Effects of aging temperature on microstructure and high cycle fatigue performance of 7075 aluminum alloy

Abstract

The hardness, the tensile and the high-cycle fatigue (HCF) performances of 7075 aluminum alloy were investigated under temper T651, solution treated at 380 °C for 0.5 h and aged at different temperatures (150, 170, 190 °C) for 10 hours. The optimal microstructures and the fatigue fracture surfaces were observed. The results show that the hardness and the tensile performances are at their optimum at T651, but the fatigue life is the shortest. The hardness and the elongation are the lowest after solution treatment. With the aging temperature increasing (150-190 °C), the HCF is improved. The crack is initiated from the impurity particles on the subsurface. Treated at 170 °C,the area of the quasi-cleavage plane and the width of parallel serrated sections of the crack propagation are the largest. With increasing aging temperature, the dimple size of finally fracture surfaces becomes larger and the depth deeper.

Keywords

creep aging forming (CAF) / high cycle fatigue (HCF) / microstructure / 7075 aluminum alloy

References

[1] Zhu A W, Starke E A. Materials Aspects of Age-Forming of Al-xCu Alloys[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2001, 117(3): 354-358.

[2] Inforzato D J, Costa J P R, Fernandez F F, et al. Creep-Age Forming of AA7475 Aluminum Panels for Aircraft Lower Wing Skin Application[J]. Materials Research, 2012, 15(4): 596-602.

[3] Cheng W. Application of Advanced Aluminum Alloys in A380 Structures[J]. Aviation Maintenance & Engineering, 2005, 50(2): 41-47.

[4] Adachi T, Kimura S, Nagayama T, et al. Age Forming Technology for Aircraft Wing Skin, 2004

[5] Sarioglu F, Orhaner F Ö. Effect of Prolonged Heating at 130 °C on Fatigue Crack Propagation of 2024 Al Alloy in Three Orientations[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 1998, 248(1): 115-119.

[6] Bray G H, Glazov M, Rioja R J, et al. Effect of Artificial Aging on the Fatigue Crack Propagation Resistance of 2000 Series Aluminum Alloys[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2001, 23(1): 265-276.

[7] Jin X, Wan M, Li C. Effect of Creep Age Forming on Fatigue for 7B04 Aluminum Alloy[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2011, 36(2): 124-127.

[8] Zhan L H, Li Y U, Huang M H. Microstructures and Properties of 2124 Alloy Creep Ageing under Stress[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2012, 43(3): 926

[9] Zhu A W, Starke E A. Stress Aging of Al-xCu Alloys: Experiments[J]. Acta Materialia, 2001, 49(12): 2285-2295.

[10] Liu J H, Li D, Liu P Y, et al. Effect of Ageing and Retrogression Treatments on Mechanical and Corrosion Properties of 7075 Aluminum Alloy[J]. Transactions of Metal Heat Treatment, 2002, 23(1): 50-54.

[11] Zhu C C, Luo J Y. Stretch Rate and Deformation for Pre-stretching Aluminum Alloy Sheet[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(4): 875-881.

[12] Zhan L H, Li Y G, Huang M H. Effect of Process Parameters on Microstructures of 7055 Aluminum Alloy in Creep Age Forming[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2011, 80(1): 40-45.

[13] ASTM. Tension Testing of Metallic Materials (Metric), 2004

[14] ASTM. Standard Practice for Conducting Force Controlled Constant Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials, 2007

[15] Yin Z P. Structural Fatigue and Fracture, 2012 Shanxi: Northwestern Polytechnical University Press.

[16] Chen C Y. Fatigue and Fracture, 2005 Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press.

[17] Basquin O H. The Exponential Law of Endurance Tests, 1910

[18] Weibull W. Fatigue Testing and Analysis of Esults, 1961 London: Pergamon Press.

[19] Cui Y X, Wang C L. Metal Fracture Analysis, 1998 Harbin: Harbin Industrial University Press.

[20] Liu X L, Zhang Z, Tao C H. Fatigue Fracture Quantitative Analysis, 2010 Beijing: National Defense Industry Press.

[21] Srivatsan T S. An Investigation of the Cyclic Fatigue and Fracture Behavior of Aluminum Alloy 7055[J]. Materials & Design, 2002, 23(2): 141-15.