Coordination for a Closed-loop Supply Chain with Recycling Platform Considering Dynamic Setting

Zehua Xiang , Ting Ji , Lingfeng Dong

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4) : 425 -451.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4) : 425 -451. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-024-5598-8
Article

Coordination for a Closed-loop Supply Chain with Recycling Platform Considering Dynamic Setting

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This paper presents a dynamic closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) model, incorporating a manufacturer, a retailer, and an internet recycling platform (IRP), utilizing differential game theory while considering the forgetting effect of consumers. The model encompasses factors such as the quality level of used products and Big Data marketing (BDM), comparing optimal equilibriums under decentralized and cooperative decision scenarios. To effectively coordinate the dynamic CLSC at each time point, we propose a revenue-sharing and cost-sharing (RSCS) combined contract. In addition to ensuring reasonable sharing of revenues and costs, this contract allows the manufacturer to flexibly adjust wholesale prices for final products and transfer prices for used products in order to distribute profits appropriately and achieve Pareto optimality within the CLSC system. Furthermore, our results indicate that there exists a threshold for Big Data marketing efficiency; high-efficiency BDM not only facilitates increased recycling on Internet platforms but also reduces unit recycling costs for enterprises. Interestingly, when implementing the combined contract, Big Data marketing efficiency does not impact the transfer price paid by manufacturers to Internet recycling platforms.

Keywords

Big Data marketing / differential game / closed-loop supply chain / coordination / internet recycling platform

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zehua Xiang, Ting Ji, Lingfeng Dong. Coordination for a Closed-loop Supply Chain with Recycling Platform Considering Dynamic Setting. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2024, 33(4): 425-451 DOI:10.1007/s11518-024-5598-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ahearn M C, Armbruster W, Young R. Big data’s potential to improve food supply chain environmental sustainability and food safety. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2016, 19: 155-171.

[2]

Bertinelli L, Camacho C, Zou B. Carbon capture and storage and transboundary pollution: A differential game approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 237(2): 721-728.

[3]

Cao K, He P, Liu Z. Production and pricing decisions in a dual-channel supply chain under remanufacturing subsidy policy and carbon tax policy. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2020, 71(8): 1199-1215.

[4]

Chen K, Wang Q, Wang S. Collecting channel selection and information value of a closed-loop supply chain with corporate social responsibility. Kybernetes, 2023, 52(3): 1027-1056.

[5]

Chen Y, Özer Ö. Supply chain contracts that prevent information leakage. Management Science, 2019, 65(12): 5619-5650.

[6]

De Giovanni P. Environmental collaboration in a closed-loop supply chain with a reverse revenue sharing contract. Annals of Operations Research, 2014, 220: 135-157.

[7]

De Giovanni P. A joint maximization incentive in closed-loop supply chains with competing retailers: The case of spent-battery recycling. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 268(1): 128-147.

[8]

De Giovanni P, Zaccour G. A two-period game of a closed-loop supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 232(1): 22-40.

[9]

Dehghanbaghi N, Sajadieh M S. Joint optimization of production, transportation and pricing policies of complementary products in a supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2017, 107: 150-157.

[10]

Eyland T, Zaccour G. Carbon tariffs and cooperative outcomes. Energy Policy, 2014, 65: 718-728.

[11]

Feng Z, Xiao T, Chai C. Recycling and pricing strategies of closed-loop supply chain by the leader of third-party recycler. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(1): 118-127.

[12]

Genc T S, De Giovanni P. Trade-in and save: A two-period closed-loop supply chain game with price and technology dependent returns. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 183: 514-527.

[13]

Guo L, Qu Y, Tseng M L, Wu C, Wang X. Two-echelon reverse supply chain in collecting waste electrical and electronic equipment: A game theory model. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2018, 126: 187-195.

[14]

Hampton S E, Strasser C A, Tewksbury J J, Gram W K, Budden A E, Batcheller A L, Duke C S, Porter J H. Big data and the future of ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2013, 11(3): 156-162.

[15]

Hazen B T, Boone C A, Ezell J D, Jones-Farmer L A. Data quality for data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: An introduction to the problem and suggestions for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 154: 72-80.

[16]

Hazen B T, Skipper J B, Ezell J D, Boone C A. Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain sustainability: A theory-driven research agenda. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2016, 101: 592-598.

[17]

He Q, Wang N, Yang Z, He Z, Jiang B. Competitive collection under channel inconvenience in closed-loop supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 275(1): 155-166.

[18]

Jafari H. Sustainable development by reusing of recyclables in a textile industry including two collectors and three firms: A game-theoretic approach for pricing decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 229: 598-610.

[19]

Jafari H (2022). Investigating environmental and economic aspects of sustainability by recycling pet plastic bottles: A game-theoretic approach. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy: 1–14.

[20]

Jafari H. A game-theoretic approach to select a channel for supplying required materials in producing a product manufactured from recyclables. Journal of Decisions and Operations Research, 2023, 8(4): 844-860.

[21]

Jafari H. A game-theoretic approach to set prices concerning a product manufactured from plastic waste. Journal of Decisions & Operations Research, 2023, 8(2): 463-477.

[22]

Jafari H, Hejazi S R, Rasti-Barzoki M. Sustainable development by waste recycling under a three-echelon supply chain: A game-theoretic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 142: 2252-2261.

[23]

Jena S K, Ghadge A, Sarmah S P. Managing channel profit and total surplus in a closed-loop supply chain network. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2018, 69(9): 1345-1356.

[24]

Jiao Z, Ran L, Zhang Y, Li Z, Zhang W. Data-driven approaches to integrated closed-loop sustainable supply chain design under multi-uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 185: 105-127.

[25]

Li Y, Deng S, Zhang Y, Liu B. Coordinating the retail supply chain with item-level rfid and excess inventory under a revenue-cost-sharing contract. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2021, 28(3): 1505-1525.

[26]

Liu P, Yi S. Pricing policies of green supply chain considering targeted advertising and product green degree in the big data environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 164: 1614-1622.

[27]

Liu Z L, Anderson T D, Cruz J M. Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 218(3): 602-613.

[28]

Mahdiraji H A, Hatami-Marbini A, Moazed N M, Ansari M, Kamardi AAA. Differential game approach to pricing and advertising decisions. Operations Research Letters, 2021, 49(5): 688-695.

[29]

Nerlove M Arrow K J (1962). Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica: 129–142.

[30]

Ramani V, De Giovanni P. A two-period model of product cannibalization in an atypical closed-loop supply chain with endogenous returns: The case of dellreconnect. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 262(3): 1009-1027.

[31]

Reimann M, Xiong Y, Zhou Y. Managing a closed-loop supply chain with process innovation for remanufacturing. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 276(2): 510-518.

[32]

Savaskan R C, Bhattacharya S, Van Wassenhove L N. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Science, 2004, 50(2): 239-252.

[33]

Xiang Z, Xu M. Dynamic cooperation strategies of the closed-loop supply chain involving the internet service platform. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 220: 1180-1193.

[34]

Xie J, Liang L, Liu L, Ieromonachou P. Coordination contracts of dual-channel with cooperation advertising in closed-loop supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 183: 528-538.

[35]

Xu X, Yan L, Choi T M, Cheng T. When is it wise to use blockchain for platform operations with remanufacturing?. European Journal of Operational Research, 2023, 309(3): 1073-1090.

[36]

Yu Z, Lin Y, Wang Y, Goh M. Closed-loop supply chain coalitional cooperation and coordination under differentiated carbon tax regulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 392: 136239.

[37]

Zaccour G. Time consistency in cooperative differential games: A tutorial. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 2008, 46(1): 81-92.

[38]

Zamani E D, Smyth C, Gupta S, Dennehy D. Artificial intelligence and big data analytics for supply chain resilience: A systematic literature review. Annals of Operations Research, 2023, 327(2): 605-632.

[39]

Zhang F, Zhang R. Trade-in remanufacturing, customer purchasing behavior, and government policy. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2018, 20(4): 601-616.

[40]

Zhang P, Xiong Y, Xiong Z, Yan W. Designing contracts for a closed-loop supply chain under information asymmetry. Operations Research Letters, 2014, 42(2): 150-155.

[41]

Zheng X, Li D, Liu Z, Jia F, Sheu J. Coordinating a closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns through variable-weighted shapley values. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2019, 126: 227-253.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

358

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/