Comparison of Gatekeeping and Non-gatekeeping Designs in a Service System with Delay-sensitive Customers

Wenhui Zhou , Xiuzhang Li , Qu Qian

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2) : 125 -150.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2) : 125 -150. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-021-5481-9
Article

Comparison of Gatekeeping and Non-gatekeeping Designs in a Service System with Delay-sensitive Customers

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This paper is motivated by a concern in China’s current medical practice in which patients can bypass the primary care and seek secondary care directly. We employ a queueing approach to examine two settings, i.e. the gatekeeping and non-gatekeeping settings, in a service system consisting of two types of service provider — one with basic skills (C-H), e.g. community hospital, and the other with advanced skills (AAA-H), e.g. specialist hospital. Customers are heterogeneous with respect to service requirement. The C-H can only serve customers with a complexity level of service requirement lower than the cure threshold, while the AAA-H can serve all customers. We aim to analyze the social planner’s capacity decision for the C-H in both settings and assess the relative merit of each setting with respect to total social welfare, i.e. the sum of customer benefits net of customer delay costs and service providers’ operating costs. Our findings show that when the C-H’s capacity is exogenous, the gatekeeper setting is preferable if the capacity of the C-H is in the intermediate range because customers’ self-selection behavior gives rise to negative externality. When the C-H’s capacity is optimized by the social planner, the non-gatekeeping setting is preferable if the capacity of the AAA-H is large or the cure threshold is high, because customers’ self-selection behavior as well as the investment in the C-H’s capacity can result in a better distribution of demand among the two service providers. The gatekeeping setting is preferable if the cure threshold is low because it is economical for the social planner to invest in a large capacity in the C-H to serve all customers. We also show numerically the conditions under which the two settings can achieve the first-best solution.

Keywords

Customer delay sensitivity / gatekeeper / service capacity / cure fraction / total social cost

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wenhui Zhou, Xiuzhang Li, Qu Qian. Comparison of Gatekeeping and Non-gatekeeping Designs in a Service System with Delay-sensitive Customers. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2021, 30(2): 125-150 DOI:10.1007/s11518-021-5481-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Adiri I, Yechiali U. Optimal priority-purchasing and pricing decisions in nonmonopoly and monopoly queues. Operations Research, 1974, 22(5): 1051-1066.

[2]

Bakker M, Tsui K L. Dynamic resource allocation for efficient patient scheduling: A data-driven approach. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2017, 26(4): 448-462.

[3]

Balachandran K R. Purchasing priorities in queues. Management Science, 1972, 18: 319-326. 5-part-1)

[4]

Bell C E, Stidham S Jr. Individual versus social optimization in the allocation of customers to alternative servers. Management Science, 1983, 29(7): 831-839.

[5]

Busse R, Riesberg A World Health Organization Health care systems in transition: Germany, 2004, Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe No. EUR/04/5046928

[6]

Chen H, Qian Q, Zhang A. Would allowing privately funded health care reduce public waiting time? Theory and empirical evidence from Canadian joint replacement surgery data. Production and Operations Management, 2015, 24(4): 605-618.

[7]

Chr N (1972). Individual and social optimization in a multiserver queue with a general cost-benefit structure. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 515–528.

[8]

Debo L G, Toktay L B, Van Wassenhove L N. Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Science, 2005, 51(8): 1193-1205.

[9]

Delnoij D, Van Merode G, Paulus A, Groenewegen P. Does general practitioner gatekeeping curb health care expenditure?. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2000, 5(1): 22-26.

[10]

Deng YL (2005). Applied Probability and its Theoretical Basis. Tsinghua University Press.

[11]

Edelson N M, Hilderbrand D K (1975). Congestion tolls for Poisson queuing processes. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 81–92.

[12]

Ferris T G, Chang Y, Blumenthal D, Pearson S D. Leaving gatekeeping behind — effects of opening access to specialists for adults in a health maintenance organization. New England Journal of Medicine, 2001, 345(18): 1312-1317.

[13]

Franks P, Clancy C M, Nutting P A (1992). Gatekeeping revisited—protecting patients from overtreatment.

[14]

González P. Gatekeeping versus direct-access when patient information matters. Health Economics, 2010, 19(6): 730-754.

[15]

Guo PF, Tang C S, Wang Y, Zhao M. The impact of reimbursement policy on social welfare, revisit rate, and waiting time in a public healthcare system: Fee-for-service versus bundled payment. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2019, 21(1): 154-170.

[16]

Hasija S, Pinker E J, Shumsky R A. Staffing and routing in a two-tier call centre. International Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 1(1–2): 8-29.

[17]

Hassin R (2016). Rational Queueing. CRC Press.

[18]

Hassin R, Haviv M (2003). To Queue or Not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems (Vol. 59). Springer Science & Business Media.

[19]

Kim S C, Horowitz I, Young K K, Buckley T A. Analysis of capacity management of the intensive care unit in a hospital. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 115(1): 36-46.

[20]

Kroneman M W, Maarse H, Van Der Zee J. Direct access in primary care and patient satisfaction: a European study. Health Policy, 2006, 76(1): 72-79.

[21]

Lee C K M, Tai W C, Ng K K. System dynamic modelling of patient flow and transferral problem in a mixed public-private healthcare system: A case study of Hong Kong SAR. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2020, 29: 590-608.

[22]

Lee H H, Pinker E J, Shumsky R A. Outsourcing a two-level service process. Management Science, 2012, 58(8): 1569-1584.

[23]

Li L. The role of inventory in delivery-time competition. Management Science, 1992, 38(2): 182-197.

[24]

Li N, Kong N, Li Q, Jiang Z. Evaluation of reverse referral partnership in a tiered hospital system-A queuing-based approach. International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 55(19): 5647-5663.

[25]

Li N, Zhang Y, Teng D, Kong N (2020). Pareto optimization for control agreement in patient referral coordination. Omega: 102234.

[26]

Li W, Gan Y, Dong X, Zhou Y, Cao S, Kkandawire N, …& Lu Z (2017). Gatekeeping and the utilization of community health services in Shenzhen, China: A cross-sectional study. Medicine 96(38).

[27]

Li XZ, Huang WX, Chen Y, Zhou WH. The effects of an online inquiry service on gatekeeping systems with heterogeneous patients. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 2019, 4(4): 211-227.

[28]

Littlechild S C. Optimal arrival rate in a simple queueing system. International Journal of Production Research, 1974, 12(3): 391-397.

[29]

Marchesi J F, Hamacher S, Fleck J L. A stochastic programming approach to the physician staffing and scheduling problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 142: 106281.

[30]

Marinoso B G, Jelovac I. GPs’ payment contracts and their referral practice. Journal of Health Economics, 2003, 22(4): 617-635.

[31]

Martin D P, Diehr P, Price K F, Richardson W C. Effect of a gatekeeper plan on health services use and charges: a randomized trial. American Journal of Public Health, 1989, 79(12): 1628-1632.

[32]

Martins B, Filipe L. Doctors’ response to queues: Evidence from a Portuguese emergency department. Health Economics, 2020, 29(2): 123-137.

[33]

Naor P (1969). The regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 15–24.

[34]

Qian Q, Guo P, Lindsey R. Comparison of subsidy schemes for reducing waiting times in healthcare systems. Production and Operations Management, 2017, 26(11): 2033-2049.

[35]

Rajan B, Tezcan T, Seidmann A. Service systems with heterogeneous customers: investigating the effect of telemedicine on chronic care. Management Science, 2019, 65(3): 1236-1267.

[36]

Shumsky R A, Pinker E J. Gatekeepers and referrals in services. Management Science, 2003, 49(7): 839-856.

[37]

Starfield B. Is primary care essential?. The lancet, 1994, 344(8930): 1129-1133.

[38]

Tijms H C (2003). A first course in stochastic models. John Wiley and sons.

[39]

Wang JJ, Li ZP, Shi JJ (2020). Hospital referral and capacity strategies in the two-tier healthcare systems. Omega 102229.

[40]

Wang XF, Wu Q, Lai GM, Scheller-Wolf A. Offering discretionary healthcare services with medical consumption. Production and Operations Management, 2019, 28(9): 2291-2304.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

177

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/