Evaluating the Impact of Spin-Off NFTs Strategy on NFT Price: An Empirical Analysis of Bored Ape Yacht Club and CryptoPunks

Zhixiang Zhou , Chang Feng , Huiqin Wang , Huaqing Wu

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› : 1 -23.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› :1 -23. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-025-5718-0
Article
research-article
Evaluating the Impact of Spin-Off NFTs Strategy on NFT Price: An Empirical Analysis of Bored Ape Yacht Club and CryptoPunks
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The quasi-experimental evidence suggests that Non-Fungible Token (NFT) Spin-Off NFTs strategies significantly dampen raw asset valuations. Utilizing the launch of Mutant Ape Yacht Club (MAYC) by Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) as an exogenous event and CryptoPunks as a control group, this study identifies the causal effects based on the trading data of 1,583 matched samples from MayDecember 2021, using the Difference-in-Differences (DID) method. The findings indicate that the issuance of MAYC leads to a significant decrease in the BAYC floor price by 39.461 ETH. Mechanism analysis reveals two transmission channels: 1) loyalty erosion, evidenced by a decrease of 324.625 normalized units in highly loyal BAYC holders post-launch compared to the control; and 2) substitution effect, where a 1-unit increase in the overlap between BAYC holders minting MAYC and BAYC sellers correlates with an average BAYC price decrease of 20.6 units. This study provides the first quantitative demonstration of the negative valuation effect of Spin-Off NFTs strategies on the original pool and identifies the dual mechanisms of loyalty loss and substitution, that offers important strategic warnings for digital asset portfolio management.

Keywords

Non-fungible token / NFT / Spin-Off NFTs strategy / cryptocurrencies / Bored Ape Yacht Club

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhixiang Zhou, Chang Feng, Huiqin Wang, Huaqing Wu. Evaluating the Impact of Spin-Off NFTs Strategy on NFT Price: An Empirical Analysis of Bored Ape Yacht Club and CryptoPunks. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 1-23 DOI:10.1007/s11518-025-5718-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

An J, Mikhaylov A, Chang T. Relationship between the popularity of a platform and the price of NFT assets. Finance Research Letters. 2024, 61: 105057.

[2]

Ante L. The non-fungible token (NFT) market and its relationship with Bitcoin and Ethereum. FinTech. 2022, 1(3): 216-224.

[3]

Bastien V, Kapferer JN. More on luxury anti-laws of marketing. Luxury Marketing: A Challenge for Theory and Practice. 2012, Wiesbaden, Gabler Verlag19-34

[4]

Baur DG, Hong K, Lee AD. Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets?. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 2018, 54: 177-189.

[5]

Bhattacharya CB, Sen S. Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing. 2003, 67(2): 76-88.

[6]

Biais B, Hillion P. Insider and liquidity trading in stock and options markets. Review of Financial Studies. 1994, 7(4): 743-780.

[7]

Borri N, Liu Y, Tsyvinski A. The economics of non-fungible tokens. 2022.

[8]

Catalini C, Gans JS. Some simple economics of the blockchain. Communications of the ACM. 2020, 63(7): 80-90.

[9]

Chalmers D, Fisch C, Matthews R, Quinn W, Recker J. Beyond the bubble: Will NFTs and digital proof of ownership empower creative industry entrepreneurs?. Journal of Business Venturing Insights. 2022, 17: e00309.

[10]

Chaudhuri A, Holbrook MB. The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing. 2001, 65(2): 81-93.

[11]

Cheah ET, Fry J. Speculative bubbles in Bitcoin markets? An empirical investigation into the fundamental value of Bitcoin. Economics Letters. 2015, 130: 32-36.

[12]

Cialdini RB. Influence: Science and Practice(5ed). 2009, Boston, Pearson Education

[13]

Colicev A. How can non-fungible tokens bring value to brands?. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2023, 40130-37.

[14]

Cong LW, Li Y, Wang N. Tokenomics: Dynamic adoption and valuation. Review of Financial Studies. 2021, 34(3): 1105-1155.

[15]

Dick AS, Basu K. Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 1994, 22: 99-113.

[16]

Dowling M. Is non-fungible token pricing driven by cryptocurrencies?. Finance Research Letters. 2022, 44: 102097.

[17]

Dyhrberg AH. Bitcoin, gold and the dollar: A GARCH volatility analysis. Finance Research Letters. 2016, 181-7

[18]

Gandal N, Hamrick JT, Moore T, Oberman T. Price manipulation in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Journal of Monetary Economics. 2018, 95: 86-96.

[19]

Gorton G, Metrick A. Securitized banking and the run on repo. Journal of Financial Economics. 2012, 104(3): 425-451.

[20]

Griffiths P, Costa CJ, Crespo NF. Behind the bubble: Exploring the motivations of NFT buyers. Computers in Human Behavior. 2024, 158: 108307.

[21]

Ho KH, Law M, Hou Y, Chan TT. Spillover analysis on NFTs, NFT-affiliated tokens and NFT submarkets. Finance Research Letters. 2024, 60104598.

[22]

Hofstetter R, Fritze MP, Lamberton C. Beyond scarcity: A social value-based lens for NFT pricing. Journal of Consumer Research. 2024, 51(1): 140-150.

[23]

Horky F, Rachel C, Fidrmuc J. Price determinants of non-fungible tokens in the digital art market. Finance Research Letters. 2022, 48: 103007.

[24]

Jacobson LS, LaLonde RJ, Sullivan DG. Earnings losses of displaced workers. American Economic Review. 1993, 834685-709

[25]

Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1991, 51193-206.

[26]

Kauffman RJ, Li T, Van Heck E. Business network-based value creation in electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2010, 15(1): 113-144.

[27]

Kireyev P. Infinite but rare: Valuation and pricing in marketplaces for blockchain-based virtual items. 2020

[28]

Kraeussl R, Tugnetti A. Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): A review of pricing determinants, applications and opportunities. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2024, 38(2): 555-574.

[29]

Kristoufek L. Bitcoin meets Google Trends and Wikipedia: Quantifying the relationship between phenomena in the digital world. Scientific Reports. 2013, 3: 3415.

[30]

Kuhle P, Arroyo D, de Andrés P. Analyzing the effectiveness of native token airdrop campaigns in NFT marketplaces. International Congress on Blockchain and Applications. 2023, Cham, Springer Nature Switzerland383-393.

[31]

Li J, Wan X, Cheng HK, Zhao X. Operation dumbo drop: To airdrop or not to airdrop for initial coin offering success?. Information Systems Research. 2024, 35(4): 1928-1947.

[32]

Lynn M. Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology & Marketing. 1991, 8(1): 43-57.

[33]

Makarov I, Schoar A. Trading and arbitrage in cryptocurrency markets. Journal of Financial Economics. 2020, 135(2): 293-319.

[34]

Mekacher A, Bracci A, Nadini M, Martino M, Alessandretti L, Aiello LM, Baronchelli A. Heterogeneous rarity patterns drive price dynamics in NFT collections. Scientific Reports. 2022, 12: 13890.

[35]

Nadini M, Alessandretti L, Di Giacinto F, Martino M, Aiello LM, Baronchelli A. Mapping the NFT revolution: Market trends, trade networks, and visual features. Scientific Reports. 2021, 11(1): 20902.

[36]

Park CW, Milberg S, Lawson R. Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of Consumer Research. 1991, 182185-193.

[37]

Park SM, Kim YG. A metaverse: Taxonomy, components, applications, and open challenges. IEEE Access. 2022, 10: 4209-4251.

[38]

Rehman W, Zainab H, Imran J, Bawany NZ. NFTs: Applications and challenges. 2021 22nd International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT). 20211-7

[39]

Scheibehenne B, Greifeneder R, Todd PM. Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research. 2010, 37(3): 409-425.

[40]

Shleifer A, Vishny RW. The limits of arbitrage. Journal of Finance. 1997, 52(1): 35-55.

[41]

Sung E, Kwon O, Sohn K. NFT luxury brand marketing in the metaverse: Leveraging blockchain-certified NFTs to drive consumer behavior. Psychology & Marketing. 2023, 40(11): 2306-2325.

[42]

Tirole J. Overcoming adverse selection: How public intervention can restore market functioning. American Economic Review. 2012, 102(1): 29-59.

[43]

Urquhart A. The inefficiency of Bitcoin. Economics Letters. 2016, 148: 80-82.

[44]

Völckner F, Sattler H. Drivers of brand extension success. Journal of Marketing. 2006, 70(2): 18-34.

[45]

Wang Q, Li R, Wang Q, Chen S (2021). Non-fungible token (NFT): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.07447.

[46]

Yermack D. Corporate governance and blockchains. Review of Finance. 2017, 21(1): 7-31.

[47]

Zhang ZJ. Cryptopricing: Whence comes the value for cryptocurrencies and NFTs?. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2023, 40(1): 22-29.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/