Beyond COVID: Reframing the Global Problematique with STiP (Systems Thinking in Practice)

Abstract

Since 2019 humanity has been subjected to the perturbations of pandemic, economic disruption, war, civil unrest and changes in whole-Earth dynamics associated with a human-induced Anthropocene. Each perturbation is like a wave-front breaking on the shore of our historical ways of thinking and acting, increasingly unfit for our human circumstances. This challenge to humanity is not new. In 1970 the French term ‘problematique’ was coined to refer to a set of 49 interrelated global problems; the classic description of wicked and tame problems was published soon after, yet little progress has been made towards answering the question: what purposeful action will aid human flourishing, create and sustain a viable space for humanity, in our ongoing co-evolution with the Anthropocene-Biosphere? A case for innovation in our ways of knowing and doing is made based on arguments that our social world is constrained by: (i) explanations we accept that are no longer relevant to our circumstances; (ii) outdated historical institutions (in the institutional economics sense) that contribute as social technologies to a broader human created and ungoverned technosphere; (iii) inadequate theory-informed practices, or praxis, and (iv) governance-systems no longer adequate for purpose. Practitioners of knowledge science and systems science are urged to act reflexively to critically evaluate the traditions-of-understanding out of which they think and act.

Keywords

Cybersystemics / governance systems / reframing and framing / critical social learning system

References

[1] Aldred J. Licence to be Bad. How Economics has Corrupted Us, 2019, UK: Allen Lane

[2] Ampere A (1834). Essay on the philosophy of science. Accessed August 25, 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9-Marie_Amp%C3%A8re.

[3] APSC Australian Public Service Commission Tackling Wicked Problems. A Public Policy Perspective, 2007, Australia: Australian Government/Australian Public Service Commission

[4] Bateson G. Steps to An Ecology of Mind., 1966

[5] Bawden R. Blackmore C. Messy issues, worldviews and systemic competencies. Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice, 2010, Singapore: Springer

[6] Boulton G, Lucas C (2008). What are universities for? League of European Research Universities. https://www.leru.org/files/What-are-Universities-for-Full-paper.pdf.

[7] Bunnell P (2008). The origin of Humanness in the Biology of Love. Editor’s Foreword. pp. v-xxi. Exeter, Imprint Academic.

[8] Christakis Alexander N. Wisdom of the people. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2004, 21(5): 479-88.

[9] Colvin J, Blackmore C, Chimbuya S, Collins K B, Dent M, Goss J, Ison R L, Roggero P P, Seddaiu G. In search of systemic innovation for sustainable development: A design praxis emerging from a decade of social learning inquiry. Research Policy, 2014, 43(4): 760-771.

[10] Crutzen P J, Stoermer E F. The Anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter, 2000, 41: 17-18.

[11] Cullen C M, Aneja K K, Beyhan S, Cho C, et al. Emerging priorities for microbiome research. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2020, 11: 136.

[12] Foster N, Ison R L, Blackmore C P, Collins K B. Revisiting deliberative policy analysis through systemic co-inquiry: Some experiences from the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in England. Policy Studies, 2019, 40(5): 510-533.

[13] Fricker M. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, 2007, UK: Oxford University Press.

[14] Goodman M (2022). Our technology sickness — and how to heal it. Sources (Spring): https://www.sourcesjournal.org/articles/our-technology-sicknessand-how-to-heal-it (Accessed 25th September 2022).

[15] Gu J, et al. Metcalf G S, et al. Oriental systems thinking. Handbook of Systems Sciences, 2020, Singapore: Springer

[16] Ison R L, Tait J, Wield D, Morris R M, Naughton J, Martin J, Lane A B (1996). Interdisciplinary teaching and research in UK universities. Submission to the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, the ‘Dearing Committee’.

[17] Ison R L. Editorial: Applying systems thinking to higher education. Special Edition Systems Research & Behavioural Science, 1999, 16(2): 107-112.

[18] Ison R L, Russell D B. Agricultural Extension and Rural Development: Breaking Out of Traditions, 2000, UK: Cambridge University Press

[19] Ison R L, Röling N, Watson D. Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: Investigating the role of social learning. Environmental Science & Policy, 2007, 10(6): 499-511.

[20] Ison R L, Russell D B. Jennings J, Packham R P, Woodside D. The worlds we create: Designing learning systems for the underworld of extension practice. Shaping Change: Natural Resource Management, Agriculture and the Role of Extension, 2011, Australia: Australasia-Pacific Extension Network (APEN) 66-76.

[21] Ison R L, Collins K B, Wallis P. Institutionalising social learning: Towards systemic and adaptive governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 2014, 53(B): 105-117.

[22] Ison R L. Governing in the Anthropocene: What future systems thinking in practice?. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 2016, 33(5): 595-613.

[23] Ison R L. Fam D, Palmer J, Mitchell C, Riedy C. Transdisciplinarity as transformation: a systems thinking in practice perspective. Transdisciplinary Research and Practice for Sustainable Outcomes, 2017, UK: Routledge 55-73.

[24] Ison R L. Systems Practice: How to Act. Situations of Uncertainty and Complexity in a Climate-change World (2ed), 2017, UK: Springer

[25] Ison R L, Alexandra J, J Wallis P. Governing in the Anthropocene: Are there cyber-systemic antidotes to the malaise of modern governance?. Sustainability Science, 2018, 13(5): 209-1223.

[26] Ison R L, Straw E. The Hidden Power of Systems Thinking — Governance in a Climate Emergency, 2020, USA: Routledge.

[27] Ison R L, Schlindwein S (2021). The dynamics of governance failure in the context of the Anthropocene: Brazil, UK and Australia, WOSC (World Organisation of Systems and Cybernetics). Conference Paper, Moscow p.71. http://wosc.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Abstracts-Rus-21-12-21.pdfAccessed11thJanuary2023

[28] Khayame H A, Collins K B, Ison R L (2021). Framing matters: How does ‘Anthropocene’ enable and constrain cybersystemic governance of social-environmental issues? WOSC (World Organisation of Systems and Cybernetics) Conference Paper, Moscow p.72–73. http://wosc.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Abstracts-Rus-21-12-21.pdf

[29] Krippendorff K. Major metaphors of communication and some constructivist reflections on their use. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 1993, 2(1): 3-25.

[30] Krippendorff K. Conversation: Possibilities for its repair and decent into discourse and computation. Constructivist Foundations, 2009, 4(3): 138-150.

[31] Lakoff G. Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 2010, 4(1): 70-81.

[32] Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By, 1980, USA: University of Chicago Press

[33] Maturana H, Varela F. The Tree of Knowledge, 1998, USA: Shambala

[34] Maturana H, Poerksen B. From Being to Doing. The Origins of the Biology of Cognition, 2004, German: Carl-Auer

[35] McClintock D, Ison R L, Armson R. Conceptual metaphors: A review with implications for human understandings and systems practice. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 2004, 11(1): 25-47.

[36] Meadows D. Places to intervene in a system. Whole Earth, 1997, 91(1997): 78-84.

[37] Özbekhan H (1970). The Predicament of Mankind. Quest for Structured Responses to Growing World-wide Complexities and Uncertainties. A Proposal and a Report to the Club of Rome. https://www.academia.edu/21206109/A_RETROSPECTIVE_STRUCTURAL_INQUIRY_OF_THE_PREDICAMENT_OF_MANKIND_PROSPECTUS_OF_THE_CLUB_OF_ROME (Accessed 24th September 2022).

[38] Reynolds M, Ison R L (2022). Evidencing systems thinking in practice (Block 2). On-line Module, Walton Hall, The Open University.

[39] Rittel H W J, Weber M M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Science, 1973, 4(2): 155-169.

[40] Russell D B, Ison R L. Ison R L, Russell D B. The research-development relationship in rural communities: An opportunity for contextual science. Agricultural Extension and Rural Development: Breaking Out of Traditions, 2000, UK: Cambridge University Press

[41] Sterling S, Jones P, Selby D. Sustainability Education: Perspectives and Practice across Higher Education, 2010, UK: Earth-scan.

[42] Sterling S (2019). Becoming ‘learner drivers’ for the future: Re-thinking learning and education in a troubled world. Routledge Sustainable Development Pages, June 2019.

[43] Sterling S, Martin S (2019). Climate crisis and the response-ability of universities. Times Higher Education (16/11/19). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/climate-crisis-and-response-ability-universities.

[44] Tansley A G. The use and abuse of vegetational terms and concepts. Ecology, 1935, 16(3): 284-307.

[45] Tsien H S. Engineering Cybernetics, 1954, USA: McGraw Hill

[46] University of Leicester (2016). Research finds Earths technosphere now weighs 30 trillion tons. https://le.ac.uk/news/2016/november/research-finds-earths-2018technosphere2019-now-weighs-30-trillion-tons.

[47] Wiener N. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, 1948, UK: The MIT Press

[48] Wolff J (2018). Britain’s bullied universities should be speaking truth to power. The Guardian. Higher Education 10th April. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/apr/10/britain-bullied-universities-jonathan-wolff. (Accessed 4th December 2022).

[49] Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Waters C N, Barnosky A D. Scale and diversity of the physical technosphere: A geological perspective. The Anthropocene Review, 2017, 4(1): 9-22.