A Multi-Level Selective Maintenance Strategy Combined to Data Mining Approach for Multi-Component System Subject to Propagated Failures
Mohamed Ali Kammoun , Zied Hajej , Nidhal Rezg
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3) : 313 -337.
In several industrial fields like air transport, energy industry and military domain, maintenance actions are carried out during downtimes in order to maintain the reliability and availability of production system. In such a circumstance, selective maintenance strategy is considered the reliable solution for selecting the faulty components to achieve the next mission without stopping. In this paper, a novel multi-level decision making approach based on data mining techniques is investigated to determine an optimal selective maintenance scheduling. At the first-level, the age acceleration factor and its impact on the component nominal age are used to establish the local failures. This first decision making employed K-means clustering algorithm that exploited the historical maintenance actions. Based on the first-level intervention plan, the remaining-levels identify the stochastic dependence among components by relying upon Apriori association rules algorithm, which allows to discover of the failure occurrence order. In addition, at each decision making level, an optimization model combined to a set of exclusion rules are called to supply the optimal selective maintenance plan within a reasonable time, minimizing the total maintenance cost under a required reliability threshold. To illustrate the robustness of the proposed strategy, numerical examples and a FMS real study case have been solved.
Selective maintenance / stochastic dependence / age acceleration factor / data mining / flexible manufacturing system
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Baohui J, Yuxin W, Zheng-qing Y (2011). The research of data mining in AHM technology based on association rule. 2011 Prognostics and System Health Managment Confernece. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM.2011.5939548. |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
Barlow R E, Proschan F (1996). Mathematical Theory of Reliability. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, SIAM. |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
Cox DR (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x. |
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
Liu Y, Xu W, Du H (2011). The method of test for state of railway tunnel lining based on association rules. In Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference 387–390. |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
Lyonnet P (2000). La Maintenance: Mathématiques et Méthodes. Tec & Doc. |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
Qin J, Coolen F P (2021). Survival signature for reliability evaluation of a multi-state system with multi-state components. Reliability Engineering & System Safety: 108–129. |
| [44] |
Rice W F, Cassady C R, Nachlas J A (1998). Optimal maintenance plans under limited maintenance time. In Proceedings of the Seventh Industrial Engineering Research Conference: 1–3. |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
Shahraki A F, Yadav O P (2018). Selective maintenance optimization for multi-state systems operating in dynamic environments. In 2018 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS): 1–6. |
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
Su P, Wang G (2020). Reliability analysis of network systems subject to probabilistic propagation failures and failure isolation effects. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability: 1748006X19893547. |
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
Young T, Fehskens M, Pujara P, Burger M, Edwards G (2010). Utilizing data mining to influence maintenance actions. In AUTOTESTCON, 2010 IEEE 1–5. |
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |