Breaking the Monolith: Strategy, Variety, and Performance of Enterprise Information Systems

Yuanxun Gu , Lian Qi , Jian Wang

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6) : 727 -770.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6) : 727 -770. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-017-5353-5
Article

Breaking the Monolith: Strategy, Variety, and Performance of Enterprise Information Systems

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This paper intends to understand the form of implementations of Enterprise Information Systems (EISs). EISs are usually provided as packaged software products. Due to the diversities of implementations, EISs are often characterized by their system architectures. A conceptual framework is proposed to delineate the diversity and dynamics of EIS implementations. This framework is constituted of three components, EIS strategy, variety, and process-level performance (SVP). In particular, the variety of implementations is defined by two constructs, application scope and application depth. A Partial Least Squares structural equation modeling approach is applied to test the hypotheses according to the survey data from 223 project reports of EIS implementations in China. The results show that the EIS strategy and variety can both affect the performance of the implemented EISs. Specifically, application depth has an important mediating effect on the relationship between EIS strategy and performance. EIS strategy and application depth are breakthrough points to improve the performance of the implemented EISs. These findings suggest that the variety plays a central and effective role in the analysis of EIS implementations. This SVP framework highlights the interconnections among its components and captures the form of EIS implementations.

Keywords

EIS strategy / application scope / application depth / process-level performance

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yuanxun Gu, Lian Qi, Jian Wang. Breaking the Monolith: Strategy, Variety, and Performance of Enterprise Information Systems. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2018, 27(6): 727-770 DOI:10.1007/s11518-017-5353-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ajzen I.. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.

[2]

Aral S., Brynjolfsson E., Van Alstyne M.. Information, technology, and information worker productivity. Information Systems Research, 2012, 23: 849-867.

[3]

Aral S., Weill P.. IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: how resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organization Science, 2007, 18(5): 763-780.

[4]

Arvidsson V., Holmstrom J., Lyytinen K.. Information systems use as strategy practice: a multi-dimensional view of strategic information system implementation and use. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2014, 23(1): 45-61.

[5]

Banker R.D., Bardhan I. R., Chang H., Lin S.. Plant information systems, manufacturing capabilities, and plant performance. MIS Quarterly, 2006, 30(2): 315-337.

[6]

Barnard, C.I. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

[7]

Basu V., Hartono E., Lederer A.L., Sethi V.. The impact of organizational commitment, senior management involvement, and team involvement on strategic information systems planning. Information & Management, 2002, 39(6): 513-524.

[8]

Biehl M.. Success factors for implementing global information systems. Communications of the ACM, 2007, 50(1): 53-58.

[9]

Bostrom R.P., Heinen J.S.. MIS problems and failures: a socio-technical perspective. Part I: The causes. MIS Quarterly, 1977, 1(3): 17-32.

[10]

Broadbent M., Butler C., Hansell A.. Business and technology agenda for information systems executives. International Journal of Information Management, 1994, 14(6): 411-426.

[11]

Broadbent M., Weill P., Clair D.S.. The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign. MIS Quarterly, 1999, 23(2): 159-182.

[12]

Burton-Jones A., Gallivan M.J.. Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: a multilevel perspective. MIS Quarterly, 2007, 31(4): 657-679.

[13]

Burton-Jones, A. & Grange, C. (2013). From use to effective use: a representation theory perspective. Information Systems Research, 24(3): 632–658.

[14]

Burton-Jones A., Straub Jr D.W.. Reconceptualizing system usage: an approach and empirical test. Information Systems Research, 2006, 17(3): 228-246.

[15]

Carr N.G.. IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Business Review, 2003, 81(5): 41-49.

[16]

CCID (2003 through 2012). The annual research report of enterprise software in China market. CCID Consulting, Co., LTD, Series of reports, 2003 through 2012, Beijing.

[17]

CCW Research (2009). The survey peport of business software development status in China market. CCW Research, December 17, 2009, Beijing.

[18]

Chakravarty A., Grewal R., Sambamurthy V.. Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: enabling and facilitating roles. Information Systems Research, 2013, 24(4): 976-997.

[19]

Chan Y.E., Huff S.L., Barclay D.W., Copeland D.G.. Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment. Information Systems Research, 1997, 8(2): 125-150.

[20]

Chandler A.D.. Strategy and Structure, 1962, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

[21]

Cheung G.W., Lau R.S.. Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 2008, 11(2): 296-325.

[22]

Chin W. W.. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 1998, 22(1): 7-16.

[23]

Chin W.W.. Marcoulides G.A.. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 1998, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 295-336.

[24]

Chin W.W., Gopal A.. Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs. Data Base, 1995, 26(2): 42-64.

[25]

Chin W.W., Marcolin B.L., Newsted P.R.. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 2003, 14(2): 189-217.

[26]

Chin W.W., Todd P.A.. On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution. MIS Quarterly, 1995, 19(2): 237-246.

[27]

Clark K.B.. Competing through manufacturing and the new manufacturing paradigm: is manufacturing strategy passé?. Production and Operations Management, 1996, 5(1): 42-58.

[28]

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ.

[29]

Conway, B., Gibbons, J. & Watts, D.E. (1959). Business Experience with Electronic Computers. Price Waterhouse & Co., New York.

[30]

Converse, J.M. & Presser, S. (1986). Survey Questions. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.

[31]

Cote J.A., Buckley M.R.. Estimating trait, method, and error variance: generalizing across 70 construct validation studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 1987, 24(3): 315-318.

[32]

Davenport T.H.. The new industrial engineering: information technology and business process re-design. Sloan Management Review, 1990, 31(4): 11-27.

[33]

Davenport, T.H. (1993). Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

[34]

Davenport, T.H. (1997). Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment. Oxford University Press, New York..

[35]

Davenport, T.H. (2000). Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

[36]

Davenport T.H., Harris J.G., Cantrell S.. Enterprise systems and ongoing process change. Business Process Management Journal, 2004, 10(1): 16-26.

[37]

Dehning B., Richardson V.J.. Returns on investments in information technology: a research synthesis. Journal of Information Systems, 2002, 16(1): 7-30.

[38]

DeLone W.H., McLean E.R.. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 1992, 3(1): 60-95.

[39]

Devaraj S., Kohli R.. Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link?. Management Science, 2003, 49(3): 273-289.

[40]

DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

[41]

Diamantopoulos A., Winklhofer H.M.. Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 2001, 38(2): 269-277.

[42]

Dutton J.E.. Understanding strategic agenda building in organizations and its implications for managing change. Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, 1986, 3(1): 3-24.

[43]

Eason, K. D. (1988). Information Technology and Organisational Change. New York: NY: Taylor & Francis.

[44]

Edwards J.R., Bagozzi R.P.. On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 2000, 5(2): 155-174.

[45]

Ein-Dor P., Segev E.. Organizational context and the success of management information systems. Management Science, 1978, 24(10): 1064-1077.

[46]

Eisenhardt K.M., Martin J.A.. Dynamic capabilities: What are they?. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10-11): 1105-1121.

[47]

Evans G., Nesary M.. computerizing small business. Montana Business Quarterly, 1991, 29(3): 2-7.

[48]

Galbraith J. R.. Organization design: an information processing view. Interfaces, 1974, 4(3): 28-36.

[49]

Gaur, A.S. & Gaur, S.S. (2009). Statistical Methods for Practice and Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

[50]

Grabowski M., Lee S.. Banker R.D., Kauffman R.J., Mahrnood M.A.. Linking information systems application portfolios and organizational strategy. Strategic Information Technology Management: Perspectives on Organizational Growth and Competitive Advantage, 1993, Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group Publishing 33-54.

[51]

Gu Y.. A framework for the coverage of business adaptability of enterprise software. CAD/CAM and Manufacturing Informatization, 2003, 10(5): 24-26.

