PDF
Abstract
Effective consumer quality management is critical for two-sided platforms to thrive. While existing literature has primarily focused on seller-side quality thresholds to restrict platform access, this study explores two consumer-centric strategies: 1) fixed subsidy allocation (both homogeneous and heterogeneous) and 2) innovative service provision (homogeneous and heterogeneous). Our analysis reveals that subsidy strategies do not universally benefit platforms — their effectiveness depends critically on network effects. In contrast, innovation strategies consistently yield positive outcomes, driving higher platform profits, increased transaction fees, and expanded network size. A key finding is that under homogeneous innovation, the platform’s transaction fee remains invariant to consumer innovation preferences. Moreover, the optimal choice between subsidies and innovation hinges on both consumer innovation preferences and bilateral network effects. This research offers actionable insights for platform managers, demonstrating how to enhance performance metrics without compromising profitability. Our findings provide concrete guidelines for strategic decision-making in consumer quality management, bridging theory and practice in platform governance.
Keywords
Media platforms
/
two-sided markets
/
content provision
/
advertising intensity
/
product differentiation
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Jiayu Liu, Weiqiang Hou.
Subsidization or Innovation? Retailing Strategies on Two-sided Market.
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 1-16 DOI:10.1007/s11518-025-5691-7
| [1] |
Anderson S, Gabszewicz J. The media and advertising: A tale of two-sided markets. Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, 2006, 1: 567-614
|
| [2] |
Anderson S P, Coate S. Market provision of broadcasting: A welfare analysis. Review of Economic Studies, 2005, 72(4): 947-972
|
| [3] |
Anderson S P, de Palma A. The logit as a model of product differentiation. Oxford Economic Papers, 1992, 44(1): 51-67
|
| [4] |
Ambrus A, Argenziano R. Asymmetric networks in two-sided markets. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2009, 1(1): 17-52
|
| [5] |
Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37(3): 668-691
|
| [6] |
Cai L, He X, Dai Y, Zhu K. Research on B2B2C E-commerce website design based on user experience. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018, 1087: 062043
|
| [7] |
Cui R, Li M, Li Q. Value of high-quality logistics: Evidence from a clash between SF Express and Alibaba. Management Science, 2020, 66(9): 3879-3902
|
| [8] |
Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne M W. Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 2006, 84(1092
|
| [9] |
Eisenmann T R, Parker G, Van Alstyne M. Opening platforms: How, when and why. Platforms, Markets and Innovation, 2009, 6: 131-162
|
| [10] |
Fader P S, Hardie B G, Lee K L. RFM and CLV: Using ISO-value curves for customer base analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 2005, 42(4415-430
|
| [11] |
Gawer A, Cusumano MA. How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2008, 49(2): 28-35
|
| [12] |
Hagiu A. Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms. RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37(3): 720-737
|
| [13] |
Hagiu A. Two-sided platforms: Product variaty and pricing structures. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2009, 18(4): 1011-1043
|
| [14] |
Hagiu A, Halaburda H. Information and two-sided platform profits. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2014, 34: 25-35
|
| [15] |
Hasiloglu M, Kaya O. An analysis of price, service and commission rate decisions in online sales made through E-commerce platforms. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2021, 162: 107688
|
| [16] |
Huang P, Lyu G, Xu Y. Quality regulation on two-Sided platforms: Exclusion, subsidization, and first-party applications. Management Science, 2022, 68(6): 4415-4434
|
| [17] |
Jeon D S, Rochet J C. The pricing of academic journals: A two-sided market perspective. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2010, 2(2222-255
|
| [18] |
Jeong H, Yi Y, Kim D. An innovative e-commerce platform incorporating metaverse to live commerce. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 2022, 18(1): 221-229
|
| [19] |
Kaptein M, Parvinen P. Advancing e-commerce personalization: Process framework and case study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2015, 19(3): 7-33
|
| [20] |
Kung L C, Zhong G Y. The optimal pricing strategy for two-sided platformdelivery in the sharing economy. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2017, 101: 1-12
|
| [21] |
Lyu G, Tian L, Wang W. Exclusion or subsidization? A competitive analysis of quality regulation strategy for two-sided platforms. Production and Operations Management, 2024
|
| [22] |
Li C, Huang Z. Subsidy strategy of pharmaceutical e-commerce platform based on two-sided market theory. PLOS One, 2019, 14(10): e0224369
|
| [23] |
Libert B, Beck M, Wind J. The Network Imperative: How to Survive and Grow in the Age of Digital Business Models, 2016, Brighton, USA, Harvard Business Review Press
|
| [24] |
Liu W, Yan X, Li X, Wei W. The impacts of market size and data-driven marketing on the sales mode selection in an Internet platform based supply chain. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2020, 136: 101914
|
| [25] |
Rochet J C, Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2003, 1(4990-1029
|
| [26] |
Springel K. Network externality and subsidy structure in two-sided markets: Evidence from electric vehicle incentives. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2021, 13(4393-432
|
| [27] |
Trabucchi D, Buganza T. Fostering digital platform innovation: From two to multi-sided platforms. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2020, 29(2): 345-358
|
| [28] |
Wang M, Deng H, Leong KG. Innovation investment and subsidy strategy in two-sided market. Information Technology and Management, 2022, 24: 337-351
|
| [29] |
Wang X, He F, Yang H, Gao H O. Pricing strategies for a taxi-hailing platform. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2016, 93: 212-231
|
| [30] |
Xu X B, Wang J Q, Tu H, Mu M. Customer classification of e-commerce based on improved RFM model. Journal of Computer Applications, 2012, 32(5): 1439-1442
|
| [31] |
Xu J, Duan Y. Pricing, ordering, and quick response for online sellers in the presence of consumer disappointment aversion. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2020, 137: 101925
|
| [32] |
Yan Z F, Shen Y L, Liu W J, Long J M, Wei Q. An e-commerce coupon target population positioning model based on random forest and extreme gradient boosting. 2018 11th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISPBMEI), Beijing, China, October 13–15, 2018
|
| [33] |
Zhang Y, Pan P, Zheng Y, Zhao K, Zhang Y, Ren X, Jin R. Visual search at Alibaba. Proceedings of the 24th ACMSIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD’ 18), London, United Kingdom, August 19–23, 2018
|
| [34] |
Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Huzhang G. Exploit customer lifetime value withmemoryless experiments, 2022
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany