Energy Conflict Resolution for Sustainable Resource Production in Ghana Using a Hybrid DEMATEL-GMCR Model

Abstract

The production of fossil energy resources is central to economic development for developing economies such as Ghana, with abundant natural resources, despite the interrelated socio-ecological disruptions. Owing to the value of the newly found oil and gas resources, disputes are sourced from a tradeoff between financial gains and socio-ecological sustainability among multiple decision-makers (DMs) in the Western Region enclave. Strategic negotiations to formally analyze the stability behavior of the government, “fisherfolks,” and oil companies as major DMs with extensive interrelated strategies are necessary for resolving the ongoing conflict. This research proposes a hybrid decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) - graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) method for multiple DMs to analyze complicated conflicts. The DEMATEL method is used to identify critical strategies based on their interrelationship and then analyze the multiple DMs’ stability behavior using an extended matrix-based algorithm within the GMCR model. An algorithm for the proposed hybrid method is put forward and applied to resolve the case of the energy-resource production dispute in Ghana to demonstrate its procedure. The analysis objectively simplifies a complicated conflict and provides strategic insights for policymakers on the stability behavior of multiple DMs that promote sustainable energy resource production.

Keywords

Hybrid DEMATEL-GMCR / matrix representations / strategic conflicts / strategy interrelationship / behavioral analysis / sustainable resource production

References

[1] Ablo A. Enterprise development? Local content, corporate social responsibility and disjunctive linkages in Ghana’s oil and gas industry. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2020, 7(2): 321-327.

[2] Addae B, Gong H, Xu H (2019). An economic perspective analysis for energy pipeline conflict using the graph model. The 19th International Conference on Group Decision and Negotiation. Loughborough, UK, June 11–15, 2019.

[3] Addae B, Zhang L, Zhou P, Wang F. Analyzing barriers of Smart Energy City in Accra with two-step fuzzy DEMATEL. Cities, 2019, 89: 218-227.

[4] Addae B, Wang W, Xu H, Feylizadeh M. Sustainable Evaluation of Factors Affecting Energy-Resource Conflict in the Western Region of Ghana Using Large Group-DEMATEL. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2021, 30: 1-31.

[5] Adjei M, Overa R. Opposing discourses on the offshore coexistence of the petroleum industry and small-scale fisheries in Ghana. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2019, 6(2): 190-197.

[6] Ayanoore I. The factors eroding enterprise development in Ghana’s oil and gas sector: A critical reflection on why the enterprise development center failed. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2021, 8(3): 1-8.

[7] Bartkus V, Mannor J, Campbell J. Fast and rigorous: Configurational determinants of strategic decisionmaking balance. Long Range Planning, 2022, 55(3): 102142.

[8] Bashar M, Kilgour D, Hipel K. Fuzzy option prioritization for the graph model for conflict resolution. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2014, 246: 34-48.

[9] Bolis I, Morioka S, Sznelwar L. Are we making decisions in a sustainable way? A comprehensive literature review about rationalities for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 145: 310-322.

[10] Brunnschweiler C, Edjekumhene I, Lujala P. Does information matter? Transparency and demand for accountability in Ghana’s natural resource revenue management. Ecological Economics, 2021, 181: 1-11.

[11] Chen Y, Jiang J, Wang L, Wang R. Impact assessment of energy sanctions in geo-conflict: Russian-Ukrainian war. Energy Reports, 2023, 9: 3082-3095.

[12] Dauvin M, Guerreiro D. The Paradox of Plenty: A Meta-Analysis. World Development, 2017, 94: 212-231.

[13] Dowlatabadi N, Banihabib E M, Roozbahani A, Randhir T O. Enhanced GMCR model for resolving conflicts in a transboundary wetland. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 744: 140816.

[14] Elard I. Three-player sovereign debt negotiations. International Economics, 2020, 164: 217-240.

[15] Fraser N, Hipel K. Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions, 1984, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd

[16] Garcia A, Obeidi A, Hipel K. Two methodological perspectives on the Energy East Pipeline conflict. Energy Policy, 2016, 91: 397-409.

[17] Guan L, Li W, Guo C, Huang J. Environmental strategy for sustainable development: Role of digital transformation in China’s natural resource exploitation. Resources Policy, 2023, 87: 104304.

[18] He S, Hipel K, Xu H, Chen Y. A two-level hierarchical graph model for conflict resolution with application to international climate change negotiations. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2020, 29: 251-272.

[19] Hedelin B, Evers M, Alkan-Olsson J, Jonsson A. Participatory modelling for sustainable development: Key issues derived from five cases of natural resource and disaster risk management. Environmental Science and Policy, 2017, 76: 185-196.

[20] Herdiansyah H, Soepandji B, Seda F, Dewi O. Conflict management of renewable natural resources in the border of Indonesia-Malaysia: Sustainable environmental approach. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2014, 20: 444-450.

[21] Howard N. Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behaviour, 1971, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press

[22] Ke G, Li K, Hipel K. An integrated multiple criteria preference ranking approach to the Canadian west coast port congestion conflict. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(10): 9181-9190.

[23] Kilgour D, Hipel K, Fang L. The graph model for conflicts. Automatica, 1987, 23(1): 41-55.

[24] Lee H S, Tzeng G H, Yeih W, Wang Y J, Yang S C. Revised DEMAh]Resolving the infeasibility of DEMATEL. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(10–11): 6746-6757.

[25] Lin Z, Wang R, Tseng M. Determination of a cause and effect decision making model for leisure farm’s service quality in Taiwan. Wseas Transactions on Business and Economics, 2009, 6(2): 73-86.

[26] Muoneke O, Okere K, Egbo O. Does political conflict tilt finance-renewable energy dynamics in Africa? Accounting for the multi-dimensional approach to financial development and threshold effect of political conflict. Heliyon, 2023, 9(3): 1-13.

[27] Necefer L, Wong-Parodi G, Small M, Begay-Campbell S. Integrating technical, economic and cultural impacts in a decision support tool for energy resource management in the Navajo Nation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2018, 22: 136-146.

[28] Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 1944, Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press

[29] Ohmura T, Creutzburg L. Guarding the for(es)t: Sustainable economy conflicts and stakeholder preference of policy instruments. Forest Policy and Economics, 2021, 131: 102553.

[30] Owusu B. Doomed by the ‘resource curse’? Fish and oil conflicts in the Western Gulf of Guinea, Ghana. Development, 2018, 61(3): 1-12.

[31] Rêgo L, Vieira G. Symmetric sequential stability in the graph model for conflict resolution with multiple decision makers. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2017, 26(4): 775-792.

[32] San-Akca B, Sever S, Yilmaz S. Does natural gas fuel civil war? Rethinking energy security, international relations, and fossil-fuel conflict. Energy Research & Social Science, 2020, 170: 101690-101690.

[33] Shen L, Hong Y. Can geopolitical risks excite Germany economic policy uncertainty: Rethinking in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Finance Research Letters, 2023, 51: 103420.

[34] Silva M, Hipel K, Kilgour D, Costa A. Strategic analysis of a regulatory conflict using dempster-shafer theory and AHP for preference elicitation. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2019, 28: 415-433.

[35] Vargas L G, Moreno-Loscertales C, Moreno-Jimenez J M. Conflict resolution in the era of cognitive multicriteria decision-making: An AHP-retributive approach. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2021, 30(3): 1453-1478.

[36] Walker S, Hipel K. Strategy, complexity and cooperation: The Sino-American climate regime. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2017, 26: 997-1027.

[37] Wang J, Hipel K, Fang L, et al. Behavioral analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2017, 49(5): 904-916.

[38] Wang W, Addae B, Xu H, Ke G (2020). Prioritizing fossil-fuel subsidies reform-induced barriers in Ghana: A large-scale group DEMATEL approach under hybrid preferences. The Second International Meeting on Innovation for Systems.

[39] Xu C, Wu Y, Dai S. What are the critical barriers to the development of hydrogen refueling stations in China? A modified fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Energy Policy, 2020, 142: 111495.

[40] Xu H, Hipel K, Kilgour D. Matrix representation of solution concepts in multiple decision maker graph models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 2009, 39(1): 96-108.

[41] Xu Q, Dhaundiyal S, Guan C. Structural conflict under the new green dilemma: Inequalities in development of renewable energy for emerging economies. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 273(1): 1-10.

[42] Yang H, Li P, Li H. An oil imports dependence forecasting system based on fuzzy time series and multi-objective optimization algorithm: Case for China. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2022, 246: 108687.

[43] Young J C, Thompson D B, Moore P, MacGugan A, Watt A, Redpath S M. A conflict management tool for conservation agencies. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 53(3): 705-711.

[44] Yu J, Hipel K, Kilgour D, Zhao M. Option prioritization for unknown preference. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2015, 25: 39-61.

[45] Zhang H, Liu Q, Lu D, Wang X, Fan H. Sustainable development perspective of linking natural resources and human capital development: An overview of resources utilization. Resources Policy, 2023, 86: 104097.

[46] Zhao G, Ahmed R, Ahmad N, Yan C. Prioritizing critical success factors for sustainable energy sector in China: A DEMATEL approach. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2021, 35: 100635.