Towards avoiding the hidden traps in QFD during requirements establishment

Abstract

The Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a useful and representative methodology to transform customer needs into different level of requirements in a system hierarchy. Simplifications that are based on assumptions are ubiquitous in the QFD, but these underlying assumptions possibly do not hold true, which renders the simplifications unjustified. Additionally, these assumptions are usually not verified within the context of the application domain. This paper identifies and illustrates eight hidden traps in QFD during the process of establishing the requirements, where the assumptions, and therefore, the simplifications made are not reasonable. These traps are implicit in the understanding of customer needs, establishment of system requirements and the flow down of these requirements to lower levels of the system hierarchy. Suggestions are given to help avoiding these hidden traps, thereby eliminating or alleviating their potentially detrimental effects. The intent of the paper is to make readers aware of these traps when applying QFD for the establishment of requirements, so that they may utilize QFD with a better understanding of its limitations and develop higher quality specifications.

Keywords

QFD / requirements establishment / value / decision-making

References

[1] Arrow KJ. Social Choice and Individual Values, 1951, New York: Wiley.

[2] Bayus BL. Shane S. Understanding customer needs. Blackwell Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management, 2007

[3] Bertoni M, Bertoni A, Isaksson O, et al. Value-oriented concept selection in aero-engine sub-system design: the EVOKE approach. Paper presented at the 23th INCOSE International Symposium, Philadelphia, USA, 24–27 June 2013, 2013

[4] Bouchereau V, Rowlands H. Methods and techniques to help quality function deployment. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 2000, 7(1): 8-20.

[5] Butler JC, James SD, Jia J. Using attributes to predict objectives in preference models. Decision Analysis, 2006, 3(2): 100-116.

[6] Carnevalli JA, Miguel PC. Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD — Types of research, difficulties and benefits. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008, 114(2): 737-754.

[7] Castagne S, Curran R, Collopy P. Implementation of value-driven optimisation for the design of aircraft fuselage panels. International Journal of Production Economics, 2009, 117(2): 381-388.

[8] Chan KY, Kwong CK, Wong TC. Modelling customer satisfaction for product development using genetic programming. Journal of Engineering Design, 2011, 22(1): 55-68.

[9] Chan LK, Wu ML. Quality function deployment: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 143(3): 463-497.

[10] Chen WC, Hoyle C, Wassenaar H J. Decision-Based Design: Integrating Consumer Preferences into Engineering Design, 2012

[11] Chen Y, Tang J, Fung RYK, et al. Fuzzy regression-based mathematical programming model for quality function deployment. International Journal of Production Research, 2004, 42(5): 1009-1027.

[12] Cheung J, Scanlan J, Wong J, et al. Application of value-driven design to commercial aeroengine systems. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, 49(3): 688-702.

[13] Collopy PD. Aerospace system value models: a survey and observations. Paper presented at AIAA Space 2009, Pasadena, California, 14–17 September 2009, 2009

[14] Collopy PD, Hollingsworth PM. Value-driven design. Journal of Aircraft, 2011, 48(3): 749-759.

[15] Cristiano JJ, White CC, Liker JK. Application of multiattribute decision analysis to quality function deployment for target setting. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C — Applications and Reviews, 2001, 31(3): 366-382.

[16] Dawson D, Askin RG. Optimal new product design using quality function deployment with empirical value functions. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 1999, 15(1): 17-32.

[17] Edwards W, Miles R, von Winterfeldt D. Advances in Decision Analysis, 2007.

[18] Eres MH, Bertoni M, Kossmann M, et al. Mapping customer needs to engineering characteristics: an aerospace perspective for conceptual design. Journal of Engineering Design, 2014, 25(1–3): 64-87.

[19] Erginel N. Construction of a fuzzy QFD failure matrix using a fuzzy multiple-objective decision model. Journal of Engineering Design, 2010, 21(6): 677-692.

[20] Harsanyi JC. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy, 1955, 63: 309-321.

[21] Hauser JR, Clausing D. The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 1988 4-13.

[22] Hazelrigg GA. An axiomatic framework for engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1999, 121(3): 342-347.

[23] Hazelrigg GA. On the role and use of mathematical models in engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design., 1999, 121(3): 336-341.

[24] Hull E, Jackson K, Dick J. Requirements Engineering, 2011, London: Springer.

