryonic hindbrain stably retain regional specification and high neurogenic potency. J Neurosci 2013;33:12407–22.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Bichelmeier U, Schmidt T, Hubener J, et al. Nuclear localization of ataxin-3 is required for the manifestation of symptoms in SCA3: in vivo evidence. J Neurosci 2007;27:7418–28.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Paulson HL, Perez MK, Trottier Y, et al. Intranuclear inclusions of expanded polyglutamine protein in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. Neuron 1997;19:333–44.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Yan Y, Shin S, Jha BS, et al. Efficient and rapid derivation of primitive neural stem cells and generation of brain subtype neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Transl Med 2013;2:862–70.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Hubener J, Weber JJ, Richter C, et al. Calpain-mediated ataxin-3 cleavage in the molecular pathogenesis of spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3). Hum Mol Genet 2013;22:508–18.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Liman J, Deeg S, Voigt A, et al. CDK5 protects from caspase- induced Ataxin-3 cleavage and neurodegeneration. J Neurochem 2014;129:1013–23.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Hartl FU, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M. Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 2011;475:324–32.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Seidel K, Meister M, Dugbartey GJ, et al. Cellular protein quality control and the evolution of aggregates in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3). Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2012;38:548–58.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
An MC, O’Brien RN, Zhang N, et al. Polyglutamine disease modeling: epitope based screen for homologous recombination using CRISPR/Cas9 system. PLoS Curr 2014;6:ecurrents.hd.0242d2e7ad72225efa72f6964589369a.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
An MC, Zhang N, Scott G, et al. Genetic correction of Huntington’s disease phenotypes in induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2012;11:253–63.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Park CY, Halevy T, Lee DR, et al. Reversion of FMR1 methylation and silencing by editing the triplet repeats in fragile X iPSC-derived neurons. Cell Rep 2015a;13:234–41.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
He L, Wang S, Peng L, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene correction ameliorates abnormal phenotypes in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 patientderived induced pluripotent stem cells. Transl Psychiatry 2021;11:479.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Marthaler AG, Tubsuwan A, Schmid B, et al. Generation of an isogenic, gene-corrected control cell line of the spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 patient-derived iPSC line H266. Stem Cell Res 2016;16:202–5.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Xu XH, Tay YL, Sim B, et al. Reversal of phenotypic abnormalities by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene correction in huntington disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep 2017;8:619–33.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Ouyang S, Xie Y, Xiong Z, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-targeted deletion of polyglutamine in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 2018;27:756–70.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Takahashi T, Kikuchi S, Katada S, et al. Soluble polyglutamine oligomers formed prior to inclusion body formation are cytotoxic. Hum Mol Genet 2008;17:345–56.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Chou AH, Yeh TH, Ouyang P, et al. Polyglutamine-expanded ataxin-3 causes cerebellar dysfunction of SCA3 transgenic mice by inducing transcriptional dysregulation. Neurobiol Dis 2008;31:89–101.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Yu YC, Kuo CL, Cheng WL, et al. Decreased antioxidant enzyme activity and increased mitochondrial DNA damage in cellular models of Machado-Joseph disease. J Neurosci Res 2009;87:1884–91.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Liu H, Li X, Ning G, et al. The Machado-Joseph disease deubiquitinase ataxin-3 regulates the stability and apoptotic function of p53. PLoS Biol 2016;14:e2000733.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Anzalone AV, Gao XD, Podracky CJ, et al. Programmable deletion, replacement, integration and inversion of large DNA sequences with twin prime editing. Nat Biotechnol 2022;40:731–40.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Anzalone AV, Randolph PB, Davis JR, et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 2019;576:149–57.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
Shakkottai VG, do Carmo Costa M, Dell’Orco JM, et al. Early changes in cerebellar physiology accompany motor dysfunction in the polyglutamine disease spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. J Neurosci 2011;31:13002–14.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[45] |
Song G, Zhang F, Tian C, et al. Discovery of potent and versatile CRISPR-Cas9 inhibitors engineered for chemically controllable genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res 2022;50:2836–53.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Song G, Zhang F, Zhang X, et al. AcrIIA5 inhibits a broad range of Cas9 orthologs by preventing DNA target cleavage. Cell Rep 2019;29:2579–89.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Chang CW, Lai YS, Westin E, et al. Modeling human severe combined immunodeficiency and correction by CRISPR/Cas9-enhanced gene targeting. Cell Rep 2015;12:1668–77.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
Firth AL, Menon T, Parker GS, et al. Functional gene correction for cystic fibrosis in lung epithelial cells generated from patient iPSCs. Cell Rep 2015;12:1385–90.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[49] |
Zhu X, Xu Y, Yu S, et al. An efficient genotyping method for genome-modified animals and human cells generated with CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci Rep 2014;4:6420.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[50] |
Hazeki N, Tukamoto T, Goto J, et al. Formic acid dissolves aggregates of an N-terminal huntingtin fragment containing an expanded polyglutamine tract: applying to quantification of protein components of the aggregates. Biochem Biophys Res 2000;277:386–93.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |