Intercultural Trust in Global Contexts: Synthesizing a Western Nomological Approach with a Chinese Systems Approach

Rong Du , Mingqian Li , Shizhong Ai , Cathal MacSwiney Brugha , Ulrike Reisach

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2) : 162 -186.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2) : 162 -186. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-024-5593-0
Article

Intercultural Trust in Global Contexts: Synthesizing a Western Nomological Approach with a Chinese Systems Approach

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Intercultural trust in global contexts plays a central role in helping people from different cultures to communicate comfortably, which is essential for cooperation. Attempting to construct a framework that might foster international cooperation, and thus be helpful for coping with global emergencies, we relate a Western nomological approach to an Eastern systems approach to analyse intercultural trust in global contexts. Considering cultural impacts on intercultural trust and the nomological framework of cultural differences, we propose an intercultural trust model to interpret how cultural differences influence trust. A qualitative study of Chinese-Irish interactions was conducted to interpret this model. We organized 10 seminars on intercultural trust, and interviewed 16 people to further explore the respondents’ deeper feelings and experiences about intercultural trust in global contexts. Through this study, we have identified factors impacting on intercultural trust, and found that intercultural trust can be developed and improved in various ways. To illustrate these ways, we have provided tactics and methods for building intercultural trust in global contexts. Implications are highlighted for organizations to avoid cultural clashes and relevant political or economic risks.

Keywords

Intercultural trust / global contexts / systems approach / Western approach / Chinese approach

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Rong Du, Mingqian Li, Shizhong Ai, Cathal MacSwiney Brugha, Ulrike Reisach. Intercultural Trust in Global Contexts: Synthesizing a Western Nomological Approach with a Chinese Systems Approach. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2024, 33(2): 162-186 DOI:10.1007/s11518-024-5593-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ai S, Du R, Brugha C M, Wang H. Pointing to priorities for multiple criteria decision making: The case of a MIS-based project in China. International Journal of Information Technology Decision Making, 2016, 15(3): 683-702.

[2]

Ai S, Du R, Knight M B, Enterprise B, Brugha C M, Liu L. Trust development process in electronic commerce in globally distributed contexts: A case of homestay.com in China. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 2018, 18: 15-28.

[3]

Barmeyer C, Franklin P. Intercultural Management: A Case-based Approach to Achieving Complementarity and Synergy, 2017, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing

[4]

Berry J W. Cross-cultural Psychology: Research and Applications, 2002, UK: Cambridge University Press

[5]

Bhagat R S, Kedia B L, Harveston P D, Triandis H C. Cultural variations in the cross-border transfer of organizational knowledge: An integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27(2): 204-221.

[6]

Bjørnskov C. Determinants of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison. Public Choice, 2007, 130(1–2): 1-21.

[7]

Boyd G, Zeman V. Towards a global systems steering vision that is simple enough, but not too simple: Symviability. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2011, 28(5): 491-496.

[8]

Branzei O, Vertinsky I, Camp R D II. Culture-contingent signs of trust in emergent relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2007, 104(1): 61-82.

[9]

Brugha C M. The structure of qualitative decision making. Western Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 104: 46-62.

[10]

Brugha C M. The structure of adjustment decision making. Western Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 104: 63-76.

[11]

Brugha C M. The structure of development decision making. Western Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 104: 77-92.

[12]

Brugha C (1998d). Considering WSR in the context of nomology, a generic meta model for systems studies. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Systems Science and Systems Engineering (ICSSSE), USA.

[13]

Brugha C M. An introduction to the priority-pointing procedure. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2000, 9(5): 227-242.

[14]

Brugha C M. Systemic thinking in China: A meta-decision-making bridge to Western concepts. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2001, 14: 339-360.

[15]

Brugha C M, Bowen K. Decision research using cognitive structures. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2005, 18(1): 67-88.

[16]

Brugha C M. Foundation of nomology. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 240(3): 734-747.

[17]

Bueechl J, Pudelko M (2018). Do Chinese subordinates trust their German supervisors? Developing a trust development model. In Academy of Management Proceedings, USA.

[18]

Bueechl J, Pudelko M, Gillespie N (2023). Do Chinese subordinates trust their German supervisors? A model of inter-cultural trust development. Journal of International Business Studies: 1–29.

[19]

Chen M-J. Transcending paradox: The Chinese ‘middle way’ perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2002, 19: 179-199.

[20]

Chen H J, Tsai Y H, Chang S H, Lin K H. Bridging the systematic thinking gap between East and West: An insight into the Yin-Yang-based system theory. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2010, 23: 173-189.

[21]

Chin T, Meng J, Wang S, Shi Y, Zhang J. Cross-cultural metacognition as a prior for humanitarian knowledge: When cultures collide in global health emergencies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2022, 26(1): 88-101.

[22]

Chu X, Luo X R, Chen Y. A systematic review on cross-cultural information systems research: Evidence from the last decade. Information & Management, 2019, 56(3): 403-417.

[23]

Chua R Y. The costs of ambient cultural disharmony: Indirect intercultural conflicts in social environment undermine creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56(6): 1545-1577.

[24]

Chua R, Jin M. Across the great divides: Gender dynamics influence how intercultural conflict helps or hurts creative collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 2020, 63(3): 903-934.

[25]

Colquitt J A, Rodell J B. Justice, trust, and trustworthiness: A longitudinal analysis integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(6): 1183-1206.

[26]

Costa A C, Fulmer C A, Anderson N R. Trust in work teams: An integrative review, multilevel model, and future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2018, 39(2): 169-184.

[27]

Costa e Silva S, Bradley F, Sousa C M. Empirical test of the trust-performance link in an international alliances context. International Business Review, 2012, 21(2): 293-306.

[28]

Dietz G, Gillespie N, Chao G T (2010). Unravelling the complexities of trust and culture. Organizational Trust: A Cultural Perspective: 3–41.

[29]

Dirks K T, de Jong B. Trust within the workplace: A review of two waves of research and a glimpse of the third. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2022, 9: 247-276.

[30]

Dollar D, Huang Y, Yao Y. China 2049: Economic Challenges of a Rising Global Power, 2020, USA: Brookings Institution Press

[31]

Doney P M, Cannon J P, Mullen M R. Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(3): 601-620.

[32]

Du R, Ai S, Brugha C M (2009). Priority-pointing procedure and its application to an intercultural trust project. In Proceedings of the Cutting-Edge Research Topics on Multiple Criteria Decision Making: 20th International Conference (MCDM 2009), China.

[33]

Easterby-Smith M, Malina D. Cross-cultural collaborative research: Toward reflexivity. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42(1): 76-86.

[34]

Ferrin D L, Gillespie N (2010). Trust differences across national-societal cultures: Much to do, or much ado about nothing. Organizational Trust: A Cultural Perspective: 42–86.

[35]

Fink G, Wallis S. Understanding and avoiding negative consequences of value-based laws, policies and programmes. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2022, 39(1): 21-29.

[36]

Frazier M L, Tupper C, Fainshmidt S. The path(s) to employee trust in direct supervisor in nascent and established relationships: A fuzzy set analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2016, 37(7): 1023-1043.

[37]

Frenkel M. The multinational corporation as a third space: Rethinking international management discourse on knowledge transfer through Homi Bhabha. Academy of Management Review, 2008, 33(4): 924-942.

[38]

Fukuyama F. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Vreation of Prosperity, 1995, USA: Free Press

[39]

Jones G R, George J M. The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(3): 531-546.

[40]

Grimm T. Kulturelle und Historische Grundlagen der Beziehungen Chinas zum Ausland, 1979, Genmany: Ges. für Auslandskunde

[41]

Gu J, Tang X. Wuli-Shili-Renli System Approach: Theory and Applications, 2006, China: Shanghai Press of Science and Technology Education (in Chinese)

[42]

Gu J, Zhu Z. Knowing Wuli, sensing Shili, caring for Renli: Methodology of the WSR approach. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2000, 13(1): 11-20.

[43]

Hajro A, Gibson C B, Pudelko M. Knowledge exchange processes in multicultural teams: Linking organizational diversity climates to teams’ effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 2017, 60(1): 345-372.

[44]

Hall E T. The Silent Language, Doubleday, 1959, USA: Garden Hills

[45]

Hamilton W. Lectures on Metaphysics, 1878, UK: Cambridge University Press

[46]

Harris J, Zaheer A (2006). Interorganizational Trust. O. Shenkar and J. Reuer (eds), 169–197.

[47]

Hass R, Denmark A (2020). More pain than gain: How the US-China trade war hurt America. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2020/08/07/more-pain-than-gain-how-the-us-china-trade-war-hurt-america/.

[48]

Hegel G W F. Science of the Logic, 1989, USA: Humanities Press International Inc. (Reissue edition.)

[49]

Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values, 1980, UK: Sage

[50]

Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations, 2001, UK: Sage

[51]

Hofstede G, Bond M H. The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 1988, 16(4): 5-21.

[52]

Holtz B C, De Cremer D, Hu B, Kim J, Giacalone R A. How certain can we really be that our boss is trustworthy, and does it matter? A metacognitive perspective on employee evaluations of supervisor trustworthiness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2020, 41(7): 587-605.

[53]

Ison R L. Beyond COVID: Reframing the global problematique with STiP (systems thinking in practice). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2023, 32(1): 1-15.

[54]

Jing R, Van de Ven A H. Being versus becoming ontology of paradox management. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 2016, 23(4): 558-562.

[55]

Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason, 1985, UK: McMillan (Original in German first published in 1790)

[56]

Kong D T, Dirks K T, Ferrin D L. Interpersonal trust within negotiations: Meta-analytic evidence, critical contingencies, and directions for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 2014, 57(5): 1235-1255.

[57]

Korsgaard M A, Schweiger D M, Sapienza H J. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(1): 60-84.

[58]

Krosgaard M A, Brodt S E, Whitener E M. Trust in the face of conflict: The role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87(2): 312.

[59]

Lado A A, Boyd N G, Wright P, Kroll M. Paradox and theorizing within the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(1): 115-131.

[60]

Leung K, Li P P, Chen C C, Luo J D. MOR Special Issue: Indigenous management research in China. Management and Organization Review, 2009, 5(2): 287-288.

[61]

Lewis M W. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25: 760-777.

[62]

Li P P. Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 2008, 4: 413-439.

[63]

Li P P (2013). Intercultural trust and trust-building: The contexts and strategies of adaptive learning in acculturation. Handbook of Advances in Trust Research: 146–173.

[64]

Li X. Can Yin-Yang guide Chinese indigenous management research?. Management and Organization Review, 2014, 10(1): 7-27.

[65]

Mayer R C, Davis J H, Schoorman F D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(3): 709-734.

[66]

McKnight D H, Chervany N L. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2002, 6(2): 35-59.

[67]

Mislin A, Williams L V, Shaughnessy B A. Motivating trust: Can mood and incentives increase interpersonal trust?. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 2015, 58: 11-19.

[68]

Molinsky A. Cross-cultural code-switching: The psychological challenges of adapting behavior in foreign cultural interactions. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(2): 622-640.

[69]

Mou B. Becoming-being complementarity: An account of the Yin-Yang metaphysical vision of the Yi-Jing. Comparative Approaches to Chinese Philosophy, 2017, UK: Routledge.

[70]

Nakamori Y. Fusing systems thinking with knowledge management. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2020, 29(3): 291-305.

[71]

Nannestad P. What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything?. Annual Review of Political Science, 2008, 11: 413-436.

[72]

Pillutla M M, Malhotra D, Murnighan J K. Attributions of trust and the calculus of reciprocity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2003, 39(5): 448-455.

[73]

Puett M, Gross-Loh C. The Path: What Chinese Philosophers Can Teach Us about the Good Life, 2016, USA: Simon & Schuster

[74]

Romano A, Spadaro G, Balliet D, Joireman J, Van Lissa C, Jin S, Leander N P. Cooperation and trust across societies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2021, 52(7): 622-642.

[75]

Schein E. Organizational Culture and Leadership, 1985, USA: Jossey-Bass Publishers

[76]

Schoorman F D, Mayer R C, Davis J H. An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(2): 344-354.

[77]

Schwartz S H. A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 1999, 48(1): 23-47.

[78]

Secter M. I Ching Clarified: A Practical Guide, 1993, Japan: Charles E. Tuttle

[79]

Srite M, Karahanna E. The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 2006, 30(3): 679-704.

[80]

Trompenaars F. Riding the Wavers of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business, 1994, USA: Irwin Publications Inc

[81]

Trompenaars F, Hampden-Turner. Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business, 1997, UK: Nicholas Brealy Publishing

[82]

Uslaner E M. Castiglione D, van Deth J W, Wolleb G. Trust as a moral value. Handbook of Social Capital, 2008, UK: Oxford University Press

[83]

Vanneste B S, Puranam P, Kretschmer T. Trust over time in exchange relationships: Meta-analysis and theory. Strategic Management Journal, 2014, 35(12): 1891-1902.

[84]

Weber J M, Malhotra D, Murnighan J K. Normal acts of irrational trust: Motivated attributions and the trust development process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2004, 26: 75-101.

[85]

Weber L, Bauman C W. The cognitive and behavioral impact of promotion and prevention contracts on trust in repeated exchanges. Academy of Management Journal, 2019, 62(2): 361-382.

[86]

Zhu Z. Theorizing systems methodologies across cultures. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2010, 27(2): 208-223.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

163

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/