Experimental Study on AE Characteristics of Granite under Uniaxial Tension at Different Strain Rates

Yan Wang , Na Wang , Zhaozhu Wang , Yuzhi Chen , Yao Wang , Haitao Zhao

Journal of Wuhan University of Technology Materials Science Edition ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4) : 691 -698.

PDF
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology Materials Science Edition ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4) : 691 -698. DOI: 10.1007/s11595-020-2309-2
Advanced Materials

Experimental Study on AE Characteristics of Granite under Uniaxial Tension at Different Strain Rates

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

To investigate the acoustic emission (AE) characteristics of quasi-brittle materials like rock and concrete, and to further analyze their damage and failure mechanism under seismic and other dynamic loads, the uniaxial tension test of granite cylinder specimens within the strain rate range of 10−7-10−4 s−1 was monitored by AE technology, and the typical AE characteristic parameters were analyzed using statistical and correlation analysis. The experimental results show that, with the increase of strain rate, the peak of AE hit rate appears earlier and increases; the proportion of AE hits with higher duration or amplitude increases significantly, the b-value shows a decreasing trend, and the distribution of AE frequency-amplitude is increasingly discrete. In addition, the obvious characteristic of double dominant frequency bands was observed in AE waveforms by using spectrum analysis, with the increase of strain rate, the percentage of A-type waveforms corresponding to low dominant frequency band increases, while that of D-type waveforms corresponding to high ones decreases accordingly, which is significance for the further study of the damage and failure mechanism of quasi-brittle materials.

Keywords

granite / strain rate / uniaxial tension / AE characteristics / spectrum analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yan Wang, Na Wang, Zhaozhu Wang, Yuzhi Chen, Yao Wang, Haitao Zhao. Experimental Study on AE Characteristics of Granite under Uniaxial Tension at Different Strain Rates. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology Materials Science Edition, 2020, 35(4): 691-698 DOI:10.1007/s11595-020-2309-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Farnam Y, Geiker MR, Bentz D, et al. Acoustic Emission Waveform Characterization of Crack Origin and Mode in Fractured and ASR Damaged Concrete[J]. Cem. Concr. Compos., 2015, 60: 135-145.

[2]

Wang Y, Hu HX, Lu GJ, et al. Effects of Specimen Height on the Acoustic Emission Rate Value ‘a’ for Cement Mortar[J]. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol., -Mater. Sci. Ed., 2016, 31(4): 843-850.

[3]

Moradian Z, Einstein HH, Ballivy G. Detection of Cracking Levels in Brittle Rocks by Parametric Analysis of the Acoustic Emission Signals[J]. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 2016, 49(3): 785-800.

[4]

Wang Y, Chen SJ, Xu ZZ, et al. Damage Processes of Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Mortar in Different Fiber Content Revealed by Acoustic Emission Behavior[J]. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol., -Mater. Sci. Ed., 2018, 33(1): 155-163.

[5]

Nasseri MHB, Mohanty B, Young RP. Fracture Toughness Measurements and Acoustic Emission Activity in Brittle Rocks[J]. Pure Appl. Geophys., 2006, 163(5–6): 917-945.

[6]

Gang L, Xiao FK, Cheng QL, et al. Experimental Study on Acoustic Emission Characteristics of Dry and Saturated Basalt Columnar Joints under Uniaxial Compression and Tensile Damage[J]. Shock Vib., 2019, 2019: 1-12.

[7]

Tham LG, Liu H, Tang CA, et al. On Tension Failure of 2-D Rock Specimens and Associated Acoustic Emission[J]. Rock Mech. Rock Engng. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 2005, 38(1): 1-19.

[8]

Li Z, Li FM, Li XS, et al. P-wave Arrival Determination and AE Characterization of Concrete[J]. J. Eng. Mech., 2000, 126(2): 194-200.

[9]

Behnia A, Chai HK, Shiotani T. Advanced Structural Health Monitoring of Concrete Structures with the Aid of Acoustic Emission[J]. Constr. Build. Mater., 2014, 65: 282-302.

