Societal problems more complex than presumed: The Compram methodology

Abstract

Complex societal problems are often wrongly addressed by politicians as mono-disciplinary, relatively easy to solve problems. By directly jumping to conclusions politicians overlook the complexity of the problems in their decision making process. Complex societal problems are generally interdisciplinary problems and should be addressed in a multi-disciplinary way considering the multiple actors and their interactions, the many variables involved, as well as the emotions that the problems provokes. These many interactions are the cause of the complexity of the problem handling process. It is high time that complex societal problems are addressed by the politicians in the right way using the methodology, methods and tools of the field of Methodology of Societal Complexity so the problems can be handled in an adequate, transparent, efficient and proper way, mitigating the damage the problems are causing. The field of Methodology of Societal Complexity developed ways to guide the problem handling process of complex societal problems for analysing, decision making and implementing interventions in an adequate, democratic and efficient way. The Compram methodology is a major methodology in this field and directs in a structured, democratic, and efficient way, the problem handling process of complex societal problems by using a multi-disciplinary, multi actor approach including emotional aspects. The OECD (2006) advised governments to handle complex societal problems that threaten global safety according to the Compram methodology. The universities should include issues of the field of Societal Complexity into their disciplines so that future managers are aware how complex societal problems should be handled.

Keywords

Societal complexity / Compram methodology

References

[1] Ackoff R. L.. The Art of Problem Solving, 1978

[2] Apeldoornse Courant Toeristen gedood door lawines in Oostenrijk, 2008

[3] Blokker B., Chorus J.. Verhuizen naar Europa, 2015

[4] Checkland P. B.. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, 1981

[5] De Telegraaf Lawinerisico in Oostenrijk stijgt, 2008

[6] De Volkskrant Fukushima lekt per dag 300 ton vervuild water in oceaan, 2013

[7] DeTombe D. J.. Defining complex interdisciplinary societal problems: a theoretical study for constructing a cooperative problem analyzing method: the method COMPRAM, 1994

[8] DeTombe D.J.. Using a simulation tool for defining global problems, 1992

[9] DeTombe, D.J. (1992b). Chaos en epidemiologische scenarios: het aids scenario. Onzekerheden in de voorspelling van de Aids epidemie (Dutch) pp. 126-137. In Dijkum van, C. & D. J. DeTombe (red.) (1992) Gamma Chaos. Onzekerheid en orde in de menswetenschappen. Bloemendaal: Aramith uitgevers. ISBN 90-68341057 (published as Tombe de, D.J.).

[10] DeTombe D.. Handling Societal Complexity: A Study of the Theory and the Methodology of Societal Complexity and the COMPRAM Methodology, 2015.

[11] DeTombe D. J.. Moments of support by a groupware brainstorming tool in handling complex technical policy problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 119(2): 267-281.

[12] DeTombe D. J.. Compram, a method for handling complex societal problems. European Journal of Operation Research, 2001, 128(2): 266-282.

[13] DeTombe D.J.. Introduction to the field of methodology for handling complex societal problem. European Journal of Operation Research, 2001, 128(2): 231-232.

[14] DeTombe D.J.. Compram a policy making method for prevention of floods, 2001

[15] DeTombe, Dorien J. (2014). War time rape as a complex societal problem using the Compram methodology. In: VanDijkum, C. & Dorien DeTombe (eds.), International Scientific Journal of Methods and Models of Complexity (ISJM&MC), Interdisciplinary Journal for Research of Complexity. Published on Internet. Amsterdam: Siswo. July 2014 ISSN-0928-3137.

[16] Forrester J. W.. Lessons from system dynamics modeling. System Dynamics Review, 1987, 3(2): 136-149.

[17] Forrester J. W.. Anderson D. F., Richardson G.P., Sterman J.D.. System dynamics as a foundation for pre-college education. System Dynamics ’90, 1990, Boston, MA: The System Dynamics Society 367-381.

[18] Geyer F., van der Zouwen J.. Socio-Cybernetic Paradoxes. London: Sage Publications, 1986

[19] Gu J.. Meta-synthesis system approach and its applications in China, 2015

[20] Hart ’t H.. Dijk J. v., de Goede M., ’t Hart H., Teunissen J.. Onderzoek en Praktijkfasen. Vakgroep Ontwikkeling en Socialisatie, Sektie Methoden, Utrecht. Onderzoeken en veranderen: Methoden van praktijkonderzoek, 1991

[21] Cao L. B.. Metasynthetic Computing and Engineering of Complex Systems, 2015.

[22] Newell A., Simon H. A.. The Theory of Human Problem Solving, 1972.

[23] OECD The Final Consensus Report of the OECD Global Science Forum Workshop Tokyo, Japan, on December 5-6, 2005, 2006

[24] Qian X., Yu J., Dai R.. A new scientific field open-complex giant systems and methodology (in Chinese). Chin. J. Nat., 1990, 13(1): 3-10.

[25] Shilts R.. And the Band Played on, 1986

[26] Shilts R.. The Plague, 1987, New York: St. Martin’s Press

[27] VanDijkum C.. VanDijkum C., de Tombe D. J.. Het onderzoek van chaos. Gamma Chaos, 1992