Integrating complex system dynamics of pandemic influenza with a multi-criteria decision making model for evaluating public health strategies

Abstract

Recent developments in computational sciences and computer modeling have allowed emergency preparedness exercises to include simulation models as supporting tools. These simulation models are generally built for predicting temporal and geographic patterns of disease spread. However sole use of simulation models in exercise design falls short in terms of incorporating policy decision makers’ preferences into decision-making processes. In this paper, a general framework for exercising public health preparedness plans with a decision support system is presented to integrate estimation of key epidemiological parameters with a system dynamics model of an outbreak. A multi-criteria decision making framework, an Analytical Hierarchy Process model, is then developed and integrated with the simulation model to help public health policy makers prioritize their response goals and evaluate mitigation strategies in a table-top exercise environment.

Keywords

Multi-criteria decision making / analytical hierarchy process / public health / preparedness exercises / pandemic influenza modeling / complex systems

References

[1] AndersonRM, MayRMInfectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control, 1991, New York, Oxford University Press

[2] ArazOM, GalvaniA, MeyersLA. Geographic prioritization of distributing pandemic influenza vaccines. Healthcare Management Science, 2012, 15: 175-187

[3] ArazOM, JehnM, LantT, FowlerJW. A new method of exercising pandemic preparedness through an interactive simulation and visualization. Journal of Medical Systems, 2012, 36: 1475-1483

[4] ArazOM, LantT, JehnM, FowlerJWSimulation modeling for pandemic decision making: a case study with bi-criteria analysis on school closures, 2011

[5] BeatonR, StergachisA, ThompsonJ, OsakiC, JohnsonC, CharvatSJ, Marsden-HaugN. Pandemic policy and planning considerations for universities: findings from a tabletop exercise. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism, 2007, 5(4): 327-334

[6] BettencourtLMA, RibeiroRM. Real time Bayesian estimation of the epidemic potential of emerging infectious diseases. PLoS One, 2008, 3: e2185

[7] BoumaJ, BrouwerR, Van EkR. The use of integrated assessment methods in Dutch water management: a comparison of cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference of the European Society of Ecological Economics, Vienna, 3–6 May 2000, 2000

[8] CDC.Available via DIALOG, 2009

[9] Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010

[10] ChowellG, AmmonCE, HengartnerNW, HymanJM. Transmission dynamics of the great influenza pandemic of 1918 in Geneva, Switzerland: assessing the effects of the hypothetical interventions. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2006, 241: 193-204

[11] Plos One, 2009, 4(12):

[12] DauseyDJ, BuehlerJW, LurieN. Designing and conducting tabletop exercises to assess public health preparedness for manmade and naturally occurring biological threats. BMC Public Health, 2007, 7: 92

[13] Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2009, 6(1):

[14] EskiciB, TurkguluB. Modeling the dynamics of avian influenza epidemics and possible pandemics. Proceedings of the 2007 System Dynamics Conference, 2007

[15] FraserC, DonnellyCA, CauchemezS, HanageWP, Van KerkhoveMD, HollingsworthTD, GriffinJ, BaggaleyRF, JenkinsHE, LyonsEJ, JombartT, HinsleyWR, GrasslyNC, BallouxF, GhaniAC, FergusonNM, RambautA, PybusOG, Lopez-GatellH, Alpuche-ArandaCM, ChapelaI, ZavalaEP, GuevaraDME, ChecchiF, GarciaE, HugonnetS, RothCThe WHO Rapid Pandemic Assessment Collaboration. Pandemic potential of a strain of influenza A (H1N1): early findings. Science, 2009, 234: 1557

[16] GalvaniA, RelugaTC, ChapmanGB. Long-standing influenza vaccination policy is in accord with individual self-interest but not with the utilitarian optimum. PNAS, 2007, 104(13): 5692-5697

[17] GojovicMZ, SandeB, FismanD, KrahnMD, BauchCT. Modeling mitigation strategies for pandemic (H1N1). CMAJ, 2009, 181(10): 673-677

[18] HarkerPT, VargasLG. Reply to remarks on the analytical hierarchy process. Management Science, 1990, 36: 269-273

[19] LempelH, HammondRA, EpsteinJM. Economic cost and health care workforce effects of school closures in the US. PLoS Curr Influenza, 2009, 5: RRN1051

[20] MorrowCB, NovickLF. A case exercise in public health preparedness: a community outbreak of influenza-like illness. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 2005, 11(4): 306-310

[21] MyliusSD, HagenaarsTJ, LugnerA, WallingaJ. Optimal allocation of pandemic influenza vaccine depends on age, risk and timing. Vaccine, 2008, 26: 3742-3749

[22] PresanisAM, De AngelisD, HagyA, ReedC, RileyS, CooperBS, FinelliL, BiedrzyckiP, LipsitchM. The severity of pandemic H1N1 influenza in the United States, from April to July 2009: a Bayesian analysis. PLoS Medicine, 2009, 6(12): e1000207

[23] SaatyTL. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 15: 234-281

[24] SaatyTL. How to make a decision: analytical hierarchy process. Interfaces, 1994, 24(6): 19-43

[25] TaylorJL, RoupBJ, BlytheD, ReedGK, TateTA, MooreKA. Pandemic influenza preparedness in Maryland: improving readiness through a tabletop exercise. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice and Science, 2005, 3: 61-69

[26] TuiteAR, FismanDN, KwongJC, GreerAL. Optimal pandemic influenza vaccine allocation strategies for the Canadian population. PLoS ONE, 2010, 5(5): e10520

[27] WallingaJ, TeunisP, KretzschmarM. Using data on social contacts to estimate age specific transmission parameters for respiratory-spread infectious agents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2006, 164: 936-944

[28] Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2008, 5(1):

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg