Contextual Relevance of Sustainable Supply Chain: Recycling, Philanthropy, or Both?

Abstract

Many firms have already been actively or passively involved in sustainable supply chain management with the objective of improving the triple bottom line (TBL). But whether the limited funds should be allocated to both community responsibility activities (e.g., corporate philanthropy) and environmental protection activities (e.g., recycling) is a confusing question. This paper provides deep insights into the combination strategy of two corporate social responsibility (CSR) types in a two-tier sustainable supply chain by modeling analysis. The decision models in eight scenarios with different combinations of CSR types are proposed and applied for the determination of equilibrium scenarios. The paper’s findings highlight: under certain conditions, (1) the supply chain with two types of CSR is the equilibrium scenario and improves the TBL; (2) counter-intuitively, balancing short- and long-term benefits, firms are more willing to cooperate with partners with relatively low consumers sensitivity of CSR activities; (3) it is wise for the manufacturer to allocate more funding to environmental responsibility than to community responsibility. In addition, considering both short- and long-term benefits, comparing with the manufacturer, the retailer has a stronger incentive to improve recycling efficiency.

Keywords

Sustainable supply chain / corporate social responsibility / triple-bottom-line (TBL) / recycling / corporate philanthropy

References

[1] Alonso-AlmeidaM D M, LlachJ. Socially responsible companies: Are they the best workplace for millennials? A cross-national analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2019, 26(1): 238-247

[2] AroraN, HendersonT. Embedded premium promotion: Why it works and how to make it more effective. Marketing Science, 2007, 26(4): 514-531

[3] BhardwajP, ChatterjeeP, DemirK ^ ^. When and how is corporate social responsibility profitable?. Journal of Business Research, 2018, 84(C): 206-219

[4] BrammerS, MillingtonA. Does it pay to be different? an analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(12): 1325-1343

[5] BrandenburgM, GovindanK, SarkisJ, SeuringS. Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 233(2): 299-312

[6] BrownT J, DacinP A. The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 1997, 61(1): 68-84

[7] BrownT J, DacinP A, PrattM G, WhettenD A. Identity, intended image, construed image, and reputation: An interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2006, 34(2): 99-106

[8] BrønnP S, VrioniA B. Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: An overview. International Journal of Advertising, 2001, 20(2): 207-222

[9] CampbellJ L. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(3): 946-967

[10] ChenX, HuangR, YangZ, DubeL. CSR types and the moderating role of corporate competence. European Journal of Marketing, 2018, 52(7/8): 1358-1386

[11] Cone2015 cone communications/ebiquity global CSR study, 2015

[12] CruzJM. Dynamics of supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 184(3): 1005-1031

[13] De GiovanniP. Closed-loop supply chain coordination through incentives with asymmetric information. Annals of Operations Research, 2017, 253(1): 133-167

[14] De GiovanniP, ReddyP V, ZaccourG. Incentive strategies for an optimal recovery program in a closedloop supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 249(2): 605-617

[15] De GiovanniP, ZaccourG. Cost-Revenue Sharing in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain. Advances in dynamic games, 2013, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA

[16] De GiovanniP, ZaccourG. A two-period game of a closed-loop supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 232(1): 22-40

[17] DuS, BhattacharyaC B, SenS. Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (csr): The role of csr communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2010, 12(1): 8-19

[18] EratS, GneezyU. White lies. Management Science, 2012, 58(4): 723-733

[19] GencT S, De GiovanniP. Closed-loop supply chain games with innovation-led lean programs and sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics, 2020, 219(2020): 440-456

[20] GibbonsR SGame Theory for Applied Economists, 1992, US, Princeton University Press

[21] GneezyU, ImasA, MadarászK. Conscience accounting: Emotion dynamics and social behavior. Management Science, 2014, 60(11): 2645-2658

[22] GoldS, SeuringS, BeskeP. Sustainable supply chain management and interorganizational resources: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2009, 17(4): 230-245

[23] GoldS, SeuringS, BeskeP. The constructs of sustainable supply chain management - A content analysis based on published case studies. Progress in Industrial Ecology, An International Journal, 2010, 7(2): 114

[24] HandyC. What’s a business for?. Harvard Business Review on Corporate Social Responsibility, 2003, US, Harvard Business School Press

[25] HuangH, XiongY, ZhouY. A larger pie or a larger slice? contract negotiation in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 142(Apr.): 106377.1-106377.8

[26] HendersonT, AroraN. Promoting brands across categories with a social cause: Implementing effective embedded premium programs. Journal of Marketing, 2010, 74(6): 41-60

[27] HullC E, RothenbergS. Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(7): 781-789

[28] JinM, ZhangX, XiongY, ZhouY. Implications of green optimism upon sustainable supply chain management. European Journal of Operational Research, 2021, 295(1): 131-139

[29] KakuR. The path of kyosei. Harvard Business Review on Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Reviewpaperback series, 2003, USA, Harvard Business School Press

[30] KotlerP. Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. Journal of Marketing, 2011, 75(4): 132-135

[31] KrishnaA, RajanU. Cause marketing: Spillover effects of cause-related products in a product portfolio. Management Science, 2009, 55(9): 1469-1485

[32] Kusi-SarpongS, GuptaH, SarkisJ. A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology. International Journal of Production Research, 2019, 57(7): 1990-2008

[33] LeeJ Y, JinC H. The role of ethical marketing issues in consumer-brand relationship. Sustainability, 2019, 11(23): 1-21

[34] LiX, CuiX, LiY, XuD, XuF. Optimisation of reverse supply chain with used-product collection effort under collectors fairness concerns. International Journal of Production Research, 2021, 59(2): 652-663

[35] LiY, NiuS, ZhaoX, WangW. Effect of epr coefficient policy on the production decision in precious metal accessory recycling. International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 55(4): 1129-1146

[36] LiangH, RenneboogL. Corporate donations and shareholder value. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2017, 33(2): 278-316

[37] MadsenP M, RodgersZ. Looking good by doing good: The antecedents and consequences of stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(5): 776-794

[38] MaignanI, RalstonD A. Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 2002, 33(3): 497-514

[39] MartinR L. The virtue matrix: Calculating the return on corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 2002, 80(3): 68-75

[40] ModakN M, PandaS, MishraR, SanaS S. A threelayer supply chain coordination in socially responsible distribution system. Tékhne, 2016, 14(1): 75-87

[41] ModakN M, PandaS, SanaS S, BasuM. Corporate social responsibility, coordination and profit distribution in a dual-channel supply chain. Pacific Science Review, 2014, 16(4): 235-249

[42] NiD, LibK W. Social responsibility allocation in two-echelon supply chains: Insights from wholesale price contracts. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(3): 1269-1279

[43] PandaS, ModakN M, BasuM, GoyalS K. Channel coordination and profit distribution in a social responsible three-layer supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 168(2015): 224-233

[44] PrahaladC K, HammondA. Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 2002, 80(9): 48-57

[45] Qiang, KeK, AndersonT, DongJ. The closed-loop supply chain network with competition, distribution channel investment, and uncertainties. Omega, 2013, 41(2): 186-194

[46] RajA, BiswasI, SrivastavaS K. Designing supply contracts for the sustainable supply chain using game theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 185(2018): 275-284

[47] RhouY, SingalM, KohY. CSR and financial performance: The role of csr awareness in the restaurant industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2016, 57(2016): 30-39

[48] SaiiaD C A, BuchholtzA. Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity begins at home. Business & Society, 2003, 42(2): 169-201

[49] Schramm-KleinH, MorschettD, SwobodaB. Retailer corporate social responsibility: Shedding light on CSR’s impact on profit of intermediaries in marketing channels. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 2015, 43(4/5): 403-431

[50] SenS, DuS, BhattacharyaC B. Corporate social responsibility: A consumer psychology perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2016, 10(2016): 70-75

[51] SeuringS. A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decision Support Systems, 2013, 54(4): 1513-1520

[52] SeuringS, MüllerM. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2008, 16(15): 1699-1710

[53] SheikhS U R, Beise-ZeeR. Corporate social responsibility or cause-related marketing? The role of cause specificity of CSR. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2011, 28(1): 27-39

[54] SimonJ L, ArndtJ. The shape of the advertising response function. Journal of Advertising Research, 1980, 4(20): 11-28

[55] SinghJ, TengN, NetessineS. Philanthropic campaigns and customer behavior: Field experiments on an online taxi booking platform. Management Science, 2019, 65(2): 913-932

[56] CranenburghK, ArenasD. Strategic and moral dilemmas of corporate philanthropy in developing countries: Heineken in sub-saharan africa. Journal of Business Ethics, 2014, 122(3): 523-536

[57] WuY, LiH, GouQ, GuJ. Supply chain models with corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 55(22): 6732-6759

[58] XuL, LiY, GovindanK, YueX. Return policy and supply chain coordination with network-externality effect. International Journal of Production Research, 2018, 56(10): 3714-3732

[59] XuX, LiY, CaiX. Optimal policies in hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing systemswith random price-sensitive product returns. International Journal of Production Research, 2012, 50(23): 6978-6998

[60] ZhangJ, XieJ. A game theoretical study of cooperative advertising with multiple retailers in a distribution channel. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2012, 21(1): 37-55

[61] ZhouY, XiongY, JinM. Less is more: Consumer education in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing. Omega, 2021, 101(2021): 102259

[62] ZolotoyL, O’SullivanD, KleinJ. Character cues and contracting costs: The relationship between philanthropy and the cost of capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 2019, 154(2): 497-515

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany