Time Lag Effect of Supply Chain Management on Firm Performance

Lu Xiao , Quan Zhu , Xiaolin Xu , Christoph Wäger

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3) : 321 -338.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3) : 321 -338. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-021-5489-1
Article

Time Lag Effect of Supply Chain Management on Firm Performance

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to identify time lag effect in the relationship between supply chain management and financial performance. We hypothesize that firms with higher supply chain management capability are associated with higher financial performance and the impact would last longer. In addition, we introduce two contextual variables, ownership and market orientation, to detect the moderating effect of ownership structure and organizational culture, respectively. We use firm-level empirical data from 1,131 public Chinese manufacturing firms for the 2010–2019 period to investigate the effect and the result shows that there is a two-year time lag effect in the relationship, which means the positive impact of current supply chain management would last for three years. Furthermore, we find evidence that supply chain management in non-state-owned firms is more efficient and its positive financial impact would last longer than that in state-owned enterprises. Finally, we indicate that market-orientation can’t moderate the relationship between supply chain management and financial performance.

Keywords

Supply chain management / financial performance / time lag effect / ownership / market orientation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lu Xiao, Quan Zhu, Xiaolin Xu, Christoph Wäger. Time Lag Effect of Supply Chain Management on Firm Performance. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2021, 30(3): 321-338 DOI:10.1007/s11518-021-5489-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Adebanjo D, Teh PL, Ahmed PK. The impact of supply chain relationships and integration on innovative capabilities and manufacturing performance: The perspective of rapidly developing countries. International Journal of Production Research, 2018, 56(4): 1708-1721.

[2]

Ahire SL, Dreyfus P. The impact of design management and process management on quality: An empirical investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 2000, 18(5): 549-575.

[3]

Altay N, Gunasekaran A, Dubey R, Childe SJ. Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: A dynamic capability view. Production Planning & Control, 2018, 29(14): 1158-1174.

[4]

Arocena P, Oliveros D. The efficiency of state-owned and privatized firms: Does ownership make a difference?. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 140(1): 457-465.

[5]

ArzuAkyuz G, ErmanErkan T. Supply chain performance measurement: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 2010, 48(17): 5137-5155.

[6]

Bodlaj M. Do managers at two hierarchical levels differ in how they assess their company’s market orientation?. Journal for East European Management Studies, 2012, 17(3): 292-312.

[7]

Boodhoo R. Journal of Online Education, 2009

[8]

Braunscheidel MJ, Suresh NC, Boisnier AD. Investigating the impact of organizational culture on supply chain integration. Human Resource Management, 2010, 49(5): 883-911.

[9]

Cao Z, Huo B, Li Y, Zhao X. The impact of organizational culture on supply chain integration: A contingency and configuration approach. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2015, 20(1): 24-41.

[10]

Carbonell P, Escudero AIR. The effect of market orientation on innovation speed and new product performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2010, 25(7): 501-513.

[11]

Castro CB, Armario EM, DelRio MES. Consequences of market orientation for customers and employees. European Journal of Marketing, 2005, 39(5/6): 646-675.

[12]

Chang W, Ellinger AE, Kim KK, Franke GR. Supply chain integration and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis of positional advantage mediation and moderating factors. European Management Journal, 2016, 34(3): 282-295.

[13]

Chen CJ, Lin BW, Lin YH, Hsiao YC. Ownership structure, independent board members and innovation performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(9): 3371-3379.

[14]

Chen Z, Tan KH. The impact of organization ownership structure on JIT implementation and production operations performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2013, 33(9): 1202-1229.

[15]

Chen Y, Cohen MA, Cui S, Dong M, Liu S, Simchi-Levi D. SSRN 2623770, 2015

[16]

Chen Z, Tan KH. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2013

[17]

Chileshe N, Watson P. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Structural and Construction Engineering, Shunan, 2005

[18]

Cohen MA, Cui S, Ernst R, Huchzermeier A, Kouvelis P, Lee HL, Matsuo H, Steuber M, Tsay AA. OM forum—benchmarking global production sourcing decisions: Where and why firms offshore and reshore. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2018, 20(3): 389-402.

[19]

Cook R (2014). GM to Battle VW in China with $12 Billion Investment and New Plants. Reuters. https://www.chicagotribune.com/autos/ct-xpm-2014-04-20-sns-rt-us-autoshow-china-gm-20140420-story.html/.

[20]

Cooper MC, Ellram LM. Characteristics of supply chain management and the implications for purchasing and logistics strategy. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 1993, 4(2): 13-24.

[21]

Craighead CW, Blackhurst J, Rungtusanatham MJ, Handfield RB. The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sciences, 2007, 38(1): 131-156.

[22]

Crooks E (2012). GE Takes $1bilion Risk in Bringing Jobs Home. https://www.ft.com/content/21a46546-78f1-11e1-88c5-00144feab49a/.

[23]

Dehning B, Richardson VJ, Zmud RW. The financial performance effects of IT-based supply chain management systems in manufacturing firms. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25(4): 806-824.

[24]

Delios A, Zhou N, Xu WW. Ownership structure and the diversification and performance of publicly-listed companies in China. Business Horizons, 2008, 51(6): 473-483.

[25]

Demsetz H, Villalonga B. Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2001, 7(3): 209-233.

[26]

Dowty RA, Wallace WA. Implications of organizational culture for supply chain disruption and restoration. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 126(1): 57-65.

[27]

Dutta S, Narasimhan O, Rajiv S. Success in high-technology markets: Is marketing capability critical?. Marketing Science, 1999, 18(4): 547-568.

[28]

Ellinger A, Shin H, Northington WM, Adams FG, Hofman D, O’Marah K. The influence of supply chain management competency on customer satisfaction and shareholder value. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2012, 17(3): 249-262.

[29]

Feng M, Yu W, Wang X, Wong CY, Xu M, Xiao Z. Green supply chain management and financial performance: The mediating roles of operational and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2018, 27(7): 811-824.

[30]

Flynn BB, Huo B, Zhao X. The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 2010, 28(1): 58-71.

[31]

Green KW, McGaughey R, Casey KM. Does supply chain management strategy mediate the association between market orientation and organizational performance?. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2006, 11(5): 407-414.

[32]

Gudmundson D, Tower CB, Hartman EA. Innovation in small businesses: Culture and ownership structure do matter. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 2003, 8(1): 1

[33]

Gunasekaran A, Kobu B. Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: A review of recent literature (1995–2004) for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research, 2007, 45(12): 2819-2840.

[34]

Guo C, Wang Y. How manufacturer market orientation influences B2B customer satisfaction and retention: Empirical investigation of the three market orientation components. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2015, 30(2): 182-193.

[35]

Guo C, Kulviwat S, Zhu J, Wang YJ. Competing in an emerging market: Antecedents and consequences of market orientation and the role of environmental factors. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 2019, 27(3): 248-267.

[36]

Hassini E, Roh JJ, Hong P, Park Y. Organizational culture and supply chain strategy: A framework for effective information flows. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 2008, 21(4): 361-376.

[37]

Hendricks KB, Singhal VR. Delays in new product introductions and the market value of the firm: The consequences of being late to the market. Management Science, 1997, 43(4): 422-436.

[38]

Hendricks KB, Singhal VR. Association between supply chain glitches and operating performance. Management Science, 2005, 51(5): 695-711.

[39]

Hendricks KB, Singhal VR. Demand-supply mismatches and stock market reaction: Evidence from excess inventory announcements. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2009, 11(3): 509-524.

[40]

Hendricks KB, Singhal VR. The effect of demand-supply mismatches on firm risk. Production and Operations Management, 2014, 23(12): 2137-2151.

[41]

Hendricks KB, Singhal VR, Stratman JK. The impact of enterprise systems on corporate performance: A study of ERP, SCM, and CRM system implementations. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25(1): 65-82.

[42]

Hendricks KB, Singhal VR, Zhang R. The effect of operational slack, diversification, and vertical relatedness on the stock market reaction to supply chain disruptions. Journal of Operations Management, 2009, 27(3): 233-246.

[43]

Hendricks KB, Hora M, Singhal VR. An empirical investigation on the appointments of supply chain and operations management executives. Management Science, 2015, 61(7): 1562-1583.

[44]

Homburg C, Pflesser C. A multiple-layer model of market-oriented organizational culture: Measurement issues and performance outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 2000, 37(4): 449-462.

