Concurrent Production Engineering System for buffer size and flexible transfer line layout design

Abstract

In this paper we propose a COncurrent Production Engineering System (COPES) for the flexible transfer line (FTL) layout design in a restricted area. COPES first determines the buffer size in front of the bay of each machine tool in the FTL and then initializes a computer aided design (CAD) system to draw the FTL in a restricted area. We develop a set of modules systems which have been integrated into a single framework, in accordance with the practice of concurrent engineering. Concurrent engineering involves the cooperation of these activities. It’s expected that the developed COPES can improve the cooperation between production engineers’ and the plant designer. This can be done by enabling the production engineers’ to make better decision regarding FTL buffer size.

Keywords

Concurrent engineering / flexible transfer line / layout design / production simulator / buffer size / CAD

References

[1] Alabas C., Altiparmak F., Dengiz B.. A comparison of the performance of artificial intelligence techniques for optimizing the number of kanbans. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2002, 53(8): 907-914.

[2] Bragila M.. Optimization of a simulated annealing based heuristic for single row machine layout problem by genetic algorithm. International Transaction in Operational Research, 1996, 3(1): 37-49.

[3] Bindhu N.Y., Nagarjun V.Y., Gary W.F.. SPAW: a design tool for planning a manufacturing process in a concurrent engineering environment. Computers in Industry, 1996, 32(1): 79-93.

[4] Bulgak A.A., Diwan P.D., Inozu B.. Buffer size optimization in asynchronous assembly systems using genetic algorithms. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1995, 28(2): 309-322.

[5] Chen Y.M., Wei C.L.. Computer aided feature-based design for net shape manufacturing. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 1997, 10(2): 147-164.

[6] Cheng K.. A designer based approach to product design in a concurrent engineering environment. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Managing Integrated Manufacturing: Strategic, Organizational and Social Change, 1996, Leicestershire, UK: Leicester University 125-130.

[7] Conway D.G., Venkataramanan M.A.. Genetic search and dynamic facility layout problem. Computers and Operations Research, 1994, 21(8): 955-960.

[8] Enginarlar E., Li J., Meerkov S.M., Zhang R.Q.. Buffer capacity for accommodating machine downtime in serial production lines. International Journal of Production Research, 2002, 40(3): 601-624.

[9] Fulya, A., Berna, D. & Akif, A. (2002). Optimization of buffer sizes in assembly systems using intelligent techniques. In: Winter Simulation Conference 2002, 1157–1162, San Diego, CA., USA

[10] Gershwin S.B., Schor J.. Efficient algorithms for buffer space allocation. International Workshop on Performance Evaluation and Optimization of Production Lines, 1997, Samos, Greece: University of the Aegean 217-228.

[11] Greef A.R., Fohn S.M., Young R.E., O’Grady P.J.. Implementation of a logic-based support system for concurrent engineering. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 1995, 15(1): 31-61.

[12] Hartley J.R.. Concurrent Engineering: Shortening Lead Times, Raising Quality, and Lowering Costs, 1998, Portland: Productivity Press

[13] Hassan S.A.. Concurrent engineering for global manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 1999, 60–61: 251-260.

[14] Heragu S.S., Alfa A.S.. Experimental analysis of simulated annealing based algorithm for the layout problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 1992, 57(2): 190-202.

[15] Hillier F.S., So K.C., Boling R.W.. Notes: toward characterizing the optimal allocation of storage space in production line systems with variable processing times. Management Science, 1993, 39(1): 126-133.

[16] Koufteros X., Vonderembse M., Doll W.. Concurrent engineering and its consequences. Journal of Operations Management, 2001, 19(1): 97-115.

[17] Kumar K.R., Hadjinicola G.C.. A heuristic procedure for the single row facilities layout problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 1995, 87: 65-73.

[18] Lee G.C., Kim Y.D.. Algorithms for adjusting shapes of departments in block layouts on the grid-based plan. OMEGA, 2000, 28: 111-122.

[19] Prasad B., Morenc R.S., Rangan R.M.. Information management for concurrent engineering: research issues. Concurrent Engineering, 1993, 1(1): 3-20.

[20] Raoot A.D., Rakshit A.. ’Fuzzy’ heuristic for the quadratic assignment formulation to the facility layout problem. International Journal of Production Research, 1994, 32(3): 563-581.

[21] Roy U.. Intelligent CAD system in concurrent engineering environment: a knowledge-based approach. Cybernetics and Systems, 1994, 25(4): 611-628.

[22] Roser, C., Nakano, M. & Tanaka, M. (2003). Buffer allocation model based on a single simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, 1238–1246, New Orleans, Louisiana

[23] Solimanpur M., Vrat P., Shankar R.. An ant algorithm for the single row layout problem in flexible manufacturing system. Computers & Operations Research, 2005, 32: 583-598.

[24] Stahl J., Luczak H., Langen R., Weck M., Klonaris P., Pfeifer T.. Concurrent engineering of work and production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 100(2): 379-398.

[25] Tompkins, G. & Azadivar, F. (1995). Genetic algorithms in optimizing simulated systems. In: WSC’95. Proceeding of the 1995 Conference on Winter Simulation, 757–762, ACM

[26] Yamamoto H.. One-by one parts input method by off-line production simulator system with GA. European Journal of Automation, Hermes Science Publication, 2000, 34(9): 1173-1186.

[27] Yamamoto, H., Marui, E. & Abu Qudeiri, J. (2003). Development of new FTL simulator for buffer size decision. In: IEEE International Symposium on Computational CIRA03, 1358–1363, Kobe, Japan

[28] Yang T., Peters B.. Flexible machine layout design for dynamic and uncertain production environments. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 108: 49-64.

[29] Yang T., Peters B., Tu M.. Layout design for flexible manufacturing systems considering single loop directional flow patterns. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 146: 440-455.