In silico studies of green fluorescent protein-tagged Hsp27-HPV16 E7 fusion protein and evaluation of cytokine secretion from antigen-presenting cells exposed to the fusion protein-carrying tumor-derived exosomes

Fatemeh Rezaei , Arash Arashkia , Fatemeh Fotouhi , Azam Bolhassani , Seyed Mehdi Sadat

Journal of Solid Tumors ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1) : 45 -62.

PDF (2249KB)
Journal of Solid Tumors ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1) : 45 -62. DOI: 10.5430/jst.v14n1p45
Original Article
research-article

In silico studies of green fluorescent protein-tagged Hsp27-HPV16 E7 fusion protein and evaluation of cytokine secretion from antigen-presenting cells exposed to the fusion protein-carrying tumor-derived exosomes

Author information +
History +
PDF (2249KB)

Abstract

Objective: Exosome (Exo)-based therapies have attracted considerable interest due to their potential as carriers for therapeutic molecules and their capacity to elicit anti-tumor immune responses. The objective of this study was to engineer TC-1 tumor cell line-derived exosomes with GFP-tagged heat shock protein (Hsp) 27-human papillomavirus (HPV)16 E7 fusion protein and evaluation of cytokine secretion from antigen-presenting cells (APCs: macrophages and dendritic cells) exposed to the engineered exosomes in vitro.
Methods: In this study, different in silico methods were employed to evaluate the Hsp27-E7 and Hsp27-E7-GFP fusion proteins as potential vaccine candidates. Regarding to the in silico data, the Hsp27-E7-GFP fusion gene was subcloned into pCDH lentiviral vector for production of lentivirions harboring the Hsp27-E7-GFP fusion protein in eukaryotic cells. Subsequently, the TC-1 tumor cells were transduced with these lentivirions to isolate the engineered exosomes (i.e., Exo-Hsp27-E7-GFP) using the ExoQuick-TCTM kit and their characterization using physicochemical methods. Finally, the secretion of key cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-10) was evaluated through incubation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) with the engineered Exo-Hsp27-E7-GFP using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Results: Our in silico data showed that both the Hsp27-E7 and Hsp27-E7-GFP constructs were soluble and non-allergenic, and exhibited strong interaction with TLR4. Indeed, the linkage of GFP did not affect the physicochemical properties, and interaction of Hsp27-E7 with the immune receptors. Moreover, western blot analysis confirmed the presence of Hsp27-E7-GFP fusion protein in the isolated exosomes. The Exo-Hsp27-E7-GFP could significantly enhance the secretion of TNF-α and IL-10 from APCs compared to Exo and Exo-GFP, as well.
Conclusions: These engineered vesicles derived from tumor cells demonstrate the capacity to induce effective immunity, suggesting their potential as a promising strategy in the development of cell-free vaccine candidates.

Keywords

Human papillomavirus 16 / E7 oncoprotein / Heat shock protein 27 / Green fluorescent protein / Exosome / Immunos-timulatory effects

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Fatemeh Rezaei, Arash Arashkia, Fatemeh Fotouhi, Azam Bolhassani, Seyed Mehdi Sadat. In silico studies of green fluorescent protein-tagged Hsp27-HPV16 E7 fusion protein and evaluation of cytokine secretion from antigen-presenting cells exposed to the fusion protein-carrying tumor-derived exosomes. Journal of Solid Tumors, 2024, 14(1): 45-62 DOI:10.5430/jst.v14n1p45

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

F. Rezaei was supported by Pasteur Institute of Iran to pursue her study in the Ph.D. thesis.

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS

F.R. performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. A.A., F.F., S.M.S. and A.B. analysed and validated the data, and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript.

FUNDING

This research received no external funding.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

INFORMED CONSENT

Not applicable.

ETHICS STATEMENT

In vitro studies were conducted in strict adherence to approved protocols and in compliance with the highest standards of animal care at the Pasteur Institute of Iran. This study was conducted in accordance with ethics code IR.PII.REC.1400.025.

ETHICS APPROVAL

The Publication Ethics Committee of the Sciedu Press. The journal’s policies adhere to the Core Practices established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW

Not commissioned; externally double-blind peer reviewed.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the manuscript.

DATA SHARING STATEMENT

Not applicable.

OPEN ACCESS

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

COPYRIGHTS

Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.

References

[1]

Okunade KS. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2020; 40(5): 602-608. PMid: 31500479. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2019.1634030

[2]

Ye J, Zheng L, He Y, et al. Human papillomavirus associated cervical lesion: pathogenesis and therapeutic interventions. MedComm. 2023; 4(5): e368. PMid: 37719443. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.368

[3]

Yusuf M. Perspectives on cervical cancer: Insights into screening methodology and challenges. Cancer Screening and Prevention. 2024; 3(1): 52-60. https://doi.org/10.14218/CSP.2023.00041

[4]

Rathod S, Potdar J, Gupta A, et al. Empowering women’s health: insights into HPV vaccination and the prevention of invasive cervical cancer. Cureus. 2023; 15(11): e49523. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.49523

[5]

Yim EK, Park JS. The role of HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins in HPV-associated cervical carcinogenesis. Cancer research and treatment: official journal of Korean Cancer Association. 2005; 37(6): 319-324. PMid: 19956366. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2005.37.6.319

[6]

Kamolratanakul S, Pitisuttithum P. Human papillomavirus vaccine efficacy and effectiveness against cancer. Vaccines. 2021; 9(12): 1413. PMid: 34960159. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9121413

[7]

Han L, Zhang B. Can prophylactic HPV vaccination reduce the re-currence of cervical lesions after surgery? Review and prospect. Infectious Agents and Cancer. 2023; 18(1): 66. PMid: 37898754. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-023-00547-2

[8]

Yan F, Cowell LG, Tomkies A, et al. Therapeutic vaccination for HPV-mediated cancers. Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports. 2023; 11(1): 44-61. PMid: 36743978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-023-00443-8

[9]

Tiwari P, Yadav K, Shukla RP, et al. Extracellular vesicles-powered immunotherapy: Unleashing the potential for safer and more effective cancer treatment. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2024; 756: 110022. PMid: 38697343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2024.110022

[10]

Mittal S, Gupta P, Chaluvally-Raghavan P, et al. Emerging role of extracellular vesicles in immune regulation and cancer progres-sion. Cancers. 2020; 12(12): 3563. PMid: 33260606. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123563

[11]

Saito RF, Machado CML, Lomba ALO, et al. Heat shock proteins mediate intercellular communications within the tumor microenvi-ronment through extracellular vesicles. Applied Biosciences. 2024; 3(1): 45-58. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci3010003

[12]

Shi C, Ulke-Lemée A, Deng J, et al. Characterization of heat shock protein 27 in extracellular vesicles: a potential anti-inflammatory ther-apy. The FASEB Journal. 2019; 33(2): 1617-1630. PMid: 30188755. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201800987R

[13]

Barros FM, Carneiro F, Machado JC, et al. Exosomes and immune response in cancer: friends or foes? Frontiers in Immunology. 2018; 9: 730. PMid: 29696022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00730

[14]

Regimbeau M, Abrey J, Vautrot V, et al. editors., Heat shock proteins and exosomes in cancer theranostics. Elsevier: Seminars in Cancer Biology; 2022. PMid:34343652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.07.014

[15]

Ansari AM, Ahmed AK, Matsangos AE, et al. Cellular GFP toxicity and immunogenicity: potential confounders in in vivo cell tracking experiments. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. 2016; 12: 553-559. PMid: 27435468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-016-9670-8

[16]

Grzelak CA, Goddard ET, Lederer EE, et al. Elimination of fluo-rescent protein immunogenicity permits modeling of metastasis in immune-competent settings. Cancer Cell. 2022; 40(1): 1-2. PMid: 34861158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2021.11.004

[17]

Lee JE, Chung Y, Rhee S, et al. Untold story of human cervical cancers: HPV-negative cervical cancer. BMB reports. 2022; 55(9):429. PMid:35725012.https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2022.55.9.042

[18]

Rezaei F, Namvar A, Akbari E, et al. Immunoinformatics studies of heat shock proteins 27 and 70: Development of potent ther-apeutic vaccine constructs against human papillomavirus-related cancers. Heliyon. 2023; 9(8): e19261. PMid: 37664744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19261

[19]

Du Z, Su H, Wang W, et al. The trRosetta server for fast and accurate protein structure prediction. Nature Protocols. 2021; 16(12): 5634-5651. PMid: 34759384. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00628-9

[20]

Heo L, Park H, Seok C. GalaxyRefine: Protein structure refine-ment driven by side-chain repacking. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013; 41(W1): W384-W388. PMid: 23737448. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt458

[21]

Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: valida-tion of protein-structure coordinates. International Tables for Crys-tallography. 2012; F (21.4): 684-687 https://doi.org/10.1107/97809553602060000882

[22]

Colovos C, Yeates TO. Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein science. 1993; 2(9): 1511-1519. PMid: 8401235. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560020916

[23]

Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, et al. Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. Springer; 2005. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-890-0:571

[24]

Hebditch M, Carballo-Amador MA, Charonis S, et al. Protein-Sol: a web tool for predicting protein solubility from sequence. Bioin-formatics. 2017; 33(19): 3098-3100. PMid: 28575391. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx345

[25]

Cheng J, Saigo H, Baldi P. Large-scale prediction of disulphide bridges using kernel methods, two-dimensional recursive neural net-works, and weighted graph matching. Proteins: Structure, Func-tion, and Bioinformatics. 2006; 62(3): 617-629. PMid: 16320312. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20787

[26]

Cheng J, Vullo A, Baldi P. Large-scale prediction of disulphide bond connectivity. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2004; 17: 1-8.

[27]

Cheng J, Randall AZ, Sweredoski MJ, et al. SCRATCH: a protein structure and structural feature prediction server. Nucleic Acids Re-search. 2005; 33(suppl_2): W72-W76. PMid: 15980571. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki396

[28]

Lopéz-Blanco JR, Garzón JI, Chacón P. iMod: multipurpose normal mode analysis in internal coordinates. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(20): 2843-2850. PMid: 21873636. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr497

[29]

Bauer JA, Pavlović J, Bauerová-Hlinková V. Normal mode analy-sis as a routine part of a structural investigation. Molecules. 2019; 24(18): 3293. PMid: 31510014. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24183293

[30]

Sikic K, Jeren B, Tomic S, editors. Identifying Protein Flexibility by NMA. BIOCOMP. 2008; 927-933.

[31]

Hospital A, Goñi JR, Orozco M, et al. Molecular dynamics sim-ulations: advances and applications. Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry. 2015; 37-47. PMid: 26604800. https://doi.org/10.2147/AABC.S70333

[32]

López-Blanco JR, Aliaga JI, Quintana-Ortí ES, et al. iMODS: inter-nal coordinates normal mode analysis server. Nucleic Acids Re-search. 2014; 42(W1): W271-W276. PMid: 24771341. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku339

[33]

Zhang B, Metharom P, Jullie H, et al. The significance of con-trolled conditions in lentiviral vector titration and in the use of multiplicity of infection (MOI) for predicting gene transfer events. Genetic Vaccines and Therapy. 2004; 2: 1-10. PMid: 15291957. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-0556-2-6

[34]

Milani A, Agi E, Pouriayevali MH, et al. Different dendritic cells-based vaccine constructs influence HIV-1 antigen-specific immuno-logical responses and cytokine generation in virion-exposed spleno-cytes. International Immunopharmacology. 2022; 113: 109406. PMid: 36461600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109406

[35]

Messaoudi A, Belguith H, Ben Hamida J. Homology modeling and virtual screening approaches to identify potent inhibitors of VEB-1-lactamase. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling. 2013; 10:1-10. PMid: 23547944. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-10-22

[36]

Cuspoca AF, Díaz LL, Acosta AF, et al. An immunoinformatics ap-proach for sars-cov-2 in latam populations and multi-epitope vaccine candidate directed towards the world’s population. Vaccines. 2021; 9(6): 581. PMid: 34205992. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060581

[37]

Rahimi M, Taghdir M, Abasi Joozdani F. Dynamozones are the most obvious sign of the evolution of conformational dynamics in HIV-1 protease. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13(1): 14179. PMid: 37648682. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40818-x

[38]

Huynh T, Smith JC, Sanson A. Protein unfolding transitions in an intrinsically unstable annexin domain: Molecular dynamics simu-lation and comparison with nuclear magnetic resonance data. Bio-physical Journal. 2002; 83(2): 681-698. PMid: 12124256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75200-4

[39]

Brady MT, Lee J, Ferrone S, et al. Interferon-secretion by t (9;22) acute lymphoblastic leukemia-derived dendritic cells. Leukemia Research. 2011; 35(2): 275-277. PMid: 20943267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2010.09.003

[40]

Darwich L, Coma G, Peña R, et al. Secretion of interferon-by human macrophages demonstrated at the single-cell level after cos-timulation with interleukin (IL)-12 plus IL-18. Immunology. 2009; 126(3): 386-393. PMid: 18759749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02905.x

[41]

Yang S, Xiao H, Cao L. Recent advances in heat shock proteins in can-cer diagnosis, prognosis, metabolism and treatment. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2021; 142: 112074. PMid: 34426258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112074PMid:34426258.

[42]

Demirden SF, Kimiz-Gebologlu I, Oncel SS. Animal cell lines as expression platforms in viral vaccine production: A post covid-19 per-spective. ACS Omega. 2024; 9(15): 16904-16926. PMid: 38645343. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c10484

[43]

Mo Y, Ma J, Zhang H, et al. Prophylactic and therapeutic HPV vaccines: current scenario and perspectives. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2022; 12: 909223. PMid: 35860379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.909223

[44]

Milani A, Basirnejad M, Bolhassani A. Heat-shock proteins in di-agnosis and treatment: An overview of different biochemical and immunological functions. Immunotherapy. 2019; 11(3): 215-239. PMid: 30730280. https://doi.org/10.2217/imt-2018-0105

[45]

Robert J. Evolution of heat shock protein and immunity. Devel-opmental & Comparative Immunology. 2003; 27(6-7): 449-464. PMid: 12697304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-305X(02)00160-X

[46]

Shevtsov M, Multhoff G. Heat shock protein-peptide and HSP-based immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer. Frontiers in immunol-ogy. 2016;7:180087. PMid: 27199993. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00171

[47]

Kim TK, Eberwine JH. Mammalian cell transfection: the present and the future. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2010; 397: 3173-3178. PMid: 20549496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3821-6

[48]

Sadraeian M, Mansoorkhani MJK, Mohkam M, et al. Prevention and inhibition of TC-1 cell growth in tumor bearing mice by HPV16 E 7 protein in fusion with Shiga toxin B-subunit from shigella dysenteriae. Cell Journal (Yakhteh). 2013; 15(2): 176.

[49]

Fazeli M, Soleimanjahi H, Ghaemi A, et al. Efficacy of HPV-16 E 7 based vaccine in a TC-1 tumoric animal model of cervical cancer. Cell Journal (Yakhteh). 2011; 12(4): 483-488.

[50]

Williams ME. HIV-1 vif protein sequence variations in South African people living with HIV and their influence on Vif-APOBEC3G interaction. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infec-tious Diseases. 2024; 43(2): 325-338. PMid: 38072879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-023-04728-0

[51]

Patra MC, Kwon HK, Batool M, et al. Computational insight into the structural organization of full-length Toll-like receptor 4 dimer in a model phospholipid bilayer. Frontiers in Immunology. 2018; 9:489. PMid: 29593733. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00489

[52]

Zaib S, Rana N, Hussain N, et al. Designing multi-epitope mon-keypox virus-specific vaccine using immunoinformatics approach. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2023; 16(1): 107-116. PMid: 36508944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2022.11.033

[53]

Steffens S, Tebbets J, Kramm CM, et al. Transduction of human glial and neuronal tumor cells with different lentivirus vector pseudotypes. Journal of Neuro-oncology. 2004; 70: 281-288. PMid: 15662969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-004-6046-8

[54]

Saltanatpour Z, Kadivar M, Johari B, et al. Transduction of an opti-mized recombinant lentivirus expressing E-cadherin shRNA resulted in stable downregulation of CDH 1 gene and obvious cell morpholog-ical change in the human colorectal cancer cell line HT29. Intern J Med Res Health Sci. 2016; 5(11): 87-93.

