Robust Pricing and Wage Optimization for On-Demand Service Platforms with Partial Information

Jixiang Zhou , Xing Yin , Xiaolin Xu

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› : 1 -28.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› :1 -28. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-026-5728-6
Article
research-article
Robust Pricing and Wage Optimization for On-Demand Service Platforms with Partial Information
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Charging consumers reasonable prices and compensating service providers fairly are crucial for the successful operation of on-demand service platforms. These factors are also central to a platform’s ability to generate substantial profits. Information plays a pivotal role in platform decision-making. However, due to the complex dynamics of both the consumer and supply markets, along with the fluctuating behaviors of consumers and service providers, and cost considerations, it is challenging for platforms to fully characterize demand or supply. Nevertheless, platforms can relatively easily and accurately obtain partial information about the distribution functions, such as the upper and lower bounds, and the mean. Assuming the demand or supply function follows a multiplicative structure and only partial information (upper and lower bounds, and the mean) is available, we apply a distribution-robust optimization approach to model platform decision-making under two perspectives: pessimistic (maximin) and optimistic (maximax). We demonstrate that, under these conditions, there exists a unique optimal combination of price and wage that maximizes the platform’s profit. This study reveals that the platform’s profit under the optimistic mindset is equivalent to that under certain demand or supply conditions. In response to criticisms that the maximin approach is excessively conservative, we show that the performance under this approach can reach up to 83% of the profit achieved under deterministic demand or supply, indicating that the maximin approach is less conservative than often claimed. To test the robustness of our main results, we extend the model to incorporate an additive structure for the demand or supply function, as well as the scenario where the demand or supply functions follow a uniform distribution. The analysis demonstrates that, under certain conditions, the platform’s profit under partial information can be up to 2.5 times higher than in the case of a uniform distribution.

Keywords

Sharing economy / partial information / optimistic / pessimistic

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jixiang Zhou, Xing Yin, Xiaolin Xu. Robust Pricing and Wage Optimization for On-Demand Service Platforms with Partial Information. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 1-28 DOI:10.1007/s11518-026-5728-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abhishek V, Guajardo J A, Zhang Z. Business models in the sharing economy: Manufacturing durable goods in the presence of peer-to-peer rental markets. Information Systems Research, 2020, 32(4): 1450-1469

[2]

Albiski S, Fontaine P, Minner S. Performance analysis of a hybrid bike sharing system: A service-level-based approach under censored demand observations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2018, 116: 59-69

[3]

Alemi F, Circella G, Handy S, Patricia M. What influences travelers to use Uber? Exploring the factors affecting the adoption of on-demand ride services in California. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2018, 13: 88-104

[4]

Agrawal V V, Bellos I. The potential of servicizing as a green business model. Management Science, 2017, 63(5): 1545-1562

[5]

Asian S, Hafezalkotob A, John J J. Sharing economy in organic food supply chains: A pathway to sustainable development. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 218: 322-338

[6]

Bai J, So K C, Tang C S, Chen X, Wang H. Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand service platform with impatient customers. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2019, 21(3): 556-570

[7]

Ban G Y, Rudin C. The big data newsvendor: Practical insights from machine learning. Operations Research, 2019, 67(1): 90-108

[8]

Bellos L, Ferguson M, Toktay L B. The car sharing economy: Interaction of business model choice and product line design. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2017, 19(2): 185-201

[9]

Benjaafar S, Bernhard H, Courcoubetis C, Kanakakis M, Papafragkos S. Drivers, riders, and service providers: The impact of the sharing economy on mobility. Management Science, 2022, 68(1): 23-42

[10]

Benjaafar S, Ding J Y, Kong G, Taylor T. Labor welfare in on-demand service platforms. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2022, 24(1): 110-124

[11]

Benjaafar S, Kong G, Li X, Courcoubetis C. Peer-to-peer product sharing: Implications for ownership, usage, and social welfare in the sharing economy. Management Science, 2019, 65(2): 477-493

[12]

Banerjee S, Riquelme C, Johari R. Pricing in ride-share platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach, 2015,

[13]

Bimpikis K, Candogan O, Saban D. Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks. Operations Research, 2019, 67(3): 744-769

[14]

Cachon G P, Daniels K M, Lobel R. The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2017, 19(3): 368-384

[15]

Chang X, Zhao L. Collaborative strategies in the product-sharing market considering manufacturer’s capital entry. International Journal of Production Economics, 2024, 274: 109345

[16]

Chen J, Feng N, Guo Z, Zhang W. On-demand, long-term, or hybrid? An economic analysis of optimal rental models on sharing platforms. Information Systems Research, 2025, 36(1): 307-325

