Good, Fair, or Poor? The Reality of Stream Macroinvertebrate Biomonitoring in an Impaired Agricultural Watershed

Abstract

Various biotic indices have been used to assess the condition of aquatic macroinvertebrate communities in agricultural watersheds. We collected 171 samples of benthic macroinvertebrates from 57 stream sites on three forks of an agricultural watershed in southeastern Minnesota, USA, and compared the abilities of various diversity, taxa richness, and multi-metric indices to evaluate invertebrate community health and/or level of impairment. Total invertebrate abundance (sample count), total taxa richness, Ephemeroptera-Plecoptera-Trichoptera (EPT) taxa richness, Simpson diversity, Shannon diversity, a regional benthic index of biotic integrity (BIBI), and the national Izaak Walton League’s Save Our Streams (SOS) rating score were all significantly correlated with one another. Total taxa richness, BIBI score, and SOS score displayed nearly identical influences within a principal components analysis (PCA) ordination. Only total abundance and the two diversities differed significantly among stream forks. When the distributions of sites among rating categories (poor or very poor to excellent) were compared for the various indices, nearly all indices rated community health differently from one another. In order from highest ratings to lowest ratings, the indices were: Simpson diversity, Shannon diversity, SOS score, total taxa richness, EPT taxa richness, and BIBI score. Taxa richness measures and the multi-metric BIBI appeared to rate stream health more realistically (i.e., mostly fair or poor site ratings with relatively few good to excellent) than either of the diversity indices or the SOS score (many good, very good, and excellent site ratings), suggesting that the choice of biotic index can significantly influence evaluations of stream communities in an agricultural watershed.

Keywords

Impaired streams / Benthic macroinvertebrates / Diversity / Taxa richness / Multi-metric indices

References

[1] University of Arkansas.Economic Impact of Agriculture; University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Research and Extension: Fayetteville, AR, USA, 2026. Available online: https://economic-impact-of-ag.uada.edu (accessed on 3 February 2026).

[2] Food Law and Policy Clinic.More Than CAFOs and Corn: A Statistical Analysis of Agriculture in Six Midwestern States; Food Law and Policy Clinic at Harvard Law School: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2024. Available online: https://chlpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CHPLI-Midwest-Agriculture-Summary-Tables-January-2024.pdf (accessed on 16 February 2026).

[3] Troelstrup NH Jr, Perry JA . Water quality in southeastern Minnesota streams: Observations along a gradient of land use and geology. J. Minn. Acad. Sci. 1989, 55, 6-13. Available online: https://digitalcommons.morris.umn.edu/jmas/vol55/iss1/2/ (accessed on 8 August 2026).

[4] Nerbonne BA, Vondracek B . Effect of local land use on physical habitat, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish in the Whitewater River, Minnesota, USA. Environ. Manag. 2001, 28, 87-99. DOI: 10.1007/s002670010209

[5] Vondracek B, Blann KL, Cox CB, Nerbonne JF, Mumford KG, Nerbonne BA, et al. Land use, spatial scale, and stream systems: Lessons from an agricultural region. Environ. Manag. 2005, 36, 775-791. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0039-z

[6] Varela WL, Mundahl ND, Bergen S, Staples DF, Cochran-Biederman J, Weaver CR . Physical and biological stream health in an agricultural watershed after 30+ years of targeted conservation practices. Water 2023, 15, 3475. DOI: 10.3390/w15193475

[7] Cooper CM. Biological effects of agriculturally derived surface water pollutants on aquatic systems-A review. J. Environ. Qual. 1993, 22, 402-408. DOI: 10.2134/jeq1993.00472425002200030003x

[8] Novotny V. Diffuse pollution from agriculture-A worldwide outlook. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 39, 1-13. DOI: 10.2166/wst.1999.0124

[9] Pericherla S, Karnena MK, Vara S. A review on impacts of agricultural runoff on freshwater resources. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 11, 829-833. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341151832_A_Review_on_Impacts_of_Agricultural_Runoff_on_Freshwater_Resources (accessed on 8 August 2026).

[10] Hughes RM, Vadas RL Jr. Agricultural effects on streams and rivers: A western USA focus. Water 2021, 13, 1901. DOI: 10.3390/w13141901

[11] Schmidt TS, Van Metre PC, Carlisle DM.Linking the agricultural landscape of the Midwest to stream health with structural equation modeling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 452-462. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b04381

[12] Waters TF. Sediment in Streams: Sources, Biological Effects and Control; American Fisheries Society Monograph 7; American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, MD, USA, 1995.

[13] Parkhill KL, Gulliver JS. Effect of inorganic sediment on whole-stream productivity. Hydrobiologia 2002, 472, 5-17. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016363228389

[14] Henley WF, Patterson MA, Neves RJ, Lemly AD. Effects of sedimentation and turbidity on lotic food webs: A concise review for natural resource managers. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2000, 8, 125-139. DOI: 10.1080/10641260091129198

[15] Lorente C, Causapé J, Glud RN, Hancke K, Merchán D, Muñiz S, et al. Impacts of agricultural irrigation on nearby freshwater ecosystems: The seasonal influence of triazine herbicides in benthic algal communities. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 503-504, 151-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.108

[16] Lozano VL, Dohle SA, Vera MS, Torremorell A, Pizarro HN. Primary production of freshwater microbial communities is affected by a cocktail of herbicides in an outdoor experiment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 201, 110821. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110821

[17] Houghton DC, DeWalt RE. The caddis aren’t alright: Modeling Trichoptera richness in streams of the northcentral United States reveals substantial species losses. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 11, 1163922. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1163922

[18] Effert-Fanta EL, Fischer RU, Wahl DH . Effects of forest buffers and agricultural land use on macroinvertebrate and fish community structure. Hydrobiologia 2019, 841, 45-64. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-019-04006-1

[19] Mundahl ND, Mundahl ED. Aquatic community structure and stream habitat in a karst agricultural landscape. Ecol. Process. 2022, 11, 18. DOI: 10.1186/s13717-022-00365-1

[20] Kroll SA, Oakland HC . A review of studies documenting the effects of agricultural best management practices on physiochemical and biological measures of stream ecosystem integrity. Nat. Areas J. 2019, 39, 58-77. DOI: 10.3375/043.039.0105

[21] Liu Y, Yang W, Bass B, Rao YR. Effectiveness of agricultural BMPs on phosphorus load reduction for the Canadian Lake Erie Basin: A literature review. Environ. Rev. 2025, 33, 1-24. DOI: 10.1139/er-2024-0069

[22] Palacios-Linares D, Guzman SM . Systematic review of best management practice implementation for agricultural phosphorus management in Florida: A 30-year overview. J. Nat. Resour. Agric. Ecosyst. 2024, 2, 139-152. DOI: 10.13031/jnrae.15912

[23] Bodrud-Doza M, Yang W, Liu Y, Yerubandi R, Daggupati P, DeVries B, et al. Evaluating best management practices for nutrient load reductions in tile-drained watersheds of the Laurentian Great Lakes Basin: A literature review. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 965, 178657. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178657

[24] Krebs CJ.Ecological Methodology; Harper and Row: New York, NY, USA, 1989.

[25] Hilsenhoff WL . Using a Biotic Index to Evaluate Water Quality in Streams; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin No. 132; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources: Madison, WI, USA, 1982.

[26] Plafkin JL, Barbour MT, Porter KD, Gross SK, Hughes RM. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers: Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish; United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA/444/4-89-001; United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1989.

[27] Herman MR, Nejadhashemi AP. A review of macroinvertebrate-and fish-based stream health indices. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 2015, 15, 53-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2015.04.001

[28] Rumschlag SL, Mahon MB, Jones DK, Battaglin W, Behrens J, Bernhardt ES, et al. Density declines, richness increases, and composition shifts in stream macroinvertebrates. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, adf4896. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adf4896

[29] Bates LM, Thompson AM, Prasad LR. Investigating interactions between macroinvertebrate indices, water quality parameters, and stream quality classifications in a Wisconsin agricultural watershed. J. Environ. Qual. 2026, 55, e701222. DOI: 10.1002/jeq2.70122

[30] Leunda PM, Oscoz J, Miranda R, Ariño AH. Longitudinal and seasonal variation of the benthic macroinvertebrate community and biotic indices in an undisturbed Pyrenean river. Ecol. Indic. 2009, 9, 52-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.01.009

[31] Türkmen G,Kazanci N. Applications of various biodiversity indices to benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in streams of a national park in Turkey. Rev. Hydrobiol. 2010, 3, 111-125. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/download/26493944/3-2b.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2026).

[32] Gray NF, Delaney E. Comparison of benthic macroinvertebrate indices for the assessment of the impact of acid mine drainage on an Irish river below an abandoned CU-S mine. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 155, 31-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.11.002

[33] Lydy MJ, Crawford CG, Frey JW . A comparison of selected diversity, similarity, and biotic indices for detecting changes in benthic-invertebrate community structure and stream quality. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 39, 469-479. DOI: 10.1007/s002440010129

[34] Gonçalves FB, de Menezes MS . A comparative analysis of biotic indices that use macroinvertebrates to assess water quality in a coastal river of Paraná estate, southern Brazil. Biota Neotrop. 2011, 11, 27-36. DOI: 10.1590/S1676-06032011000400002

[35] Rico E, Rallo A,Sevillano MA, Arretxe ML. Comparison of several biological indices based on river macroinvertebrate benthic community for assessment of running water quality. In Annales de Limnologie-International Journal of Limnology; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 1992; Volume 28, pp. 147-156.

[36] Waters TF. The Streams and Rivers of Minnesota; University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1977.

[37] Anderson D. Economic Impact of Recreational Trout Angling in the Driftless Area; University of Wisconsin-La Crosse: La Crosse, WI, USA, 2016.

[38] Surber T.Biological surveys and investigations in Minnesota. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1923, 52, 225-238. DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(1922)52[225:BSAIIM]2.0.CO;2

[39] Thorn WC, Anderson CS, Lorenzen WE, Hendrickson DL, Wagner JW.A review of trout management in southeast Minnesota streams. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 1997, 17, 860-872. DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(1997)017%3C0860:AROTMI%3E2.3.CO;2

[40] Trimble SW.Historical Agriculture and Soil Erosion in the Upper Mississippi Valley Hill Country; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013.

[41] Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.Trout Angling Opportunities in Southern and Central Minnesota; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources: Saint Paul, MN, USA, 2025.

[42] Hilsenhoff WL . Key to Genera of Wisconsin Plecoptera (Stonefly) Nymphs, Ephemeroptera (Mayfly) Nymphs, Trichoptera (Caddisfly) Larvae; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Research Report 67; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources: Madison, WI, USA, 1970.

[43] Hilsenhoff WL. Aquatic Insects of Wisconsin: Generic Keys and Notes on Biology, Ecology and Distribution; Technical Bulletin No. 89; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources: Madison, WI, USA, 1975.

[44] Pennak RW. Fresh-Water Invertebrates of the United States, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1978.

[45] Merritt RW, Cummins KW. (Eds.). An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 2nd ed.; Kendall-Hunt Publishing Company: Dubuque, IA, USA, 1984.

[46] Thorp JH, Covich AP. (Eds.). Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1991.

[47] Wiggins GB . Larvae of the North American Caddisfly Genera (Trichoptera), 2nd ed.; University of Toronto Press: Toronto, ON, Canada, 1996.

[48] Bouchard RW Jr. Guide to Aquatic Invertebrates of the Upper Midwest: Identification Manual for Students, Citizen Monitors, and Aquatic Resource Professionals; University of Minnesota: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2004.

[49] Brower JE, Zar JH, von Ende CN . Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology, 4th ed.; WCB McGraw-Hill: Boston, MA, USA, 1998.

[50] Wittman E, Mundahl ND. Development and Validation of a Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity (B-IBI) for Streams in Southeastern Minnesota; Winona State University, College of Science and Engineering: Winona, MN, USA, 2003.

[51] Magner JA, Vondracek B, Brooks KN . Grazed riparian management and stream channel response in southeastern Minnesota (USA) streams. Environ. Manag. 2008, 42, 377-390. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9132-4

[52] Izaak Walton League of America.Save Our Streams; Izaak Walton League of America: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2026. Available online: https://iwla.org/save-our-streams/ (accessed on 13 January 2026).

[53] McGabe DJ, Gotelli NJ . Effects of disturbance frequency, intensity, and area on assemblages of stream macroinvertebrates. Oecologia 2000, 124, 270-279. DOI: 10.1007/s004420000369

[54] Feio MJ, Hughes RM, Serra SRQ, Nichols SJ, Kefford BJ, Lintermans M, et al. Fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages reveal extensive degradation of the world’s rivers. Glob. Change Biol. 2023, 29, 255-374. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16439

[55] Kirkman TW. Statistics to Use; College of Saint Benedict/Saint John University: Saint Joseph, MN, USA, 1996. Available online: http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/ (accessed on 10 January 2026).

[56] Mundahl ND. Intra-and inter-watershed variability in benthic macroinvertebrate community diversity, taxa richness, and biotic integrity: Citizen scientist sampling within a Minnesota USA region dominated by agriculture. Ecol. Divers. 2026, 3, 10003. DOI: 10.70322/ecoldivers.2026.10003

[57] Mundahl ND. Driftless Area streams in karstic agricultural watersheds: Best management practices, biotic integrity, and environmental stressors. J. Watershed Ecol. 2026, 1, 10006. DOI: 10.70322/jwe.2026.10006

[58] Carter JL, Resh VH. Analytical Approaches Used in Stream Benthic Macroinvertebrate Biomonitoring Programs of State Agencies in the United States; U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013-1129; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2013.

[59] Paller MH, Blas SA, Kelley RW. Macroinvertebrate taxonomic richness in minimally disturbed streams on the southeastern USA coastal plain. Diversity 2020, 12, 459. DOI: 10.3390/d12120459

[60] Castella E, Adalsteinsson H, Brittain JE, Gislason GM, Lehmann A, Lencioni V, et al. Macrobenthic invertebrate richness and composition along a latitudinal gradient of European glacier-fed streams. Freshw. Biol. 2001, 46, 1811-1831. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00860.x

[61] Statzner B, Bonada N, Dolédec S. Conservation of taxonomic and biological trait diversity of European stream macroinvertebrate communities: A case for a collective public database. Biodivers. Conserv. 2007, 16, 3609-3632. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-007-9150-1

[62] Medupin C.Distribution of benthic macroinvertebrate communities and assessment of water quality in a small UK river catchment. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 544. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-0464-x

[63] Engel SR, Voshell JR Jr. Volunteer biological monitoring: Can it accurately assess the ecological condition of streams? Am. Entomol. 2002, 48, 164-177. DOI: 10.1093/ae/48.3.164

[64] Izaak Walton League of America.Clean Water Hub; Izaak Walton League of America: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2026. Available online: https://www.cleanwaterhub.org (accessed on 23 June 2026).