On Optimal Priority Modelling of Group Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations with Normal Uncertainty Distribution

Lihong Wang , Zaiwu Gong

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4) : 510 -525.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4) : 510 -525. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-019-5425-9
Article

On Optimal Priority Modelling of Group Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations with Normal Uncertainty Distribution

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The uncertainty distribution can more effectively express the uncertainty of decision makers’ judgments during a pairwise comparison of any alternatives. This paper investigates the priority models of group intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations with normal uncertainty distribution. The mathematical equivalence between the membership, non-membership degree interval fuzzy preference relation and the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation is constructed, showing that there exists an inverse relationship between the priority of alternatives using these two types of interval preference relations. The new optimal models regarded the event that the deviation between the ideal judgement meeting the multiplicative consistency and the actual judgement obeying normal uncertainty distribution shall not exceed a threshold value under the given belief degree as a constraint, and regarded the minimum sum of all the threshold values as the objective function. The chance constraint was introduced to measure the degree to which multiplicative consistency can be realized under different belief degrees. The priority model provides a new method for simulating uncertainty and fuzziness in the real-world decision making environment.

Keywords

Group decisions and negotiations / intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation / multiplicative consistency / normal uncertainty distribution / chance constraint programming

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lihong Wang, Zaiwu Gong. On Optimal Priority Modelling of Group Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations with Normal Uncertainty Distribution. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2019, 28(4): 510-525 DOI:10.1007/s11518-019-5425-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 1986, 20(1): 87-96.

[2]

Bustince H, Burillo P. Vague sets are intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 1996, 79(3): 403-405.

[3]

Charnes A, Cooper WW. Chance-Constrained Programming. Management Science, 1959, 6(6): 73-79.

[4]

Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Herrera F. Cardinal Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Characterization of Multiplicative Transitivity. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2009, 17(1): 14-23.

[5]

Dimitrov D. The Paretian liberal with intuitionistic fuzzy preferences: A result. Social Choice & Welfare, 2004, 23(1): 149-156.

[6]

Dong Y, Herrera-Viedma E. Consistency-driven automatic methodology to set interval numerical scales of 2-tuple linguistic term sets and its use in the linguistic GDM with preference relation. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2017, 45(4): 780-792.

[7]

George C, Roger LB. Statistical Inference: Common Families of Distributions, 2002

[8]

Gong ZW, Li LS, Zhou FX, Yao TX. Goal programming approaches to obtain the priority vectors from the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2009, 57(4): 1187-1193.

[9]

Gong Z, Tan X, Yang Y. Optimal weighting models based on linear uncertain constraints in intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2018 1-12.

[10]

Gong Z, Zhang N, Chiclana F. The optimization ordering model for intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations with utility functions. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018, 162: 174-184.

[11]

Gorzalczany B. Approximate inference with interval - valued fuzzy sets — an outline. Proceedings of the Polish Symposium on Interval and Fuzzy Mathematics, 1983 89-95.

[12]

Hwang CL, Lin MJ. Group decision making under multiple criteria: Methods and applications. Bioworld Today, 1987 281

[13]

Li CC, Dong Y, Xu Y, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. An overview on managing additive consistency of reciprocal preference relations for consistency driven decision making and fusion: Taxonomy and future directions. Information Fusion, 2019, 52: 143-156.

[14]

Liu B. Uncertainty Theory, 2014

[15]

Meng F, Chen X. A robust additive consistency-based method for decision making with triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Fuzzy Optimization & Decision Making, 2016, 17(1): 1-25.

[16]

Meng F, Tan C, Chen X. Multiplicative consistency analysis for interval fuzzy preference relations: A comparative study. Omega, 2016, 68: 17-38.

[17]

Orlovsky S. Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1978, 1(3): 155-167.

[18]

Saaty TL. Modeling unstructured decision problems-the theory of analytical hierarchies. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 1978, 20(3): 147-158.

[19]

Saaty TL, Vargas LG. Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1987, 32(1): 107-117.

[20]

Saaty TL. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1994, 24(6): 19-43.

[21]

Tanino T. Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 1984, 12(2): 117-131.

[22]

Tanino T. Fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making, 1988 54-71.

[23]

Wan S, Feng W, Dong J. A three-phase method for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2017 1-1.

[24]

Wang L, Gong Z. Priority of a hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relation with a normal distributionin meteorological disaster risk assessment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017, 14(10): 1203.

[25]

Wang LH, Gong ZW, Zhang N. Consensus modelling on interval-valued fuzzy preference relations with normal distribution. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2018, 11(1): 706-715.

[26]

Xu ZS. Uncertain Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, 2004, Beijing: Tsinghua University Press

[27]

Xu Z. Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Information Sciences An International Journal, 2007, 177(11): 2363-2379.

[28]

Xu Z, Chen J. Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 184(1): 266-280.

[29]

Xu YJ, Gupta JND, Wang HM. The ordinal consistency of an incomplete reciprocal preference relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2014, 246(4): 62-77.

[30]

Xu YJ, Li KW, Wang HM. Incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations and their applications. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2014, 67: 93-103.

[31]

Xu Y, Wang QQ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E. Methods to improve the ordinal and multiplicative consistency for reciprocal preference relations. Applied Soft Computing, 2018, 67: 479-493.

[32]

Xu Y, Herrera F. Visualizing and rectifying different inconsistencies for fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2018 362

[33]

Xu Y, Ma F, Herrera F. Revisiting inconsistent judgments for incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations: Algorithms to identify and rectify ordinal inconsistencies. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018, 163: 305-319.

[34]

Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information & Control, 1965, 8(3): 338-353.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

132

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/