Optimization and Simulation of Operation Performance in Crushing Plants Using Fuzzy Modelling

Khaled Ali Abuhasel

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6) : 766 -780.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6) : 766 -780. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-019-5430-z
Article

Optimization and Simulation of Operation Performance in Crushing Plants Using Fuzzy Modelling

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This research includes optimization of aggregate production of the stone crushing plant using fuzzy modelling. The investigation includes onsite aggregate testing and fuzzy logic implementation. Fuzzy modelling is a type of computerized reasoning used to simulate the real plant operation. In this work, a lot of agent degree information for crushers were reproduced using fuzzy logic. Fuzzy logic was then used to shape the information after a crusher process. Fuzzy logic is created to improve the final product gradation for the client. Strategies for utilizing the created fuzzy model is sketched out and could be utilized as a part of a representative preparing program or for informative purposes. About the tonnages anticipated by fuzzy, it is evident that the program does great in predicting the final product tonnage with an average of 13.7 % for just four samples.

Keywords

Aggregate production / crushing / fuzzy modelling / product tonnage

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Khaled Ali Abuhasel. Optimization and Simulation of Operation Performance in Crushing Plants Using Fuzzy Modelling. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2019, 28(6): 766-780 DOI:10.1007/s11518-019-5430-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abuhasel K A. Comparative study of regression model and the adaptive neuro-fuzzy conjecture systems for predicting energy consumption for jaw crusher. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(1): 3916.

[2]

Aliev R A, Fazlollahi B, Guirimov B, Aliev R R. Fuzzy-genetic approach to aggregate production-distribution planning in supply chain management. Information Sciences, 2007, 177: 4241-4255.

[3]

Asbjörnsson G, Hulthén E, Evertsson M. Modelling and simulation of dynamic crushing plant behavior with MATLAB/simulink. Minerals Engineering, 2013, 43(1): 112-120.

[4]

Bearman R T (2019). Jaw and Impact Crushers. SME Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Handbook.

[5]

Calanog E, Geiger G. How to optimize crushing and screening through computer aided design. Engineering and Mining Journal, 1973, 174: 82-87.

[6]

Carter R A. New crusher models enhance process design flexibility. Engineering and Mining Journal, 2016, 217: 48-51.

[7]

Cleary P, Sinnott M, Morrison R, Cummins S, Delaney G. Analysis of cone crusher performance with changes in material properties and operating conditions using DEM. Minerals Engineering, 2017, 100: 49-70.

[8]

Fu R, Hu X, Zhou B. Discrete element modeling of crushable sands considering realistic particle shape effect. Computers and Geotechnics, 2017, 91: 179-191.

[9]

Guimaraes M, Valdes J, Palomino A, Santamarina J. Aggregate production: Fines generation during rock crushing. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2007, 81: 237-247.

[10]

Gurun T (1973). Design of crushing plant flow-sheets by simulation. Application of Computer Methods in the Mineral Industry. South African Institute of Minerals and Metallurgy 91–98.

[11]

Hajjar D, AbouRizk S M. Modeling and analysis of aggregate production operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1998, 124: 390-401.

[12]

Johansson M, Bengtsson M, Evertsson M, Hulthén E. A fundamental model of an industrial-scale jaw crusher. Minerals Engineering, 2017, 105: 69-78.

[13]

Kapur P, Ball B, Fuerstenau D. A stochastic approach to sieving kinetics. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 1977, 4: 131-147.

[14]

King R P. Modeling and simulation of mineral processing systems, 2012, Amsterdam: Elsevier

[15]

Kivikytö-Reponen P, Ala-Kleme S, Hellman J, Liimatainen J, Hannula S-P. The correlation of material characteristics and wear in a laboratory scale cone crusher. Wear, 2009, 267(1): 568-575.

[16]

Lee E. Optimization of Compressive Crushing, 2012, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology

[17]

Lin C T, Lee C S G. Neural Fuzzy Systems: A Neuro-Fuzzy Synergism to Intelligent Systems, 1996, New Jersey: Prentice Hall

[18]

Lynch A. Mineral Crushing and Grinding Circuits: Their Simulation, Optimisation, Design, and Control, 1977, New York: Elsevier Science Ltd.

[19]

Mehdizadeh E, Niaki S T A, Hemati M. A biobjective aggregate production planning problem with learning effect and machine deterioration: Modeling and solution. Computers & Operations Research, 2018, 91: 21-36.

[20]

Mwangi P N’u, Muvengei O M, Mbuya T O (2018). Review of discrete element modelling in optimisation of energy consumption of a single-toggle jaw crusher. IOP Proceedings of Sustainable Research and Innovation Conference:251–259.

[21]

Modarres M, Izadpanahi E. Aggregate production planning by focusing on energy saving: A robust optimization approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 133: 1074-1085.

[22]

Numbi B P. Optimal Energy Management of Crushing Processes in the Mining Industry, 2015, South Africa: University of Pretoria

[23]

Quist J, Evertsson C M. Cone crusher modelling and simulation using DEM. Minerals Engineering, 2016, 85: 92-105.

[24]

Svensson A, Steer J. New cone crusher technology and developments in comminution circuits. Minerals Engineering, 1990, 3: 83-103.

[25]

Yaghin R G. Integrated multi-site aggregate production-pricing planning in a two-echelon supply chain with multiple demand classes. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2018, 53: 276-295.

[26]

Zhang Z, Ren T, Cheng J, Jin X. The improved model of inter-particle breakage considering the transformation of particle shape for cone crusher. Minerals Engineering, 2017, 112: 11-18.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

127

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/