[17]

Chen Y, Hu M. Pricing and matching with forward-looking buyers and sellers. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2020, 22(4): 717-734

[18]

Chen Z, Xie W. Regret in the newsvendor model with demand and yield randomness. Production and Operations Management, 2021, 30(11): 4176-4197

[19]

Choi T M, Guo S, Liu N, Shi X. Values of food leftover sharing platforms in the sharing economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 213: 23-31

[20]

Choi T M, Guo S, Liu N, Shi X. Optimal pricing in on-demand-service-platform-operations with hired agents and risk-sensitive customers in the blockchain era. European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 284(3): 1031-1042

[21]

Choi T M, He Y. Peer-to-peer collaborative consumption for fashion products in the sharing economy: Platform operations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2019, 126: 49-65

[22]

Colby C, Bell K (2016). The on-demand economy is growing, and not just for the young and wealthy. Harvard Business Review 14.

[23]

Dabbous A, Barakat K A, Woodside A G. How do configurations of the sharing economy, renewable energy, and financial development support/dampen nations’ sustainable competitiveness?. International Journal of Production Economics, 2025, 511: 145647

[24]

Eichberger J, Kelsey D. Optimism and pessimism in games. International Economic Review, 2014, 55(2): 483-505

[25]

Fang B, Ye Q, Law R. Effect of sharing economy on tourism industry employment. Annals of Tourism Research, 2016, 57: 264-267

[26]

Feng L, Zheng X, Govindan K, Xue K. Does the presence of secondary market platform really hurt the firm?. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 213: 55-68

[27]

Gallego G, Moon I. The distribution free newsboy problem: Review and extensions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1993, 44(8): 825-834

[28]

Gong D, Liu S, Liu J, Ren L. Who benefits from online financing? A sharing economy e-tailing platform perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 2020, 222: 107490

[29]

Govindan K, Shankar K M, Kannan D. Achieving sustainable development goals through identifying and analyzing barriers to industrial sharing economy: A framework development. International Journal of Production Economics, 2020, 227: 107575

[30]

Guo D, Fan Z P, Sun M. B2C car-sharing services: Sharing mode selection and value-added service investment. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2022, 165: 102836

[31]

Hamari J, Sjöklint M, Ukkonen A. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(9): 2047-2059

[32]

Hellwig K, Morhart F, Girardin F, Hauser M. Exploring different types of sharing: A proposed segmentation of the market for sharing businesses. Psychology & Marketing, 2015, 32(9): 891-906

[33]

Hong J H, Kim B C, Park K S. Optimal risk management for the sharing economy with stranger danger and service quality. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 279: 1024-1035

[34]

Ho S J, Chang H. Impacts of sharing business on production, sales, and rental markets. International Journal of Production Economics, 2022, 248: 108478

[35]

Hosseini M, Milner J, Romero G. Dynamic relocations in car-sharing networks. Operations Research, 2025, 73(4): 2010-2025

[36]

Hu J, Wang K, Liu Y. Economic implications of equipment sharing under cloud manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 2022, 254: 108627

[37]

Hu M, Zhou Y. Price, wage and fixed commission in on-demand matching, 2018,

[38]

Huang Y, Fang C, Lin S. Pricing and operating strategies for products in the sharing economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 2023, 266: 109038

[39]

Jiang B, Tian L. Collaborative consumption: Strategic and economic implications of product sharing. Management Science, 2018, 64(3): 1171-1188

[40]

Kim K, Baek C, Lee J D. Creative destruction of the sharing economy in action: The case of Uber. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2018, 110: 118-127

[41]

Kung L C, Zhong G Y. The optimal pricing strategy for two-sided platform delivery in the sharing economy. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2017, 101: 1-12

[42]

Leoni G, Parker L D. Governance and control of sharing economy platforms: Hosting on Airbnb. The British Accounting Review, 2019, 51(6): 100814

[43]

Li G, Zhang X, Chiu S M, Liu M, Sethi S P. Online market entry and channel sharing strategy with direct selling diseconomies in the sharing economy era. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 218: 135-147

[44]

Li H, Srinivasan K. Competitive dynamics in the sharing economy: An analysis in the context of Airbnb and hotels. Marketing Science, 2019, 38(3): 365-391

[45]

Li Y, Bai X, Xue K. Business modes in the sharing economy: How does the OEM cooperate with third-party sharing platforms?. International Journal of Production Economics, 2020, 221: 107467

[46]

Lin X, Lu T, Wang X. Mergers between on-demand service platforms: The impact on consumer surplus and labor welfare. Information Systems Research, 2025,

