Fatigue Behavior of a Dissimilar Aluminum Alloy Welding Joint With and Without Natural Defect

Abstract

In order to investigate the influence of natural defect on the fatigue behavior of 5A06/7A05 dissimilar aluminum alloys welding joint, fatigue tests of two types of specimens with and without defects were carried out systematically under stress amplitude control conditions (stress ratio R=0.1) at normal temperature in laboratory air condition. Furthermore, a new parameter, i e, fatigue defect effect factor (FDEF) was introduced to assess the effect of defect on fatigue strength. The fatigue failure analysis was conducted as well to compare the fatigue and fracture behavior of the two types of specimens. The results show that: (1) natural defects have a strong effect on the fatigue lives of welding joint, and the differences between the specimens with and without defects can reach 80 times under a same theoretical net sectional stress; (2) the FDEF parameter introduced is effective to deal with the defect effect, and the FDEF decreases along with the increase of fatigue life. The mean relative error between the experimental data and predicted fatigue strength based on the FDEF is 10.2%; (3) the macro fracture of both types of specimens have three typical zones, i e, fatigue source zone, crack propagation zone and final fracture zone, while there are more than one fatigue sources for specimens with natural defects. The overall pattern of crack propagation zone and fracture zone are quite similar, but the morphologies are different in details.

Keywords

aluminum alloys / welding joint / natural defect / fatigue life / scanning electron microscope (SEM)

References

[1] Heinz A, Haszler A, Keidel C, et al. Recent Development in Aluminium Alloys for Aerospace Applications[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, 280(1): 102-107.

[2] Miller W S, Zhuang L, Bottema J, et al. Recent Development in Aluminum Alloys for the Automotive Industry[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, 280(1): 37-49.

[3] Wu X R, Newman J C, Zhao W, et al. Small Crack Growth and Fatigue Life Predictions for High-strength Aluminium Alloys. Part 1; Experimental and Fracture Mechanics Analysis[J]. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2000, 23(1): 59-72.

[4] Wen W, Zhao Y, Morris J G. The Effect of Mg Precipitation on the Mechanical Properties of 5xxx Aluminum Alloys[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 392(1–2): 136-144.

[5] Kumar P V, Reddy G M, Rao K S. Microstructure, Mechanical and Corrosion Behavior of High Strength AA7075 Aluminium Alloy Friction Stir Welds — Effect of Post Weld Heat Treatment[J]. Defence Technology, 2015, 11(1): 362-369.

[6] Niu P L, Li W Y, Vairis A, et al. Cyclic Deformation Behavior of Friction-stir-welded Dissimilar AA5083-to-AA2024 Joints: Effect of Microstructure and Loading History[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, 744(1): 145-153.

[7] Kang J, Chen Y, Sigler D, et al. Effect of Adhesive on Fatigue Property of Aural2 to AA5754 Dissimilar Aluminum Alloy Resistance Spot Welds[J]. Eng. Fail. Anal., 2016, 69(1): 57-65.

[8] Sundaram N S, Murugan N. Tensile Behavior of Dissimilar Friction Stir Welded Joints of Aluminum Alloys[J]. Mater. Des., 2010, 31(9): 4 184-4 193.

[9] Kumar A, Sundarrajan S. Optimization of Pulsed TIG Welding Process Parameters on Mechanical Properties of AA 5456 Aluminum Alloy Weldments[J]. Mater. Des., 2009, 30(4): 1 288-1 297.

[10] Li H, Zou J S, Yao J S, et al. The Effect of TIG Welding Techniques on Microstructure, Properties and Porosity of the Welded Joint of 2219 Aluminum Alloy[J]. J. Alloy. Compd., 2017, 727(1): 531-539.

[11] Zhan X H, Zhao Y Q, Liu Z M, et al. Microstructure and Porosity Characteristics of 5A06 Aluminum Alloy Joints Using Laser-MIG Hybrid Welding[J]. J. Manuf. Process., 2018, 35(10): 437-445.

[12] Crawford R, Cook G E, Strauss A M, et al. Experimental Defect Analysis and Force Prediction Simulation of High Weld Pitch Friction Stir Welding[J]. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2006, 11(6): 657-665.

[13] Wu S C, Yu C, Zhang W H, et al. Porosity Induced Fatigue Damage of Laser Welded 7075-T6 Joints Investigated Via Synchrotron X-Ray Microtomography[J]. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2015, 20(1): 11-19.