[55]

Pellinen R, Hakkarainen T, Wahlfors T, et al. Cancer cells as targets for lentivirus-mediated gene transfer and gene therapy. International Journal of Oncology. 2004; 25(6): 1753-1762. PMid: 15547714. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.25.6.1753

[56]

Zhao XY, Xu QL, Zhao XD, et al. Enhancing lentiviral vector trans-duction efficiency for facilitating gene therapy. China Biotechnology. 2021; 41(8): 52-58.

[57]

Morishita M, Takahashi Y, Matsumoto A, et al. Exosome-based tu-mor antigens-adjuvant co-delivery utilizing genetically engineered tumor cell-derived exosomes with immunostimulatory CpG DNA. Biomaterials. 2016; 111: 55-65. PMid: 27723556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.031

[58]

Di Bonito P, Ridolfi B, Columba-Cabezas S, et al. HPV-E 7 delivered by engineered exosomes elicits a protective CD8+ T cell-mediated immune response. Viruses. 2015; 7(3): 1079-1099. PMid: 25760140. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7031079

[59]

Chen W, Wang J, Shao C, et al. Efficient induction of antitumor T cell immunity by exosomes derived from heat-shocked lymphoma cells. European Journal of Immunology. 2006; 36(6): 1598-1607. PMid: 16708399. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.200535501

[60]

Zhang M, Jin K, Gao L, et al. Methods and technologies for exosome isolation and characterization. Small Methods. 2018; 2(9): 1800021. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201800021

[61]

Somu P, Paul S. Inter-relationship between the inflammation and heat shock protein in cancer development: A possible target for diagnosis and cancer immunotherapy. Heat Shock Proteins in Human Diseases. 2021; 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/7515_2020_19

[62]

Cao J, Lv G, Wei F. Engineering exosomes to reshape the immune microenvironment in breast cancer: Molecular insights and therapeu-tic opportunities. Clinical and Translational Medicine. 2024; 14(4): e1645. PMid: 38572668. https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.1645

[63]

Santos P, Almeida F. Exosome-based vaccines: history, current state, and clinical trials. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021; 12: 711565. PMid: 34335627. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.711565

[64]

Hu K, McKay PF, Samnuan K, et al. Presentation of antigen on extracellular vesicles using transmembrane domains from viral gly-coproteins for enhanced immunogenicity. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. 2022; 11(3): e12199. PMid: 35233930. https://doi.org/10.1002/jev2.12199

[65]

Morosini M, Meloni F, Uccelli M, et al. Ex vivo evaluation of PPD-specific IFN-or IL-5 secreting cells in the peripheral blood and lungs of patients with tuberculosis. The International Journal of Tu-berculosis and Lung Disease. 2005; 9(7): 753-759.

[66]

Jang DI, Lee AH, Shin HY, et al. The role of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-) in autoimmune disease and current TNF-inhibitors in therapeutics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(5): 2719. PMid: 33800290. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052719

[67]

Wang X, Lin Y. Tumor necrosis factor and cancer, buddies or foes?1. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2008; 29(11): 1275-1288. PMid: 18954521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7254.2008.00889.x

[68]

Midekessa G, Godakumara K, Ord J, et al. Zeta potential of extra-cellular vesicles: toward understanding the attributes that determine colloidal stability. ACS Omega. 2020; 5(27): 16701-16710. PMid: 32685837. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01582

[69]

Di Bonito P, Ridolfi B, Columba-Cabezas S, et al. HPV-E 7 delivered by engineered exosomes elicits a protective CD8+ T cell-mediated immune response. Viruses. 2015; 7(3): 1079-1099. PMid: 25760140. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7031079

[70]

Xie Y, Bai O, Zhang H, et al. Membrane-bound HSP70-engineered myeloma cell-derived exosomes stimulate more efficient CD8(+) CTL-and NK-mediated antitumour immunity than exosomes re-leased from heat-shocked tumour cells expressing cytoplasmic HSP70. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2010; 14(11): 2655-2666. PMid: 19627400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00851.x

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (2249KB)

289

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/