Historical shifts, geographic biases, and biological constraints shape mammal species discovery

Abstract

Species descriptions have become increasingly comprehensive, yet disparities persist across taxa and regions. We assess temporal trends in mammal species descriptions (1990–2025) using four proxies of comprehensiveness—counts of examined specimens and compared taxa, number of pages (only from the Methods/Results sections), and number of evidence lines (i.e., analytical tools and techniques). Using generalized linear models, we assessed how these proxies are explained by factors associated with species’ biology, geography, and taxonomic practice. Most new species originate from tropical regions, particularly among rodents and bats, reflecting the global discovery hotspots. Descriptions have grown more rigorous over time, with expanded specimen sampling, broader taxonomic comparisons, and integrative methods. However, disparities emerge along geographic and biological axes: descriptions from temperate regions incorporate more evidence lines, while small-bodied and tropical species (especially bats) remain understudied due to sampling biases and resource limitations. Body size inversely correlates with description length, as smaller species often require advanced diagnostics. Species-rich genera show greater comprehensiveness, likely due to heightened diagnostic scrutiny. Our findings highlight progress in taxonomic rigor but underscore persistent gaps tied to geography, body size, and accessibility of analytical tools. Addressing these disparities requires targeted investments in local capacity, equitable collaboration, and accessible methodologies to strengthen global taxonomic infrastructure and support conservation priorities.

Keywords

linnean shortfall / mammalia / species descriptions / taxonomic practice / taxonomy

References

[1] Abreu ECT, da Silva EL, Moura MR. 2025. Geopolitical impacts on the description of new terrestrial mollusc species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 292: 20251428.

[2] Abreu EF, Casali D, Costa-Araújo R, Garbino GST, Libardi GS, Loretto D, Loss AC, Marmontel M, Moras LM, Nascimento MC, Oliveira ML, Pavan SE, Tirelli FP. 2024. Lista de Mamíferos do Brasil (2024-1) [online]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14536925 [accessed 01 October 2025].

[3] Allen L, O'Connell A, Kiermer V. 2019. How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship. Learned Publishing 32: 71–74.

[4] Alroy J. 2002. How many named species are valid? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 3706–3711.

[5] Baselga A, Lobo JM, Hortal J, Jiménez-Valverde A, Gómez JF. 2008. Assessing alpha and beta taxonomy in eupelmid wasps: determinants of the probability of describing good species and synonyms. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 48: 40–49.

[6] Benton MJ. 2008. Fossil quality and naming dinosaurs. Biology Letters 4: 729–732.

[7] Bertrand Y, Härlin M. 2006. Stability and universality in the application of taxon names in phylogenetic nomenclature. Systematic Biology 55: 848–858.

[8] Blackburn DC, Boyer DM, Gray JA, Winchester J, Bates JM, Baumgart SL, Braker E, Coldren D, Conway KW, Rabosky AD, de la Sancha N, Dillman CB, Dunnum JL, Early CM, Frable BW, Gage MW, Hanken J, Maisano JA, Marks BD, Maslenikov KP, McCormack JE, Nagesan RS, Pandelis GG, Prestridge HL, Rabosky DL, Randall ZS, Robbins MB, Scheinberg LA, Spencer CL, Summers AP, Tapanila L, Thompson CW, Tornabene L, Watkins-Colwell GJ, Welton LJ, the oVert Project Team, Stanley EL. 2024. Increasing the impact of vertebrate scientific collections through 3D imaging: The openVertebrate (oVert) Thematic Collections Network. BioScience 74: 169–186.

[9] Bonferroni C. 1936. Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilita. Pubblicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commericiali di Firenze 8: 3–62.

[10] Bovendorp RS, McCleery RA, Galetti M. 2017. Optimising sampling methods for small mammal communities in Neotropical rainforests. Mammal Review 47: 148–158.

[11] Braby MF, Hsu Y-F, Lamas G. 2024. How to describe a new species in zoology and avoid mistakes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 202: 1–16.

[12] Bremer K, Bremer B, Karis P, Källersjö M. 1990. Time for change in taxonomy. Nature 434: 202.

