The Failure Mechanisms of Ultra-high Molecular Weight Polyethylene Fibre Composites Under In-plane Compression

Abstract

The in-plane compressive characteristics of the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibre (Dyneema®) reinforced composites, both in 0/90° and ±45° fibre orientations with respect to the loading direction, have been investigated. The composite made from unidirectional high modulus fibres (volume fraction 83%) and low strength polyurethane matrix (volume fraction 17%) is layered in an orthogonally alternating manner. The different failure mechanisms for the composites with 0/90° and ±45° fibre orientations have been detected with the methods of experimental measurement, SEM observation and theoretical analysis. The composites specimens of 0/90° fibre orientation failed with macro-buckling of the high-modulus UHMWEP fibre layers with the matrix damage, whereas the specimens of ±45° fibre orientation failed with the shearing of the soft matrix. Hence, the composite specimens in 0/90° fibre orientation had higher stiffness as well as compressive strength than those in ±45° fibre orientation. The failure criteria of the composites under in-plane compression was employed to characterize the failure mechanism. Compared with the traditional thermoset matrix, the soft thermoplastic matrix leads to lower strength and higher failure strain of fibre reinforced composites under in-plane compression. In addition, the composite specimens cut by waterjet machine exhibited higher stress levels than those cut by bandsaw that introduced more initial imperfections with the temperature rising and tensile shocking. The comparison between the methodologies for cutting the tough composites can provide a valuable suggestion to obtain required composite structures without reducing the mechanical properties.

Keywords

UHMWPE fibre composites / in-plane compression / failure mechanisms / fibre buckling / matrix shearing

References

[1] Jacobs MN, Dingenen JLJV. Ballistic Protection Mechanisms in Personal Armour[J]. J. Mater. Sci., 2001, 36: 3137-3142.

[2] Karthikeyan K, Russell BP, Fleck NA, et al. The Effect of Shear Strength on the Ballistic Response of Laminated Composite Plates[J]. Eur. J. Mech. A-Solid., 2013, 42: 35-53.

[3] Chocron S, King N, Bigger R, et al. Impacts and Waves in Dyneema®HB80 Strips and Laminates[J]. J. App.Mech., 2013, 80: 1-10.

[4] O’Masta MR, Crayton DH, Deshpande VS, et al. Mechanisms of Penetration in Polyethylene Reinforced Cross-ply Laminates[J]. Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2015, 86: 249-264.

[5] Tan VC, Khoo KJL. Perforation of Flexible Laminates by Projectiles of Different Geometry[J]. Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2005, 31: 793-810.

[6] Bilsik AK, Turhan Y. Multidirectional Stitched Layered Aramid Woven Fabric Structures and their Experimental Characterization of Ballistic Performance[J]. Text. Res. J., 2009, 79: 1331-1343.

[7] Termonia Y. Impact Resistance of Woven Fabrics[J]. Text. Res. J., 2004, 74: 723-729.

[8] Bilisik K. Two-dimensional (2D) Fabrics and Three-dimensional (3D) Preforms for Ballistic and Stabbing Protection: A Review[J]. Text. Res. J., 2016, 87: 2275-2304.

[9] Karthikeyan K, Russell BP, Fleck NA, et al. The Soft Impact Response of Composite Laminate Beams[J]. Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2013, 60: 24-36.

[10] Tagarielli VL, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA. The Dynamic Response of Composite Sandwich Beams to Transverse Impact[J]. Int. J. Solids. Struct., 2007, 44: 2442-2457.

[11] Liu G, Thouless MD, Deshpande VS, et al. Collapse of a Composite Beam Made From Ultra High Molecular-weight Polyethylene Fibres[J]. J. Mech. Phys. Solids., 2014, 63: 320-335.

[12] Russell BP, Karthikeyan K, Deshpande VS, et al. The High Strain Rate Response of Ultra High Molecular-weight Polyethylene: From Fibre to Laminate[J]. Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2013, 60: 1-9.

[13] Attwood JP, Khaderi SN, Karthikeyan K, et al. The Out-of-plane Compressive Response of Dyneema® Composites[J]. J. Mech. Phys. Solids., 2014, 70: 200-226.

[14] Greenhalgh ES, Bloodworth VM, Iannucci L, et al. Fractographic Observations on Dyneema® Composites under Ballistic Impact[J]. Compos. Part A: App. S, 2013, 44: 51-62.

[15] Castaneda N, Wisner B, Cuadra J, et al. Investigation of the Z-binder Role in Progressive Damage of 3D Woven Composites[J]. Compos. Part A: Appl. S, 2017, 98: 76-89.

[16] Hart KR, Chia PXL, Sheridan LE, et al. Mechanisms and Characterization of Impact Damage in 2D and 3D Woven Fiber-reinforced Composites[J]. Compos.Part A: Appl.S, 2017, 101: 432-443.

[17] Budiansky B, Fleck NA. Compressive Failure of Fibre Composites[J]. J. Mech. Phys. Solids., 1993, 41: 183-211.

[18] Budiansky B, Fleck NA. Compressive Kinking of Fibre Composites[J]. App. Mech. Rev., 1994, 47: 246-250.

[19] Park S, Russell BP, Deshpande VS, et al. Dynamic Compressive Response of Composite Square Honeycombs[J]. Compos. Part A: App.S, 2012, 43: 527-536.

[20] Jumahat A, Soutis C, Jones FR, et al. Fracture Mechanisms and Failure Analysis of Carbon Fibre/Toughened Epoxy Composites Subjected to Compressive Loading[J]. Compos.Struct., 2010, 92: 295-305.

[21] Russell BP, Deshpande VS, Wadley HNG. Quasi-static Deformation and Failure Modes of Composite Square Honeycombs[J]. J. Mech. Mater. Struct., 2008, 3: 1315-1340.

[22] Feng L, Li K, Xue B, et al. Optimizing Matrix and Fiber/Matrix Interface to Achieve Combination of Strength, Ductility and Toughness in Carbon Nanotube-reinforced Carbon/Carbon Composites[J]. Mater. Design., 2017, 113: 9-16.

[23] Shokrieh MM, Omidi MJ. Compressive Response of Glass–fiber Reinforced Polymeric Composites to Increasing Compressive Strain Rates[J]. Compos. Struct., 2009, 89: 517-523.

[24] Lee SH, Waas AM. Compressive Response and Failure of Fiber Reinforced Unidirectional Composites[J]. Int. J. Fracture, 1999, 100: 275-306.

[25] Hart KR, Chia PXL, Sheridan LE, et al. Comparison of Compression-After-Impact and Flexure-After-Impact Protocols for 2D and 3D Woven Fiber-reinforced Composites[J]. Compos. Part A: App. S, 2017, 101: 471-479.

[26] Smith P, Lemstra PJ. Ultra-high-strength Polyethylene Filaments by Solution Spinning/ Drawing[J]. J. Mater. Sci., 1979, 15: 505-514.

[27] Smith P, Lemstra PJ. Ultra-high Strength Polyethylene Filaments by Solution Spinning/Drawing. 3. Influence of Drawing Temperature[J]. Poly., 1980, 21: 1341-1343.

[28] Turner P, Liu T, Zeng X. Collapse of 3D Orthogonal Woven Carbon Fibre Composites under In-plane Tension-compression and Out-of-plane Bending[J]. Compos. Struct., 2016, 142: 286-297.

[29] Zhang Y, Liu T, Xu Z. Dynamic Response of Hybrid Carbon Fibre Laminate Beams under Ballistic Impact[J]. Compos. Struct., 2019, 210: 409-420.