[14] Liu H, Yang S, Xie C, et al. Microstructure Characterization and Mechanism of Fatigue Crack Initiation Near Pores for 6005A CMT Welded Joint[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, 707(1): 22-29.

[15] Gaur V, Enoki M, Okada T, et al. A Study on Fatigue Behavior of MIG-Welded Al-Mg Alloy With Different Filler-Wire Materials Under Mean Stress[J]. Int. J. Fatigue, 2018, 107(1): 119-129.

[16] Chen H B, Yan K, Lin T, et al. The Investigation of Typical Welding Defects for 5456 Aluminum Alloy Friction Stir Welds[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, 433(1–2): 64-69.

[17] Kah P, Rajan R, Martikainen J, et al. Investigation of Weld Defects in Friction-Stir Welding and Fusion Welding of Aluminium Alloys[J]. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2015, 10: 26-36.

[18] Buffière J Y, Savelli S, Jouneau P H, et al. Experimental Study of Porosity and Its Relation to Fatigue Mechanisms of Model Al-Si7-Mg0.3 Cast Al Alloys[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2001, 316(1/2): 115-126.

[19] Nicoletto G, Konečná R, Fintova S. Characterization of Microshrinkage Casting Defects of Al-Si Alloys by X-Ray Computed Tomography and Metallography[J]. Int. J. Fatigue, 2012, 41(1): 39-46.

[20] Bracquart B, Mareau C, Saintier N, et al. Experimental Study of The Impact of Geometrical Defects on The High Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Polycrystalline Aluminium With Different Grain Sizes[J]. Int. J. Fatigue, 2018, 109(1): 17-25.

[21] Karry R W, Dolan T J. Influence of Grain Size on Fatigue Notch-sensitivity[J]. ASTM Proc, 1953, 53(1): 789-804.

[22] Vincent M, Nadot Y, Nadot-Martin C, et al. Interaction Between a Surface Defect and Grain Size Under High Cycle Fatigue Loading: Experimental Approach for Armco Iron[J]. Int. J. Fatigue, 2016, 87(1): 81-90.

[23] Praveen P, Yarlagadda P K D V. Meeting Challenges in Welding of Aluminum Alloys Through Pulse Gas Metal Arc Welding[J]. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2005, 164(0): 1 106-1 112.

[24] Garcia R, Lopez V H, Kennedy A R, et al. Welding of Al -359 /20% Sic_p Metal Matrix Composites by the Novel MIG Process with Indirect Electric Arc(IEA)[J]. J. Mater. Sci., 2007, 42(18): 7 794-7 800.

[25] Garcia R, Lopez V H, Bedolla E, et al. A Comparative Study of The MIG Welding of Al/TiC Composites Using Direct And Indirect Electric Arc Processes[J]. J. Mater. Sci., 2003, 38(12): 2 271-2 779.

[26] Wang W K, Cao Z Q, Liu K, et al. Fabrication and Mechanical Properties of Tungsten Inert Gas Welding Ring Welded Joint of 7A05-T6/5A06-O Dissimilar Aluminum Alloy[J]. Materials, 2018, 7: 1 156.

[27] ASTM Committee on Standards. Standard Practice for Contact Ultrasonic Testing of Welds Using Phased Arrays[S]. ASTM E2700, 2009

[28] ASTM Committee on Standards. Standard Practice for Conducting Force Controlled Constant Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials[S]. ASTM E466, 2015

[29] Kachanov L M. Introduction to Continuum Damage Mechanics[M], 1986 Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

[30] Yao W, Xia K, Gu Y. On the Fatigue Notch Factor Kf[J]. Int. J. Fatigue, 1995, 17(1): 245-251.

[31] Yang X G, Dong C L, Shi D Q, et al. Experimental Investigation on Both Low Cycle Fatigue and Fracture Behavior of DZ125 Base Metal and the Brazed Joint At Elevated Temperature[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528(22): 7 005-7 011.

[32] Beachm C D, Warke W R. Fractography-microscopic Cracking Process[S]. ASTM STP600, 1976

[33] Lin S, Deng Y L, Tang J G, et al. Microstructures and Fatigue Behavior of Metal-inert-gas-welded Joints for Extruded Al-Mg-Si Alloy[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, 745(1): 63-73.

[34] Tsoukalas D V. Development of A Knowledge-Based Engineering System for Diagnosis and Alleviation of Defects in Aluminium Welding[J]. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B-J. Eng. Manuf., 2008, 222(2): 255-266.

[35] Chen C Y. Fatigue and Fracture[M], 2002 Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press. (in Chinese)