Effects of a Full-Solid Waste-Based Soil Stabilizer: Strength, Durability and Microstructure

Zechuan Peng , Yuxin Gao , Wen Yang , Yichuan Zhou , Da Gao

Journal of Wuhan University of Technology Materials Science Edition ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3) : 792 -800.

PDF
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology Materials Science Edition ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3) : 792 -800. DOI: 10.1007/s11595-025-3115-7
Cementitious Materials

Effects of a Full-Solid Waste-Based Soil Stabilizer: Strength, Durability and Microstructure

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This study investigates the use of a low-carbon soil stabilizer called SDG, which is made up of granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), desulfurization gypsum (DG), and calcium carbide slag (CCS), to solidify the soil. The impact of SDG components on the strength and durability of solidified soil was analysed through a series of tests, including unconfined compressive strength, water stability coefficient, water absorption rate, drying-wetting cycles, and shrinkage tests. Furthermore, microstructure characteristics were analysed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The study shows that the solidified soil has excellent strength and durability when the SDG stabilizer contains 60% GGBGS, 10% DG, and 30% CCS. Additionally, increasing the DG content negatively affects the soil’s resistance to water. The SDG stabilizer has potential chemical cementitious characteristics and the calcium carbide slag is rich in calcium ions, which undergo an ion exchange reaction with minerals in the soil. These findings offer new ideas for the development of soil stabilizers.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zechuan Peng, Yuxin Gao, Wen Yang, Yichuan Zhou, Da Gao. Effects of a Full-Solid Waste-Based Soil Stabilizer: Strength, Durability and Microstructure. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology Materials Science Edition, 2025, 40(3): 792-800 DOI:10.1007/s11595-025-3115-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

BaiM, XiaoJ, GaoQ, et al.. Utilization of Construction Spoil and Recycled Powder in Fired Bricks[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2023, 18: e02 024

[2]

NgF, HardingJ A, GlassJ. An Eco-approach to Optimise Efficiency and Productivity of a Hydraulic Excavator[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112: 3966-3976

[3]

XiaoJ, ShenJ, BaiM. Reuse of Construction Spoil in China: Current Status and Future Opportunities[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 290: 125 742

[4]

XiaoJ Z, ShenJ Y, DuanZ H, et al.. Basic Problems and Low-carbon Technical Path of Construction Spoil Recycling[J]. Chin. Sci. Bul., 2023, 68(21): 2722-2736 in Chinese)

[5]

AmiriM, SanjariM, PorhonarF. Microstructural Evaluation of the Cement Stabilization of Hematite-rich Red Soil[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2022, 16: e00 935

[6]

MüllerM, LudwigH-M, HasholtM T. Salt Frost Attack on Concrete: the Combined Effect of Cryogenic Suction and Chloride Binding on Ice Formation[J]. Materials and Structures, 2021, 54(5): 189

[7]

WanY, HuiX, HeX, et al.. Utilization of Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum to Produce Green Binder for Dredged Soil Solidification: Strength, Durability, and Planting Performance[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 367: 133 076

[8]

ShenW, ZhouM, ZhaoQ. Study on Lime-fly Ash-phosphogypsum Binder[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2007, 21(7): 1480-1485

[9]

PengE, LiD, HuX, et al.. Feasibility of Ramming Erosion Area of Earthen Sites Using Solidified Soil Induced by an Ancient Curing Agent, Calcined Ginger Nuts[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 370: 130 442

[10]

SaussayeL, BoutouilM, BaraudF, et al.. Influence of Anions on the Geotechnical Properties of Soils Treated with Hydraulic Binders: Individual and Coupling Effects[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 65: 303-309

[11]

ZhangJ, YaoB, SunY, et al.. Study of the Effects of an Ionic Stabilizer on the Permeability of Gangue Bonding Material[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 345: 128 325

[12]

Soltani-JighehH, BagheriM, Amani-GhadimA R. Use of Hydrophilic Polymeric Stabilizer to Improve Strength and Durability of Finegrained Soils[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2019, 157: 187-195

[13]

SoltaniA, DengA, TaheriA, et al.. Intermittent Swelling and Shrinkage of a Highly Expansive Soil Treated with Polyacrylamide[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 14(1): 252-261

[14]

PanovaI G, IlyasovL O, KhaidapovaD D, et al.. Soil Conditioners Based on Anionic Polymer and Anionic Micro-sized Hydrogel: A Comparative Study[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2021, 610: 125 635

[15]

HanZ, ChengX, MaQ. An Experimental Study on Dynamic Response for MICP Strengthening Liquefiable Sands[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2016, 15(4): 673-679

[16]

PooniJ, GiustozziF, RobertD, et al.. Durability of Enzyme Stabilized Expansive Soil in Road Pavements Subjected to Moisture Degradation[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2019, 21: 100 255

[17]

ChangI, LeeM, TranA T P, et al.. Review on Biopolymer-based Soil Treatment (BPST) Technology in Geotechnical Engineering Practices[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2020, 24: 100 385

