Platform selection for complex systems: Building automation systems

Abstract

Automation systems for buildings interconnect components and technologies from the information technology industry and the telecommunications industry. In these industries, existing platforms and new platforms (that are designed to make building automation systems work) compete for market acceptance and consequently several platform battles among suppliers for building automation networking are being waged. It is unclear what the outcome of these battles will be and also which factors are important in achieving platform dominance. Taking the fuzziness of decision makers’ judgments into account, a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methodology called the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process is applied to investigate the importance of such factors in platform battles for building automation networking. We present the relative importance of the factors for three types of platforms (subsystem platforms, system platforms, and evolved subsystem platforms). The results provide a first indication that the set of important factors differs per type of platform. For example, when focusing on other stakeholders, for subsystem platforms, the previous installed base is of importance; for system platforms, the diversity of the network of stakeholders is essential; and for evolved subsystem platforms, the judiciary is an important factor.

Keywords

Building / automation system / complex system / platform / Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) / multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM)

References

[1] Arthur WB. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 1989, 99(394): 116-131.

[2] Axelrod R, Mitchell W, Thomas RE, Bennett DS, Bruderer E. Coalition formation in standard-Setting alliances. Management Science, 1995, 41(9): 1493-1508.

[3] Badri MA. A combined AHP-GP model for quality control systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 2001, 72(1): 27-40.

[4] Baker S, Green H, Einhorn B, Moon I. Big Bang! Business Week, 2004, 3888: 68-76.

[5] Baldwin CY, Clark KB. Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business Review, 1997 84-93.

[6] Belton V, Stewart TJ. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: an Integrated Approach, 2003, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers

[7] Besen SM, Farrell J. Choosing how to compete: strategies and tactics in standardization. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994, 8(2): 117-131.

[8] Blind K. The Economics of Standards, Theory, Evidence, Policy, 2004, Cheltenham, UK: Edwar Elgar

[9] Boudreau KJ. Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organization Science, 2012, 23(5): 1409-1427.

[10] Bozdağ CE, Kahraman C, Ruan D. Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry, 2003, 51(1): 13-29.

[11] Buckley JJ. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1985, 17(3): 233-247.

[12] Çakır O. On the order of the preference intensities in fuzzy AHP. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2008, 54(4): 993-1005.

[13] Chan FT, Kumar N, Tiwari MK, Lau HCW, Choy KL. Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of Production Research, 2008, 46(14): 3825-3857.

[14] Chang DY. Application of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 95(3): 649-655.

[15] Clark KB. The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Research Policy, 1985, 14(5): 235-251.

[16] Cusumano MA. Technology strategy and management: platform wars come to social media. Communications of the ACM, 2011, 54(4): 31-33.

[17] Dağdeviren M, Yüksel. Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Information Sciences, 2008, 178(6): 1717-1733.

[18] David PA. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 1985, 75(2): 332-337.

[19] David PA, Greenstein S. The economics of compatibility standards: an introduction to recent research. Economics of Innovation & New Technologies, 1990, 1(12): 3-41.

[20] De Vries HJ. Standardization, a business approach to the role of national standardization organizations, 1999, Boston / Dordrecht / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers

[21] De Vries HJ, Hendrikse GWJ. The dutch banking chipcard game — understanding a battle between two standards. International Studies of Management and Organization, 2001, 31(1): 106-125.

[22] Dranove D, Gandal N. The DVD versus DIVX standard war: empirical evidence of network effects and preannouncement effects. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2003, 12(3): 363-386.

[23] Duysters GM, Hagedoorn J. Technological convergence in the IT industry: the role of strategic technology alliances and technological competencies. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 1998, 5(3): 355-368.

[24] Farrell J, Saloner G. Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. The Rand Journal of Economics, 1985, 16(1): 70-83.

[25] Farrell J, Saloner G. Installed base and compatibility: innovation, product preannouncements, and predation. American Economic Review, 1986, 76(5): 940-955.

[26] Farrell J, Saloner G. Coordination through committees and markets. The Rand Journal of Economics, 1988, 19(2): 235-252.

[27] Frenzel, L.E. (2009). A dizzying mix of standards. Electronic Design, December: 7.

[28] Gallagher SR. The complementary role of dominant designs and industry standards. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2007, 54(2): 371-388.

[29] Gallagher SR, Park SH. Innovation and competition in standard-based industries: a historical analysis of the U.S. home video game market. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2002, 49(1): 67-82.

[30] Garud R, Jain S, Kumaraswamy A. Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: the case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(1): 196-214.

[31] Garud R, Kumaraswamy A. Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: an exploration of Sun microsystems’ open systems strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(5): 351-369.

[32] Gawer A. Gawer A. Platform dynamics and strategies: from products to services. Platforms, Markets and Innovation, 2009, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar 45-76.

[33] Gawer A. Platforms, markets and innovation, 2009, Celtenham, UK: Edwar Elgar Publishing

[34] Gawer A. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 2014, 43(7): 1239-1249.

[35] Gawer A, Cusumano M. Platform leadership: how Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation, 2002, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press

[36] Gawer A, Cusumano MA. Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 31(3): 417-433.

[37] Gomes-Casseras B. Group versus group: how alliance networks compete. Harvard Business Review, 1994, 72(4): 62-74.

[38] Halman JIM, Hofer AP, Van Vuuren W. Platform-driven development of product families: linking theory with practice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2003, 20: 149-162.

[39] Hornby AS. Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current english, 2000, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press

[40] Katz ML, Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 1985, 75(3): 424-440.

[41] Keil T. De-facto standardization through alliances — lessons from Bluetooth. Telecommunications Policy, 2002, 26(3–4): 205-213.

[42] Kotha S. Mass customization: implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16(S1): 21-42.

[43] Krishnan V, Gupta S. Appropriateness and impact of platform-based product development. Management Science, 2001, 47(1): 52-68.

[44] Kuo RJ, Chi SC, Kao SS. A decision support system for selecting convenience store location through integration of fuzzy AHP and artificial neural network. Computers in Industry, 2002, 47(2): 199-214.

[45] Langlois RN, Robertson PL. Networks and innovation in a modular system: lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Research Policy, 1992, 21(4): 297-313.

[46] Lee J, Lee J, Lee H. Exploration and exploitation in the presence of network externalities. Management Science, 2003, 49(4): 553-570.

[47] Lee J, O’Neal DE, Pruett MW, Thoams H. Planning for dominance: a strategic perspective on the emergence of a dominant design. R&D Management, 1995, 25(1): 3-15.

[48] Lehr W. Standardization: understanding the process. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1992, 43(8): 550-555.

[49] Leiponen AE. Competing through cooperation: the organization of standard setting in wireless telecommunications. Management Science, 2008, 54(11): 1904-1919.

[50] Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB. First Mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 1988, 9: 41-58.

[51] Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB. First-Mover (Dis)Advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19(12): 1111-1125.

[52] Lint O, Pennings E. The recently chosen digital video standard: playing the game within the game. Technovation, 2003, 23(4): 297-306.

[53] Meyer MH, Utterback JM. The product family and the dynamics of core capability. Sloan Management Review, 1993, 34(3): 29-47.

[54] Mikhailov L. Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003, 134(3): 365-385.

[55] Mitchell W, Singh K. Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(3): 169-195.

[56] Mitra K. Validating AHP, fuzzy alpha cut and fuzzy preference programming method using clustering technique. Opsearch, 2010, 47(1): 5-15.

[57] Pelkmans J. The GSM standard: explaining a success story. Journal of European Public Policy, 2001, 8(3): 432-354.

[58] Rezaei J, Ortt R. Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 225(1): 75-84.

[59] Rezaei J, Ortt R, Scholten V. An improved fuzzy preference programming to evaluate entrepreneurship orientation. Applied Soft Computing, 2013, 13(5): 2749-2758.

[60] Robertson D, Ulrich K. Planning for product platforms. Sloan Management Review, 1998, 39(4): 19-31.

[61] Rochet JC, Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2003, 1(4): 990-1029.

[62] Rose B. Home networks: a standards perspective. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2001, 39(12): 78-85.

[63] Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, 1980, New York: McGraw-Hill.

[64] Saaty TL. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48(1): 9-26.

[65] Saaty TL. Making and validating complex decisions with the AHP/ANP. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2005, 14(1): 1-36.

[66] Saaty TL, Khouja MW. A measure of world influence. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 1976, 2(1): 31-48.

[67] Samvedi A, Jain V, Chan FT. Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. International Journal of Production Research, 2013, 51(8): 2433-2442.

