Knowledge synthesis in technology development

Yukihiro Yamashita , Yoshiteru Nakamori , Andrzej P. Wierzbicki

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2009, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2) : 184 -202.

PDF
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering ›› 2009, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2) : 184 -202. DOI: 10.1007/s11518-009-5103-4
Article

Knowledge synthesis in technology development

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This paper introduces a knowledge construction model called the i-System for knowledge integration and creation and its relation to the new concept of the Creative Space. The five ontological elements of the i-System are Intelligence, Involvement, Imagination, Intervention, and Integration corresponding to five diverse dimensions of the Creative Space. The paper discusses the meanings and functions of these dimensions in knowledge integration and creation, and presents applications of the i-System to technology roadmapping and archiving.

Keywords

Knowledge construction / creative space / technology roadmapping / technology archiving

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yukihiro Yamashita, Yoshiteru Nakamori, Andrzej P. Wierzbicki. Knowledge synthesis in technology development. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2009, 18(2): 184-202 DOI:10.1007/s11518-009-5103-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ackoff R.L.. Redesigning the Future, 1974, New York: Wiley

[2]

Boland R.J., Tenkasi R.V.. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organisation Science, 1995, 6: 350-372.

[3]

Checkland P.B.. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, 1981, New York: John Wiley & Sons

[4]

Gu J.F., Tang X.J.. Meta-synthesis approach to complex system modeling. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 166(3): 597-614.

[5]

Jackson M.C.. Systems Approaches to Management, 2000, New York: Kluwer Academic — Plenum Publishers

[6]

Kant I.. Kritik der Praktischen Vernunft, 1788, Warsaw: E.Wende & Co

[7]

Kostoff R.N., Boylan R., Simons G.R.. Disruptive technology roadmaps. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2004, 71: 141-159.

[8]

Ma T., Liu S., Nakamori Y.. Roadmapping as a way of knowledge management for supporting scientific research in academia. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2005, 22: 1-13.

[9]

Motycka A.. Science and Unconscious, 1998, Wroclaw: Leopoldinum

[10]

Nakamori, Y. (2000). Knowledge management system toward sustainable society. In: The 1st International Symposium on Knowledge and System Sciences, 57–64, Ishikawa, Japan, September 25–27, 2000

[11]

Nakamori Y.. Systems methodology and mathematical models for knowledge management. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2003, 12(1): 49-72.

[12]

Nakamori Y., Zhu Z.C.. Exploring a sociologist understanding for the i-System. International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Sciences, 2004, 1(1): 1-8.

[13]

Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.. The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, 1995, New York: Oxford University Press

[14]

Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. & Probert, D. (2001). T-plan: Fast Start to Technology Roadmapping Planning Your Route to Success. Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge

[15]

Popper K.R.. Objective Knowledge, 1972, Oxford: Oxford University Press

[16]

Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill

[17]

Sawaragi Y., Nakamori Y.. Shinayakana systems approach in modeling and decision support. The 10th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, 1992, 1: 77-86.

[18]

Wierzbicki A.P., Nakamori Y.. Knowledge creation and integration: Creative space and creative environments. Proc. of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38), 2005, Hawaii: IEEE Computer Society

[19]

Wierzbicki A.P., Nakamori Y.. Creative Space: Models of Creative Processes for the Knowledge Civilization Age, 2006, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

[20]

Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Cambridge

[21]

Zhu Z.C.. Conscious mind, forgetting mind: two approaches in multimethodology. Systems Practice and Action Research, 1998, 11(6): 669-690.

[22]

Zhu Z.C.. The practice of multimodal approaches: the challenge of cross-cultural communication, and the search for responses. Human Relations, 1999, 52(5): 579-607.

[23]

Zhu Z.C.. Dealing with a differentiated whole: the philosophy of the WSR approach. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2000, 13(1): 21-57.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

424

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/