[52]

Gu, Y. (2003b). Business architecture design for enterprise software: method and practice (Postdoctoral research report, Oct 13, 2003). Postdoctoral work station of UFIDA Software Co. Ltd jointly with Tsinghua University, Beijing.

[53]

Habjan A., Andriopoulos C., Gotsi M.. The role of GPS-enabled information in transforming operational decision making: an exploratory study. European Journal of Information Systems, 2014, 23(4): 481-502.

[54]

Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

[55]

Hamel G., Prahalad C.K.. Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review, 1989, 67(3): 63-76.

[56]

Hamilton S., Chervany N.L.. Evaluating information system effectiveness -Part I: comparing evaluation approaches. MIS Quarterly, 1981, 5(3): 55-69.

[57]

Harris S., Katz J.. Firm size and the information technology investment intensity of life insurers. MIS Quarterly, 1991, 15(3): 333-352.

[58]

Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. The Guilford Press, New York.

[59]

Hayes, R.H., & Wheelwright, S.C. (1984). Restoring our competitive edge: competing through manufacturing. John Wiley, New York.

[60]

Helfat, C.E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Sing, H., Teece, D. & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Blackwell, Malden, MA.

[61]

Hicks, B.J., Culley, S.J., McMahon, C.A. & Powell, P. (2010). Understanding information systems infrastructure in engineering SMEs: a case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 27 (1–2): 52–73.

[62]

Hickson D.J., Hinings C.R., Lee C.A., Schneck R.E., Pennings J.M.. A strategic contingencies’ theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16(2): 216-229.

[63]

Hinkin T.R.. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1998, 1(1): 104-121.

[64]

Hung W.H., Ho C.F., Jou J.J., Kung K.H.. Relationship bonding for a better knowledge transfer climate: an ERP implementation research. Decision Support Systems, 2012, 52(2): 406-414.

[65]

Ives B., Hamilton S., Davis G.B.. A framework for research in computer-based management information systems. Management Science, 1980, 26(9): 910-934.

[66]

Ives B., Olson M.H., Baroudi J.J.. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 1983, 26(10): 785-793.

[67]

Jarvis C.B., MacKenzie S.B., Podsakoff P.M.. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 2003, 30(2): 199-218.

[68]

Karimi J., Somers T.M., Bhattacherjee A.. The impact of ERP implementation on business process outcomes: a factor-based study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2007, 24(1): 101-134.

[69]

Kearns G.S., Sabherwal R.. Strategic alignment between business and information technology: a knowledge-based view of behaviors, outcome, and consequences. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2006, 23(3): 129-162.

[70]

Keen, P.G. W. (1991). Shaping the Future: Business Design through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

[71]

King W.R.. Strategic planning for management information systems. MIS Quarterly, 1978, 2(1): 27-37.

[72]

King, W.R. (1988). How effective is your information systems planning? Long Range Planning, 21(5): 103–112.

[73]

Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Third Edition). The Guilford Press, New York.

[74]

Kwahk K., Ahn H.. Moderating effects of localization differences on ERP use: a socio-technical systems perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010, 26(2): 186-198.

[75]

Lederer A.L., Sethi V.. The implementation of strategic information systems planning methodologies. MIS Quarterly, 1988, 12(3): 445-461.

[76]

Liang H., Saraf N., Hu Q., Xue Y.. Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 2007, 31(1): 59-87.

[77]

Lindell M. K., Whitney D. J.. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(1): 114-121.

[78]

Lucas H.C.. Implementation: The Key to Successful Information Systems, 1981, New York: Columbia University Press

[79]

Lucas H.C.. Banker R.D., Kauffman R.J., Mahrnood M.A.. The business value of information technology. Strategic Information Technology Management: Perspectives on Organizational Growth and Competitive Advantage, 1993, Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group Publishing 359-374.

[80]

Lucas, H.C., Ginzberg, M.J. & Schultz, R.L. (1990). Information systems implementation: testing a structural model. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ.

[81]

Lucas H.C. Jr., Swanson E.B., Zmud R.. Implementation, innovation, and related themes over the years in information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2008, 8(4): 206-210.

[82]

Mabert V.A., Soni A., Venkataramanan M.A.. The impact of organization size on enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations in the US manufacturing sector. Omega, 2003, 31(3): 235-246.

[83]

MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W.. The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: some practical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 114(3): 533-541.

[84]

Malhotra N.K., Kim S.S., Patil A.. Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 2006, 52(12): 1865-1883.

[85]

Malone S.C.. Computerizing small business information systems. Journal of Small Business Management, 1985, 23(2): 10-16.

[86]

Mantere S., Sillince J.A.. Strategic intent as a rhetorical device. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 2007, 23(4): 406-423.

[87]

Markus M.L.. Power, politics and implementation. Communications of the ACM, 1983, 26(6): 430-444.

[88]

Markus M.L., Soh C.. Banker R.D., Kauffman R.J., Mahrnood M.A.. Banking on information technology: converting IT spending into firm performance. Strategic Information Technology Management: Perspectives on Organizational Growth and Competitive Advantage, 1993, Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group Publishing 375-403.

[89]

Markus M.L., Tanis C.. Zmud R.W.. The enterprise systems experience–from adoption to success. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future...Through the Past, 2000, Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex Educational Resources 173-207.

[90]

Massetti B., Zmud R.W.. Measuring the extent of EDI usage in complex organizations strategies and illustrative examples. MIS Quarterly, 1996, 20(3): 331-345.

[91]

Mata F.J., Fuerst W.L., Barney J.B.. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 1995, 19(4): 487-505.

[92]

McFarlan F.W.. Problems in planning the information system. Harvard Business Review, 1971, 49(2): 75-89.

[93]

Melville N., Kraemer K., Gurbaxani V.. Review: information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of ITbusiness value. MIS Quarterly, 2004, 28(2): 283-322.

[94]

Mintzberg H.. The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review, 1994, 72(1): 107-114.

[95]

Morris M.G., Venkatesh V.. Job characteristics and job satisfaction: understanding the role of enterprise resource planning system implementation. MIS Quarterly, 2010, 34(1): 143-161.

[96]

Nan N.. Capturing bottom-up information technology use processes: a complex adaptive systems model. MIS Quarterly, 2011, 35(2): 505-532.

[97]

Nelson K.M., Ghods M.. Measuring technology flexibility. European Journal of Information Systems, 1998, 7(4): 232-240.

[98]

Orlikowski W.J.. CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 1993, 17(3): 309-340.

[99]

Orlikowski W.J., Yates J., Okamura K., Fujimoto M.. Shaping electronic communication: the metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organization Science, 1995, 6(4): 423-444.

[100]

Peteraf M.A., Barney J.B.. Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2003, 24(4): 309-323.

[101]

Petter S., DeLone W., McLean E.R.. Information systems success: the quest for the independent variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2013, 29(4): 7-61.

[102]

Petter S., Straub D., Rai A.. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 2007, 31(4): 623-656.

[103]

Phillips-Wren G.E., Hahn E.D., Forgionne G. A.. A multiple-criteria framework for evaluation of decision support systems. Omega, 2004, 32(4): 323-332.

[104]

Podsakoff P., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J., Podsakoff N.P.. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5): 879-903.

[105]

Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. The Free Press, New York.

[106]

Radhakrishnan A., Zu X., Grover V.. A process-oriented perspective on differential business value creation by information technology: an empirical investigation. Omega, 2008, 36(6): 1105-1125.

[107]

Raghunathan T.S., King W.R.. The impact of information systems planning on the organization. Omega, 1988, 16(2): 85-93.

[108]

Ranganathan C., Brown C.V.. ERP investments and the market value of firms: toward an understanding of influential ERP project variables. Information Systems Research, 2006, 17(2): 145-161.

[109]

Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0(Software). Hamburg: SmartPLS, http://www.smartpls.de.

[110]

Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (Third Edition). The Free Press, New York.

[111]

Ross, J.W., Weill, P. & Robertson, D.C. (2006). Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.

[112]

Sabherwal R., Hirschheim R., Goles T.. The dynamics of alignment: insights from a punctuated equilibrium model. Organization Science, 2001, 12(2): 179-197.

[113]

Saunders C.S.. Management information systems, communications, and departmental power: an integrative model. Academy of Management Review, 1981, 6(3): 431-442.

[114]

Seddon P.B., Calvert C., Yang S.. A multi-project model of key factors affecting organizational benefits from enterprise systems. MIS Quarterly, 2010, 34(2): 305-328.

[115]

Sedera D.. Gupta J.N.D., Sharma S. K., Rashid M.A.. Size matters! Enterprise system success in medium and large organizations. Handbook of Research on Enterprise Systems, 2009, New York, NY: Information Science Reference 218-231.

[116]

Segars A.H., Grover V.. Strategic information systems planning success: an investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS Quarterly, 1998, 22(2): 139-163.

[117]

Spector P.E.. Method variance in organizational research: truth or urban legend. Organizational Research Methods, 2006, 9(2): 221-232.

[118]

Sullivan C.H.. Systems planning in the information age. Sloan Management Review, 1985, 26(2): 3-12.

[119]

Sun A.Y.T., Yazdani A., Overend J.D.. Achievement assessment for enterprise resource planning (ERP) system implementations based on critical success factors (CSFs). International Journal of Production Economics, 2005, 98(2): 189-203.

[120]

Sundaram S., Schwarz A., Jones E., Chin W.W.. Technology use on the front line: how information technology enhances individual performance. Journal of the Academic Marketing Science, 2007, 35(1): 101-112.

[121]

Swanson E.B., Ramiller N.C.. The organizing vision in information systems innovation. Organization Science, 1997, 8(5): 458-474.

[122]

Velleman P.F., Wilkinson L.. Nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio typologies are misleading. The American Statistician, 1993, 47(1): 65-72.

[123]

Venkatraman N.. IT-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review, 1994, 35(2): 73-87.

[124]

Voss, C.A. (1995). Alternative paradigms for manufacturing strategy. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15 (4): 5–16.

[125]

Voss C.A.. Paradigms of manufacturing strategy re-visited. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 2005, 25(12): 1223-1227.

[126]

Wang E.T.G., Shih S., Jiang J.J., Klein G.. The consistency among facilitating factors and ERP implementation success: a holistic view of fit. The Journal of Systems and Software, 2008, 81(9): 1609-1621.

[127]

Ward J.M.. Information systems strategy: quo vadis?. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2012, 21(2): 165-171.

[128]

Ward, J. & Peppard, J. (2002). Strategic Planning for Information Systems (Third Edition). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.

[129]

Ward P.T., Bickford D.J., Leong G.K.. Configurations of manufacturing strategy, business strategy, environment and structure. Journal of Management, 1996, 22(4): 597-626.

[130]

Ward P.T., Duray R.. Manufacturing strategy in context: environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy. Journal of Operations Management, 2000, 18(2): 123-138.

[131]

Weill P.. The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: a study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research, 1992, 3(4): 307-333.

[132]

Weill, P. & Broadbent, M. (1998). Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

[133]

Williams L.J., Gavin M.B., Williams M.L.. Measurement and nonmeasurement processes with negative affectivity and employee attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996, 81(1): 88-101.

[134]

Zhang Z., Lee M. K., Huang P., Zhang L., Huang X.. A framework of ERP systems implementation success in China: an empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 2005, 98(1): 56-80.

[135]

Zmud R.W., Apple L.. Measuring technology infusion/incorporation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1992, 9(2): 148-155.

[136]

Zmud R.W., Blocher E., Moffie R.P.. The impact of color graphic report formats on decision performance and learning. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, 1983 179-193.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

437

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/