[13] Burgin CJ, Zijlstra JS, Becker MA, Handika H, Alston JM, Widness J, Liphardt S, Huckaby DG, Upham NS. 2025. How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge. Journal of Mammalogy 106: 1082–1117.

[14] Burgin CJ, Colella JP, Kahn PL, Upham NS. 2018. How many species of mammals are there? Journal of Mammalogy 99: 1–14.

[15] Burnham KP, Anderson DA eds. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Fort Collins, CO: Springer.

[16] Carneiro CM, Shields-Estrada A, Boville AE, Alves-Ferreira G, Xu T, Wong Arnott RL, Allen-Love CM, Puertas M, Jacisin JJ, Chapman Tripp H, Basham EW, Zamudio KR, Belasen AM. 2025. Toward a global science of conservation genomics: Coldspots in genomic resources highlight a need for equitable collaborations and capacity building. Molecular Ecology 34: e17729.

[17] Chek AA, Austin JD, Lougheed SC. 2003. Why is there a tropical–temperate disparity in the genetic diversity and taxonomy of species? Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: 69–77.

[18] Dayrat B. 2005. Towards integrative taxonomy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 85: 407–415.

[19] De Queiroz K. 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology 56: 879–886.

[20] Dinerstein E, Olson D, Joshi A, Vynne C, Burgess ND, Wikramanayake E, Hahn N, Palminteri S, Hedao P, Noss R, Hansen M, Locke H, Ellis EC, Jones B, Barber CV, Hayes R, Kormos C, Martin V, Crist E, Sechrest W, Price L, Baillie JEM, Weeden D, Suckling K, Davis C, Sizer N, Moore R, Thau D, Birch T, Potapov P, Turubanova S, Tyukavina A, de Souza N, Pintea L, Brito JC, Llewellyn OA, Miller AG, Patzelt A, Ghazanfar SA, Timberlake J, Klöser H, Shennan-Farpón Y, Kindt R, Barnekow Lillesø J-P, van Breugel P, Graudal L, Voge M, Al-Shammari KF, Saleem M. 2017. An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. BioScience 67: 534–545.

[21] Diniz-Filho JAF, Jardim L, Guedes JJM, Meyer L, Stropp J, Frateles LEF, Pinto RB, Lohmann LG, Tessarolo G, de Carvalho CJB, Ladle RJ, Hortal J. 2023. Macroecological links between the Linnean, Wallacean, and Darwinian shortfalls. Frontiers of Biogeography 15: 1–11.

[22] Dominguez E, Wheeler QD. 1997. Forum—taxonomic stability is ignorance. Cladistics 13: 367–372.

[23] Dubois A. 2007. Naming taxa from cladograms: Some confusions, misleading statements, and necessary clarifications. Cladistics 23: 390–402.

[24] Ebach MC, Valdecasas AG, Wheeler QD. 2011. Impediments to taxonomy and users of taxonomy: Accessibility and impact evaluation. Cladistics 27: 550–557.

[25] Feijó A, Brandão MV. 2022. Taxonomy as the first step towards conservation: An appraisal on the taxonomy of medium- and large-sized Neotropical mammals in the 21st century. Zoologia (Curitiba) 39: e22007.

[26] Freeman BG, Pennell MW. 2021. The latitudinal taxonomy gradient. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 36: 778–786.

[27] Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM, Loder N. 1995. Which species are described first?: the case of North American butterflies. Biodiversity and Conservation 4: 119–127.

[28] GBIF. 2025. GBIF home page. Available from: https://www.gbif.org/ [accessed 30 June 2025].

[29] Gippoliti S, Farina S, Andreone F. 2024. Lost species, neglected taxonomy, and the role of natural history collections and synonymization in the identification of the World's forgotten biodiversity. Nature Conservation. 56: 119–126.

[30] Grenié M, Berti E, Carvajal-Quintero J, Dädlow GML, Sagouis A, Winter M. 2023. Harmonizing taxon names in biodiversity data: A review of tools, databases and best practices. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 14: 12–25.

[31] Guedes JJM, Feio RN, Meiri S, Moura MR. 2020. Identifying factors that boost species discoveries of global reptiles. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 190: 1274–1284.

