Personalized Individual Semantics-driven Group Consensus Decision-making Method with Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information for the Evaluation of Third-party Logistics Service Providers

Jian Li , Shaoxuan Zhang , Xianglin Liu , Qiongxia Chen , Jianping Ye , Zhongxing Wang

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› : 1 -34.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› :1 -34. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-025-5687-3
Article
research-article

Personalized Individual Semantics-driven Group Consensus Decision-making Method with Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information for the Evaluation of Third-party Logistics Service Providers

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The rapid development of e-commerce often delegates logistical tasks to third-party logistics (3PLs) service providers to acquire a competitive edge in the dynamic market. But, selecting the most suitable 3PL partner is a multifaceted task that requires careful evaluation of various criteria and alternatives. In response to this issue, numerous multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have been developed, each aiming to enhance group decision-making in complex scenarios involving multiple criteria. However, challenges persist, particularly in measuring and integrating intuitionistic evaluations, as well as addressing issues related to weighting. Accordingly, this paper innovatively develops a personalized individual semantics (PISs)-driven group consensus decision-making method for 3PLs service providers selection. Specifically, a Hamming distance formula for linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (LIFNs) is developed considering the PISs of decision-makers (DMs). Furthermore, a consensus-driven optimization model for improving the consensus level is constructed. Finally, the decision-making process is conducted with the evaluation of 3PLs service providers. The proposed method focuses on checking and improving consensus reaching processes, it avoids the processes of consistency checking and improving in the pairwise judgment matrix, and more suitable for decision-making problems in some backgrounds. The proposed method provides a technical path for relevant departments to make decisions on practical issues.

Keywords

Contract logistics provider / group decision-making / linguistic intuitionistic information / consensus model / personalized semantics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jian Li, Shaoxuan Zhang, Xianglin Liu, Qiongxia Chen, Jianping Ye, Zhongxing Wang. Personalized Individual Semantics-driven Group Consensus Decision-making Method with Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information for the Evaluation of Third-party Logistics Service Providers. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 1-34 DOI:10.1007/s11518-025-5687-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

AbbasiS, SıcakyüzÇ, GonzalezEDRS, GhasemiP. A systematic literature review of logistics services outsourcing. Heliyon, 2024, 1013e33374.

[2]

BaralS P, ParidaP K, SahooD. An enhanced TOPSIS-based framework for MCDM with uncertain weights: Application to e-waste recycling partner selection. Results in Control and Optimization, 2025, 19100545.

[3]

CaoM, GaiT, XingY, LiuY, WuJ. Risk management of liquefied natural gas transportation routes: An interactive consensus reaching approach under personalized individual semantics. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2022, 169108307.

[4]

ChenZ, LiuP, PeiZ. An approach to multiple attribute group decision making based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2015, 8(4): 747-760.

[5]

ChengX, ChenC, WanS. Group decision making with incomplete triangular fuzzy multiplicative preference relations for evaluating third-party reverse logistics providers. Applied Soft Computing, 2024, 160111688.

[6]

DangV L, WanS, GuoJ. Third-party logistics outsourcing: A review of two decades of advancing decision-making approaches with an up-to-date three-layer criteria framework integrating environmental, social, and governance metrics. International Journal of Production Economics, 2025, 284109615.

[7]

FanS, LiangH, DongY, PedryczW. A personalized individual semantics-based multi-attribute group decision making approach with flexible linguistic expression. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 192116392.

[8]

GaoY, LiY, HuZ, LiC C. Consistency improvement under a personalized individual semantics context in distributed linguistic group decision making. Information Fusion, 2022, 88: 319-331.

[9]

GörçünÖ F, ChatterjeeP, StevićŽ, KüçükönderH. An integrated model for road freight transport firm selection in third-party logistics using T-spherical Fuzzy sets. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2024, 186103542.

[10]

GuoX, HeY, IgnatiusJ. Optimal security and pricing strategies for AI cloud service providers: Balancing effort and price discounts across public, private, and hybrid AI cloud models. International Journal of Production Economics, 2025, 284109605.

[11]

HaseliG, YazdaniM, ShaayestehM T, Hajiaghaei-KeshteliM. Logistic hub location problem under fuzzy extended Z-numbers to consider the uncertainty and reliable group decision-making. Applied Soft Computing, 2025, 171112751.

[12]

HuaS, SunS, LiuZ, ZhaiX. Benefits of third-party logistics firms as financing providers. European Journal of Operational Research, 2021, 294(1): 174-187.

[13]

HuangZ, WangL, MengJ. Does rural e-commerce improve the economic resilience of family farms?. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2024, 95103505.

[14]

ImanovG, GaribliE, AkbarovR. Analysis of socioeconomic development by intuitionistic linguistic fuzzy numbers. Procedia Computer Science, 2017, 120: 341-348.

[15]

JiangL, LiuH, MaY, LiY. Deriving the personalized individual semantics of linguistic information from flexible linguistic preference relations. Information Fusion, 2022, 81: 154-170.

[16]

JiangS, HuangM, LiuY, ZhangY, WangX. Capacity planning to cope with demand surges in fourth-party logistics networks under chance-constrained service levels. Computers & Operations Research, 2025, 176106956.

[17]

JinF, ZhengX, LiuJ, ZhouL, ChenH. Group consensus reaching process based on information measures with probabilistic linguistic preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 249123573.

[18]

KumarK, ChenS M. Group decision making based on weighted distance measure of linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy sets and the TOPSIS method. Information Sciences, 2022, 611: 660-676.

[19]

KumarK, ChenS M. Multiple attribute group decision making based on advanced linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging aggregation operator of linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Information Sciences, 2022, 587: 813-824.

[20]

KumarK, ChenS M. Group decision making based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy Yager weighted arithmetic aggregation operator of linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Information Sciences, 2023, 647119228.

[21]

KumarM, KaushikM. System failure probability evaluation using fault tree analysis and expert opinions in intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 67104236.

[22]

LiT, ZhangL. A novel group decision-making method for incomplete interval-valued intuitionistic multiplicative linguistic preference relations. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2025, 149110412.

[23]

LiC C, DongY, HerreraF, Herrera-ViedmaE, MartínezL. Personalized individual semantics in computing with words for supporting linguistic group decision making. An application on consensus reaching. Information Fusion, 2017, 33: 29-40.

[24]

LiC C, RodríguezRM, MartínezL, DongY, HerreraF. Personalized individual semantics based on consistency in hesitant linguistic group decision making with comparative linguistic expressions. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018, 145: 156-165.

[25]

LiC C, DongY, LiangH, PedryczW, HerreraF. Data-driven method to learning personalized individual semantics to support linguistic multi-attribute decision making. Omega, 2022, 111102642.

[26]

LiC C, DongY, PedryczW, HerreraF. Integrating continual personalized individual semantics learning in consensus reaching in linguistic group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2022, 52(3): 1525-1536.

[27]

LiZ, BaiL, QianB, ChenY. Active learning based hyper-heuristic for the integration of production and Transportation: A third-party logistics perspective. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2024, 194110381.

[28]

LiG, ZhengZ, ChengTCE, WangW, WuF. Agency selling or reselling: The impact of logistics service on selling mode choice. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2025, 193103849.

[29]

LiuJ, MaiJ, LiH, HuangB, LiuY. On three perspectives for deriving three-way decision with linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy information. Information Sciences, 2022, 588: 350-380.

[30]

LiuY, YangY, SunL, HuangA. Managing multi-granular probabilistic linguistic information in large-scale group decision making: A personalized individual semantics-based consensus model. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 230120645.

[31]

LiuH, XuZ, JiangL, ZhuJ. Multi-criteria group decision making with preference approval structures: A personalized individual semantics approach. Information Fusion, 2023, 96: 80-91.

[32]

LiuJ, GuoX, RenP, ZhangL, HaoZ. Consensus of three-way group decision with weight updating based on a novel linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy similarity. Information Sciences, 2023, 648119537.

[33]

MaoX, WuH, WanS. A personalized comprehensive cloud-based method for heterogeneous MAGDM and application in COVID-19. CMES-Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2022, 131(3): 1751-1792.

[34]

MaoQ, GaoY, FanJ. An integrated MCDM framework for tidal current power plant site selection based on interval 2-tuple linguistic. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 2024, 74103518.

[35]

MengF, DongB. Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy PROMETHEE method based on similarity measure for the selection of sustainable building materials. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2022, 13(9): 4415-4435.

[36]

PaulA, MahapatraS S. An integrated fuzzy-AHP and fuzzy-DEMATEL approach for analyzing sustainable supply chain factors in the mining industry. Supply Chain Analytics, 2025, 10100113.

[37]

PengH, WangJ, ChengP. A linguistic intuitionistic multi-criteria decision-making method based on the Frank Heronian mean operator and its application in evaluating coal mine safety. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2018, 9(6): 1053-1068.

[38]

SajjadM, SałabunW, FaiziS, IsmailM, WątróbskiJ. Statistical and analytical approach of multi-criteria group decision-making based on the correlation coefficient under intuitionistic 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 193116341.

[39]

SaputroT E, RosianiT Y, MubinA, DewiS K, BarotoT. Green supplier selection under supply risks using novel integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 449141788.

[40]

SariI U. Fermatean fuzzy Z-analytic hierarchy process: An application to third party logistics providers. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 133108327.

[41]

TangX, PengZ, ZhangQ, PedryczW, YangS. Consistency and consensus-driven models to personalize individual semantics of linguistic terms for supporting group decision making with distribution linguistic preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2020, 189105078.

[42]

TianR, ChangL, SunZ, ZhaoG, LuX. PTB: A deep reinforcement learning method for flexible logistics service combination problem with spatial-temporal constraint. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2025, 195103978.

[43]

TiwariS, SharmaP, ChoiT M, LimA. Blockchain and third-party logistics for global supply chain operations: Stakeholders’ perspectives and decision roadmap. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2023, 170103012.

[44]

TudiscoV, PerottiS, EkrenB Y, AktasE. Sustainable e-grocery home delivery: An optimization model considering on-demand vehicles. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2025, 201110874.

[45]

UlutaşA, TopalA, GörçünÖ F, EcerF. Evaluation of third-party logistics service providers for car manufacturing firms using a novel integrated grey LOPCOW-PSI-MACONT model. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 241122680.

[46]

WanS P, YanJ, DongJ Y. Personalized individual semantics based consensus reaching process for large-scale group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations and application to COVID-19 surveillance. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 191116328.

[47]

WanS P, YanJ, DongJ Y. Trust and personalized individual semantics based fusion method for heterogeneous multi-criteria group decision making and application to live streaming commerce. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 208118151.

[48]

WanS P, ZouW C, DongJ Y, MartinezL. A consensual method for multi-criteria group decision-making with linguistic intuitionistic information. Information Sciences, 2022, 582: 797-832.

[49]

WangW, TianG, ZhangT, JabarullahN H, LiF, Fathollahi-FardA M, WangD, LiZ. Scheme selection of design for disassembly (DFD) based on sustainability: A novel hybrid of interval 2-tuple linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and regret theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 281124724.

[50]

WangZ, ZhangH, WangY, WangY, LeiL, LiangC, WangY. Deficit irrigation decision-making of indigowoad root based on a model coupling fuzzy theory and grey relational analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 2023, 275107983.

[51]

WangY, ZhanJ, ZhangC, DeveciM. Considering personalized individual semantics with ordinal and cardinal consensus reaching processes via three-way decision and regret theory. Applied Soft Computing, 2024, 162111851.

[52]

WuY, LiZ, GaoY, ChiclanaF, ChenX, DongY. An endogenous and continual learning approach to personalize individual semantics to support linguistic consensus reaching. Information Fusion, 2025, 114102640.

[53]

XuZ, CaiX. Recent advances in intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation. Fuzzy Optimiza and Decision Maming, 2010, 9(4): 359-381.

[54]

ZhangH, PengH, WangJ, WangJ. An extended outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making problems with linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 59: 462-474.

[55]

ZhangH, WangX, XuW, DongY. From numerical to heterogeneous linguistic best-worst method: Impacts of personalized individual semantics on consistency and consensus. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 117105495.

[56]

ZhangL, YangZ, LiT. Group decision making with incomplete interval-valued linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Information Sciences, 2023, 647119451.

[57]

ZhangX, ZhuS, DaiS, JiangZ, GongQ, WangY. Optimization of third party take-back enterprise collection strategy based on blockchain and remanufacturing reverse logistics. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2024, 187109846.

[58]

ZhangS, TianH, HuL, DeveciM, LiuX. Managing flexible linguistic expressions with subjective preferences and objective information in group decision-making: A perspective based on personalized individual semantics. Information Fusion, 2025, 113102633.

[59]

ZouL, LinH, SongX, FengK, LiuX. Rule extraction based on linguistic-valued intuitionistic fuzzy layered concept lattice. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2021, 133: 1-16.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

PDF

124

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/