Systemic pathologies of confrontation: diagnosing security disruption

Abstract

The world post-9/11 is characterised by uncertainty, fear and suspicion. Psychological confrontations amplified by the mass media have even come to dominate physical engagements between warring parties. Drama theory provides a powerful framework for understanding these interactions in much the way that game theory was able to support strategy making by autonomous players in a less inter-connected era. A model of the ‘normal’ process leading to dramatic resolution is an essential feature of the drama theory approach and is described here. However this process can be derailed or fail in many ways. This paper reviews many of these systemic pathologies and illustrates some of them through consideration of three high-profile cases. The conclusion is that it is important to recognise and possibly to use pathological behavior as an element of a character’s interaction strategy.

Keywords

Drama theory / confrontation / conflict resolution / systemic pathology

References

[1] Bennett P., Cropper S., Huxham C.. Rosenhead J.. Modelling interactive decisions: the hypergame focus. Rational Analysis for a Problematic World, 1989, Chichester, U.K: Wiley 283-314.

[2] Bryant J.. The Six Dilemmas of Collaboration: Inter-organisational Relationships as Drama, 2003, Chichester, U.K: Wiley

[3] Cristal M.. Negotiating under the cross: the story of the forty day siege of the church of the nativity. International Negotiation, 2003, 8: 549-576.

[4] Dolnik A., Pilch R.. The Moscow Theatre hostage crisis: the perpetrators, their tactics, and the Russian response. International Negotiation, 2003, 8: 577-611.

[5] Howard N.. Negotiation as drama: how “games” become dramatic. International Negotiation, 1996, 1: 125-152.

[6] Howard N.. Oedipus, Decision-maker: Theory of Drama and Conflict Resolution. Chapter 4 Pathologies: Humour and Irony, 2007, Brighton, U.K: Dramatec

[7] Independent Police Complaints Commission. Stockwell One: Investigation into the Shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes at Stockwell Underground Station on 22 July 2005, 2007, London: IPCC

[8] Levy J.K., Hipel K.W., Howard N.. Advances in drama theory for managing global hazards and disasters. Part I: theoretical foundation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2009, 18(4): 303-316.

[9] Levy J.K., Hipel K.W., Howard N.. Advances in drama theory for managing global hazards and disasters. Part II: coping with global climate change and environmental catastrophe. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2009, 18(4): 317-334.

[10] Lewicki R.J., Hiam A., Olander K.W.. Think Before You Speak: A Complete Guide to Strategic Negotiation, 1996, New York: Wiley

[11] Singh C.. Terror in Moscow. Frontline, 2002, 19(3): 2002

[12] Smith R., Howard N., Tait A.. Confrontations in War and Peace, 2000, Brighton, U.K: Dramatec