The Value of Buyer Financing under Stochastic Component Cost in Supply Chains with Disruption Risk

Wei Cheng , Jianbin Li , Qihuang Mei , Ziyi Wang

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1) : 102 -128.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1) : 102 -128. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-024-5632-x
Article
research-article

The Value of Buyer Financing under Stochastic Component Cost in Supply Chains with Disruption Risk

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This study delves into the dynamics of a supply chain scenario wherein a capital-abundant retailer extends buyer financing to a capital-constrained supplier. The supplier procures components from the spot market and subsequently procures the final product, subject to a certain probability of disruption. We introduce a Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) model to capture the variability of component costs. We characterize the equilibrium results under different financing schemes, including buyer financing and bank financing. The retailer’s equilibrium order time under buyer financing is earlier than that under bank financing iff the probability of disruption is relatively small. When the trend of the component cost is downward, the retailer will place the order at the end, and buyer financing is advantageous for the retailer but detrimental for the supplier. If the component cost shows a slight upward trend with minor fluctuations and settles into a moderate range, immediate buyer financing and transaction execution can yield a win-win outcome for the retailer and supplier with high delivery probability. We also numerically compare our optimal policy with other naive policies, and extend our model to an an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) process.

Keywords

Buyer financing / bank financing / geometric Brownian motion / disruption

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wei Cheng, Jianbin Li, Qihuang Mei, Ziyi Wang. The Value of Buyer Financing under Stochastic Component Cost in Supply Chains with Disruption Risk. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2025, 34(1): 102-128 DOI:10.1007/s11518-024-5632-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

BerlingP, Martínez-de-AlbénizV. Optimal inventory policies when purchase price and demand are stochastic. Operations Research, 2011, 59(1): 109-124

[2]

BirgeJ R, CapponiA, ChenP C. Disruption and rerouting in supply chain networks. Operations Research, 2022, 71(2): 750-767

[3]

BoogertA, de JongC. Gas storage valuation using a monte carlo method. The Journal of Derivatives, 2008, 15(3): 81-98

[4]

ChambersC, KouvelisP, SempleJ. Quality-based competition, profitability, and variable costs. Management Science, 2006, 52(12): 1884-1895

[5]

ChenS, LeiJ, MoinzadehK. When to lock the volatile input price? Procurement of commodity components under different pricing schemes. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2022, 24(2): 1183-1201

[6]

ChenX, LuQ, CaiG. Buyer financing in pull supply chains: Zero-interest early payment or in-house factoring?. Production and Operations Management, 2020, 29(10): 2307-2325

[7]

ChengW, LiJ, YangJOptimal timing of acquisition under fluctuating prices. Available at SSRN:, 2024

[8]

ChenY, XueW, YangJ. Optimal inventory policy in the presence of a long-term supplier and a spot market. Operations Research, 2013, 61(1): 88-97

[9]

DeCroixG A. Inventory management for an assembly system subject to supply disruptions. Management Science, 2013, 59(9): 2079-2092

[10]

DemirelS, KapuscinskiR, YuM. Strategic behavior of suppliers in the face of production disruptions. Management Science, 2017, 64(2): 533-551

[11]

DengS, GuC, CaiG, LiY. Financing multiple heterogeneous suppliers in assembly systems: Buyer finance vs. Bank finance. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2018, 20(1): 53-69

[12]

FengQ A, LiL, ShanthikumarJ G. Express: The effect of supply uncertainty on dynamic procurement and pricing strategies under lost sales. Production and Operations Management, 2024, 33(1): 108-127

[13]

HeL, RongY, ShenZ. Product sourcing and distribution strategies under supply disruption and recall risks. Production and Operations Management, 2019, 29(1): 9-23

[14]

HuangX. Financing disruptive suppliers: Payment advance, timeline, and discount rate. Production and Operations Management, 2021, 31(3): 1115-1134

[15]

HuangW, LiY, ShouB, XiaoYFinancing suppliers in the presence of demand risk. Available at SSRN 3909009, 2021

[16]

KarabagO, GokgurB. Integrated optimisation of pricing, manufacturing, and procurement decisions of a make-to-stock system operating in a fluctuating environment. International Journal of Production Research, 2023, 61(24): 8423-8450

[17]

KouvelisP, TurcicD, ZhaoW. Supply chain contracting in environments with volatile input prices and frictions. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2017, 20(1): 130-146

[18]

LiC, KouvelisP. Flexible and risk-sharing supply contracts under price uncertainty. Management Science, 1999, 45(10): 1378-1398

[19]

LiJ, ChengW, SongX, ZhengY. The value of buyer financing with a minimum quantity commitment in pull supply chains. Omega, 2023, 121102938

[20]

LiY, OuJ, GuC. Buyer guarantee and bailout in supplier finance with bankruptcy cost. European Journal of Operational Research, 2023, 305(1): 287-299

[21]

MandlC, MinnerS. Data-driven optimization for commodity procurement under price uncertainty. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2023, 25(2): 371-390

[22]

NingJ. Strategic trade credit in a supply chain with buyer competition. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2023, 24(4): 2183-2201

[23]

ShaoL, WuX, ZhangF. Sourcing competition under cost uncertainty and information asymmetry. Production and Operations Management, 2020, 29(2): 447-461

[24]

TangC S, YangS A, WuJ. Sourcing from suppliers with financial constraints and performance risk. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2018, 20(1): 70-84

[25]

The World BankEnterprise surveys, 2016

[26]

TomlinB. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Science, 2006, 52(5): 639-657

[27]

WangQ, ZhouH, ZhaoX. The role of supply chain diversification in mitigating the negative effects of supply chain disruptions in COVID-19. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2023(ahead-of-print)

[28]

WangW, CaiG. Curtailing bank loan and loan insurance under risk regulations in supply chain finance. Management Science, 2024, 70(4): 2682-2698

[29]

WangY. The optimality of myopic stocking policies for systems with decreasing purchasing prices. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 133(1): 153-159

[30]

WangY, TomlinB. To wait or not to wait: Optimal ordering under lead time uncertainty and forecast updating. Naval Research Logistics, 2009, 56(8): 766-779

[31]

XiaoG, YangN, ZhangR. Dynamic pricing and inventory management under fluctuating procurement costs. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2015, 17(3): 321-334

[32]

YangJ, XiaY. Acquisition management under fluctuating raw material prices. Production and Operations Management, 2009, 18(2): 212-225

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

147

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/