[32] Guedes JJM, Gomes De Lima HV, Mendonça LR, Chen-Zhao R, Diniz-Filho JAF, Moura MR. 2024. Temporal trends in global reptile species descriptions over three decades. Systematics and Biodiversity 22: 2419832.

[33] Guedes JJM, Moura MR, Jardim L, Diniz-Filho JAF. 2025. Global patterns of taxonomic uncertainty and its impacts on biodiversity research. Systematic Biology 74: 834–849.

[34] Hackathon R, Bolker B, Butler M, Cowan P, de Vienne D, Eddelbuettel D, Holder M, Jombart T, Kembel S, Michonneau F, Orme D, O'Meara B, Paradis E, Regetz J, Zwickl D 2020. phylobase: Base Package for Phylogenetic Structures and Comparative Data. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=phylobase [accessed 01 October 2025].

[35] Hamdan B, Bonatto SL, Rödder D, Seixas VC, Ferreira Santos RM, Santana DJ, Machado LG, Kleiz-Ferreira JM, de Freitas MA, Gonzalez RC, Cavalcante T, de Souza MB, Régis CB, Fernandes DS, Fernandes-Ferreira H, Zingali RB. 2024. When a name changes everything: Taxonomy and conservation of the Atlantic bushmaster (Lachesis Daudin, 1803) (Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalinae). Systematics and Biodiversity 22: 2366215.

[36] Hendrixson BE, Bond JE. 2005. Testing species boundaries in the Antrodiaetus unicolor complex (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Antrodiaetidae): “Paraphyly” and cryptic diversity. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36: 405–416.

[37] Isaac NJB, Mallet J, Mace GM. 2004. Taxonomic inflation: Its influence on macroecology and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 464–469.

[38] Kassambara A 2023. rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests, R package version 0.7.2. Available from: https://rpkgs.datanovia.com/rstatix/ [accessed 01 October 2025].

[39] Keck F, Rimet F, Bouchez A, Franc A. 2016. Phylosignal: An R package to measure, test, and explore the phylogenetic signal. Ecology and Evolution 6: 2774–2780.

[40] Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Neter J, Li W. 2005. Applied linear statistical models. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

[41] Lessa T, Stropp J, Hortal J, Ladle RJ. 2024. How taxonomic change influences forecasts of the Linnean shortfall (and what we can do about it)? Journal of Biogeography 51: 1365–1373.

[42] Lin Z. 2024. Modernizing authorship criteria and transparency practices to facilitate open and equitable team science. Accountability in Research 32: 1–24.

[43] Lüdecke D, Ben-Shachar M, Patil I, Waggoner P, Makowski D. 2021. performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. Journal of Open Source Software 6: 3139.

[44] Mahony S, Kamei RG, Brown RM, Chan KO. 2024. Unnecessary splitting of genus-level clades reduces taxonomic stability in amphibians. Vertebrate Zoology 74: 249–277.

[45] Mansfield ER, Helms BP. 1982. Detecting multicollinearity. The American Statistician 36: 158–160.

[46] Mammal Diversity Database (MDD). 2025. Mammal Diversity Database (version 2.1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17033774 [acessed 01 October 2025].

[47] Meiri S. 2018. Traits of lizards of the world: Variation around a successful evolutionary design. Global Ecology and Biogeography 27: 1168–1172.

[48] Moura MR, Carvalho R, Ceron K, Guedes JJM, Moroti MT, Nakamura G 2025. Local expertise anchors biodiversity documentation, but geopolitical power drives parachute discovery. Research Square. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-7724270/v1.

[49] Moura MR, Ceron K, Guedes JJM, Chen-Zhao R, Sica YV, Hart J, Dorman W, Portmann JM, González-del-Pliego P, Ranipeta A, Catenazzi A, Werneck FP, Toledo LF, Upham NS, Tonini JFR, Colston TJ, Guralnick R, Bowie RCK, Pyron RA, Jetz W. 2024. A phylogeny-informed characterisation of global tetrapod traits addresses data gaps and biases. PLoS Biology 22: e3002658.

[50] Moura MR, Costa HC, Peixoto MA, Carvalho ALG, Santana DJ, Vasconcelos HL. 2018. Geographical and socioeconomic determinants of species discovery trends in a biodiversity hotspot. Biological Conservation 220: 237–244.

