New product design strategies with subsidy policies

Abstract

Industrial development can enrich people’s lives, but it also causes environmental pollution, which is an area of significant concern among governments, consumers, and companies. Governments formulate some environmental policies, which motivate industry by providing greater incentives for green product development. Consumers are classified into two groups — ordinary and green market segments — according to their environmental awareness and attitudes. In this regard, companies need to reconsider their primary product design strategies. By investigating the interactions among customers’ preferences, firms’ product strategies, and government subsidy policies, this paper presents a theoretical model for new product design strategies. After detailed theoretical analysis of such strategies, we found that to motivate firms to choose environmentally friendly product design strategies, governments should inaugurate effective subsidy policies. After simultaneously considering environmental issues and firms’ benefits, we designed a subsidy policy. With such a policy, firms can change their primary product design strategies and develop both green and ordinary products, thereby increasing the firms’ profits and improving the total environmental quality.

Keywords

Product design strategy / subsidy policy / green product / total environmental quality

References

[1] Bai G.H.. A sustainable platform for e-service system design. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2004, 13(4): 436-449.

[2] Bansal S., Gangopadhyay S.. Tax/subsidy policies in the presence of environmentally aware consumers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003, 45(2): 333-355.

[3] Baumann H., Boons F., Bragd A.. Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2002, 10(5): 409-425.

[4] Bei L.T., Simpson E.M.. The determinants of consumers’ purchase decision for recycled products: an application of acquisition-transaction utility theory. Advance Consumer Research, 1995, 22: 257-261.

[5] Boks C., Stevels A.. Essential perspectives for design for environment. Experiences from the electronics industry. International Journal of Production Research, 2007, 45(18/19): 4021-4039.

[6] Chen C.L.. Design for the environment: a quality-based model for green product development. Management Science, 2001, 47(2): 250-263.

[7] Chung K.Y., Oh S.Y., Kim S.S., Han S.Y.. Three representative market segmentation methodologies for hotel guest room customers. Tourism Management, 2004, 25: 429-441.

[8] Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Green paper on integrated product policy. Available via DIALOG. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/ com/2001/com2001_0068en01.pdf

[9] Crandall R.W., Graham J.D.. The effect of fuel economy standards on automobile safety. Journal of Law and Economics, 1992, 32: 97-118.

[10] Dangelico R.M., Pujari D.. Mainstreaming green product innovation: why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 95(3): 471-486.

[11] Desai P., Kekre S., Radhakrishnan S., Srinivasan K.. Product differentiation and commonality in design: balancing revenue and cost drivers. Management Science, 2001, 47(1): 37-51.

[12] Environmental Protection Agency. Clean Air Act (CAA), 2011, Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Production Agency

[13] Fishbein M.. An investigation of relationship between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object. Human Relations, 1967, 16: 233-240.

[14] Garvin D.A.. Managing Quality, 1998, New York: Free-Press

[15] Grote C.A., Jones R.M., Blount G.N., Goodyer J., Shayler M.. An approach to the Eup directive and the application of the economic eco-design for complex products. International Journal of Production Research, 2007, 45(18/19): 4099-4117.

[16] Heiskanen E.. The performative nature of consumer research: consumers’ environmental awareness as an example. Journal of Consumer Policy, 2005, 28: 179-201.

[17] Horie K., Maeno Y., Ohsawa Y.. Data crystallization applied for designing new products. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2007, 16(1): 34-49.

[18] Hua Z.S., Zhang X.M., Xu X.Y.. Asymmetric support vector machine for the classification problem with asymmetric cost of misclassification. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 2010, 6(12): 5597-5608.

[19] Hua Z.S., Zhang X.M., Xu X.Y.. Product design strategies in a manufacturer-retailer distribution channel. Omega, 2011, 39(1): 23-32.

[20] Keeney R.L., Raiffa H.. Decision with Multiple Objectives, 1993, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

[21] Kempen L.V., Muradian R., Sandoval C., Castaneda J.P.. Too poor to be green consumers? A field experiment on revealed preferences for firewood in rural Guatemala. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68: 2160-2167.

[22] Kim K., Chhajed D.. Commonality in product design: cost saving, valuation change and cannibalization. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 125(3): 602-621.

[23] Kim Y., Choi S.M.. Antecedents of green purchase behavior: an examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PEC. Advances in Consumer Research, 2005, 32: 592-599.

[24] Knight P., Jenkins J.O.. Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: a practitioners perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009, 17: 549-558.

[25] Lancaster K.. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economic, 1966, 74: 132-157.

[26] Levy J.K.. A case for sustainable security systems engineering: integrating national, human, energy and environmental security. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2009, 18(4): 385-402.

[27] Levy J.K., Howard N.. Advances in sustainable security systems engineering with Drama Theory (DT) II. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2009, 18(4): 403-422.

[28] Liu B., Chen J., Wu S., Liu S.F.. Two-stage ordering decision for a short-life-cycle product. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2006, 15(3): 340-358.

[29] Marinoni O., Hoppe A.. Using the analytical hierarchy process to support sustainable use of geo-resources in metropolitan areas. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2006, 15(2): 154-164.

[30] Moorthy K.S.. Market segmentation, self-selection, and product line design. Marketing Science, 1984, 3(4): 288-307.

[31] Moorthy K.S., Png I.P.L.. Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Management Science, 1992, 38(3): 345-359.

[32] NRC Canada. (2003). Design for environment guide. National Research Council. Available via DIALOG. http://dfe-sce.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/home_e.html

[33] O’shea M.A.. Design for environment in conceptual product design - a decision model to reflect environmental issues of all life-cycle phases. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 2002, 2: 11-28.

[34] Pujari D.. Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 2006, 26(1): 76-85.

[35] Pujari D., Peattie K., Wright G.. Organizational antecedents of environmental responsiveness in industrial new product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 2004, 33(5): 381-391.

[36] Pujari D., Wright G., Peattie K.. Green and competitive influences on environmental new product development performance. Journal of Business Research, 2003, 56(8): 657-671.

[37] Rehfeld K.M., Rennings K., Ziegler A.. Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: an empirical analysis. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(1): 91-100.

[38] Reinhardt F.L.. Environmental product differentiation: implications for corporate strategy. California Management Review, 1998, 40(4): 43-73.

[39] Ritzen S., Beskow C.. Actions for integrating environmental aspects into product development. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 2001, 1: 91-102.

[40] Rubik F.. Environmental sound product innovation and integrated product policy (IPP). The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 2001, 1: 219-232.

[41] Shi J.M., Zhang G.Q., Sha J.C., Amin S.H.. Coordinating production and recycling decisions with stochastic demand and return. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2010, 19(4): 385-407.

[42] Shin I., Kim H.. The effect of subsidy policies on the product quality improvement. Economic Modeling, 2010, 27(3): 687-696.

[43] Thompson D.W., Anderson R.C., Hansen E.N.. Green segmentation and environmental certification: insights from forest products. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2010, 19(5): 319-334.

[44] Toshimitsu T.. On the paradoxical case of a consumer-based environmental subsidy policy. Economic Modeling, 2010, 27(1): 159-164.

[45] Tsai C.Y., Chiu C.C.. A purchase-based market segmentation methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 2004, 27: 265-276.

[46] Unruh G., Ettenson R.. Growing green. Harvard Business Review, 2010, 88(6): 94-100.

[47] Zhu Q.H., Sarkis J., Lai K.. Green supply chain management: pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2007, 15: 1041-1052.