Pricing and Service Strategies for Two-sided Platforms

Xiaogang Lin , Chuanying Chen , Zhaozhan Lin , Yongwu Zhou

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3) : 299 -316.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3) : 299 -316. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-019-5409-9
Article

Pricing and Service Strategies for Two-sided Platforms

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Nowadays, more and more transactions or interactions like online dating and shopping are completed on two-sided platforms involving two groups of agents. On these two-sided platforms, there often exist cross-network effects, i.e., the benefits that agents at one side receive are positively related to the number of agents at the other side, and vice versa. This paper considers such two-sided platforms, where the platforms offer a certain service to attract agents of both sides to join the platforms, and then charge agents who join the platforms a lump-sum fee to gain the profit. We present service and pricing strategies for both monopolistic and duopolistic platforms, respectively. We also investigate the impact of platforms’ life cycle on their service and pricing strategies. Some managerial implications are shown.

Keywords

Two-sided markets / cross-network effects / service level / platform pricing / multi-homing

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaogang Lin, Chuanying Chen, Zhaozhan Lin, Yongwu Zhou. Pricing and Service Strategies for Two-sided Platforms. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2019, 28(3): 299-316 DOI:10.1007/s11518-019-5409-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Anderson E G Jr, Parker G G, Tan B. Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Information Systems Research, 2013, 25(1): 152-172.

[2]

Aoki R, Prusa T J. Sequential versus simultaneous choice with endogenous quality. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1997, 15(1): 103-121.

[3]

Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37(3): 668-691.

[4]

Bhargava H K, Kim B C, Sun D. Commercialization of platform technologies: Launch timing and versioning strategy. Production and Operations Management, 2013, 22(6): 1374-1388.

[5]

Caillaud B, Jullien B. Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics, 2003, 34(2): 309-328.

[6]

Candogan O, Bimpikis K, Ozdaglar A. Optimal pricing in networks with externalities. Operations Research, 2012, 60(4): 883-905.

[7]

Chao Y, Derdenger T. Mixed bundling in two-sided markets in the presence of installed base effects. Management Science, 2013, 59(8): 1904-1926.

[8]

Chen W, Yu Z. Platform strategy: The business model in revolution, 2013, Beijing: CITIC Press Corporation

[9]

Chen Y, Xie J. Cross-market network effect with asymmetric customer loyalty: Implications for competitive advantage. Marketing Science, 2007, 26(1): 52-66.

[10]

Chou M C, Sim C K, Teo C P, Zheng H. Newsvendor pricing problem in a two-sided market. Production and Operations Management, 2012, 21(1): 204-208.

[11]

Choudhary V, Ghose A, Mukhopadhyay T, Rajan U. Personalized pricing and quality differentiation. Management Science, 2005, 51(7): 1120-1130.

[12]

Cusumano M. Technology strategy and management: The evolution of platform thinking. Comm. ACM, 2010, 53(1): 32-34.

[13]

Doganoglu T, Wright J. Multihoming and compatibility. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2006, 24(1): 45-67.

[14]

Dou G, He P. Value-added service investing and pricing strategies for a two-sided platform under investing resource constraint. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2016, 26(5): 609-627.

[15]

Evans D S. The Antitrust Economics of Multi-Sided Platform Markets. Yale Journal on Regulation, 2003, 20(2): 325-381.

[16]

Gabszewicz J J, Wauthy X Y (2004). Two-sided markets and price competition with multi-homing. SSRN Electric Journal, doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.975897.

[17]

Gabszewicz J J, Wauthy X Y. Vertical product differentiation and two-sided markets. Economics Letters, 2014, 123(1): 58-61.

[18]

Gawer A, Cusumano MA. How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Rev, 2008, 49(2): 28-35.

[19]

Hagiu A. Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms. RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37(3): 720-737.

[20]

Hagiu A. Two-sided platforms: Product variety and pricing structures. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2009, 18(4): 1011-1043.

[21]

Hagiu A, Halaburda H. Information and two-sided platform profits. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2014, 34(1): 25-35.

[22]

Hagiu A, Spulber D. First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Management Science, 2013, 59(4): 933-949.

[23]

Hagiu A, Wright J. Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2015, 43: 162-174.

[24]

Jing B. Behavior-based pricing, production efficiency, and quality differentiation. Management Science, 2016, 63(7): 2365-2376.

[25]

Katz M L, Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 1985, 75(3): 424-440.

[26]

Katz M L, Shapiro C. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. The Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94(4): 822-841.

[27]

King S P. Two-sided markets. Australian Economic Review, 2013, 46(2): 247-258.

[28]

Klastorin T, Tsai W. New product introduction: Timing, design, and pricing. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2004, 6(4): 302-320.

[29]

Liu Q, Serfes K. Price discrimination in two-sided markets. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2013, 22(4): 768-786.

[30]

Moorthy K S, Png I P. Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Management Science, 1992, 38(3): 345-359.

[31]

Padmanabhan V, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K. New products, upgrades, and new releases: A rationale for sequential product introduction. Journal of Marketing Research, 1997, 34(4): 456-472.

[32]

Parker G G, Van Alstyne M W. Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science, 2005, 51(10): 1494-1504.

[33]

Parker G G, Van Alstyne M W. Six challenges in platform licensing and open innovation. Communications & Strategies, 2009, 1: 17-36.

[34]

Parlaktürk A K. The value of product variety when selling to strategic consumers. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2012, 14(3): 371-385.

[35]

Prasad A, Venkatesh R, Mahajan V. Optimal bundling of technological products with network externality. Management Science, 2010, 56(12): 2224-2236.

[36]

Ramdas K. Managing product variety: An integrative review and research directions. Production and Operations Management, 2003, 12(1): 79-101.

[37]

Rochet J C, Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2003, 1(4): 990-1029.

[38]

Rysman M. Competition between networks: A study of the market for yellow pages. The Review of Economic Studies, 2004, 71(2): 483-512.

[39]

Tiwana A. Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Information Systems Research, 2015, 26(2): 266-281.

[40]

Tyagi R K. Sequential product positioning under differential costs. Management Science, 2000, 46(7): 928-940.

[41]

Zhang K, Sarvary M. Differentiation with user-generated content. Management Science, 2015, 61(4): 898-914.

[42]

Zhang X, Han X, Liu X, Liu R, Leng J. The pricing of product and value-added service under information asymmetry: A product life cycle perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 2015, 53(1): 25-40.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

188

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/