[10]

Ji HG, Wang HW, Cao SZ, et al. Experimental Research on Frequency Characteristics of Acoustic Emission Signals under Upniaxial Compression of Granite[J]. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng., 2012, 31(SUPPL.1): 2 900-2 905.

[11]

Li LR, Deng JH, Zheng L, et al. Dominant Frequency Characteristics of Acoustic Emissions in White Marble during Direct Tensile Tests[J]. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 2017, 50(5): 1 337-1 346.

[12]

Shen DJ, Liu XZ, Li QY, et al. Early-age Behavior and Cracking Resistance of High-strength Concrete Reinforced with Dramix 3D Steel Fiber[J]. Constr. Build. Mater., 2019, 196: 307-316.

[13]

Wang Y, Li X, Zheng B. Stress-strain Behavior of Soil-rock Mixture at Medium Strain Rates — Response to Seismic Dynamic Loading[J]. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 2017, 93: 7-17.

[14]

Hou Z, Gutierrez M, Ma S, et al. Mechanical Behavior of Shale at Different Strain Rates[J]. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 2019: 1–14

[15]

Wang Y, Wu SX, Zhou JK, et al. Experimental Study of Dynamic Axial Tensile Mechanical Properties of Granite[J]. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng., 2010, 29(11): 2 328-2 336.

[16]

Sagasta F, Zitto ME, Piotrkowsk R, et al. Acoustic Emission Energy b-value for Local Damage Evaluation in Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Loadings[J]. Mech. Syst. Signal. Pr., 2018, 102: 262-277.

[17]

Feng W, Liu F, Yang F, et al. Experimental Study on Dynamic Split Tensile Properties of Rubber Concrete[J]. Constr. Build. Mater., 2018, 165: 675-687.

[18]

Cho S H, Ogata Y, Kaneko K. Strain-rate Dependency of the Dynamic Tensile Strength of Rock[J]. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min., 2003, 40(5): 763-777.

[19]

Backers T, Stanchits S, Dresen G. Tensile Fracture Propagation and Acoustic Emission Activity in Sandstone: The Effect of Loading Rate[J]. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min., 2005, 42(7–8): 1 094-1 101.

[20]

Wang Y, Chen SJ, Ge L, et al. Analysis of Dynamic Tensile Process of Fiber Reinforced Concrete by Acoustic Emission Technique[J]. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol., -Mater. Sci. Ed., 2018, 33(5): 1 129-1 139.

[21]

Khazaei C, Hazzard J, Chalaturnyk R. Damage Quantification of Intact Rocks Using Acoustic Emission Energies Recorded during Uniaxial Compression Test and Discrete Element Modeling[J]. Comput. Geotech., 2015, 67: 94-102.

[22]

Sagar RV, Prasad BKR, Kumar SS. An Experimental Study on Cracking Evolution in Concrete and Cement Mortar by the b-value Analysis of Acoustic Emission Technique[J]. Cem. Concr. Res., 2012, 42(8): 1 094-1 104.

[23]

Wang Y, Wu SX, Zhou JK. Experiment on Acoustic Emission Characteristics of Dam Concrete under Dynamic Bending Tension[J]. Nondestr. Test., 2009, (2): 115–119

[24]

Hamstad MA. A Review: Acoustic Emission, a Tool for Composite-materials Studies[J]. Exp. Mech., 1986, 26(1): 7-13.

[25]

Kim JS, Lee KS, Cho WJ, et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Stress-Strain and Acoustic Emission Methods for Quantitative Damage Assessments of Brittle Rock[J]. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 2015, 48(2): 495-508.

[26]

Deng JH, Li LR, Chen F, et al. Twin-peak Frequencies of Acoustic Emission due to the Fracture of Marble and Their Possible Mechanism[J]. Adv. Eng. Mater., 2018, 50(5): 2 096-3 246.

[27]

Hu SW, Lu J, Xiao FP. Evaluation of Concrete Fracture Procedure based on Acoustic Emission Parameters[J]. Constr. Build. Mater., 2013, 47: 1 249-1 256.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

121

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/