Order scheduling with controllable processing times, common due date and the processing deadline

Qing Yue , Guohua Wan

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2) : 199 -218.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2) : 199 -218. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-016-5323-3
Article

Order scheduling with controllable processing times, common due date and the processing deadline

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Due date quotation and scheduling are important tools to match demand with production capacity in the MTO (make-to-order) environment. We consider an order scheduling problem faced by a manufacturing firm operating in an MTO environment, where the firm needs to quote a common due date for the customers, and simultaneously control the processing times of customer orders (by allocating extra resources to process the orders) so as to complete the orders before a given deadline. The objective is to minimize the total costs of earliness, tardiness, due date assignment and extra resource consumption. We show the problem is NP-hard, even if the cost weights for controlling the order processing times are identical. We identify several polynomially solvable cases of the problem, and develop a branch and bound algorithm and three Tabu search algorithms to solve the general problem. We then conduct computational experiments to evaluate the performance of the three Tabu-search algorithms and show that they are generally effective in terms of solution quality.

Keywords

Order scheduling / due date assignment / controllable processing times / deadline

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qing Yue, Guohua Wan. Order scheduling with controllable processing times, common due date and the processing deadline. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2017, 26(2): 199-218 DOI:10.1007/s11518-016-5323-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Baker K., Scudder G.. Sequencing with earliness and tardiness penalties: a review. Operations Research, 1990, 38(1): 22-36.

[2]

Beicourt M.. Outsourcing - the benefits and risks. Human Resource Management Review, 2006, 16(2): 269-279.

[3]

Biskup D., Jahnke H.. Common due date assignment for scheduling on a single machine with jointly reducible processing times. International Journal of Production Economics, 2001, 69(3): 317-322.

[4]

Cheng T.C.E., Shakhlevich N.V.. Two machine open shop problem with controllable processing times. Discrete Optimization, 2007, 4(1): 175-184.

[5]

Cheng T.C.E., Ding Q., Lin B.M.T.. A concise survey on the scheduling problems with deteriorating processing times. European Journal Operational Research, 2004, 152(1): 1-13.

[6]

Cheng T.C.E., Oğaz C., Qi X.D.. Due-date assignment and single machine scheduling with compressible processing times. International Journal of Production Economics, 1996, 43(1-2): 29-35.

[7]

Choi B.-C., Leung J.-T., Pinedo M.L.. Complexity of a scheduling problem with controllable processing times. Operations Research Letters, 2010, 38(2): 123-126.

[8]

Della C.F., Narayan V., Tadei R.. The two-machine total completion time flow shop problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 90(2): 227-237.

[9]

Garey M.R., Johnson D.S.. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness, 1979, San Francisco: Freeman.

[10]

Gordon V., Proth J.M., Chu C.B.. Due date assignment and scheduling: SLK, TWK and other due date assignment models. Production Planning & Control, 2002, 13(2): 117-132.

[11]

Gordon V., Proth J. M., Chu C.B.. A survey of the state-of-the-art of common due date assignment and scheduling research. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 139(1): 1-25.

[12]

Gordon V.S., Strusevich V. A.. Earliness penalties on a single machine subject to precedence constraints: SLK due date assignment. Computers & Operations Research, 1999, 26(2): 157-177.

[13]

Gunasekaran A., Ngai E.W.T.. Build-to-order supply chain management: a literature review and framework for development. Journal of Operations Management, 2005, 23(5): 423-451.

[14]

Hall N.G., Posner M.E.. Earliness-tardiness scheduling problems, I: weighted deviation of completion times about a common due date. Operations Research, 1991, 39(5): 836-846.

[15]

Hall N.G., Kubiak W., Sethi S.P.. Earliness-tardiness scheduling problems, II: deviation of completion times about a restrictive common due date. Operations Research, 1991, 39(5): 847-856.

[16]

Hardy G.H., Littlewood J.E., Polya G.. Inequalities, 1934, NY: Cambridge University Press.

[17]

He Y., Qi W., Cheng T.C.. Single-machine scheduling with trade-off between number of tardy jobs and compression cost. Journal of Scheduling, 2007, 10(5): 303-310.

[18]

Huynh T.N., Ameur S.. Due dates assignment and JIT scheduling with equal size jobs. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 205(2): 280-289.

[19]

Janiak A.. Minimization of resource consumption under a given deadline in the two-processor flow-shop scheduling problem. Information Processing Letters, 1989, 32(3): 101-112.

[20]

Jansen K., Mastrolilli M., Solis-Oba R.. Approximation schemes for job shop scheduling problems with controllable processing times. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 167(2): 297-319.

[21]

Kaminsky P., Lee Z.H.. On-line algorithms for flow shop due date quotation., 2002, University of California: Berkeley

[22]

Kaminsky P., Lee Z.H.. Effective on-line algorithms for reliable due date quotation and-large-scale scheduling. Journal of Scheduling, 2008, 11(3): 187-204.

[23]

Kaspi M., Shabtay D.. Convex resource allocation for minimizing the makespan in a single machine with job release dates. Computers & Operations Research, 2004, 31(9): 1481-1489.

[24]

Lawler E.L., Wood D.E.. Branch-and-bound methods: a survey. Operations Research, 1966, 14(4): 699-719.

[25]

Leyvand Y., Shabtay D., Steiner G.. Optimal delivery time quotation to minimize total tardiness penalties with controllable processing times. IIE Transactions, 2010, 42(3): 221-231.

[26]

Mitten L. G.. Branch-and-bound methods: general formulation and properties. Operations Research, 1970, 18(1): 24-34.

[27]

Monma C.L., Schrijver A., Todd M. J., Wei V. K.. Convex resource allocation problems on directed acyclic graphs: duality, complexity, special cases and extensions. Mathematics of Operations Research, 1990, 15(4): 736-748.

[28]

Ng C.T.D., Cheng T.C.E., Kovalyov M.Y., Lam S. S.. Single machine scheduling with a variable common due date and resource-dependent processing times. Computers & Operations Research, 2003, 30(8): 1173-1185.

[29]

Nowicki E., Zdrzalka S.. A bicriterion approach to preemptive scheduling of parallel machines with controllable job processing times. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 1995, 63(3): 237-256.

[30]

Panwalkar S.S., Smith M.L., Seidmann A.. Common due date assignment to minimize total penalty for the one machine scheduling problem. Operations Research, 1982, 30(2): 391-399.

[31]

Pinedo M.. Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms and Systems, 2012, Springer: Berlin.

[32]

Qi X., Tu F.-S.. Scheduling a single machine to minimize earliness penalties subject to the SLK due-date determination method. European Journal of Operations Research, 1998, 105(3): 502-508.

[33]

Shabtay D., Steiner G.. Two due date assignment problems in scheduling a single machine. Operations Research Letters, 2006, 34(6): 683-691.

[34]

Shabtay D., Steiner G.. A survey of scheduling with controllable processing times. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2007, 155(13): 1643-1666.

[35]

Shabtay D., Steiner G.. Optimal due date assignment and resource allocation to minimize the weighted number of tardy jobs on a single machine. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2007, 9(3): 332-350.

[36]

Shabtay D., Steiner G.. The single-machine earliness-tardiness scheduling problem with due date assignment and resource-dependent processing times. Annals of Operation Research, 2008, 159(1): 25-40.

[37]

Shabtay D., Kaspi M.. Parallel machine scheduling with a convex resource consumption function. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 173(1): 92-107.

[38]

Slotnick S.A., Sobel M.J.. Manufacturing lead-time rules: customer retention versus tardiness costs. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 163(3): 825-856.

[39]

Spearman M.L., Zhang R.Q.. Optimal lead time policies. Management Science, 1999, 45(2): 290-295.

[40]

Tseng C.T., Liao C.J., Huang K.L.. Minimizing total tardiness on a single machine with controllable processing times. Computers & Operations Research, 2009, 36(6): 1852-1858.

[41]

Wan G.H., Yen B.P.C., Li C.-L.. Single machine scheduling to minimize total processing plus weighted flow cost is NP-hard. Information Processing Letters, 2001, 79(6): 273-280.

[42]

Xu K.L., Feng Z.R., Ke L.J.. Single machine scheduling with total tardiness criterion and convex controllable processing times. Annals of Operations Research, 2011, 186(1): 383-391.

[43]

Yedidsion Y., Shabtay D., Kaspi M.. Complexity analysis of an assignment problem with controllable assignment costs and its applications in scheduling. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2011, 159(12): 1264-1278.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

177

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/