[25] INCOSE. Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes And Activities, 2011

[26] Isaksson O, Kossmann M, Bertoni M, et al. Value-driven design — a methodology to link expectations to technical requirements in the extended enerprise. Paper presented at the 23th INCOSE International Symposium, Philadelphia, USA, 24–27 June 2013, 2013

[27] Keeney RL. Value-Focused Thinking, 1992, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press

[28] Keeney RL. Applying value-focused thinking. Military Operations Research, 2008, 13(2): 7-17.

[29] Keeney RL. The foundations of collaborative group decisions. International Journal of Collaborative Engineering, 2009, 1(1–2): 4-18.

[30] Keeney RL. Value-focused brainstorming. Decision Analysis, 2012, 9(4): 303-313.

[31] Keeney RL. Foundations for group decision analysis. Decision Analysis, 2013, 10(2): 103-120.

[32] Keeney RL, Gregory RS. Selecting attributes to measure the achievement of objectives. Operations Research, 2005, 53(1): 1-11.

[33] Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, 1993.

[34] Kwong CK, Chen Y, Chan KY, et al. A generalised fuzzy least-squares regression approach to modelling relationships in QFD. Journal of Engineering Design, 2010, 21(5): 601-613.

[35] Lee YC, Sheu LC, Tsou YG. Quality function deployment implementation based on fuzzy Kano model: an application in PLM system. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2008, 55(1): 48-63.

[36] Locascio A, Thurston DL. Transforming the House of Quality to a multiobjective optimization formulation. Structural Optimization, 1998, 16: 136-146.

[37] Mayyas A, Shen Q, Mayyas A, et al. Using quality function deployment and Analytical Hierarchy Process for material selection of Body-In-White. Materials & Design, 2011, 32(5): 2771-2782.

[38] Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Vining GG, et al. Response surface methodology: a retrospective and literature survey. Journal of Quality Technology, 2004, 36(1): 53-77.

[39] Pahl G, Beitz W. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 2007, London: Springer.

[40] Ramaswamy R, Ulrich K. Augmenting the House of Quality with engineering models. Research in Engineering Design, 1993, 5(2): 70-79.

[41] Ross AM, O’Neill MG, Hastings DE, et al. Aligning perspectives and methods for value-driven design. Paper presented at AIAA Space 2010, Anaheim, CA, September 2010, 2010

[42] Sen A. Collective Choice and Social Warfare. North Holland, 1984

[43] Ulrich K, Eppinger S. Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Press, 2008

[44] Van de Poel I. Methodological problems in QFD and directions for future development. Research in Engineering Design, 2007, 18(1): 21-36.

[45] Wang CH, Shih CW. Integrating conjoint analysis with quality function deployment to carry out customer-driven concept development for ultrabooks. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 2013, 36(1): 89-96.

[46] Woolley M, Scanlan JP, Eveson W. Optimising the development of a medical devise using formal engineering design techniques and the CODA-System. Paper presented at ICE 7th international conference on concurrent engineering, Bremen, Germany, 26–29 June 2001, 2001

[47] Xu J, Xu X, Xie SQ. A comprehensive review on recent developments in quality function deployment. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 2010, 6(4): 457-494.

[48] Xu QL, Jiao RJ, Yang X, et al. An analytical Kano model for customer need analysis. Design Studies, 2009, 30(1): 87-110.

[49] Yang YS, Jang BS, Yeun YS. QFD-based optimisation using response surface method. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 2004, 28(4): 275-283.

[50] Zhang XW, Auriol G, Eres H, et al. A prescriptive approach to qualify and quantify customer value for value-based requirements engineering. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2013, 26(4): 327-345.

[51] Zhang XW, Auriol G, Monceaux A, et al. et al. Culley SJ, Hicks BJ, McAloone TC, et al. et al. A value-centric QFD for establishing requirements specification. International Conference on Engineering Design, Copenhagen, 15–18 August, 2011, Design Society, 2011

[52] Zhang XW, Eres H, Baron C, et al. Replacing target setting by value models in the ‘house of quality’ for value-based requirements specification. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2014

[53] Zhang XW, Tong SR, Eres H, et al. A value-focused approach for establishing requirements’ specification of commercial aircraft. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G-Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2014, 228(11): 2033-2044.

[54] Zhong SY, Zhou J, Chen YZ. Determination of target values of engineering characteristics in QFD using a fuzzy chance-constrained modelling approach. Neurocomputing, 2014, 142: 125-135.