An Extended ORESTE Method with Interval-valued Hesitant Fuzzy Information for the Selection of Renewable Energy Projects

Jian Li , Yuanyuan Xiang , Lili Niu , Qiongxia Chen , Zhongxing Wang , Zhonghui Li

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› : 1 -36.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› :1 -36. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-025-5688-2
Article
research-article

An Extended ORESTE Method with Interval-valued Hesitant Fuzzy Information for the Selection of Renewable Energy Projects

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Addressing global environmental problems and growing energy demand has highlighted the urgent need for a sustainable renewable energy program. The selection of suitable renewable energy sources is important for maintaining the balance between renewable energy supply and demand, reducing the cost of new energy applications, and accelerating the pace of the new energy revolution. In response to this issue, numerous multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods exist, each aiming to improve group decision-making in complex scenarios involving multiple criteria. However, challenges remain, particularly in measuring and integrating hesitant evaluations and addressing issues related to weighting and normalization. This study introduces an extended French organization Rangement et Synthese de Ronnees Relationnelles (ORESTE) method combined with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information. First, several novel distance measurement methods and a possibility degree formula for interval-valued hesitant fuzzy elements (IVHFEs) are developed. The proposed generalized normalized Hamming distance overcomes the limitations of existing normalized methods by handling IVHFEs of different lengths. Based on these developments, an extended ORESTE method incorporating interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information is established. To demonstrate its applicability, the proposed method is applied to a case study involving renewable energy project selection in China. The main contribution of this manuscript is proposing an extended fuzzy MCDM approach, and offering an alternative to the strong ranking procedure. The proposed method provides a technical path for relevant departments to make decisions on practical issues.

Keywords

Multi-criteria decision-making / ORESTE / interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information / renewable energy project

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jian Li, Yuanyuan Xiang, Lili Niu, Qiongxia Chen, Zhongxing Wang, Zhonghui Li. An Extended ORESTE Method with Interval-valued Hesitant Fuzzy Information for the Selection of Renewable Energy Projects. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 1-36 DOI:10.1007/s11518-025-5688-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

AlinejadS, AlimohammadlouM, AbbasiA, MirghaderiS H. Smart-Circular strategies for managing biomass resource challenges: A novel approach using circular intuitionistic fuzzy methods. Energy Conversion and Management, 2024, 314118690.

[2]

AmiriM M, ShadmanM, EstefenS F. A review of physical and numerical modeling techniques for horizontal-axis wind turbine wakes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, 193114279.

[3]

AzzamS M, SleemM M, SallamK M, MunasingheK, AbohanyA A. A framework for evaluating sustainable renewable energy sources under uncertain conditions: A case study. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2022, 37(10): 6652-6685.

[4]

BabaeiL, NiksokhanM H, TorabianA, Negahban-AzarM. Sustainability indicators for evaluation of the water-energy-food nexus in urban agriculture. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2024, 31(4): 466-480.

[5]

CaoH. An improved IVHF-Topsis method based on hesitancy degree. 2023 2nd International Conference on Applied Statistics, Computational Mathematics and Software Engineering (ASCMSE 2023), 2023May 12–14, 2023

[6]

ChenK, TanJ, ZhuC, LiuG. A generalized TODIM evaluation approach based on the novel score function and trust network under interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 255124637.

[7]

ChenK, TanJ, ZhuC, LiuG. Some information measures for interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets in multiple criteria decision-making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2024, 202416186183.

[8]

ChenN, XuZ, XiaM. Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 37: 528-540.

[9]

ChenX H, TeeK, ElnahassM, AhmedR. Assessing the environmental impacts of renewable energy sources: A case study on air pollution and carbon emissions in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 345118525.

[10]

DemartiniM, FerrariM, GovindanK, TonelliF. The transition to electric vehicles and a net zero economy: A model based on circular economy, stakeholder theory, and system thinking approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 410137031.

[11]

DemartiniM, FerrariM, GovindanK, TonelliF. The transition to electric vehicles and a net zero economy: A model based on circular economy, stakeholder theory, and system thinking approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 410137031.

