How to Deal with the Trade-off between Development and Decarbonization for Rural Logistics in China? Evidence from Jiangsu

Xiaoyu Bian , Jing Xu

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6) : 656 -686.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6) : 656 -686. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-023-5575-7
Article

How to Deal with the Trade-off between Development and Decarbonization for Rural Logistics in China? Evidence from Jiangsu

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Rural logistics faces a dilemma between development and high carbon emissions in China. We assess the tension between rural logistics development and carbon emissions from the perspective of policy guidance by modeling a rural logistics system using Jiangsu’s data. We simulate the development trend of Jiangsu rural logistics under carbon abatement policies from 2021–2030, with a focus on promoting its development while simultaneously reducing carbon emissions at a minimal cost. The findings show that rural logistics will move towards high carbon emissions without a carbon abatement policy, while the huge tax pressure of carbon reduction policies reduces the profitability of rural logistics, leading to a trade-off between development and decarbonization. From the perspective of implementation timing and manner of carbon abatement policies implementation, we propose a pathway for securing the profitability of rural logistics and resolving the trade-off.

Keywords

Rural logistics / carbon emissions / policy guidance / decarbonization / development / trade-off

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaoyu Bian, Jing Xu. How to Deal with the Trade-off between Development and Decarbonization for Rural Logistics in China? Evidence from Jiangsu. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2023, 32(6): 656-686 DOI:10.1007/s11518-023-5575-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abbas K A, Bell M G. System dynamics applicability to transportation modeling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 1994, 28(5): 373-390.

[2]

Akbari F, Mahpour A, Ahadi M R. Evaluation of energy consumption and CO2 emission reduction policies for urban transport with system dynamics approach. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2020, 25(4): 505-520.

[3]

Andersen J J, Greaker M. Emission trading with fiscal externalities: The case for a common carbon tax for the non-ETS emissions in the EU. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2017, 71(3): 803-823.

[4]

Ao Y, Huang K, Wang Y, Wang Q, Martek I. Influence of built environment and risk perception on seismic evacuation behavior: Evidence from rural areas affected by Wenchuan earthquake. International Journal Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 46: 101504.

[5]

Arslan M, Sar S. Examination of environmentally friendly “green” logistics behavior of managers in the pharmaceutical sector using the theory of planned behavior. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 2017, 14(11): 1007-1014.

[6]

Barlas Y. Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 1996, 12(3): 183-210.

[7]

Bi H, Xiao H, Sun K. The impact of carbon market and carbon tax on green growth pathway in China: A dynamic CGE model approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2019, 55(6): 1312-1325.

[8]

Bristow A L, Wardman M, Zanni A M, Chintakayala P K. Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(9): 1824-1837.

[9]

Budolfson M, Dennig F, Errickson F, Feindt S, Ferranna M, Fleurbaey M, Zuber S. Climate action with revenue recycling has benefits for poverty, inequality and well-being. NatureClimateChange, 2021, 11(12): 1111-1116.

[10]

CDRI (2021). The first plenary session of the leading group for carbon peak and carbon neutrality work. Available at https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-05/27/content_5613268.htm.

[11]

Chen H, Tang B J, Liao H, Wei Y M. A multi-period power generation planning model incorporating the non-carbon external costs: A case study of China. Applied Energy, 2016, 183(1): 1333-1345.

[12]

Choi B, Park S I, Lee K D. A system dynamics model of the modal shift from road to rail: Containerization and imposition of taxes. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2019, 20(19): 7232710

[13]

Demare T, Bertelle C, Dutot A, Leveque L. Modeling closed-loop supply chains in the electronics industry: A retailer collection application. Journal of Transport Geography, 2017, 62(4): 51-65.

[14]

Eichner, Thomas, Pethig, Rüdiger. Flattening the carbon extraction path in unilateral cost-effective action. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2013, 66(2): 185-201.

[15]

Forrester J W. World Dynamics, 1971, USA: Wright-Allen Press

[16]

Frank L, Dirks N, Walther G. Improving rural accessibility by locating multi-modal mobility hubs. Journal of Transport Geography, 2021, 94: 103111.

[17]

Georgina S, Hannah B, Laura M, Tara S, Alexander T. Part I: Externalities and economic policies in road transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 2010, 28(1): 2-45.

[18]

Hamoudi K, Bellaouar A, Petiot R. A model of systems dynamics for physical flow analysis in a distribution supply chain. Transport and Telecommunication, 2021, 22(1): 98-108.

[19]

Ho Y X (2017). Xi Jinping made his first choice after nineteen years of study and chose Jiangsu to explore the way for national reform and development. Available at: http://news.cctv.com/2017/12/14/ARTIxU5eviskwee62KqcHCCN171214.shtml, accessed 10 April 2015.

[20]

Homer J B. Partial-model testing as a validation tool for system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 2012, 28(3): 281-294.

[21]

Huang D, Han M, Jiang Y. Research on freight transportation carbon emission reduction based on system dynamics. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(5): 2041.

[22]

Jia Z, Lin B. Rethinking the choice of carbon tax and carbon trading in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 159: 120187.

[23]

JPBS (2021). Jiangsu Statistical Yearbook. Available at: tj.jiangsu.gov.cn/2021/index.html.

[24]

Kapmeier F P, Gonçalves. Wasted paradise? Policies for Small Island States to manage tourism-driven growth while controlling waste generation: The case of the Maldives. System Dynamics Review, 2018, 34(1–2): 172-221.

[25]

Kerdan I G, Raslan R, Ruyssevelt P, Gálvez D M. A comparison of an energy/economic-based against an exergoeconomic-based multi-objective optimisation for low carbon building energy design. Energy, 2017, 128(1): 244-263.

[26]

Lecuyer O, Quirion P. Interaction between CO2 emissions trading and renewable energy subsidies under uncertainty: Feed-in tariffs as a safety net against over-allocation. Climate Policy, 2019, 19(8): 1002-1018.

[27]

Lin B, Jia Z. The energy, environmental and economic impacts of carbon tax rate and taxation industry: A CGE based study in China. Energy, 2018, 159(1): 558-568.

[28]

Liu P, Liu C, Du J, Mu D. A system dynamics model for emissions projection of hinterland transportation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 218: 591-600.

[29]

Liu P, Wang C, Xie J, Mu D, Lim M K. Towards green port-hinterland transportation: Coordinating railway and road infrastructure in Shandong Province, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2021, 94: 102806.

[30]

Penazzi S, Accorsi R, Manzini R. Planning low carbon urban-rural ecosystems: An integrated transport and-use model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 235: 96-111.

[31]

Pigou A C. The Economics of Welfare, 1924, USA: Routledge, Macmillan

[32]

Porter M E, Linde C D. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 9(4): 97-118.

[33]

Qiu Y, Shi X (2015). A system dynamics modeling framework for urban logistics demand system with a view to society, economy and environment. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Science (LISS’2014). Berkeley, California, USA & Beijing, China, July 23–26, 2014.

[34]

Repenning N P. A simulation-based approach to understanding the dynamics of innovation implementation. Organization Science, 2002, 13(2): 109-127.

[35]

Sérgio C, Hébrard J P, Casas C. Acaulon Fontiquerianum Casas et Sérgio (Musci, Pottiaceae) Nouveau Pour la Bryoflore du Portugal, 1993, FR: Orsis: organismes i sistemes

[36]

Shepherd S P. A review of system dynamics models applied in transportation. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, 2014, 2(2): 83-105.

[37]

Sorrell S, Sijm J. Carbon trading in the policy mix. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2003, 19(3): 420-437.

[38]

Sterman J D. Business Dynamics, 2000, USA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education

[39]

Sundarakani B, Sikdar A, Balasubramanian S. System dynamics-based modeling and analysis of greening the construction industry supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 2014, 18(4): 517-537.

[40]

Tang S, Wang W, Yan H, Hao G. Low carbon logistics: Reducing shipment frequency to cut carbon emissions. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 164(C): 339-350.

[41]

Walker G, Manson A. Telematics, urban freight logistics and low carbon road networks. Journal of Transport Geography, 2014, 37(C): 74-81.

[42]

Wang H, Cao R, Zeng W. Multi-agent based and system dynamics models integrated simulation of urban commuting relevant carbon dioxide emission reduction policy in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 272: 122620.

[43]

Wang S, Tao F, Sun Y. Optimization of location-routing problem for cold chain logistics considering carbon footprint. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(1): 86-103.

[44]

Wen L, Bai L. System dynamics modeling and policy simulation for urban traffic: A case study in Beijing. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2017, 22: 363-378.

[45]

Wolfram P, Weber S, Gillingham K, Hertwich E G. Pricing indirect emissions accelerates low-carbon transition of US light vehicle sector. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 1-8.

[46]

Xia Y, Fu Z, Tsai S, Wang J. A new TS algorithm for solving low-carbon logistics vehicle routing problem with split deliveries by backpack-from a green operation perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 15(5): 949-961.

[47]

Xie Y, Wang P, Dou Y, Yang L, Ren S, Zhao D. Assessment on the cost synergies and impacts among measures on energy conservation, decarbonization, and air pollutant reductions using an MCEE model: A case of Guangzhou, China. Energy, 2022, 15(4): 1258

[48]

Yang X. A review of distribution related problems in logistics and supply chain research. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2013, 2(4): 1-8.

[49]

Yao G, Bian X. Optimizing China’s low-carbon rural logistics system from the perspective of traffic demand management. Logistics Technology, 2016, 39(5): 66-69.

[50]

Zadek H, Schulz R (2010). Methods for the calculation of CO2 emissions in logistics activities. Proceeding of the 8th International Conference on Advanced Manufacturing and Sustainable Logistics, Germany.

[51]

Zhang W, Zhang M, Wu G. How to realize low-carbon travel in rural areas? Evidence from China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2022, 105: 103224.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

141

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/