[45]

Hsu C, Wallace WA. An industrial network flow information integration model for supply chain management and intelligent transportation. Enterprise Information Systems, 2007, 1(3): 327-351.

[46]

Jacobs BW, Singhal VR, Subramanian R. An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. Journal of Operations Management, 2010, 28(5): 430-441.

[47]

Jaworski BJ, Kohli AK. Market orientation: review, refinement, and roadmap. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 1996, 1(2): 119-135.

[48]

Johnson M, Templar S. The relationships between supply chain and firm performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2011, 41(2): 88-103.

[49]

Jones SL, Fawcett SE, Wallin C, Fawcett AM, Brewer BL. Can small firms gain relational advantage? Exploring strategic choice and trustworthiness signals in supply chain relationships. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52(18): 5451-5466.

[50]

Kang YS, Kim BY. Ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from the Chinese corporate reform. China Economic Review, 2012, 23(2): 471-481.

[51]

Kannan VR, Tan KC. Just in time, total quality management, and supply chain management: Understanding their linkages and impact on business performance. Omega, 2005, 33(2): 153-162.

[52]

Kirca AH, Jayachandran S, Bearden WO. Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 2005, 69(2): 24-41.

[53]

Kirchoff JF, Tate WL, Mollenkopf DA. The impact of strategic organizational orientations on green supply chain management and firm performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2016, 46(3): 269-292.

[54]

Koenker R, BassettJr G. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1982

[55]

Kohli AK, Jaworski BJ. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 1990, 54(2): 1-18.

[56]

Koufteros X, Lu G, Peters RC, Lai K, Wong CW, Cheng TE. Product development practices, manufacturing practices, and performance: A mediational perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 156: 83-97.

[57]

Li S, Lin YC, Selover DD. Chinese state-owned enterprises: Are they inefficient?. Chinese Economy, 2014, 47(5–6): 81-115.

[58]

Li S, Jayaraman V, Paulraj A, Shang K. Proactive environmental strategies and performance: Role of green supply chain processes and green product design in the Chinese high-tech industry. International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54(7): 2136-2151.

[59]

Liu Z, Prajogo D, Oke A. Supply chain technologies: Linking adoption, utilization, and performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2016, 52(4): 22-41.

[60]

Martin JH, Grbac B. Using supply chain management to leverage a firm’s market orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 2003, 32(1): 25-38.

[61]

Marcoulides GA, Heck RH. Organizational culture and performance: Proposing and testing a model. Organization Science, 1993, 4(2): 209-225.

[62]

Min S, Mentzer JT, Ladd RT. A market orientation in supply chain management. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2007, 35(4): 507-522.

[63]

Mnasri K, Ellouze D. Ownership structure, product market competition and productivity. Management Decision, 2015, 53(8): 1771-1805.

[64]

Modi SB, Mishra S. What drives financial performance-resource efficiency or resource slack?: Evidence from US based manufacturing firms from 1991 to 2006. Journal of Operations Management, 2011, 29(3): 254-273.

[65]

Mohr JJ, Sarin S. Drucker’s insights on market orientation and innovation: Implications for emerging areas in high-technology marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2009, 37(1): 85.

[66]

Najib MF, Kartini D, Suryana Y, Sari D. Market orientation, buyer-supplier relationship and firm performance with dynamic capabilities as an intervening variable: A research model. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 2017, 19(4): 567-582.

[67]

Narver JC, Slater SF. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 1990, 54(4): 20-35.

[68]

Ogbonna E, Harris LC. Leadership style, organizational culture and performance: Empirical evidence from UK companies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2000, 11(4): 766-788.

[69]

Oliveira T, Thomas M, Espadanal M. Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Information & Management, 2014, 51(5): 497-510.

[70]

Pelham AM, Wilson DT. A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimensions of small-firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1995, 24(1): 27-43.

[71]

Peng GC, Nunes MB. Barriers to the successful exploitation of ERP systems in Chinese State-Owned Enterprises. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 2010, 4(5–6): 596-620.

[72]

Poston R, Grabski S. Financial impacts of enterprise resource planning implementations. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2001, 2(4): 271-294.

[73]

Pyke D, Robb D, Farley J. Manufacturing and supply chain management in China: A survey of state-, collective-, and privately-owned enterprises. European Management Journal, 2000, 18(6): 577-589.

