Design for availability: A holistic approach to create value for manufacturers and customers of capital goods

Abstract

This research introduces a holistic framework called Design for Availability that uses the principles of Lean Sigma and Design for X to cost-effectively optimize the availability of capital goods (i.e., technical systems used in the production of end-products or -services such as medical systems, airplanes, and manufacturing equipment) throughout their entire lifetime. Manufacturers require such a framework because users of capital goods increasingly insist on high system availability levels against reduced lifetime costs. The Design for Availability framework allows manufacturers to determine the current status of system availability and associated lifetime costs, and to identify opportunities to create additional value for themselves and their customers. A case study at a global manufacturer of capital goods in the food processing industry illustrates how the framework can be used in practice and to what extent the manufacturer and customers may profit from applying Design for Availability.

Keywords

Design for X / system availability / MTTR / MTTF / MTTS / lifecycle costs / capital goods

References

[1] Al-Najjar B., Alsyouf I.. Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making. International Journal of Production Economics, 2003, 84(1): 85-100.

[2] Arnheiter E.D., Maleyeff J.. The integration of Lean Management and Six Sigma. The TQM Magazine, 2005, 17(1): 5-18.

[3] Arts R.H.P.M., Knapp G.M., Mann L.J.. Some aspects of measuring maintenance performance in the process industry. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 1998, 4(1): 6-11.

[4] Asiedu Y., Gu P.. Product life cycle cost analysis: state of the art review. International Journal of Production Research, 1998, 36(4): 883-908.

[5] Bayazit O., Karpak B., Yagci A.. A purchasing decision: selecting a supplier for a construction company. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2006, 15(2): 217-231.

[6] Bessant J., Caffyn S., Gilbert J., Harding R., Webb S.. Rediscovering continuous improvement. Technovation, 1994, 14(1): 17-29.

[7] Bhuiyan N., Baghel A.. An overview of continuous improvement: from the past to the present. Management Decision, 2005, 43(5): 761-771.

[8] Bigio D., Edgeman R.L., Ferleman T.. Six Sigma availability management of information technology in the office of the chief technology officer of Washington, DC. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2004, 15(5): 679-687.

[9] Birolini, A. (2010). Reliability Engineering: Theory and Practice. Springer

[10] Blanchard, B.S., Verma, D. & Peterson, E.L. (1995). Maintainability: A Key to Effective Serviceability and Maintenance Management. Wiley-IEEE

[11] Cheung C., Lee W., Wang W., Chu K., To S.. A multi-perspective knowledge-based system for customer service management. Expert Systems with Applications, 2003, 24(4): 457-470.

[12] Fabrycky, W.J. & Blanchard, B.S. (1991). Life-cycle Cost and Economic Analysis. Prentice Hall

[13] Furterer S., Elshennawy A.K.. Implementation of TQM and Lean Six Sigma tools in local government: a framework and a case study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2005, 16(10): 1179-1191.

[14] Huang, G.Q. (1996). Design for X. Springer

[15] Kumar D.. Reliability Maintenance and Logistic Support: A Life Cycle Approach, 2000, US: Springer.

[16] Langabeer J.R., DelliFraine J.L., Heineke J., Abbass I.. Implementation of Lean and Six Sigma quality initiatives in hospitals: a goal theoretic perspective. Operations Management Research, 2009, 2(1–4): 13-27.

[17] Moubray, J. (1997). Reliability-centered Maintenance. Industrial Press Inc.

[18] Negri L., Galli M.. Quality policies and value creation strategies in Italian manufacturing industry. Technovation, 1997, 17(6): 321-328.

[19] Nowlan, F.S. & Heap, H.F. (1978). Reliability-centered Maintenance. Dolby Access Press

[20] Öner K.B., Kiesmüller G.P., van Houtum G.J.. Optimization of component reliability in the design phase of capital goods. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 205: 615-624.

[21] Oyebisi T.O.. On reliability and maintenance management of electronic equipment in the tropics. Technovation, 2000, 20(9): 517-522.

[22] Perera H.S., Nagarur N., Tabucanon M.T.. Component part standardization: a way to reduce the life-cycle costs of products. International Journal of Production Economics, 1999, 60–61: 109-116.

[23] Shah R., Chandrasekaran A., Linderman K.. In pursuit of implementation patterns: the context of Lean and Six Sigma. International Journal of Production Research, 2008, 46(23): 6679-6699.

[24] Smith C., Knezevic J.. Achieving quality through supportability — Part I: concepts and principles. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 1996, 2(2): 21-29.

[25] Thompson, G. (1999). Improving Maintainability and Reliability through Design. Professional Engineering Publishing

[26] Tsang A.H.C.. Condition-based maintenance: tools and decision making. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 1995, 1(3): 3-17.

[27] Ulrich K.. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 1995, 24(3): 419-440.

[28] Yin, R.K. (2003). Applications of Case Study Research. Sage Publications, Inc.

[29] Zu X., Robbins T.L., Fredendall L.D.. Mapping the critical links between organizational culture and TQM/Six Sigma practices. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 123(1): 86-106.