Effects of soft monomers on the water resistance and moisture permeability of hydrophilic polyurethane

Abstract

Six groups of segmented polyurethanes with amorphous soft segment domains based on mixed hydrophobic polyester and hydrophilic polyether soft monomers were prepared from 4, 4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI), polybutylene adipate glycol 2000 (PBA2000), polytetramethylene glycol 1000 (PTMG1000) and polyethylene glycol 1000 (PEG1000) with 1,4-butanediol (BDO) as the chain extender. Furthermore, the representative properties of the hydrophilic polyurethanes, moisture permeability and water resistance, were investigated. The results show that the chemical structure, molecular weight and concentration of soft monomers have remarkable effects on the main application properties of hydrophilic polyurethane. The important factors in diffusion are the content of hydrophilic ether bond and the mobility of hydrophilic chain in the soft phase, which is represented with a good approximation by the average mean molecular weight of soft segment. On the contrary, the functional properties of the hydrophilic polyurethane are almost not affected by its hard segment.

Keywords

hydrophilic polyurethane / polyether / polyester / waterproof / breathable

References

[1] Yilgor I., Yilgor E. Hydrophilic Polyurethaneurea Membranes: Influence of Soft Block Composition on the Water Vapor Permeation Rates[J]. Polymer, 1999, 40: 5 575-5 581.

[2] Tsonos C., Apekis L., Viras K., . Investigation of the Microphase Separation in Blends of Polyurethane-Based Ionomers[J]. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part B, 2000, 39(2): 155-174.

[3] Ding X. M., HU J. L., Tao X. M., . Preparation of Temperature-Sensitive Polyurethanes for Smart Textiles[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2006, 76(5): 406-413.

[4] Yang J. H., Chun B. C., Chung Y. C., . Comparison of Thermal/mechanical Properties and Shape Memory Effect of Polyurethane Block-copolymers with Planar or Bent Shape of Hard Segment[J]. Polymer, 2003, 44: 3 251-3 258.

[5] Ashish A., Wilkes G. L. Hard Segment Connectivity in Low Molecular Weight Model ‘Trisegment’ Polyurethanes Based on Monols[J]. Polymer, 2004, 45: 927-935.

[6] Hourston D. J., Williams G., Satguru R., . A Structure-Property Study of IPDI-Based Polyurethane Anionomers[ J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1998, 67: 1 437-1 448.

[7] Dolmaire N., Espuche E., Mechin F., . Water Transport Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane Films[J]. Journal of Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer Physics, 2004, 42: 473-492.

[8] Jeong H. M., Lee S. Y., Kim B. K. Shape Memory Polyurethane Containing Amorphous Reversible Phase[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2000, 35: 1 579-1 583.

[9] Katsuhiko N., Takashi N., Seiji A., . Microphase Separation and Surface Properties of Segmented Polyurethane—Effect of Hard Segment Content[J]. Adhesion and Adhesives, 1996, 16(4): 233-239.

[10] Bradley F., Halley P., Jack K. Effect of the Average Soft-Segment Length on the Morphology and Properties of Segmented Polyurethane Nanocomposites[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2006, 102: 128-139.

[11] Galland G., Lam T. M. Permeability and Diffusion of Gases in Segmented Polyurethanes: Structure-properties Relations[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1993, 50: 1 041-1 058.