In-service structural health monitoring of a full-scale composite horizontal tail

Abstract

In-service structural health monitoring (SHM) technologies are critical for the utilization of composite aircraft structures. We developed a Lamb wave-based in-service SHM technology using built-in piezoelectric actuator/sensor networks to monitor delamination extension in a full-scale composite horizontal tail. The in-service SHM technology combine of damage rapid monitoring (DRM) stage and damage imaging diagnosis (DID) stage allows for real-time monitoring and long term tracking of the structural integrity of composite aircraft structures. DRM stage using spearman rank correlation coefficient was introduced to generate a damage index which can be used to monitor the trend of damage extension. The DID stage based on canonical correlation analysis aimed at intuitively highlighting structural damage regions in two-dimensional images. The DRM and DID stages were trialed by an in-service SHM experiment of CFRP T-joint. Finally, the detection capability of the in-service SHM technology was verified in the SHM experiment of a full-scale composite horizontal tail. Experimental results show that the rapid monitoring method effectively monitors the damage occurrence and extension tendency in real time; damage imaging diagnosis results are consistent with those from the failure model of the composite horizontal tail structure.

Keywords

in-service structural health monitoring / full-scale composite horizontal tail / lamb wave / damage rapid monitoring / damage imaging diagnosis

References

[1] Purekar A, Kothari K, Choi Y, et al. Structural Health Monitoring for Bell 407 Tail Boom. Annual Forum Proceedings-American Helicopter Society, London, 2009 Lancaster: Destech Publications.

[2] Diamanti K, Soutis C. Structural Health Monitoring Techniques For Aircraft Composite Structures [J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2010, 46(8): 342-352.

[3] Qing XP, Beard SJ, Kumar A, et al. A Real-Time Active Smart Patch System for Monitoring the Integrity of Bonded Repair on an Aircraft Structure [J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2006, 15(3): 66

[4] Zak A, Ostachowicz W, Krawczuk M. Damage Detection Strategies for Aircraft Shell-Like Structures Based on Propagation Guided Elastic Waves, 2011 Oxford: IOP Publishing.

[5] Summerscales LKR, Hinders MK. Automatic Multi-Mode Lamb Wave Arrival Time Extraction for Improved Tomographic Reconstruction[J]. Inverse Problems, 2004, 206: 1873.

[6] Su Z, L Y, Y L. Guided Lamb Waves for Identification of Damage in Composite Structures: A Review [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006, 295(3): 753-780.

[7] Yu L, Giurgiutiu V. In-Situ Optimized PWAS Phased Arrays for Lamb Wave Structural Health Monitoring[J]. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, 2007, 23: 459-487.

[8] Zhou C, Su Z, Cheng L. Probability-Based Diagnostic Imaging Using Hybrid Features Extracted from Ultrasonic Lamb Wave Signals [J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2011, 20(12): 125005

[9] Qing XP, Chan HL, Beard SJ, et al. An Active Diagnostic System for Structural Health Monitoring of Rocket Engines [J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2006, 17(7): 619-628.

[10] Ihn JB, Chang FK. Pitch-Catch Active Sensing Methods in Structural Health Monitoring for Aircraft Structures [J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2008, 7(1): 5-19.

[11] Staszewski WJ, Mahzan S, Traynor R. Health Monitoring of Aerospace Composite Structures-Active and Passive Approach [J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2009, 69(11): 1678-1685.

[12] Kundu AK. Aircraft Design, 2010 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[13] Howe D AIOA Astronautics, Aircraft Loading and Structural Layout, 2004 London: Professional Engineering Publishing.

[14] Hardoon DR, Szedmak S, Shawe-Taylor J. Canonical Correlation Analysis: An Overview With Application to Learning Methods [J]. Neural Computation, 2004, 16(12): 2639-2664.