[74]

Ralston PM, Blackhurst J, Cantor DE, Crum MR. A structure-conduct-performance perspective of how strategic supply chain integration affects firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2015, 51(2): 47-64.

[75]

Rees CJ, Hassard J, Morris J, Sheehan J, Yuxin X. China’s state-owned enterprises: Economic reform and organizational restructuring. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2010, 23(5): 500-516.

[76]

Saeed KA, Abdinnour S. Understanding postadoption IS usage stages: An empirical assessment of self-service information systems. Information Systems Journal, 2013, 23(3): 219-244.

[77]

Sin LY, Tse AC, Yau OH, Lee JS, Chow R, Lau LB. Market orientation and business performance: An empirical study in mainland China. Journal of Global Marketing, 2000, 14(3): 5-29.

[78]

Song J, Wei YS, Wang R. Market orientation and innovation performance: The moderating roles of firm ownership structures. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2015, 32(3): 319-331.

[79]

Song H, Liu L, Li W. Science of Science and Management of S. & T, 2011

[80]

Sridharan UV, Caines WR, Patterson CC. Implementation of supply chain management and its impact on the value of firms. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2005, 10(4): 313-318.

[81]

State Council of the People’s Republic of China (2015). State Council of the PRC. http://www.miit.gov.cn973401n1234620-/index.html.

[82]

Spiegel T, Vasconcelos P, Porto DL, Caulliraux HM. Supply chain integration researches: An overview of the field. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2014, 3(1): 12-20.

[83]

Su D, He X. Ownership structure, corporate governance and productive efficiency in China. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2012, 38(3): 303-318.

[84]

Taylor WA, Wright GH. A longitudinal study of TQM implementation: Factors influencing success and failure. Omega, 2003, 31(2): 97-111.

[85]

Thirumalai S, Sinha KK. Product recalls in the medical device industry: An empirical exploration of the sources and financial consequences. Management Science, 2011, 57(2): 376-392.

[86]

Thomsen S, Pedersen T. Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(6): 689-705.

[87]

Udenio M, Hoberg K, Fransoo JC. Inventory agility upon demand shocks: Empirical evidence from the financial crisis. Journal of Operations Management, 2018, 62: 16-43.

[88]

Vickery S, Droge C, Setia P, Sambamurthy V. Supply chain information technologies and organisational initiatives: Complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance. International Journal of Production Research, 2010, 48(23): 7025-7042.

[89]

Waller M, Blankley A. A conceptual model for evaluating the financial impact of supply chain management technology investments. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 2008, 19(2): 155-182.

[90]

Wang Z, Sarkis J. Investigating the relationship of sustainable supply chain management with corporate financial performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2013, 62(8): 871-888.

[91]

Wagner SM, Grosse-Ruyken PT, Erhun F. The link between supply chain fit and financial performance of the firm. Journal of Operations Management, 2012, 30(4): 340-353.

[92]

Wieland A, Wallenburg CM. Dealing with supply chain risks. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2012, 42(10): 887-905.

[93]

Yaprak A, Tasoluk B, Kocas C. Market orientation, managerial perceptions, and corporate culture in an emerging market: Evidence from Turkey. International Business Review, 2015, 24(3): 443-456.

[94]

Yu W, Jacobs MA, Salisbury WD, Enns H. The effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and financial performance: An organizational learning perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 146(1): 346-358.

[95]

Zhang J, Zhu M. Market orientation, product innovation and export performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturers. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 2016, 24(5): 377-397.

[96]

Zhang M, Tse YK, Dai J, Chan HK. Examining green supply chain management and financial performance: Roles of social control and environmental dynamism. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2017, 66(1): 20-34.

[97]

Zhao Y, Cavusgil ST. The effect of supplier’s market orientation on manufacturer’s trust. Industrial Marketing Management, 2006, 35(4): 405-414.

[98]

Zhu Q, Sarkis J. The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 2007, 45(18–19): 4333-4355.

[99]

Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K. Examining the effects of green supply chain management practices and their mediations on performance improvements. International Journal of Production Research, 2012, 50(5): 1377-1394.

[100]

Zsidisin GA, Petkova BN, Dam L. Examining the influence of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth: Does the reason matter?. International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54(1): 69-82.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

136

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/