Market Behaviors under the Stock Index Circuit Breaker using an Agent-based Approach

Xinyue Dong , Honggang Li , Jianlin Zhou , Youwei Li

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2) : 231 -256.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2) : 231 -256. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-024-5621-0
Article

Market Behaviors under the Stock Index Circuit Breaker using an Agent-based Approach

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In this paper, we combine an agent-based model of multi-asset stock market with circuit breaker mechanism and empirical analysis of S&P 500 Index to study market behaviors under the circuit breaker. The artificial stock market model can reproduce the stylized fact that the stock index triggers a circuit breaker. The results show that the smaller the circuit breaker, the more likely the circuit breaker events will occur. And the higher the traders’ index-dependent strength, the more likely the circuit breaker events will occur. From the perspective of market behaviors under the stock index circuit breaker, we find that the market volatility, the correlation of individual stock returns and the convergence of traders’ behavior on the circuit breaker day are higher than those before the circuit breaker day when the circuit breaker in the market is set relatively small or traders refer to the stock index more for decision-making. This is because the smaller circuit breaker mechanism and traders’ more reference to the stock index for decision-making make the behavior of originally heterogeneous traders in the market converge, which aggravates the occurrence of circuit breakers.

Keywords

Circuit breakers / agent-based modeling / stock index / market behaviors / synchronize

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xinyue Dong, Honggang Li, Jianlin Zhou, Youwei Li. Market Behaviors under the Stock Index Circuit Breaker using an Agent-based Approach. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2024, 34(2): 231-256 DOI:10.1007/s11518-024-5621-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Al-AwadhiA M, AlsaifiK, Al-AwadhiA, et al.. Death and contagious infectious diseases: Impact of the covid-19 virus on stock market returns. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 2020, 27: 100326

[2]

AlbuquerqueR, KoskinenY, YangS, et al.. Resiliency of environmental and social stocks: An analysis of the exogenous covid-19 market crash. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 2020, 9(3): 593-621

[3]

AliM, AlamN, RizviSAR. Coronavirus (covid-19) – an epidemic or pandemic for financial markets. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 2020, 27: 100341

[4]

AllenH, TaylorM P. Charts, noise and fundamentals in the London foreign exchange market. The Economic Journal, 1990, 100(400): 49-59

[5]

BerkmanH, SteenbeekO W. The influence of daily price limits on trading in Nikkei futures. The Journal of Futures Markets (1986–1998), 1998, 18(3): 265

[6]

BikhchandaniS, SharmaS. Herd behavior in financial markets. IMF Staff Papers, 2000, 47(3): 279-310

[7]

CastroJ, DrewsS, ExadaktylosF, et al.. A review of agent-based modeling of climate-energy policy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2020, 11(4): e647

[8]

ChiangT C, ZhengD. An empirical analysis of herd behavior in global stock markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2010, 34(8): 1911-1921

[9]

ChiarellaC, HeX Z, HommesC. A dynamic analysis of moving average rules. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2006, 30(9–10): 1729-1753

[10]

ChiarellaC, IoriG, PerellóJ. The impact of heterogeneous trading rules on the limit order book and order flows. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2009, 33(3): 525-537

[11]

ChiarellaC, HeX Z, PellizzariP. A dynamic analysis of the microstructure of moving average rules in a double auction market. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2012, 16(4): 556-575

[12]

DongX, LiH. The effect of extremely small price limits: Evidence from the early period of the Chinese stock market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2019, 55(7): 1516-1530

[13]

DongX, MaR, LiH. Stock index pegging and extreme markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2019, 64: 13-21

[14]

EconomouF, HassapisC, PhilippasN. Investors’ fear and herding in the stock market. Applied Economics, 2018, 50(34–35): 3654-3663

[15]

GoldsteinM A, KavajeczK A. Trading strategies during circuit breakers and extreme market movements. Journal of Financial Markets, 2004, 7(3): 301-333

[16]

GreenwaldB, SteinJ. The task force report: The reasoning behind the recommendations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1988, 2(3): 3-23

[17]

GuA, ViensF G, YaoH. Optimal robust reinsurance-investment strategies for insurers with mean reversion and mispricing. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2018, 80: 93-109

[18]

HeX Z, LiK, LiY. Asset allocation with time series momentum and reversal. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2018, 91: 441-457

[19]

HouK, LiX, ZhongW. Price limits and asymmetry of price dynamics – high frequency evidence from the Chinese stock market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2020, 56(7): 1447-1461

[20]

Kern S, Loiacono G (2018). High frequency trading and circuit breakers. Global Algorithmic Capital Markets: High Frequency Trading, Dark Pools, and Regulatory Challenges: 308.

[21]

KimY H, YangJ J. What makes circuit breakers attractive to financial markets? A survey. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 2004, 13(3): 109-146

[22]

KoijenR S, RodriguezJ C, SbuelzA. Momentum and mean reversion in strategic asset allocation. Management Science, 2009, 55(7): 1199-1213

[23]

LauterbachB, Ben-ZionU. Stock market crashes and the performance of circuit breakers: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Finance, 1993, 48(5): 1909-1925

[24]

Lin K, Gurrola-Perez P, Speth B (2022). Circuit breakers and market quality. SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]

LuxT. Herd behaviour, bubbles and crashes. The Economic Journal, 1995, 105(431): 881-896

[26]

LuxT. The socio-economic dynamics of speculative markets: Interacting agents, chaos, and the fat tails of return distributions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1998, 33(2): 143-165

[27]

Lynch D (2020). Fears of corporate debt bomb grow as coronavirus outbreak worsens. Washington Post.

[28]

MagnaniJ, MunroD. Dynamic runs and circuit breakers: An experiment. Experimental Economics, 2020, 23: 127-153

[29]

OkorieD I, LinB. Stock markets and the covid-19 fractal contagion effects. Finance Research Letters, 2021, 38: 101640

[30]

Partington R, Wearden G (2020). Global stock markets post biggest falls since 2008 financial crisis. The Guardian ISSN: 0261-3077.

[31]

SantoniG J, LiuT. Circuit breakers and stock market volatility. Journal of Futures Markets, 1993, 13(3): 261-277

[32]

SongR, ShuM, ZhuW. The 2020 global stock market crash: Endogenous or exogenous?. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2022, 585: 126425

[33]

SubrahmanyamA. Circuit breakers and market volatility: A theoretical perspective. The Journal of Finance, 1994, 49(1): 237-254

[34]

TaylorM P, AllenH. The use of technical analysis in the foreign exchange market. Journal of International Money and Finance, 1992, 11(3): 304-314

[35]

TsengJ J, LinC H, LinC T, et al.. Statistical properties of agent-based models in markets with continuous double auction mechanism. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2010, 389(8): 1699-1707

[36]

UllahS. Impact of covid-19 pandemic on financial markets: A global perspective. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2023, 14(2): 982-1003

[37]

WangS S, XuK, ZhangH. A microstructure study of circuit breakers in the Chinese stock markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2019, 57: 101174

[38]

WangX, KimM H, SuardiS. Herding and China’s market-wide circuit breaker. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2022, 141: 106533

[39]

WesterhoffF. Speculative markets and the effectiveness of price limits. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2003, 28(3): 493-508

[40]

XiangC, LuJ. Magnet effects of circuit breakers in electronic order-driven markets: Evidence from China. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2023, 28(2): 1450-1469

[41]

XuY, TaylorN, LuW. Illiquidity and volatility spillover effects in equity markets during and after the global financial crisis: An MEM approach. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2018, 56: 208-220

[42]

YehC H, YangC Y. Examining the effectiveness of price limits in an artificial stock market. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2010, 34(10): 2089-2108

[43]

ZhangT, LiH. Buying on margin, selling short in an agent-based market model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2013, 392(18): 4075-4082

[44]

ZhouX, LiH. Buying on margin and short selling in an artificial double auction market. Computational Economics, 2019, 54(4): 1473-1489

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

296

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/