[51] Moura MR, Jetz W. 2021. Shortfalls and opportunities in terrestrial vertebrate species discovery. Nature Ecology & Evolution 5: 631–639.

[52] Mutanen M, Kivelä SM, Vos RA, Doorenweerd C, Ratnasingham S, Hausmann A, Huemer P, Dincă V, van Nieukerken EJ, Lopez-Vaamonde C, Vila R, Aarvik L, Decaëns T, Efetov KA, Hebert PDN, Johnsen A, Karsholt O, Pentinsaari M, Rougerie R, Segerer A, Tarmann G, Zahiri R, Godfray HCJ. 2016. Species-level para- and polyphyly in DNA barcode gene trees: Strong operational bias in European Lepidoptera. Systematic Biology 65: 1024–1040.

[53] Nakamura G, Soares BE, Pillar VD, Diniz-Filho JAF, Duarte L. 2023. Three pathways to better recognize the expertise of global south researchers. npj Biodiversity 2: 17.

[54] Padial JM, de la Riva I. 2021. A paradigm shift in our view of species drives current trends in biological classification. Biological Reviews 96: 731–751.

[55] Pante E, Schoelinck C, Puillandre N. 2015. From integrative taxonomy to species description: one step beyond. Systematic Biology 64: 152–160.

[56] Parsons DJ, Pelletier TA, Wieringa JG, Duckett DJ, Carstens BC. 2022. Analysis of biodiversity data suggests that mammal species are hidden in predictable places. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119: e2103400119.

[57] Poulin R, Presswell B. 2016. Taxonomic quality of species descriptions varies over time and with the number of authors, but unevenly among parasitic taxa. Systematic Biology 65: 1107–1116.

[58] Pyke GH. 2014. Evaluating the quality of taxonomic publications: a simple alternative to citations and effort. BioScience 64: 961–962.

[59] R Core Team. 2023. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/ [accessed 01 October 2025].

[60] Raposo MA, Stopiglia R, Brito GRR, Bockmann FA, Kirwan GM, Gayon J, Dubois A. 2017. What really hampers taxonomy and conservation? A riposte to Garnett and Christidis (2017). Zootaxa 4317: 179–184.

[61] Revell LJ. 2010. Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1: 319–329.

[62] Sandall EL, Maureaud AA, Guralnick R, McGeoch MA, Sica YV, Rogan MS, Booher DB, Edwards R, Franz N, Ingenloff K, Lucas M, Marsh CJ, McGowan J, Pinkert S, Ranipeta A, Uetz P, Wieczorek J, Jetz W. 2023. A globally integrated structure of taxonomy to support biodiversity science and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 38: 1143–1153.

[63] Sangster G, Luksenburg JA. 2015. Declining rates of species described per taxonomist: slowdown of progress or a side-effect of improved quality in taxonomy? Systematic Biology 64: 144–151.

[64] Schmidt B, Hildebrandt A. 2017. Next-generation sequencing: big data meets high performance computing. Drug Discovery Today 22: 712–717.

[65] Solow AR, Mound LA, Gaston KJ. 1995. Estimating the rate of synonymy. Systematic Biology 44: 93–96.

[66] Streicher JW, Wiens JJ, Jocqué M, García-Vázquez UO, Smith EN. 2023. Molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal both underestimation and overestimation of species diversity in northern rain frogs (Craugastor). Journal of Vertebrate Biology 72: 1–23.

[67] Sullivan KA, Tucker EM, Barve V, Dowdy NJ, Allen JM, Boone JH, Bush SE, Evenhuis NL, Hastriter M, Light JE, Mayfield-Meyer T, Racz GR, Seltmann KC, O'Connor BM, Poelen JH, Zaspel JM. 2023. Building a community-based taxonomic resource for digitization of parasites and their hosts. Insect Systematics and Diversity 7: 1–9.

[68] Thomer AK, Twidale MB, Yoder MJ. 2018. Transforming taxonomic interfaces. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2: 1–23.

[69] Tobler MW, Carrillo-Percastegui SE, Leite Pitman R, Mares R, Powell G. 2008. An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large- and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Animal Conservation 11: 169–178.

