PDF
Abstract
E-commerce live streaming has emerged as a novel electronic shopping method, progressively becoming a pivotal force in the transformation of the retail industry and driving consumer growth and economic prosperity. Compared to traditional TV shopping channels, live e-commerce platforms provide celebrities with significant autonomy in their marketing strategies. This study develops a marketing model to analyze new product promotions through live-streaming collaborations between brand owners and celebrities, focusing on balancing economic gains with the sustainability of the following base. The findings reveal that the evaluation of the product-market fit of a celebrity and their professional competence significantly influence the promotional strategies. Highly professional celebrities favor honest recommendations for high-fit products, while deceptive promotions mitigate risks for low-fit products. Moderately professional celebrities adopt nuanced strategies, shifting between honest and deceptive promotions based on product-market fit levels, while low-professionalism celebrities consistently favor deceptive promotions due to inaccurate product judgment. Furthermore, the coefficient of follower traffic value and follower concentration shape the effectiveness of the strategy, forming customized approaches for celebrities with short-sighted, mature, and new arrivals. These insights optimize marketing strategies by aligning them with product traits, audience composition, and engagement dynamics.
Keywords
Live commerce
/
online celebrities
/
followers
/
audience traffic
/
information asymmetry
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Chun Dong, Yi Yang, Qianqian Chen.
New Product Promotion Strategies within Live Streaming E-commerce Platforms.
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 1-33 DOI:10.1007/s11518-025-5690-8
| [1] |
AnandA, SouvikD, MukherjeeP. Influencer marketing with fake followers. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2020
|
| [2] |
BermanR, ZhengX D. Marketing with shallow and prudent influencers. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2020
|
| [3] |
ChenX, JiL, JiangL, MiaoS, ShiC. More bang for your buck: Effective KOL marketing campaign in emerging short-video markets. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2020
|
| [4] |
ChengC, HuY, LuY, HongY. Everyone can be a star: Understanding the role of live video streaming in online retail. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2019
|
| [5] |
CongLW, LiS G. Influencer marketing and product competition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2024, 220105867.
|
| [6] |
DuZ, FanZ P, SunF, LiuY. Open the live streaming sales channel or not? Analysis of strategic decision for a manufacturer. Annals of Operations Research, 2023125
|
| [7] |
FainmesserI P, GaleottiA. The market for online influence. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2021, 13(4): 332-72
|
| [8] |
GongS, ZhangJ, ZhaoP, JiangX. Tweeting as a marketing tool: A field experiment in the TV industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 2017, 54(6): 833-850.
|
| [9] |
GuZ Y, ZhaoX Y, WuD JA model of shoppertainment live streaming. Management Science, 2024
|
| [10] |
HanX, WangL Y, FanW G. Cost-effective social media influencer marketing. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 2022, 35(1): 138-157.
|
| [11] |
HuangY F, MorozovI. The promotional effects of live streams by twitch influencers. Marketing Science, 2025, 44(4): 916-932.
|
| [12] |
KatonaZ. Competing for influencers in a social network. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2013
|
| [13] |
LeeC H, ChenC W. Impulse buying behaviors in live streaming commerce based on the stimulus-organism-response framework. Information, 2021, 12(6): 2078-2489.
|
| [14] |
NistorC, SeloveM. Influencers: The power of comments. Marketing Science, 2024, 43(6): 1153-1167.
|
| [15] |
PeiA, MayzlinD. Influencing social media influencers through affiliation. Marketing Science, 2021, 41(3): 593-615.
|
| [16] |
PengJ, ZhangJ, NieT. Social influence and channel competition in the live-streaming market. Annals of Operations Research, 2025, 344: 617-645.
|
| [17] |
QiA, SethiS, WeiL, ZhangJ. Top or regular influencer? Contracting in live-streaming platform selling. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2021
|
| [18] |
ShenB, ChengM, HeR L, YangM L. Selling through social media influencers in influencer marketing: Participation-based contract versus sales-based contract. Electronic Commerce Research, 2024, 24: 1095-1118.
|
| [19] |
SinagaR F P, BudiI. Influencer detection through social network analysis on Twitter of the Indonesian smartphone industry. Proceedings of 7th ASRES International Conference on Intelligent Technologies, 2023
|
| [20] |
WangQ, ZhaoN, JiX. Reselling or agency selling? The strategic role of live streaming commerce in distribution contract selection. Electronic Commerce Research, 2024, 24: 983-1016.
|
| [21] |
WangY, LuZ C, CaoP, ChuJ Y, WangH N, WattenhoferR. Howlive streaming changes shopping decisions in e-commerce: A study of live streaming commerce. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2022, 31: 701-729.
|
| [22] |
YangJ, ZhangJ J, ZhangY H. Engagement that sells: Influencer video advertising on TikTok. Marketing Science, 2024, 44(2): 247-267.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
Just Accepted
This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.