Dominant factors on the early hydration of metakaolin-cement paste

Abstract

The dominant factors during early hydration process of cement paste containing 10% metakaolin replacement (MK10) and 10% kaolin replacement (K10) are investigated in comparison to neat cement paste (NCP), and X-ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis is employed to identify the crystalline phases of all specimens. Thermogravimetric (TG) and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) are used to identify the phase constituents. The amount of acid-insoluble residue (AIR) of all specimens is used to evaluate the unreacted materials. The results indicate that, after the first day, MK act as nuclei for the formation of C-S-H during hydration of C₃S and C₂S, densifying the microstructure of cement paste. Its contribution is mainly due to the fine nature of the MK. From 3 days to 7 days, more and more MK reacts with CH to form C-S-H, making the microstructure denser. The strength contribution is mainly due to the chemical activity of MK.

Keywords

metakaolin (MK) / hydration / dominant factor / cement paste

References

[1] Sabir B., Wild S., Baj J. Metakaolin and Calcined Clays as Pozzolans for Concrete: A Review[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2001, 23(6): 441-454.

[2] Edited by Hewlett. Lea’s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete[M]. 4th ed. New York: Wiley, 1998

[3] Shvarzman A., Kovler K., Schamban I., . Influence of Chemical and Phase Composition of Mineral Admixtures on Their Pozzolanic Activity[J]. Advances Cement Research, 2002, 14(1): 35-41.

[4] Li Z., Ding Z. Property Improvement of Portland Cement by Incorporating with Metakaolin and Slag[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2003, 33(4): 579-584.

[5] Murat M. Hydration Reaction and Hardening of Calcined Clays and Related Materials, I. Preliminary Investigation on Metakaolinite[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1983, 13(4): 511-518.

[6] Zhang M. H., Malhotra V. M. Characteristics of a Thermally Activated Alumino-silicate Pozzolanic Material and Its Use in Concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1995, 25(8): 1 713-1 725.

[7] Wild S., Khatib J. M., Jones A. Relative Strength, Pozzolanic Activity and Cement Hydration in Superplasticised Metakaolin Concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1996, 26(10): 1 537-1 544.

[8] Talero R. Performance of Metakaolin and Portland Cements in Ettringite Formation as Determined by ASTM C 452-68: Kinetic and Morphological Differences[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35(7): 1 269-1 284.

[9] Kakali G., Perraki T., Tsivilis S., . Thermal Treatment of Kaolin: the Effect of Mineralogy on the Pozzolanic Activity[ J]. Applied Clay Science, 2001, 20(1): 73-80.

[10] Crennan J. M., Hemaly S. A. S., Taylor H. F. W. Autoclaved Lime-quartz Materials I. Some Factors Influencing Strength[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1977, 7(5): 493-502.

[11] Klimesch D. S., Ray A. Metakaolin Additions to Autoclaved Cement-quartz Pastes: Evaluation of the Acid-insoluble Residue[J]. Advances Cement Research, 1997, 9(36): 157-165.

[12] Shvarzman A., Kovler K., Grader G. S., . The Effect of Dehydroxylation/amorphization Degree on Pozzolanic Activity of Kaolinite[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2003, 33(3): 405-416.

[13] Bensted J., Barnes P. Structure and Performance of Cements[M], 2002 London Spon Press