Estimating Network Connectedness of Financial Markets and Commodities

Ehsan Bagheri , Seyed Babak Ebrahimi

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5) : 572 -589.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5) : 572 -589. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-020-5465-1
Article

Estimating Network Connectedness of Financial Markets and Commodities

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

We investigate the directional volatility and return network connectedness among stock, commodity, bond, currency and cryptocurrency markets. The period of study covers Feb 2006 until August 2018. We utilize and expand Diebold and Yilmaz (2014 2015) connectedness measurement; accordingly, in the variance decomposition structure, we use Hierarchical Vector Autoregression (HVAR) to estimate high dimensional networks more accurately. Our empirical results show that markets are highly connected, especially during 2008–2009. Asian stock markets are the net receiver of shocks, while European and American stock markets are the net transmitter of shocks to other markets. The pairwise connectedness results suggest that among stock markets, DAX-CAC 40, FTSE 100-CAC 40 and S&P 500-S&P_TSX index are more integrated through connectedness than the others. For other markets, WTI crude oil — Brent crude oil, 30-Year bond and 10-Year bond, Dollar Index futures-EUR/USD have notable connections. In terms of cryptocurrencies, they contribute insignificantly to other markets and are highly integrated with each other. Gold and cryptocurrencies seem to be good choices for investors to hedge during a crisis.

Keywords

Financial markets / network / connectedness / econometrics / commodity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ehsan Bagheri, Seyed Babak Ebrahimi. Estimating Network Connectedness of Financial Markets and Commodities. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2020, 29(5): 572-589 DOI:10.1007/s11518-020-5465-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abbas G, Hammoudeh S, Shahzad SJ, Wang S, Wei Y. Return and volatility connectedness between stock markets and macroeconomic factors in the G-7 countries. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2019, 28(1): 1-36.

[2]

Acharya VV, Pedersen LH, Philippon T, Richardson M. Measuring systemic risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 2017, 30(1): 2-47.

[3]

Adrian T, Brunnermeier MK (2011). CoVaR. National Bureau of Economic Research.

[4]

Ahmad W, Mishra AV, Daly KJ. Financial connectedness of BRICS and global sovereign bond markets. Emerging Markets Review, 2018, 37: 1-16.

[5]

Antonakakis N, Kizys R. Dynamic spillovers between commodity and currency markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2015, 41: 303-319.

[6]

Barbaglia L, Croux C, Wilms I. Volatility spillovers and heavy tails: A large t-Vector AutoRegressive approach. Energy Economics, 2020, 85: 104555

[7]

Barigozzi M, Hallin M. A network analysis of the volatility of high dimensional financial series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 2017, 66(3): 581-605.

[8]

Belke A, Dubova I. International spillovers in global asset markets. Economic Systems, 2018, 42(1): 3-17.

[9]

Billio M, Getmansky M, Lo AW, Pelizzon L. Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors. Journal of financial economics, 2012, 104(3): 535-559.

[10]

Boon LN, Ielpo F. Determining the maximum number of uncorrelated strategies in a global portfolio. Journal of Alternative Investments, 2014, 16(4): 8

[11]

Chen Y, Li W, Qu F. Dynamic asymmetric spillovers and volatility interdependence on China’s stock market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2019, 523: 825-838.

[12]

Cimini R. Eurozone network “Connectedness” after fiscal year 2008. Finance Research Letters, 2015, 14: 160-166.

[13]

Dao TM, McGroarty F, Urquhart A. The Brexit vote and currency markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2019, 59: 153-164.

[14]

Demirer M, Diebold FX, Liu L, Yilmaz K. Estimating global bank network connectedness. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2018, 33(1): 1-15.

[15]

Diebold FX, Yilmaz K. Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. International Journal of Forecasting, 2012, 28(1): 57-66.

[16]

Diebold FX, Yilmaz K. On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. Journal of Econometrics, 2014, 182(1): 119-134.

[17]

Diebold FX, Yilmaz K. Financial and Macroeconomic Connectedness: A Network Approach to Measurement and Monitoring, 2015, USA: Oxford University Press.

[18]

Ebrahimi SB, Seyedhosseini SM. Robust Mestimation of multivariate FIGARCH models for handling volatility transmission: A case study of Iran, United Arab Emirates and the global oil price index. Scientia Iranica, 2015, 22(3): 1218-1226.

[19]

Ferrario A, Guidolin M, Pedio M (2018). Comparing in-and out-of-sample approaches to variance decomposition-based estimates of network connectedness an application to the Italian banking system.

[20]

Forbes KJ, Rigobon R. No contagion, only interdependence: Measuring stock market comovements. The Journal of Finance, 2002, 57(5): 2223-2261.

[21]

Greenwood-Nimmo M, Nguyen VH, Rafferty B. Risk and return spillovers among the G10 currencies. Journal of Financial Markets, 2016, 31: 43-62.

