PDF
Abstract
Recycling waste products through trade-in programs is of great importance for firms. Interestingly, many new energy vehicle (NEV) manufacturers, such as NIO, XPeng, and BYD, have offered both trade-in for new energy vehicles and trade-in for new energy batteries to customers. In this paper, we develop a two-period game-theoretic model to analyze the pricing strategies of NEV manufacturers while taking into account customers’ purchasing behaviors. Our findings reveal several key insights. First, strategic customers exhibit varied purchasing behaviors depending on the selling price of NEVs. Moreover, myopic customers also display heterogeneous preferences, and manufacturers can achieve effective market segmentation by implementing a preannounced pricing strategy (PPS) in markets with myopic consumers. Second, when the additional innovation level (the incremental innovation level of the new-generation product relative to the old-generation product) surpasses a certain threshold, NEV manufacturers are more likely to adopt a dynamic pricing strategy (DPS). Conversely, if the additional innovation level falls below this threshold, PPS becomes the preferred approach. Finally, government subsidies for trade-in programs are shown to significantly enhance customer participation and enthusiasm in such initiatives.
Keywords
Trade-ins
/
NEVs
/
pricing strategy
/
trade-in subsidy
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Xiaoqing Zhang, Xigang Yuan, Jiajia Chen, Yan Gui.
Research on the Trade-in Pricing Strategy for the Electric Vehicle Manufacturer.
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 1-23 DOI:10.1007/s11518-025-5698-0
| [1] |
AckereA V, ReyniersD J. Trade-ins and introductory offers in a monopoly. Rand Journal of Economics, 1995, 26(1): 58-74.
|
| [2] |
BaiX M, ChoiT-M, LiY J, et al.. Implementing trade-in programs in the presence of resale platforms: Mode selection and pricing. Production and Operations Management, 2023, 32(9): 1167-1182
|
| [3] |
BaiJ R, HuS, GuiL Y, et al.. Optimal subsidy schemes and budget allocations for government-subsidized trade-in programs. Production and Operations Management, 2021, 30(8): 2689-2706.
|
| [4] |
CaoK Y, ChoiT M. Optimal trade-in return policies: Is it wise to be generous?. Production and Operations Management, 2022, 31(3): 1309-1331.
|
| [5] |
CachonG P, SwinneyR. The value of fast fashion: Quick response, enhanced design, and strategic consumer behavior. Management Science, 2011, 57(4): 778-795.
|
| [6] |
DongR, WangN M, JiangB, et al.. Within-brand or cross-brand: The trade-in option under consumer switching costs. International Journal of Production Economics, 2023, 255(3): 109-136
|
| [7] |
HuS, ZhuS X, FuK. The manufacturer’s resale strategy for trade-ins. European Journal of Operational Research, 2025, 323(2): 583-598.
|
| [8] |
LiK J, XuS H. The comparison between trade-in and leasing of a product with technology innovations. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2015, 54(4): 134-146.
|
| [9] |
LiuJ C, ZhaiX, ChenL H. Optimal pricing strategy under trade-in program in the presence of strategic consumers. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2019, 84(4): 1-17
|
| [10] |
LinB Q, ShiS. Identify and bridge the intention-behavior gap in new energy vehicles consumption: Based on a new measurement method. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2022, 31(5): 432-447.
|
| [11] |
LouY P, WangW H, YangX G. Customers’ attitude on new energy vehicles’ policies and policy impact on customers’ purchase intention. Energy Procedia, 2017, 105(5): 2187-2193.
|
| [12] |
LiX C, XieJ X, LiT T. Trade-in strategy for durable products in the presence of a peer-to-peer second-hand marketplace. Annals of Operations Research, 2023, 326(1): 223-260.
|
| [13] |
MiaoZ W, FuK, XiaZ Q, WangY. Models for closed-loop supply chain with trade-ins. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2017, 66(4): 308-326.
|
| [14] |
PapanastasiouY, SavvaN. Dynamic pricing in the presence of social learning and strategic consumers. Management Science, 2017, 63(4): 919-939.
|
| [15] |
ParkS, MowenJ C. Replacement purchase decisions: On the effects of trade-ins, hedonic versus utilitarian usage goal, and tight wadism. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 2007, 6(2): 123-131.
|
| [16] |
PurohitD. Playing the role of buyer and seller: The mental accounting of trade-ins. Marketing Letters, 1995, 6(2): 101-110.
|
| [17] |
RaoR S, NarasimhanO, JohnG. Understanding the role of trade-ins in durable goods markets: Theory and evidence. Marketing Science, 2009, 28(5): 950-967.
|
| [18] |
RayS, BoyaciT, ArasN. Optimal prices and trade-in rebates for durable, remanufacturable products. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2005, 7(3): 208-228.
|
| [19] |
Tan R P, Liu B Q. Public perception of new energy vehicles: Evidence from willingness to pay for new energy vehicle fares in China. Energy Policy 130(7): 347–354.
|
| [20] |
TianX Q, ZhangQ L, ChiY Z, ChengY. Purchase willingness of new energy vehicles: A case study in Jinan city of China. Reginal Sustainability, 2021, 2(1): 12-22.
|
| [21] |
WangZ H, ZhaoC Y, YinJ H, ZhangB. Purchasing intentions of Chinese citizens on new energy vehicles: How should one respond to current preferential policy?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 161(9): 1000-1010.
|
| [22] |
WangW, LinJ Z, LiY B. Consumer willingness to purchase hydrogen fuel cell vehicles: A meta-analysis of the literature. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 50(2): 1536-1557.
|
| [23] |
WangX, LinB Q. How has consumers’ willingness to pay for the environmental value of new energy vehicles changed? Based on comparative surveys in 2016 and 2023. Research in International Business and Finance, 2024, 10(4): 134-154
|
| [24] |
WeiX Y. Effects of double subsidies and consumers’ acceptability of re-manufactured products on a closed-loop supply chain with trade-in programs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 447(4): 141-157
|
| [25] |
XiaoY B, ZhouS X. Trade-in for cash or for upgrade? Dynamic pricing with customer choice. Production and Operations Management, 2020, 29(4): 856-881.
|
| [26] |
XiongY Q, WangL Y. Policy cognition of potential consumers of new energy vehicles and its sensitivity to purchase willingness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 261(7): 121-141
|
| [27] |
YiY Y, ChenJ, FengJ J. Optimizing prices in trade-in strategies for vehicle manufacturers. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2021, 157(8): 107-118
|
| [28] |
YinR, LiH, TangC S. Optimal pricing of two successive-generation products with trade-in options under uncertainty. Decision Sciences, 2015, 46(3): 565-595.
|
| [29] |
YinR, TangC S. Optimal temporal customer purchasing decisions under trade-in programs with up-front fees. Decision Sciences, 2014, 45(3): 373-400.
|
| [30] |
YuJ J, TangC S, ShenZ J M. Improving consumer welfare and manufacturer profit via government subsidy programs: Subsidizing consumers or manufacturers?. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2018, 20(4): 752-766.
|
| [31] |
YuanX G, MaZ J, ZhangX Q, et al.. Who should provide a trade-in service under the online agency-selling mode?. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2024, 681101454.
|
| [32] |
ZhaY, SunY, ChenY, et al.. Idlefish or not? Online platforms strategy of secondhand marketplace introduction in the presence of consumers uncertain preferences and strategic behavior. Annals of Operations Research, 2024, 333(1): 331-359.
|
| [33] |
ZhangX Q, YuanX G, WangY J, LiW B. Research on the trade-in pricing strategy of new energy vehicle producers considering the consumers’ heterogeneous behavior. Green and Low-Carbon Economy, 2023, 1(8): 1-16.
|
| [34] |
ZhangX Q, YuanX G, WangM, WangY J, ZhangD L. Pricing strategy for the automobile producer considering consumer anxiety behavior and policy substitution effect. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 446141414.
|
| [35] |
ZhuX X, WangM M, ChenG F, ChenX. The effect of implementing trade-in strategy on duopoly competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 248(3): 856-868.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
Just Accepted
This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.