Regional container port competition in a dual gateway-port system

Abstract

Many ocean transportation hub systems consist of two container ports that share the container handling business in the area. The container flow passing through a port is the main measurement of the port’s competitiveness. In this paper we adopt a Hotelling model to study the container port competition in a so-called “dual gateway-port system”. The system contains two ports and two terminals, one belonging to each port. The two governments in which the two ports are located compete on cargo fees and the two terminals determine service price and service quality. We study two models with different levels of competition between the terminals. In the first model, the two terminals are owned by two different operators and in the second model, the two terminals are centralized under one operator. The second model exists in practice but is not well studied in the literature. We derive the cargo fee, terminal service price, and service quality equilibria for these two models. We investigate the competition outcome sensitivity with a numerical study. The numerical results reveal that governments prefer terminals to compete with each other. If the terminals do not have competitive advantages in their service quality, then terminal centralization brings more profits to the terminal operator than the competition case.

Keywords

Container port competition / container terminal competition / Hotelling model

References

[1] Balvers R., Szerb L.. Location in the Hotelling duopoly model with demand uncertainty. European Economic Review, 1996, 40: 1453-1461.

[2] Cachon G., Netessine S.. Simchi-Levi D., Wu S.D., Shen M.. Game theory in supply chain analysis. Supply Chain Analysis in the eBusiness Era. Kluwer, 2004

[3] Chang Y.T., Lee S.Y., Tongzon J.L.. Port selection factors by shipping lines: different perspectives between trunk liners and feeder service providers. Marine Policy, 2008, 32(6): 877-885.

[4] Cullinane K., Teng Y., Wang T.. Port competition between Shanghai and Ningbo. Maritime Policy & Management, 2005, 32(4): 331-346.

[5] De Langen P.W.. Port competition and selection in contestable hinterlands: the case of Austria. European Journal of Transport Infrastructure Research, 2007, 7(1): 1-14.

[6] Garrido R.A., Leva M.. Port of destination and carrier selection for fruit exports: a multi-dimensional space-time multi-nomial probit model. Transportation Research B, 2004, 38(7): 657-667.

[7] Homsombat W., Yip T.L., Yang H., Fu X.. Regional cooperation and management of port pollution. Maritime Policy & Management, 2013, 40(5): 451-466.

[8] Kaselimi E.N., Notteboom T.E., Borger B.D.. A game theoretical approach to competition between multi-user terminals: the impact of exclusive terminals. Maritime Policy and Mangement, 2011, 38(4): 395-414.

[9] Leachman R.C.. Final Report: Port and Modal Elasticity Study. Piedmont, Southern California Association of Governments, California, 2005

[10] Lirn T.C., Thanopoulou H.A., Beresford A.K.C.. Transhipment port selection and decision-making behaviour: analysing the Taiwanese case. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 2003, 6(4): 229-244.

[11] Liu L., Wang K.Y., Yip T.L.. Development of a container port system in Pearl River Delta: path to multi-gateway ports. Journal of Transport Geography, 2013, 28: 30-38.

[12] Luo M., Liu L., Gao F.. Post-entry container port capacity expansion. Transportation Research B, 2012, 46(1): 120-138.

[13] Murphy P.R., Daley J.M., Dalenberg D.R.. Port selection criteria: an application of a transportation research framework. Logistic and Transportation Review, 1992, 28: 238-254.

[14] Nir A.-S., Lin K., Liang G.S.. Port choice behaviour- from the perspective of the shipper. Maritime Policy and Management, 2003, 30(2): 165-173.

[15] Notteboom T.E.. Container shipping and ports: an overview. The Review of Network Economics, 2004, 3(2): 86-106.

[16] Slack B.. Containerization, inter-port competition and port selection. Maritime Policy and Management, 1985, 12(4): 293-303.

[17] Song D.W.. Regional container port competition and co-operation: the case of Hong Kong and South China. Journal of Transport Geography, 2002, 10: 99-11.

[18] Song D.W.. Port co-opetition in concept and practice. Maritime Policy and Management, 2003, 30(1): 29-44.

[19] Tiwari P., Itoh H., Doi M.. Shippers’ port and carrier selection behaviour in China: a discrete choice analysis. Journal of Maritime Economics and Logistics, 2003, 5(1): 23-39.

[20] Tongzon J.L., Sawant L.. Port choice in a competitive environment: from the shipping lines’ perspective. Applied Economics, 2007, 39(4): 477-492.

[21] Tsay A.A., Agrawal N.. Channel dynamics under price and service competition. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 2000, 2(4): 372-391.

[22] Veldman S.J., Buckmann E.H.. A model on container port competition: an application for the west European container hub-ports. Journal of Maritime Economics and Logistics, 2003, 5(1): 3-22.

[23] Wiegmans B.W., Van Der Hoest A., Notteboom T.E.. Port and terminal selection by deep-sea container operators. Maritime Policy and Management, 2008, 35(6): 517-534.

[24] Yeo G.T., Roe M., Dinwoodie J.. Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China. Transportation Research Part A, 2008, 42(6): 910-921.

[25] Yip T.L., Liu J.J., Fu X., Feng J.. Modeling the effects of competition on seaport terminal awarding. Transport Policy, 2014, 35: 341-349.

[26] Yu M.. Essays on container terminal operations management and competition. Dissertation. The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, 2012