[18]

WangD, GaoX, LiuX, et al.. Strength, Durability and Microstructure of Granulated Blast Furnace Slag-modified Magnesium Oxychloride Cement Solidified Waste Sludge[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 292: 126 072

[19]

BashaE A, HashimR, MahmudH B, et al.. Stabilization of Residual Soil with Rice Husk Ash and Cement[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2005, 19(6): 448-453

[20]

James J, Pandian P K. Industrial Wastes as Auxiliary Additives to Cement/Lime Stabilization of Soils[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2016: 1 687–8 086

[21]

KosarimovahhedM, ToufighV. Sustainable Usage of Waste Materials as Stabilizer in Rammed Earth Structures[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 277: 123 279

[22]

DegirmenciN, OkucuA, TurabiA. Application of Phosphogypsum in Soil Stabilization[J]. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(9): 3393-3398

[23]

WuJ, ZhengX Y, YangA W, et al.. Experimental Study on the Compressive Strength of Muddy Clay Solidified by the One-part Slag-fly Ash Based Geopolymer[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(3): 647-655(in Chinese)

[24]

CuiC, YuC, ZhaoJ, et al.. Steel Slag/Precarbonated Steel Slag as a Partial Substitute for Portland Cement: Effect on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Stabilized Soils[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2022, 26: 3803-3814

[25]

LiJ, ChengY, HanF, et al.. Experimental Research on Sslag-bottom Ash-calcium Carbide Slag Stabilized Silty Clay for Sub-grade Filling[J]. Transport Research, 2022, 8(1): 130-140(in Chinese)

[26]

BarmanP, SinghB. Influence of Tyre Buffings and Cement on Strength Behaviour of Soil-Fly Ash Mixes[J]. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2017, 3(1): 34-43

[27]

Akcanca F, Aytekin M. Effect of Wetting-drying Cycles on Swelling Behavior of Lime Stabilized Sand-bentonite Mixtures[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2012: 67–74

[28]

Okagbue C O. Stabilization of Clay Using Woodash[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2007: 14–18

[29]

ZhouY, PengZ, ChenL, et al.. The Influence of Two Types of Alkali Activators on the Microstructure and Performance of Supersulfated Cement Concrete: Mitigating the Strength and Carbonation Resistance[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 118: 103 947

[30]

WangY, ZhangS, NiuD, et al.. Quantitative Evaluation of the Characteristics of Air Voids and Their Relationship with the Permeability and Salt Freeze-thaw Resistance of Hybrid Steel-polypropylene Fiber-reinforced Concrete Composites[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 125: 104 292

[31]

JiangL, LiC, WangC, et al.. Utilization of Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum as an Activation Agent for High-volume Slag Concrete[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 205: 589-598

[32]

WansomS, ChintasongkroP, SrijampanW. Water Resistant Blended Cements Containing Flue-gas Desulfurization Gypsum, Portland Cement and Fly Ash for Structural Applications[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2019, 103: 134-148

[33]

WuL, FarzadniaN, ShiC, et al.. Autogenous Shrinkage of High Performance Concrete: A review[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 149: 62-75

[34]

Toledo FilhoR D, GhavamiK, SanjuánM A, et al.. Free, Restrained and Drying Shrinkage of Cement Mortar Composites Reinforced with Vegetable Fibres[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2005, 27(5): 537-546

[35]

XuanD X, MolenaarA A A, HoubenL J M. Evaluation of Cement Treatment of Reclaimed Construction and Demolition Waste as Road Bases[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 100: 77-83

[36]

XuF, WeiH, QianW, et al.. Composite Alkaline Activator on Cemented Soil: Multiple Tests and Mechanism Analyses[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 188: 433-443

[37]

AllenA J, ThomasJ J, JenningsH M. Composition and Density of Nanoscale Calcium-silicate-hydrate in Cement[J]. Nature Materials, 2007, 6(4): 311-316

[38]

ZhouY, PengZ, ChenL, et al.. Double-sided Tuning Effects of Lactic Acid on the Hydration, Microstructure and Strength of Supersulfated Cement[J]. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2022, 12(2): 170-183

[39]

XingJ, ZhouY, PengZ, et al.. The Influence of Different Kinds of Weak Acid Salts on the Macro- performance, Micro-structure, and Hydration Mechanism of the Supersulfated Cement[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 66: 105 937

[40]

YlménR, JäglidU, SteenariB, et al.. Early Hydration and Setting of Portland Cement Monitored by IR, SEM and Vicat Techniques[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2009, 39(5): 433-439

[41]

ZhangJ, LiG, YeW, et al.. Effects of Ordinary Portland Cement on the Early Properties and Hydration of Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 186: 1144-1153

[42]

PengZ, ZhouY, WangJ, et al.. The Impediment and Promotion Effects and Mechanisms of Lactates on the Hydration of Supersulfated Cements-Aiming at a Performance Enhancement[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 341: 130 751

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Wuhan University of Technology and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, Part of Springer Nature

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

148

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/