[68] Sawhney MS. Leveraged high-variety strategies: from portfolio thinking to platform thinking. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 1998, 26(1): 54-61.

[69] Schilling MA. Technological lockout: an integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(2): 267-284.

[70] Schilling MA. Winning the standards race: building installed base and the availability of complementary goods. European Management Journal, 1999, 17(3): 265-274.

[71] Schilling MA. Toward a general modular systems thoery and its application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25(2): 312-334.

[72] Schilling MA. Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: the impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(2): 387-398.

[73] Schilling MA. Strategic Management of Technological Innovation, 2013, New York, USA: McGraw-Hill

[74] Schmidt SK, Werle R. Co-ordinating technology. studies in the international standardization of telecommunications, 1998, Cambridge: MIT Press

[75] Schumpeter JA. The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle, 1934, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press

[76] Shapiro C, Varian HR. The art of standards wars. California Management Review, 1999, 41(2): 8-32.

[77] Shapiro C, Varian HR. Information rules, a strategic guide to the network economy, 1999, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press

[78] Shim JP. Bibliographical research on the analytic hierarchy process. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 1989, 23(3): 161-167.

[79] Simon HA. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 1962, 106(6): 467-482.

[80] Singh SP, Singh VK. Three-level AHP-based heuristic approach for a multi-objective facility layout problem. International Journal of Production Research, 2011, 49(4): 1105-1125.

[81] Soh P-H, Roberts EB. Networks of innovators: a longitudinal perspective. Research Policy, 2003, 32(9): 1569-1588.

[82] Steward TJ. A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision-making theory and practice. Omega, 1992, 20(5–6): 569-586.

[83] Suarez FF. Battles for technological dominance: an integrative framework. Research Policy, 2004, 33(2): 271-286.

[84] Suarez FF, Utterback JM. Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16(6): 415-430.

[85] Teece DJ. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy, 1986, 15(6): 285-305.

[86] Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C. Digital infrastructures: the missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(5): 748-759.

[87] Tiwana A, Konsynsky B, Bush AA. Platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4): 675-687.

[88] Vaidya OS, Kumar S. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 169(1): 1-29.

[89] Van de Kaa G, De Vries HJ. Factors for winning format battles: A comparative case study. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2014

[90] Van de Kaa G, Den Hartog F, De Vries HJ. Mapping standards for home networking. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 2009, 31: 1175-1181.

[91] Van de Kaa G, Greeven M, van Puijenbroek G. Standards battles in China: opening up the black-box of the Chinese government. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2013, 25(5): 567-581.

[92] Van de Kaa G, Rezaei J, Kamp L, De Winter A. Photovoltaic technology selection: a fuzzy MCDM approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 32: 662-670.

[93] Van de Kaa G, Van den Ende J, De Vries HJ, Van Heck E. Factors for winning interface format battles: a review and synthesis of the literature. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2011, 78(8): 1397-1411.

[94] Van de Kaa G, Van Heck HWGM, De Vries HJ, Van den Ende JCM, Rezaei J. Supporting decision-making in technology standards battles based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2014, 61(2): 336-348.

[95] van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Set Syst., 1983, 11(2): 229-241.

[96] Varajão J, Cruz-Cunha MM. Using AHP and the IPMA competence baseline in the project managers selection process. International Journal of Production Research, 2013, 51(11): 1-13.

[97] Vargas LG. An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48(1): 2-6.

[98] Wacks K. Home systems standards: achievements and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2002, 40(4): 152-159.

[99] Wang YM, Chin KS. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: a logarithmic fuzzy preference programming methodology. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2011, 52(4): 541-553.

[100] Wang YM, Luo Y, Hua Z. On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 186(2): 735-747.

[101] Webster EoM. Webster’s third new international dictionary, 2000, Springfield, Massachusetts: Merriam-Webster, Inc.

[102] Whitaker R. Validation examples of the analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2007, 46(7): 840-859.

[103] Willard GE, Cooper AC. Survivors of industry shake-outs: the case of the U.S. color television set industry. Strategic Management Journal, 1985, 6(4): 299-318.

[104] Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A. Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organization Science, 2012, 23(5): 1398-1408.

[105] Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K. The new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4): 724-735.

[106] Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 1965, 8(3): 338-353.