Conflict measure model for large group decision based on interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number and its application

Xuanhua Xu , JoongHo Ahn , Xiaohong Chen , Yanju Zhou

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2013, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4) : 487 -498.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2013, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4) : 487 -498. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-013-5235-4
Technical Note

Conflict measure model for large group decision based on interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number and its application

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The problem of measuring conflict in large-group decision making is examined with every decision preference expressed by multiple interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (IITFNs). First, a distance measurement between two IITFNs is given and a function of conflict between two members of the large group is proposed. Second, members of the large group are clustered. A measurement model of group conflict, which is applied to aggregating large-group preferences, is then proposed by employing the conflict measure of clusters. Finally, a simulation example is presented to validate the models. These models can deal with the preference analysis and coordination of a large-group decision, and are thus applicable to emergency group decision making.

Keywords

Interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number / large group decision making / conflict measure

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xuanhua Xu, JoongHo Ahn, Xiaohong Chen, Yanju Zhou. Conflict measure model for large group decision based on interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number and its application. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2013, 22(4): 487-498 DOI:10.1007/s11518-013-5235-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20(1): 87-96.

[2]

Boulding K. Conflict and Defense, 1963, New York: Harper & Row

[3]

Chen S-M, Tan J-M. Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1994, 67(2): 163-172.

[4]

Cosier RA. The effects of three potential aids for making strategic decisions on prediction accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978, 22: 295-306.

[5]

Guetzkow H, Gyr J. An analysis of conflict in decision-making groups. Human Relations, 1954, 7: 367-381.

[6]

Jehn K. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42: 530-557.

[7]

Jehn K. The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44: 238-251.

[8]

Lang C-G, Xi Y-M, Bi P-C. Study on conflict in group decision making process. Forecasting, 2005, 24(5): 1-8.

[9]

Liu H-W, Wang G-J. Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 179(1): 220-233.

[10]

Mason RO. A dialectical approach to strategic planning. Management Science, 1969, 15: 403-414.

[11]

Palomares I, Rodriguez RM, Martinez L. An attitude-driven web consensus support system for heterogeneous group decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 2013, 40(1): 139-149.

[12]

Priem R, Price K. Process and outcome expectations for the dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus techniques of strategic decision making. Group and Organization Studies, 1991, 16: 206-225.

[13]

Schweiger DM. Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32: 745-772.

[14]

Shai K, Sun L-P. The Function of Social Conflict, 1989, Beijing: Huaxia Press

[15]

Shannon CE, Haken H. Application of the maximum information entropy principle to selforganizing systems. Condensed Matter, 1985, 61(3): 335-338.

[16]

Thomas KW. Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1992, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc 61-718.

[17]

Wall VD, Nolan LL. Small group conflict: a look at equity, satisfaction and styles of conflict manage-ment. Small Group Behavior, 1987, 18: 188-211.

[18]

Wan S-P. Survey on intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making approach. Control and Decision, 2010, 25(11): 1601-1606.

[19]

Wan S-P. Multi-attribute decision making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number. Control and Decision, 2011, 26(6): 857-866.

[20]

Wang J-Q. Overview on fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. Control and Decision, 2008, 23(6): 601-606.

[21]

Wang J-Q, Zhang Z. Multi-criteria decision-making method with incomplete certain information based on intuitionistic fuzzy number. Control and Decision, 2009, 24(2): 226-230.

[22]

Xu X-H, Chen X-H. Research of a kind of method of multi-attributes and multi-schemes large group decision making. Journal of systems engineering, 2008, 23(2): 137-141.

[23]

Xu Z. On similarity measures of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to pattern recognitions. Journal of Southeast University, 2007, 23(1): 139-143.

[24]

Ye J. Expected value method for intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multicriteria decision-making problems. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(9): 11730-11734.

[25]

Ye J. Improved method of multicriteria fuzzy decision-making based on vague sets. Computer Aided Design, 2007, 39(2): 164-169.

[26]

Zhang Y-L, Liu M. Emergency decision in emergency rescue. China Public Security, Academy Edition, 2009, 1: 66-69.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

130

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/