Who Hires Streamer? A Tug between Platform and Manufacturer

Yuyan Wang , Luping Ding , Dahai Sun , T. C. Edwin Cheng

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› : 1 -28.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› :1 -28. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-025-5679-3
Article
research-article

Who Hires Streamer? A Tug between Platform and Manufacturer

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Live-streaming e-commerce has revolutionized enterprise development strategies, presenting both opportunities and challenges in model selection. This study investigates three prevalent live-streaming models in supply chain ecosystems: merchant self-streaming, influencer-hosted streaming, and platform-driven live-streaming. Through a game-theoretic framework, we analyze these models to determine optimal decision-making and profit distributions among supply chain members. The analysis incorporates key variables, including product pricing, streaming effort level, and platform service level across various scenarios, while examining the impact of influencer commission rates and technological service fees on decision-making and profitability. A critical finding emerges from influencer-hosted streaming: influencers not only exert substantial market influence during streaming sessions but also generate significant post-streaming continuity effects for manufacturers. These continuity effects prove crucial in manufacturers’ streaming model selection. Furthermore, our analysis reveals a counterintuitive relationship between influencer commission rates and manufacturer profitability. While commission fees represent a direct cost, their increase can simultaneously drive product price elevation and market demand expansion, resulting in a dualistic impact on manufacturer profits. This research provides theoretical insights for supply chain decision-making in live-streaming commerce, offering practical guidance for model selection and partnership strategies.

Keywords

Live-streaming sale / merchant self-streaming / influencer-hosted streaming / sales commission

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yuyan Wang, Luping Ding, Dahai Sun, T. C. Edwin Cheng. Who Hires Streamer? A Tug between Platform and Manufacturer. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 1-28 DOI:10.1007/s11518-025-5679-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

BaoZ, ZhuY. Understanding customers’ stickiness of live streaming commerce platforms: An empirical study based on modified e-commerce system success model. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 2022, 35(3): 775-793

[2]

ChenA H, LuY B, WangB. Customers’ purchase decision-making process in social commerce: A social learning perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 2017, 37(6): 627-638

[3]

ChenX, ShenJ, WeiS. What reduces product uncertainty in live streaming e-commerce? From a signal consistency perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2023, 74103441

[4]

DuanH S, DengS J, SongH Q, XuJ Y. The impacts of sales efforts and mode of payment on the competition between agent and retailer. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2021, 103102416

[5]

HaoC X, YangL. Resale or agency sale? Equilibrium analysis on the role of live streaming selling. European Journal of Operational Research, 2023, 307(3): 1117-1134

[6]

HeY, ChenL, MuJ, UllahA. Optimal contract design for live streaming shopping in a manufacturer-retailer-streamer supply chain. Electronic Commerce Research, 2022, 24(2): 1071-1093

[7]

HuM Y, ChaudhryS S. Enhancing consumer engagement in e-commerce live streaming via relational bonds. Internet Research, 2020, 30(3): 1019-1041

[8]

JiangY, CaiH. The impact of impulsive consumption on supply chain in the live-streaming economy. Ieee Access, 2021, 9: 48923-48930

[9]

JinD L, LaiD L, PuX J, HanG H. Self-broadcasting or cooperating with streamers? A perspective on live streaming sales of fresh products. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2024, 64101367

[10]

JohnsonM R, WoodcockJ. ‘It’s like the gold rush’: The lives and careers of professional video game streamers on Twitch.tv. Information, Communication & Society, 2017, 22(3): 336-351

[11]

KangK, LuJ X, GuoL Y, LiW L. The dynamic effect of interactivity on customer engagement behavior through tie strength: Evidence from live streaming commerce platforms. International Journal of Information Management, 2021, 56102251

[12]

KimY, KrishnanR. On product-level uncertainty and online purchase behavior: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 2015, 61(10): 2449-2467

[13]

LiW H, ChengY, FangZ. Analysis on the consumer decision time of online shopping. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 971–973: 2289-2292

[14]

LiY, LiX L, CaiJ L. How attachment affects user stickiness on live streaming platforms: A sociotechnical approach perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2021, 60102478

[15]

LiY N, NingY, FanW G, KumarA, YeF. Channel choice in live streaming commerce. Production and Operations Management, 2024, 33(11): 2221-2240

[16]

LiuH Y, LiuS L. Optimal decisions and coordination of live streaming selling under revenue-sharing contracts. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2021, 42(4): 1022-1036

[17]

LiuM Q, LiangK, PereraS, HuangR, GhoseS. Game theoretical analysis of service effort timing scheme strategies in dual-channel supply chains. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2022, 158102620

[18]

LuB J, ChenZ J. Live streaming commerce and consumers’ purchase intention: An uncertainty reduction perspective. Information & Management, 2021, 587103509

[19]

MaY Y. Elucidating determinants of customer satisfaction with live-stream shopping: An extension of the information systems success model. Telematics and Informatics, 2021, 65101707

[20]

MaoZ, DuZ, YuanR, MiaoQ. Short-term or long-term cooperation between retailer and MCN? New launched products sales strategies in live streaming e-commerce. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2022, 67102996

[21]

PengL J, LuG, PangK, YaoQ. Optimal farmer’s income from farm products sales on live streaming with random rewards: Case from China’s rural revitalisation strategy. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2021, 189106403

[22]

PickM. Psychological ownership in social media influencer marketing. European Business Review, 2020, 33(1): 9-30

[23]

SokolovaK, KefiH. Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2020, 53101742

[24]

SunY, WangZ, HanX. Supply chain channel strategies for online retailers: Whether to introduce web showrooms?. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2020, 144102122

[25]

WangX, WangX Y, YuB Q, ZhangS H. A comparative study of entry mode options for E-commerce platforms and suppliers. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2019, 37100888

[26]

WangY Y, YuZ Q, ShenL, JinM Z. Operational modes of E-closed loop supply chain considering platforms’ services. International Journal of Production Economics, 2022, 251108551

[27]

WongkitrungruengA, AssarutN. The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. Journal of Business Research, 2020, 117: 543-556

[28]

XiaoQ, WanS S, ZhangX, SiponenM, QuL, LiX. How consumers’ perceptions differ towards the design features of mobile live streaming shopping platform: A mixed-method investigation of respondents from Taobao Live. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2022, 69103098

[29]

XiaoY B, YuJ, ZhouS X. Commit on effort or sales? Value of commitment in live-streaming e-commerce. Production and Operations Management, 2024, 33(11): 2241-2258

[30]

YeF, JiL, NingY, LiY. Influencer selection and strategic analysis for live streaming selling. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2024, 77103673

[31]

ZhangW, YuL L, WangZ Z. Live-streaming selling modes on a retail platform. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2023, 173103096

[32]

ZhangY, XuQ. Proportional incentive contracts in live streaming commerce supply chain based on target sales volume. Electronic Commerce Research, 2023, 25(1): 241-269

[33]

ZhangY F, XuQ. Consumer engagement in live streaming commerce: Value co-creation and incentive mechanisms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2024, 81103987

[34]

ZhangY F, XuQ, ZhangG Q. Optimal contracts with moral hazard and adverse selection in a live streaming commerce market. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2023, 74103419

[35]

ZhenX P, WangP, LiX R. The Streamer’s sales strategy choice considering sales effort. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2024, 78103745

[36]

ZhengR, LiZ, NaS. How customer engagement in the live-streaming affects purchase intention and customer acquisition, E-tailer’s perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2022, 68103015

[37]

ZhengS, ChenJ, LiaoJ, HuH-L. What motivates users’ viewing and purchasing behavior motivations in live streaming: A stream-streamer-viewer perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2023, 72103240

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

PDF

101

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/