[12]

DuK, FanR, WangY, WangD, QianR, ZhuB. A data-driven group emergency decision-making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets and its application in Covid-19 pandemic. Applied Soft Computing, 2023, 139110213.

[13]

FarhadiniaB. Information measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 2013, 240: 129-144.

[14]

GuoJ, ZhuX, LiH. A novel ORESTE approach for MAGDM incorporating probabilistic interval-valued linguistic information: Case studies in higher education quality and the energy industry. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2024, 15(10): 4845-4866.

[15]

HanX, DingJ, ChengH. Enhanced multiobjective optimization algorithm for intelligent grid management of renewable energy sources. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2024, 202414541163

[16]

HeY, HeZ, ShiL, MengS. Multiple attribute group decision making based on IVHFPBMs and a new ranking method for interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2016, 99: 63-77.

[17]

HuM, LanJ, WangZ. A distance measure, similarity measure and possibility degree for hesitant interval-valued fuzzy sets. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019, 137106088.

[18]

HuaZ, JingX, MartínezL. An ELICIT information-based ORESTE method for failure mode and effect analysis considering risk correlation with GRA-DEMATEL. Information Fusion, 2023, 93: 396-411.

[19]

HussainA, YinS, UllahK, WaqasM, SenapatiT, Esztergár-KissD, MoslemS. Enhancing renewable energy evaluation: Utilizing complex picture fuzzy frank aggregation operators in multi-attribute group decision-making. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024, 116105842.

[20]

ImamA A, AbusorrahA, MarzbandM. Potentials and opportunities of solar PV and wind energy sources in Saudi Arabia: Land suitability, techno-socioeconomic feasibility, and future variability. Results in Engineering, 2024, 21101785.

[21]

JiangH D, PurohitP, LiangQ M, LiuL J, ZhangY F. Improving the regional deployment of carbon mitigation efforts by incorporating air-quality co-benefits: A multi-provincial analysis of China. Ecological Economics, 2023, 204107675.

[22]

Karadayi-UstaS. Role of artificial intelligence and augmented reality in fashion industry from consumer perspective: Sustainability through waste and return mitigation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 133108114.

[23]

KaripoğluF, OzturkS, EfeB. A GIS-based FAHP and FEDAS analysis framework for suitable site selection of a hybrid offshore wind and solar power plant. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2023, 77101349.

[24]

KumlerA, KravitzB, DraxlC, VimmerstedtL, BentonB, LundquistJ K, MartinM, BuckH J, WangH, LennardC, et al.. Potential effects of climate change and solar radiation modification on renewable energy resources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2025, 207114934.

[25]

LeeH C, ChangC T. Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 92: 883-896.

[26]

LiangW, LabellaÁ, WangY M, RodríguezR M. Consensus reaching process under interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2023, 176108971.

[27]

LiangW, RodriguezR M, WangY M, GohM, YeF. The extended ELECTRE III group decision making method based on regret theory under probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environments. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 231120618.

[28]

LiaoH, LiuF, LongY, ZhangZ, ZavadskasE K. Sustainable food supply chain screening and relationship analysis with unknown criteria weight information. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2024, 30(6): 1732-1768.

[29]

LiuX, ZhanH, YuY. Towards informed decision-making: A comprehensive statistical study of economic and financing models for sustainable energy transition in urban environments. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024, 108105475.

[30]

LuhaniwalJ, PuppalaH, AgarwalS, MathurT. Framework for strategic deployment of hybrid offshore solar and wind power plants: A case study of India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 479144009.

[31]

ManirathinamT, NarayanamoorthyS, GeethaS, OthmanM F I, AlotaibiB S, AhmadianA, KangD. Sustainable renewable energy system selection for self-sufficient households using integrated fermatean neutrosophic fuzzy stratified AHP-MARCOS approach. Renewable Energy, 2023, 218119292.

[32]

Nagaraja M R, Biswas W K, Selvan C P (2024). Advancements and challenges in solar photovoltaic technologies: Enhancing technical performance for sustainable clean energy – A review. Solar Energy Advances page 100084.

[33]

RoubensM. Preference relations on actions and criteria in multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 1982, 10(1): 51-55.

[34]

SekerogluA. Site selection for biomass-solar hybrid renewable energy facilities: Spatial modelling based on fuzzy logic-geographic information systems. Renewable Energy, 2024, 237121775.

[35]

ShaoM, MaoZ, SunJ, GuanX, ShaoZ, TangT. Multi-scale offshore wind farm site selection decision framework based on GIS, MCDM and meta-heuristic algorithm. Ocean Engineering, 2025, 316119921.

[36]

ShenF, HuangQ, SuH, XuZ. An outranking approach for multi-attribute group decision-making with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 137109120.

[37]

ShenY, LiuW, YükselS, DinçerH. A molecular fuzzy decision-making model for optimizing renewable energy investments towards carbon neutrality. Renewable Energy, 2025, 240122175.

[38]

TengX, LinghuK, JiangG, ChangT H, LiuF P, ChiuY H. China’s energy efficiency improvement considering renewable energy substitution: Applying a dynamic two-stage undesirable non-radial directional distance function. Journal of Power Sources, 2025, 629235946.

[39]

TianZ P, LiangH M, NieR X, WangX K, WangJ Q. Data-driven multi-criteria decision support method for electric vehicle selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2023, 177109061.

[40]

TorraV. Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2010, 25(6): 529-539

[41]

UluskanM, BekiB. Project selection revisited: Customized type-2 fuzzy ORESTE approach for project prioritization. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice, 2024, 31(2): 317-339

[42]

WanS, ChenZ, DongJ. An efficiency-based interactive dynamic technique with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy constraint cone for rescue route planning. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 231120648.

[43]

WangB, EvergreenS, ForestJ. Game theory in smart grids: Strategic decision-making for renewable energy integration. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024, 108105480.

[44]

WangS, PanX H, MartínezL, Moreno-AlbarracínA. A novel interval type-2 fuzzy consensus reaching process model and group decision-making method for renewable energy investment. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 133108422.

[45]

WangX, HouB, TengY, YangY, ZhangX, SunL, ChenF. Reformative ROCOSD-ORESTE-LDA model with an MLP neural network to enhance decision reliability. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2024, 286111384.

[46]

WangY, LeiT. Influencing mechanisms of renewable energy development on carbon emission intensity in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 372123402.

[47]

WeiG, ZhaoX, LinR. Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 46: 43-53.

[48]

XiaM, XuZ. Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2011, 52(3): 395-407.

[49]

XieG, WangK, WuX, WangJ, LiT, PengY, ZhangH. A hybrid multi-stage decision-making method with probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy set for 3D printed composite material selection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 123106483.

[50]

XuZ, CaiX. Recent advances in intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2010, 9(4): 359-381.

[51]

XuZ, DaQ L. The uncertain OWA operator. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2002, 17(6): 569-575.

[52]

YangX, ZhengX, ZhouZ, MiaoH, LiuH, WangY, ZhangH, YouS, WeiS. A novel multilevel decision-making evaluation approach for the renewable energy heating systems: A case study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 390135934.

[53]

YangY, JieM Q, ChenZ S. Dynamic three-way multi-criteria decision making with basic uncertain linguistic information: A case study in product ranking. Applied Soft Computing, 2024, 152111228.

[54]

YerlikayaM A, YildizK, KeskinB N. Solution proposal for completed preference structure in oreste method. Scientific Reports, 2023, 1314754.

[55]

ZhanQ, JinL, YagerR R, MesiarR. A novel three-way decision method for interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environment. Soft Computing, 2023, 27(17): 12289-12307.

[56]

ZhangC, WangC, ZhangZ, TianD. A novel technique for multiple attribute group decision making in interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environments with incomplete weight information. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2019, 10(6): 2417-2433.

[57]

ZhengQ, LiuX, WangW, HanS. A hybrid HFACS model using dematel-oreste method with linguistic z-number for risk analysis of human error factors in the healthcare system. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 235121237.

[58]

ZhuC, LiuX, DingW, ZhangS. Cloud model-based multi-stage multi-attribute decision-making method under probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 255124595.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

PDF

220

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/