[22]

Hsu NJ, Hung HL, Chang YM. Subset selection for vector autoregressive processes using Lasso. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2008, 52(7): 3645-3657.

[23]

Jeong D, Park S. The more connected, the better? Impact of connectedness on volatility and price discovery in the Korean financial sector. Managerial Finance, 2018, 44(1): 46-73.

[24]

Ji Q, Bouri E, Lau CK, Roubaud D. Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2018, 63: 257-272.

[25]

Ji Q, Geng JB, Tiwari AK. Information spillovers and connectedness networks in the oil and gas markets. Energy Economics, 2018, 75: 71-84.

[26]

Kang SH, Lee JW. The network connectedness of volatility spillovers across global futures markets. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2019, 526: 120756

[27]

Kim D, Wang Y, Zou J. Asymptotic theory for large volatility matrix estimation based on high-frequency financial data. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 2016, 126(11): 3527-3577.

[28]

Koop G, Pesaran MH, Potter SM. Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of Econometrics, 1996, 74(1): 119-147.

[29]

Lundgren AI, Milicevic A, Uddin GS, Kang SH. Connectedness network and dependence structure mechanism in green investments. Energy Economics, 2018, 72: 145-153.

[30]

Maghyereh AI, Awartani B, Bouri E. The directional volatility connectedness between crude oil and equity markets: New evidence from implied volatility indexes. Energy Economics, 2016, 57: 78-93.

[31]

Mensi W, Boubaker FZ, Al-Yahyaee KH, Kang SH. Dynamic volatility spillovers and connectedness between global, regional, and GIPSI stock markets. Finance Research Letters, 2018, 25: 230-238.

[32]

Mensi W, Hkiri B, Al-Yahyaee KH, Kang SH. Analyzing time-frequency co-movements across gold and oil prices with BRICS stock markets: A VaR based on wavelet approach. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2018, 54: 74-102.

[33]

Nicholson WB, Matteson DS, Bien J. VARX-L: Structured regularization for large vector autoregressions with exogenous variables. International Journal of Forecasting, 2017, 33(3): 627-651.

[34]

Nicholson WB, Wilms I, Bien J, Matteson DS (2018). High dimensional forecasting via interpretable vector autoregression. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1412.5250.

[35]

Nicholson W, Matteson D, Bien J (2019). BigVAR: Dimension reduction methods for multivariate time series. R Package Version: 1(4).

[36]

Parkinson M (1980). The extreme value method for estimating the variance of the rate of return. Journal of business: 61–65.

[37]

Pesaran HH, Shin Y. Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters, 1998, 58(1): 17-29.

[38]

Schwendner P, Schuele M, Ott T, Hillebrand M (2015). European government bond dynamics and stability policies: Taming contagion risks. Working Papers, 2015.

[39]

Shahzad SJ, Arreola-Hernandez J, Bekiros S, Rehman MU. Risk transmitters and receivers in global currency markets. Finance Research Letters, 2018, 25: 1-9.

[40]

Shahzad SJ, Arreola-Hernandez J, Bekiros S, Shahbaz M, Kayani GM. A systemic risk analysis of Islamic equity markets using vine copula and delta CoVaR modeling. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2018, 56: 104-127.

[41]

Sims CA (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 1–48.

[42]

Singh VK, Nishant S, Kumar P. Dynamic and directional network connectedness of crude oil and currencies: Evidence from implied volatility. Energy Economics, 2018, 76: 48-63.

[43]

Song S, Bickel PJ (2011). Large vector auto regressions. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1106.3915.

[44]

Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 1996, 58(1): 267-288.

[45]

Wei WW (2019). Dimension reduction in high dimensional multivariate time series analysis. Contemporary Biostatistics with Biopharmaceutical Applications: 33–59.

[46]

Wen T, Wang GJ (2020). Volatility connectedness in global foreign exchange markets. Journal of Multinational Financial Management: 100617.

[47]

Xiao X, Huang J. Dynamic connectedness of international crude oil prices: The Diebold-Yilmaz approach. Sustainability, 2018, 10(9): 3298

[48]

Xu N, Tang X. A causality analysis of societal risk perception and stock market volatility in China. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2018, 27(5): 613-631.

[49]

Yi S, Xu Z, Wang GJ. Volatility connectedness in the cryptocurrency market: Is Bitcoin a dominant cryptocurrency. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2018, 60: 98-114.

[50]

Yoon SM, Al Mamun M, Uddin GS, Kang SH. Network connectedness and net spillover between financial and commodity markets. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2019, 48: 801-818.

[51]

Zhang D, Broadstock DC (2018). Global financial crisis and rising connectedness in the international commodity markets International Review of Financial Analysis: 101239.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

135

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/