[47]

Lin X, Sun C, Cao B, Zhou Y, Chen C. Should ride-sharing platforms cooperate with car-rental companies? Implications for consumer surplus and driver surplus. Omega, 2021, 102: 102309

[48]

Liu H, Qiao H, Wang S, Li Y. Platform competition in peer-to-peer lending considering risk control ability. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 274(1): 280-290

[49]

Liu R, Xu J, Iris C, et al. . Dynamic rebalancing strategies for dockless bike-sharing systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 2025, 285: 209634

[50]

Lutz C, Newlands G. Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb. Journal of Business Research, 2018, 88: 187-196

[51]

Pavlova A, Wang T. Dynamic decision making under ambiguity: A field experiment in financial markets. Management Science, 2024, 70(1): 458-479

[52]

Petruzzi N, Dada M. Pricing and the newsvendor problem: A review with extensions. Operations Research, 1999, 47(2): 183-194

[53]

Roma P, Panniello U, Nigro G L. Sharing economy and incumbents’ pricing strategy: The impact of Airbnb on the hospitality industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 214: 17-29

[54]

Rossmannek O, Chen M. Why people use the sharing economy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 387: 135824

[55]

Scarf H. A min-max solution of an inventory problem. Studies in the Mathematical Theory of Inventory and Production, 1958, 201-209

[56]

Shen Y, Willems S P, Dai Y. Channel selection and contracting in the presence of a retail platform. Production and Operations Management, 2019, 28(5): 1173-1185

[57]

Stourm L, Stourm V. Estimating sparse spatial demand to manage crowdsourced supply in the sharing economy. Marketing Science, 2025, 44(4): 777-801

[58]

Sun X, Tang W, Chen J, Zhang J. Optimal investment strategy of a free-floating sharing platform. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2020, 138: 101958

[59]

Taylor T A. On-demand service platforms. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2018, 20(4): 704-720

[60]

Tian L, Jiang B. Effects of consumer-to-consumer production sharing on distribution channel. Production and Operations Management, 2018, 27(2): 350-367

[61]

Wang L, Yuan J, Hu L, Du S. Deterministic and probabilistic service-hailing mode choice for on-demand service platforms. International Journal of Production Economics, 2024, 269: 109516

[62]

Wang W, Li F, Yi Z. Scores vs. stars: A regression discontinuity study of online consumer reviews. Information Management, 2019, 56(3): 418-428

[63]

Wang X, He F, Yang H, Gao H O. Pricing strategies for a taxi-hailing platform. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2016, 93: 212-231

[64]

Weber T A. Intermediation in a sharing economy: Insurance, moral hazard, and rent extraction. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2014, 31(3): 35-71

[65]

Wen X, Siqin T. How do product quality uncertainties affect the sharing economy platforms with risk considerations? A mean-variance analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 2020, 224: 107544

[66]

Xu X, Zeng S, He Y. The impact of information disclosure on consumer purchase behavior on sharing economy platform Airbnb. International Journal of Production Economics, 2021, 231: 107846

[67]

Xu Y, Lu B, Ghose A. The interplay of earnings, ratings, and penalties on sharing platforms: An empirical investigation. Management Science, 2023, 69(10): 6128-6146

[68]

Yang C, Wang H, Ma X, Talluri S. A data-driven newsvendor problem: A high-dimensional and mixed-frequency method. International Journal of Production Economics, 2023, 266: 109402

[69]

Yuan Q, Shen B. Renting fashion with strategic customers in the sharing economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 218: 185-195

[70]

Zhang C, Chen J, Raghunathan S. Two-sided platform competition in a sharing economy. Management Science, 2022, 68(12): 8909-8932

[71]

Zhang C, Chen J, Raghunathan S. When sharing economy meets traditional business: Coopetition between ride-sharing platforms and car-rental firms. Information Systems Research, 2024, 35(3): 1137-1153

[72]

Zervas G, Proserpio D, Byers J W. The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 2017, 54(5): 687-705

[73]

Zhong Y, Liu J, Zhou Y, Cao B, Chen T C E. Robust contract design and coordination under consignment contracts with revenue sharing. International Journal of Production Economics, 2022, 253: 108543

[74]

Zhong Y, Yang T, Cao B, Cheng T C E. On-demand ride-hailing platforms in competition with the taxi industry: Pricing strategies and government supervision. International Journal of Production Economics, 2022, 243: 108301

[75]

Zhou Y W, Lin X, Zhong Y, Xie W. Contract selection for a multi-service sharing platform with self-scheduling capacity. Omega, 2019, 86: 198-217

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/