[70] Upham NS, Esselstyn JA, Jetz W. 2019. Inferring the mammal tree: species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation. PLoS Biology 17: 1–44.

[71] Valdecasas AG. 2011. An index to evaluate the quality of taxonomic publications. Zootaxa 62: 57–62.

[72] Valdecasas AG, Castroviejo S, Marcus LF. 2000. Reliance on the citation index undermines the study of biodiversity. Nature 403: 698.

[73] Valdecasas AG, Williams D, Wheeler QD. 2008. “Integrative taxonomy” then and now: A response to Dayrat (2005). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 93: 211–216.

[74] Venables WN, Ripley BD. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. New York: Springer.

[75] Weksler M, D'Elía G, Teta P, Bolaños AR, Bocchiglieri A, Delfraro A, Olivares AI, Caccavo A, Portillo A, Bezerra AMR, Percequillo AR, Loss AC, Bernardes-Dias AC, Mendes-Oliveira AC, Costa-Pinto AL, Bender B, de Thoisy B, Marques cf, Cárdenas-González C, Calabuig C, Costa CG, Silva CR, Thompson CW, Cruz-Rodríguez CA, Cisterna DM, Zurc D, Lijtmaer DA, Astúa D, Palma RE, Yepes E, Chiquito EA, Crespo EA, González EM, Meza-Andrade E, Perini FA, Passos FC, Torres-Pérez F, Martin GM, Sabino-Santos G, Garbino GST, Maharaj G, Ramírez-Chaves HE, Pastore H, Oliveira HFM, López-Arévalo HF, Mantilla-Meluk H, Salas JA, Pérez-Torres J, Wickert JC, Barrio J, Hernández JC, Oliveira JA, Colella JP, Castaño JH, Dunnum JL, Brito J, Baldo JL, Salazar-Bravo J, Coda JA, Mena JL, Duarte MJB, Cook JA, do Prado JR, Fernicola JC, Ortiz-Zapata JC, Carrera-E JP, Cárdenas JS, Torres J, Concha KC, Rivero K, Airaldi-Wood K, Monteiro LR, Geise L, Leiva LA, Costa LP, Aguiar LMS, Silveira LF, Camacho MA, dos Santos-Filho M, Barbosa MVM, Montani ME, Piccirilli MG, Pereira MJR, Pires MRS, Cosse M, Sánchez MS, Messias MR, Hidalgo-Cossio M, Alvarez MR, Tammone MN, Lima M, Santillán MÁ, Alfonso M, Pinto-Sánchez NR, Reyes-Amaya N, Cáceres NC, Murillo-García OE, Gonçalves PR, Suárez P, Cordeiro-Estrela P, Maneyro R, Costa RN, Gregorin R, Owen RD, Vilela RV, Barquez RM, Burneo SF, García-Restrepo S, Bogan S, Althoff SL, Solari S, Smith R, González S, Velásquez-Roa T, Freitas TRO, Sinani TRF, Pacheco V, Saavedra VR, Romero V, Hannibal W, Rueda-Isaza X. 2025. A comprehensive survey of mammal collections and genetic resources in South America: challenges and directions. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 146: blaf069.

[76] Wetterstrand KA. 2025. DNA sequencing costs: Data from the NHGRI Genome Sequencing Program (GSP). Available from: www.genome.gov/sequencingcostsdata [accessed 01 October 2025].

[77] Will KW, Mishler BD, Wheeler QD. 2005. The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Systematic Biology 54: 844–851.

[78] Williams DF, Braun SE. 1983. Comparison of pitfall and conventional traps for sampling small mammal populations. The Journal of Wildlife Management 47: 841–845.

[79] Wüster W, Thomson SA, O'shea M, Kaiser H. 2021. Confronting taxonomic vandalism in biology: Conscientious community self-organization can preserve nomenclatural stability. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 645–670.

[80] Ziegler A, Sagorny C. 2021. Holistic description of new deep sea megafauna (Cephalopoda: Cirrata) using a minimally invasive approach. BMC Biology 19: 81.

[81] Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM eds. 2009. Statistics for biology and health. New York: Springer.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Author(s). Journal of Systematics and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences.