Intercultural Trust in Global Contexts: Synthesizing a Western Nomological Approach with a Chinese Systems Approach
Rong Du , Mingqian Li , Shizhong Ai , Cathal MacSwiney Brugha , Ulrike Reisach
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2) : 162 -186.
Intercultural Trust in Global Contexts: Synthesizing a Western Nomological Approach with a Chinese Systems Approach
Intercultural trust in global contexts plays a central role in helping people from different cultures to communicate comfortably, which is essential for cooperation. Attempting to construct a framework that might foster international cooperation, and thus be helpful for coping with global emergencies, we relate a Western nomological approach to an Eastern systems approach to analyse intercultural trust in global contexts. Considering cultural impacts on intercultural trust and the nomological framework of cultural differences, we propose an intercultural trust model to interpret how cultural differences influence trust. A qualitative study of Chinese-Irish interactions was conducted to interpret this model. We organized 10 seminars on intercultural trust, and interviewed 16 people to further explore the respondents’ deeper feelings and experiences about intercultural trust in global contexts. Through this study, we have identified factors impacting on intercultural trust, and found that intercultural trust can be developed and improved in various ways. To illustrate these ways, we have provided tactics and methods for building intercultural trust in global contexts. Implications are highlighted for organizations to avoid cultural clashes and relevant political or economic risks.
Intercultural trust / global contexts / systems approach / Western approach / Chinese approach
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
Brugha C (1998d). Considering WSR in the context of nomology, a generic meta model for systems studies. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Systems Science and Systems Engineering (ICSSSE), USA. |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
Bueechl J, Pudelko M (2018). Do Chinese subordinates trust their German supervisors? Developing a trust development model. In Academy of Management Proceedings, USA. |
| [18] |
Bueechl J, Pudelko M, Gillespie N (2023). Do Chinese subordinates trust their German supervisors? A model of inter-cultural trust development. Journal of International Business Studies: 1–29. |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
Dietz G, Gillespie N, Chao G T (2010). Unravelling the complexities of trust and culture. Organizational Trust: A Cultural Perspective: 3–41. |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Du R, Ai S, Brugha C M (2009). Priority-pointing procedure and its application to an intercultural trust project. In Proceedings of the Cutting-Edge Research Topics on Multiple Criteria Decision Making: 20th International Conference (MCDM 2009), China. |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Ferrin D L, Gillespie N (2010). Trust differences across national-societal cultures: Much to do, or much ado about nothing. Organizational Trust: A Cultural Perspective: 42–86. |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
Harris J, Zaheer A (2006). Interorganizational Trust. O. Shenkar and J. Reuer (eds), 169–197. |
| [47] |
Hass R, Denmark A (2020). More pain than gain: How the US-China trade war hurt America. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2020/08/07/more-pain-than-gain-how-the-us-china-trade-war-hurt-america/. |
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
Li P P (2013). Intercultural trust and trust-building: The contexts and strategies of adaptive learning in acculturation. Handbook of Advances in Trust Research: 146–173. |
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |